<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:spotify="http://www.spotify.com/ns/rss">
    <channel>
        <title>Science Conversations</title>
        <generator>Castos</generator>
        <atom:link href="https://feeds.castos.com/7v23" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.3abnaustralia.org.au/radio/series/r-sc/</link>
        <description>There is scientific evidence proving evolution cannot be responsible for life on Earth.
It is time to question what biology text books and nature documentaries claim about our origins. Even Darwin admitted, “I threw out queries, suggestions, wondering all the time over everything; and to my astonishment the ideas took like wildfire. People made a religion of them.”
Dr. John Ashton has dedicated 40+ years to teaching and researching science, and exposing the lack of proven evidence for Darwin’s theories. In Evolution Impossible, he uses discoveries in genetics, biochemistry, geology, radiometric dating, and other scientific disciplines to explain why the theory of evolution is a myth.
Discover for yourself: Why the fossil record is evidence of extinction, not evolution. How erosion and sedimentation dates conflict with radiometric dating. How the lack of transitional fossils undermines evolutionary notions. Why living cells and new organisms do not rise by chance or random mutations.
</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 06:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-au</language>
        <copyright>© 2025 3ABN Australia Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
        
        <spotify:limit recentCount="300" />
        
        <spotify:countryOfOrigin>
              
        </spotify:countryOfOrigin>
                    
                <itunes:subtitle>There is scientific evidence proving evolution cannot be responsible for life on Earth.
It is time to question what biology text books and nature documentaries claim about our origins. Even Darwin admitted, “I threw out queries, suggestions, wondering all the time over everything; and to my astonishment the ideas took like wildfire. People made a religion of them.”
Dr. John Ashton has dedicated 40+ years to teaching and researching science, and exposing the lack of proven evidence for Darwin’s theories. In Evolution Impossible, he uses discoveries in genetics, biochemistry, geology, radiometric dating, and other scientific disciplines to explain why the theory of evolution is a myth.
Discover for yourself: Why the fossil record is evidence of extinction, not evolution. How erosion and sedimentation dates conflict with radiometric dating. How the lack of transitional fossils undermines evolutionary notions. Why living cells and new organisms do not rise by chance or random mutations.
</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:author>3ABN Australia Radio</itunes:author>
        <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
        <itunes:summary>There is scientific evidence proving evolution cannot be responsible for life on Earth.
It is time to question what biology text books and nature documentaries claim about our origins. Even Darwin admitted, “I threw out queries, suggestions, wondering all the time over everything; and to my astonishment the ideas took like wildfire. People made a religion of them.”
Dr. John Ashton has dedicated 40+ years to teaching and researching science, and exposing the lack of proven evidence for Darwin’s theories. In Evolution Impossible, he uses discoveries in genetics, biochemistry, geology, radiometric dating, and other scientific disciplines to explain why the theory of evolution is a myth.
Discover for yourself: Why the fossil record is evidence of extinction, not evolution. How erosion and sedimentation dates conflict with radiometric dating. How the lack of transitional fossils undermines evolutionary notions. Why living cells and new organisms do not rise by chance or random mutations.
</itunes:summary>
        <itunes:owner>
            <itunes:name>Kyle Serra</itunes:name>
            <itunes:email>radio@3abnaustralia.org.au</itunes:email>
        </itunes:owner>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/R-SC-SC1400.jpg"></itunes:image>
        
                                    <itunes:category text="Science">
                                            <itunes:category text="Natural Sciences" />
                                    </itunes:category>
                                                <itunes:category text="Religion &amp; Spirituality">
                                            <itunes:category text="Christianity" />
                                    </itunes:category>
                                                <itunes:category text="Education" />
                    
                    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.castos.com/7v23</itunes:new-feed-url>
                
        
        <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
                                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Young Earth Evidence: Are Textbooks Wrong? - SC2542]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2281863</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/young-earth-evidence-are-textbooks-wrong-sc2542</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Discover the scientific young earth evidence that challenges modern textbooks. We explore radiometric dating problems, carbon 14 dating flaws, and genomic decay to show why the evolution vs creation debate favours the biblical account.</p>
<p>In this episode of Science Conversations, we examine the flaws in evolutionary theory that are often ignored. From the rapid erosion rates of the 12 Apostles to the discovery of Carbon-14 in "ancient" diamonds and coal, the data points to a much younger timeline than previously taught. We also discuss why genomic decay sets a hard limit on the age of humanity, supporting the biblical creation science model.</p>
<p>Topics Covered:</p>
<p>Why continental erosion rates prove the earth cannot be billions of years old.<br />The fatal flaws in radiometric dating assumptions.<br />Scientific proof of Carbon-14 in diamonds and coal.<br />How DNA mutation rates (genomic decay) confirm a recent creation.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" target="_blank" title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Discover the scientific young earth evidence that challenges modern textbooks. We explore radiometric dating problems, carbon 14 dating flaws, and genomic decay to show why the evolution vs creation debate favours the biblical account.
In this episode of Science Conversations, we examine the flaws in evolutionary theory that are often ignored. From the rapid erosion rates of the 12 Apostles to the discovery of Carbon-14 in "ancient" diamonds and coal, the data points to a much younger timeline than previously taught. We also discuss why genomic decay sets a hard limit on the age of humanity, supporting the biblical creation science model.
Topics Covered:
Why continental erosion rates prove the earth cannot be billions of years old.The fatal flaws in radiometric dating assumptions.Scientific proof of Carbon-14 in diamonds and coal.How DNA mutation rates (genomic decay) confirm a recent creation.
Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Young Earth Evidence: Are Textbooks Wrong? - SC2542]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>42</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Discover the scientific young earth evidence that challenges modern textbooks. We explore radiometric dating problems, carbon 14 dating flaws, and genomic decay to show why the evolution vs creation debate favours the biblical account.</p>
<p>In this episode of Science Conversations, we examine the flaws in evolutionary theory that are often ignored. From the rapid erosion rates of the 12 Apostles to the discovery of Carbon-14 in "ancient" diamonds and coal, the data points to a much younger timeline than previously taught. We also discuss why genomic decay sets a hard limit on the age of humanity, supporting the biblical creation science model.</p>
<p>Topics Covered:</p>
<p>Why continental erosion rates prove the earth cannot be billions of years old.<br />The fatal flaws in radiometric dating assumptions.<br />Scientific proof of Carbon-14 in diamonds and coal.<br />How DNA mutation rates (genomic decay) confirm a recent creation.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" target="_blank" title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2281863/c1e-ndjqidr97gb9zw36-9j3zdwddt4z4-xknulp.mp3" length="14579211"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Discover the scientific young earth evidence that challenges modern textbooks. We explore radiometric dating problems, carbon 14 dating flaws, and genomic decay to show why the evolution vs creation debate favours the biblical account.
In this episode of Science Conversations, we examine the flaws in evolutionary theory that are often ignored. From the rapid erosion rates of the 12 Apostles to the discovery of Carbon-14 in "ancient" diamonds and coal, the data points to a much younger timeline than previously taught. We also discuss why genomic decay sets a hard limit on the age of humanity, supporting the biblical creation science model.
Topics Covered:
Why continental erosion rates prove the earth cannot be billions of years old.The fatal flaws in radiometric dating assumptions.Scientific proof of Carbon-14 in diamonds and coal.How DNA mutation rates (genomic decay) confirm a recent creation.
Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2281863/c1a-qdxq-z3p8j4j7t3wx-9vsgcm.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:11</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[How Did Life on Earth Start? - SC2541]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2025 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2281703</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/how-did-life-on-earth-start-part-2-sc2541</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Does the fossil record prove evolution, or does it point to a global flood? Discover 3 reasons why evolution cannot explain the origin of life and how the evidence supports a supernatural Creator.</p>
<p>In this episode of Science Conversations, we examine the "missing links" and geological facts that textbooks often ignore. From the complexity of the Cambrian explosion to the lack of transitional species, the rocks tell a story of rapid, catastrophic burial—not slow change over millions of years.</p>
<p>In this episode, you will learn:</p>
<p>Why we don't find the "intermediate species" Darwin predicted.<br />How complex animals like trilobites appear suddenly in the deepest layers.<br />Why fossilization requires catastrophic conditions (like a flood) rather than slow processes.<br />The evidence of "mixed" fossil layers that defy standard evolutionary timelines.</p>
<p><a href="https://soundcloud.com/tags/evolutiondebunked">#evolutiondebunked</a> <a href="https://soundcloud.com/tags/fossilrecord">#fossilrecord</a> <a href="https://soundcloud.com/tags/creationism">#creationism</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Does the fossil record prove evolution, or does it point to a global flood? Discover 3 reasons why evolution cannot explain the origin of life and how the evidence supports a supernatural Creator.
In this episode of Science Conversations, we examine the "missing links" and geological facts that textbooks often ignore. From the complexity of the Cambrian explosion to the lack of transitional species, the rocks tell a story of rapid, catastrophic burial—not slow change over millions of years.
In this episode, you will learn:
Why we don't find the "intermediate species" Darwin predicted.How complex animals like trilobites appear suddenly in the deepest layers.Why fossilization requires catastrophic conditions (like a flood) rather than slow processes.The evidence of "mixed" fossil layers that defy standard evolutionary timelines.
#evolutiondebunked #fossilrecord #creationism]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[How Did Life on Earth Start? - SC2541]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>41</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Does the fossil record prove evolution, or does it point to a global flood? Discover 3 reasons why evolution cannot explain the origin of life and how the evidence supports a supernatural Creator.</p>
<p>In this episode of Science Conversations, we examine the "missing links" and geological facts that textbooks often ignore. From the complexity of the Cambrian explosion to the lack of transitional species, the rocks tell a story of rapid, catastrophic burial—not slow change over millions of years.</p>
<p>In this episode, you will learn:</p>
<p>Why we don't find the "intermediate species" Darwin predicted.<br />How complex animals like trilobites appear suddenly in the deepest layers.<br />Why fossilization requires catastrophic conditions (like a flood) rather than slow processes.<br />The evidence of "mixed" fossil layers that defy standard evolutionary timelines.</p>
<p><a href="https://soundcloud.com/tags/evolutiondebunked">#evolutiondebunked</a> <a href="https://soundcloud.com/tags/fossilrecord">#fossilrecord</a> <a href="https://soundcloud.com/tags/creationism">#creationism</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2281703/c1e-jpkzc5dm5ncn1gwr-8do1kr9ka25z-fuhrdf.mp3" length="11955264"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Does the fossil record prove evolution, or does it point to a global flood? Discover 3 reasons why evolution cannot explain the origin of life and how the evidence supports a supernatural Creator.
In this episode of Science Conversations, we examine the "missing links" and geological facts that textbooks often ignore. From the complexity of the Cambrian explosion to the lack of transitional species, the rocks tell a story of rapid, catastrophic burial—not slow change over millions of years.
In this episode, you will learn:
Why we don't find the "intermediate species" Darwin predicted.How complex animals like trilobites appear suddenly in the deepest layers.Why fossilization requires catastrophic conditions (like a flood) rather than slow processes.The evidence of "mixed" fossil layers that defy standard evolutionary timelines.
#evolutiondebunked #fossilrecord #creationism]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2281703/c1a-qdxq-34mr8dg2hn32-t0g0zr.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:12:27</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Did Evolution Really Start Life on Earth? - SC2540]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2025 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2268561</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/did-evolution-really-start-life-on-earth-sc2540</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>How did life start on earth? Chemistry proves evolution cannot happen naturally. Leading synthetic chemist challenges reveal no known mechanism for life formation despite decades of research. Harvard University meeting confirms scientists still cannot explain how living cells arise from non-living matter.</p>
<p> SHOCKING SCIENTIFIC REVELATIONS:<br />• Urey-Miller experiments only work in sterile laboratory conditions<br />• Chemical reactions required for life don't occur in natural environments<br />• Harvard University 2024 meeting: No known mechanism for life formation<br />• Synthetic chemists challenge the plausibility of basic life chemistry in nature<br />• Even "panspermia" theory fails—universal physics laws make life impossible by chance</p>
<p> KEY POINTS COVERED:<br />• Why the origin of life remains unexplained in modern textbooks<br />• Problems with "warm little pond" and deep ocean hot springs theories<br />• Laboratory vs. natural environment: why real-world chemistry doesn't support evolution<br />• Complex intermediate steps missing from published research<br />• Universal laws of physics and chemistry apply everywhere—making random life formation impossible</p>
<p>This episode of Science Conversations examines the fundamental chemical impossibility of life arising naturally, featuring insights from leading synthetic chemists and recent Harvard University scientific meetings that confirm no naturalistic explanation exists for life's origin.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" target="_blank" title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[How did life start on earth? Chemistry proves evolution cannot happen naturally. Leading synthetic chemist challenges reveal no known mechanism for life formation despite decades of research. Harvard University meeting confirms scientists still cannot explain how living cells arise from non-living matter.
 SHOCKING SCIENTIFIC REVELATIONS:• Urey-Miller experiments only work in sterile laboratory conditions• Chemical reactions required for life don't occur in natural environments• Harvard University 2024 meeting: No known mechanism for life formation• Synthetic chemists challenge the plausibility of basic life chemistry in nature• Even "panspermia" theory fails—universal physics laws make life impossible by chance
 KEY POINTS COVERED:• Why the origin of life remains unexplained in modern textbooks• Problems with "warm little pond" and deep ocean hot springs theories• Laboratory vs. natural environment: why real-world chemistry doesn't support evolution• Complex intermediate steps missing from published research• Universal laws of physics and chemistry apply everywhere—making random life formation impossible
This episode of Science Conversations examines the fundamental chemical impossibility of life arising naturally, featuring insights from leading synthetic chemists and recent Harvard University scientific meetings that confirm no naturalistic explanation exists for life's origin.
Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Did Evolution Really Start Life on Earth? - SC2540]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>40</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>How did life start on earth? Chemistry proves evolution cannot happen naturally. Leading synthetic chemist challenges reveal no known mechanism for life formation despite decades of research. Harvard University meeting confirms scientists still cannot explain how living cells arise from non-living matter.</p>
<p> SHOCKING SCIENTIFIC REVELATIONS:<br />• Urey-Miller experiments only work in sterile laboratory conditions<br />• Chemical reactions required for life don't occur in natural environments<br />• Harvard University 2024 meeting: No known mechanism for life formation<br />• Synthetic chemists challenge the plausibility of basic life chemistry in nature<br />• Even "panspermia" theory fails—universal physics laws make life impossible by chance</p>
<p> KEY POINTS COVERED:<br />• Why the origin of life remains unexplained in modern textbooks<br />• Problems with "warm little pond" and deep ocean hot springs theories<br />• Laboratory vs. natural environment: why real-world chemistry doesn't support evolution<br />• Complex intermediate steps missing from published research<br />• Universal laws of physics and chemistry apply everywhere—making random life formation impossible</p>
<p>This episode of Science Conversations examines the fundamental chemical impossibility of life arising naturally, featuring insights from leading synthetic chemists and recent Harvard University scientific meetings that confirm no naturalistic explanation exists for life's origin.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" target="_blank" title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2268561/c1e-mkqpfq90j5uwq63m-8dojpvmwbdvr-5vqb8s.mp3" length="11714937"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[How did life start on earth? Chemistry proves evolution cannot happen naturally. Leading synthetic chemist challenges reveal no known mechanism for life formation despite decades of research. Harvard University meeting confirms scientists still cannot explain how living cells arise from non-living matter.
 SHOCKING SCIENTIFIC REVELATIONS:• Urey-Miller experiments only work in sterile laboratory conditions• Chemical reactions required for life don't occur in natural environments• Harvard University 2024 meeting: No known mechanism for life formation• Synthetic chemists challenge the plausibility of basic life chemistry in nature• Even "panspermia" theory fails—universal physics laws make life impossible by chance
 KEY POINTS COVERED:• Why the origin of life remains unexplained in modern textbooks• Problems with "warm little pond" and deep ocean hot springs theories• Laboratory vs. natural environment: why real-world chemistry doesn't support evolution• Complex intermediate steps missing from published research• Universal laws of physics and chemistry apply everywhere—making random life formation impossible
This episode of Science Conversations examines the fundamental chemical impossibility of life arising naturally, featuring insights from leading synthetic chemists and recent Harvard University scientific meetings that confirm no naturalistic explanation exists for life's origin.
Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2268561/c1a-qdxq-47mjpq9kf169-qurnbi.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:12:12</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Prophetic Dreams: Evidence of an Intervening God - SC2539]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2247369</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/prophetic-dreams-evidence-of-an-intervening-god-sc2539</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Prophetic dreams, life-saving premonitions, and evidence for an intervening God – discover how creation science , mind, and miracles challenge evolution and support theBible’s picture of a supernatural Creator.</p>
<p>In this episode of Science Conversations, we explore real stories of vivid dreams and warnings that came true, and what they reveal about the existence of a powerful, supernatural mind behind the universe. Drawing from the book “Evolution Impossible: 12 Reasons why Evolution Cannot Explain the Origin of Life on Earth,” our guest shares researched cases where dreams guided scientific discoveries and even saved lives.</p>
<p>You’ll hear about:<br />• How premonitions differ from ordinary dreams<br />• Famous prophetic dreams (including Abraham Lincoln and Mark Twain)<br />• Scientific breakthroughs revealed in dreams – insulin, the periodic table, and oil fields<br />• Modern testimonies of life-saving warnings and answered prayer<br />• Why consciousness and the human mind point beyond naturalistic creation vs evolution explanations<br />• How biblical stories like Daniel and “the writing on the wall” fit the evidence for a supernatural, intervening God</p>
<p>If you’re interested in faith, science, and the question “Does God really intervene today?”, this conversation will strengthen your confidence that the God of the Bible is real, personal, and active in human history.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Prophetic dreams, life-saving premonitions, and evidence for an intervening God – discover how creation science , mind, and miracles challenge evolution and support theBible’s picture of a supernatural Creator.
In this episode of Science Conversations, we explore real stories of vivid dreams and warnings that came true, and what they reveal about the existence of a powerful, supernatural mind behind the universe. Drawing from the book “Evolution Impossible: 12 Reasons why Evolution Cannot Explain the Origin of Life on Earth,” our guest shares researched cases where dreams guided scientific discoveries and even saved lives.
You’ll hear about:• How premonitions differ from ordinary dreams• Famous prophetic dreams (including Abraham Lincoln and Mark Twain)• Scientific breakthroughs revealed in dreams – insulin, the periodic table, and oil fields• Modern testimonies of life-saving warnings and answered prayer• Why consciousness and the human mind point beyond naturalistic creation vs evolution explanations• How biblical stories like Daniel and “the writing on the wall” fit the evidence for a supernatural, intervening God
If you’re interested in faith, science, and the question “Does God really intervene today?”, this conversation will strengthen your confidence that the God of the Bible is real, personal, and active in human history.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Prophetic Dreams: Evidence of an Intervening God - SC2539]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>39</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Prophetic dreams, life-saving premonitions, and evidence for an intervening God – discover how creation science , mind, and miracles challenge evolution and support theBible’s picture of a supernatural Creator.</p>
<p>In this episode of Science Conversations, we explore real stories of vivid dreams and warnings that came true, and what they reveal about the existence of a powerful, supernatural mind behind the universe. Drawing from the book “Evolution Impossible: 12 Reasons why Evolution Cannot Explain the Origin of Life on Earth,” our guest shares researched cases where dreams guided scientific discoveries and even saved lives.</p>
<p>You’ll hear about:<br />• How premonitions differ from ordinary dreams<br />• Famous prophetic dreams (including Abraham Lincoln and Mark Twain)<br />• Scientific breakthroughs revealed in dreams – insulin, the periodic table, and oil fields<br />• Modern testimonies of life-saving warnings and answered prayer<br />• Why consciousness and the human mind point beyond naturalistic creation vs evolution explanations<br />• How biblical stories like Daniel and “the writing on the wall” fit the evidence for a supernatural, intervening God</p>
<p>If you’re interested in faith, science, and the question “Does God really intervene today?”, this conversation will strengthen your confidence that the God of the Bible is real, personal, and active in human history.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2247369/c1e-ok8qf2374xu8n3v6-6zqr7xm0hp10-h20b6v.mp3" length="14403251"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Prophetic dreams, life-saving premonitions, and evidence for an intervening God – discover how creation science , mind, and miracles challenge evolution and support theBible’s picture of a supernatural Creator.
In this episode of Science Conversations, we explore real stories of vivid dreams and warnings that came true, and what they reveal about the existence of a powerful, supernatural mind behind the universe. Drawing from the book “Evolution Impossible: 12 Reasons why Evolution Cannot Explain the Origin of Life on Earth,” our guest shares researched cases where dreams guided scientific discoveries and even saved lives.
You’ll hear about:• How premonitions differ from ordinary dreams• Famous prophetic dreams (including Abraham Lincoln and Mark Twain)• Scientific breakthroughs revealed in dreams – insulin, the periodic table, and oil fields• Modern testimonies of life-saving warnings and answered prayer• Why consciousness and the human mind point beyond naturalistic creation vs evolution explanations• How biblical stories like Daniel and “the writing on the wall” fit the evidence for a supernatural, intervening God
If you’re interested in faith, science, and the question “Does God really intervene today?”, this conversation will strengthen your confidence that the God of the Bible is real, personal, and active in human history.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2247369/c1a-qdxq-gp971mgpc00x-ob8p12.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:00</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Angels and Divine Intervention: Real Modern‑Day Stories - SC2538]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2234179</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/angels-and-divine-intervention-real-modernday-stories-sc2538</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Angels, divine intervention, supernatural protection and real modern miracle stories – from Daniel and the lions den to today. Discover true angel stories, answered prayer and God’s guiding voice in everyday life.</p>
<p>In this episode of Science Conversations, Kaysie Vokurka talks with a scientist about evidence for an intervening God:<br />• Daniel in the lions den and angel protection<br />• Modern‑day angel encounters in Zimbabwe<br />• The supernatural story behind Joan of Arc<br />• A doctor hears a warning voice that saves her life<br />• Car accident and radiator hose miracles in Tasmania<br />• Harriet Tubman’s amazing guidance rescuing slaves</p>
<p>We explore how angels, divine protection, answered prayer, and a supernatural God still interact with human beings today – not just in Bible times.</p>
<p>If you’re interested in: supernatural encounters, angel stories, modern miracles, Divine intervention, God’s protection, and Bible accounts like Daniel and the lion’s den then this conversation will encourage your faith and give you reasons to trust that God still intervenes.</p>
<p>Watch series on Youtube:<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6%E2%80%A6O63aUlz98PEggxygq" target="_blank" title="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq</a></p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a href="http://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn%E2%80%A6ontent/podcasts" target="_blank" title="http://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>
<p></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Angels, divine intervention, supernatural protection and real modern miracle stories – from Daniel and the lions den to today. Discover true angel stories, answered prayer and God’s guiding voice in everyday life.
In this episode of Science Conversations, Kaysie Vokurka talks with a scientist about evidence for an intervening God:• Daniel in the lions den and angel protection• Modern‑day angel encounters in Zimbabwe• The supernatural story behind Joan of Arc• A doctor hears a warning voice that saves her life• Car accident and radiator hose miracles in Tasmania• Harriet Tubman’s amazing guidance rescuing slaves
We explore how angels, divine protection, answered prayer, and a supernatural God still interact with human beings today – not just in Bible times.
If you’re interested in: supernatural encounters, angel stories, modern miracles, Divine intervention, God’s protection, and Bible accounts like Daniel and the lion’s den then this conversation will encourage your faith and give you reasons to trust that God still intervenes.
Watch series on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Angels and Divine Intervention: Real Modern‑Day Stories - SC2538]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>38</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Angels, divine intervention, supernatural protection and real modern miracle stories – from Daniel and the lions den to today. Discover true angel stories, answered prayer and God’s guiding voice in everyday life.</p>
<p>In this episode of Science Conversations, Kaysie Vokurka talks with a scientist about evidence for an intervening God:<br />• Daniel in the lions den and angel protection<br />• Modern‑day angel encounters in Zimbabwe<br />• The supernatural story behind Joan of Arc<br />• A doctor hears a warning voice that saves her life<br />• Car accident and radiator hose miracles in Tasmania<br />• Harriet Tubman’s amazing guidance rescuing slaves</p>
<p>We explore how angels, divine protection, answered prayer, and a supernatural God still interact with human beings today – not just in Bible times.</p>
<p>If you’re interested in: supernatural encounters, angel stories, modern miracles, Divine intervention, God’s protection, and Bible accounts like Daniel and the lion’s den then this conversation will encourage your faith and give you reasons to trust that God still intervenes.</p>
<p>Watch series on Youtube:<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6%E2%80%A6O63aUlz98PEggxygq" target="_blank" title="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq</a></p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a href="http://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn%E2%80%A6ontent/podcasts" target="_blank" title="http://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>
<p></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2234179/c1e-qdxqid39mqc0vm68-34mvr3x7sg95-qx3cur.mp3" length="14707107"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Angels, divine intervention, supernatural protection and real modern miracle stories – from Daniel and the lions den to today. Discover true angel stories, answered prayer and God’s guiding voice in everyday life.
In this episode of Science Conversations, Kaysie Vokurka talks with a scientist about evidence for an intervening God:• Daniel in the lions den and angel protection• Modern‑day angel encounters in Zimbabwe• The supernatural story behind Joan of Arc• A doctor hears a warning voice that saves her life• Car accident and radiator hose miracles in Tasmania• Harriet Tubman’s amazing guidance rescuing slaves
We explore how angels, divine protection, answered prayer, and a supernatural God still interact with human beings today – not just in Bible times.
If you’re interested in: supernatural encounters, angel stories, modern miracles, Divine intervention, God’s protection, and Bible accounts like Daniel and the lion’s den then this conversation will encourage your faith and give you reasons to trust that God still intervenes.
Watch series on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2234179/c1a-qdxq-5zd4nr3dcp8q-fbmlyj.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:19</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Ancient Prophecy That Predicted World Empires - SC2537]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2204796</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/ancient-prophecy-that-predicted-world-empires-sc2537</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Biblical prophecy from the Book of Daniel accurately predicted world empires 2600 years ago. Nebuchadnezzar's dream revealed Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome and modern Europe. Evidence for supernatural intelligence and an intervening God through Daniel 2 prophecy explained. Science Conversations explores how this ancient prophecy proves divine foreknowledge.</p>
<p>Discover compelling evidence for an intervening God through one of history's most accurate prophecies. This Science Conversations episode examines Daniel's interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar's dream in 603 BC, which predicted the rise and fall of world empires with stunning accuracy. From Babylon to Persia, Greece to Rome, and the divided kingdoms of Europe, this biblical prophecy demonstrates supernatural intelligence guiding human history.</p>
<p>Learn how this ancient text accurately foretold the succession of world powers centuries before they occurred, and why attempts to reunite Europe by Charlemagne, Napoleon, and Hitler all failed - just as prophesied. Featuring discussion of historical evidence, archaeological records, and the implications for understanding divine intervention in human affairs.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Biblical prophecy from the Book of Daniel accurately predicted world empires 2600 years ago. Nebuchadnezzar's dream revealed Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome and modern Europe. Evidence for supernatural intelligence and an intervening God through Daniel 2 prophecy explained. Science Conversations explores how this ancient prophecy proves divine foreknowledge.
Discover compelling evidence for an intervening God through one of history's most accurate prophecies. This Science Conversations episode examines Daniel's interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar's dream in 603 BC, which predicted the rise and fall of world empires with stunning accuracy. From Babylon to Persia, Greece to Rome, and the divided kingdoms of Europe, this biblical prophecy demonstrates supernatural intelligence guiding human history.
Learn how this ancient text accurately foretold the succession of world powers centuries before they occurred, and why attempts to reunite Europe by Charlemagne, Napoleon, and Hitler all failed - just as prophesied. Featuring discussion of historical evidence, archaeological records, and the implications for understanding divine intervention in human affairs.
Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Ancient Prophecy That Predicted World Empires - SC2537]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>37</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Biblical prophecy from the Book of Daniel accurately predicted world empires 2600 years ago. Nebuchadnezzar's dream revealed Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome and modern Europe. Evidence for supernatural intelligence and an intervening God through Daniel 2 prophecy explained. Science Conversations explores how this ancient prophecy proves divine foreknowledge.</p>
<p>Discover compelling evidence for an intervening God through one of history's most accurate prophecies. This Science Conversations episode examines Daniel's interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar's dream in 603 BC, which predicted the rise and fall of world empires with stunning accuracy. From Babylon to Persia, Greece to Rome, and the divided kingdoms of Europe, this biblical prophecy demonstrates supernatural intelligence guiding human history.</p>
<p>Learn how this ancient text accurately foretold the succession of world powers centuries before they occurred, and why attempts to reunite Europe by Charlemagne, Napoleon, and Hitler all failed - just as prophesied. Featuring discussion of historical evidence, archaeological records, and the implications for understanding divine intervention in human affairs.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2204796/c1e-343wak6qopukqv83-wwpwd398h9n8-hmvsjd.mp3" length="14707107"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Biblical prophecy from the Book of Daniel accurately predicted world empires 2600 years ago. Nebuchadnezzar's dream revealed Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome and modern Europe. Evidence for supernatural intelligence and an intervening God through Daniel 2 prophecy explained. Science Conversations explores how this ancient prophecy proves divine foreknowledge.
Discover compelling evidence for an intervening God through one of history's most accurate prophecies. This Science Conversations episode examines Daniel's interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar's dream in 603 BC, which predicted the rise and fall of world empires with stunning accuracy. From Babylon to Persia, Greece to Rome, and the divided kingdoms of Europe, this biblical prophecy demonstrates supernatural intelligence guiding human history.
Learn how this ancient text accurately foretold the succession of world powers centuries before they occurred, and why attempts to reunite Europe by Charlemagne, Napoleon, and Hitler all failed - just as prophesied. Featuring discussion of historical evidence, archaeological records, and the implications for understanding divine intervention in human affairs.
Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2204796/c1a-qdxq-25m52jqmsmpn-zbnevq.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:19</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Can a Scientist Believe in God? - Part 3 - SC2536]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2193866</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/can-a-scientist-believe-in-god-part-3-sc2536</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Leading scientists with PhDs in biochemistry and genetics explain why evolution is mathematically impossible. Discover evidence from hormone complexity, genetic conservation, and probability calculations that support intelligent design over naturalistic origins.</p>
<p>In this Science Conversations episode, explore compelling arguments from credentialed researchers including:<br /> **Professor David Gower** - Emeritus Professor of Steroid Biochemistry, University of London. Explains how hormone regulatory systems demonstrate irreducible complexity requiring a Creator.</p>
<p> **Dr. John Cramer** - Senior biochemist, University of Guelph. Reveals how "archaic bacteria" are actually MORE complex than regular bacteria, contradicting evolutionary timlines.</p>
<p> **Dr. James Allen** - Former Senior Lecturer in Genetics, University of Stellenbosch. Former atheist turned creationist who demonstrates genetic conservation patterns that evolution cannot explain.</p>
<p> **Dr. John Baumgardner** - Research scientist, Los Alamos National Laboratory (PhD Geophysics). Mathematical probability analysis proving even trillions of years wouldn't allow enough mutations for basic proteins.</p>
<p>This is Part 3 of our series examining credentialed scientists who reject Darwinian evolution based on empirical evidence from their specialized fields.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Leading scientists with PhDs in biochemistry and genetics explain why evolution is mathematically impossible. Discover evidence from hormone complexity, genetic conservation, and probability calculations that support intelligent design over naturalistic origins.
In this Science Conversations episode, explore compelling arguments from credentialed researchers including: **Professor David Gower** - Emeritus Professor of Steroid Biochemistry, University of London. Explains how hormone regulatory systems demonstrate irreducible complexity requiring a Creator.
 **Dr. John Cramer** - Senior biochemist, University of Guelph. Reveals how "archaic bacteria" are actually MORE complex than regular bacteria, contradicting evolutionary timlines.
 **Dr. James Allen** - Former Senior Lecturer in Genetics, University of Stellenbosch. Former atheist turned creationist who demonstrates genetic conservation patterns that evolution cannot explain.
 **Dr. John Baumgardner** - Research scientist, Los Alamos National Laboratory (PhD Geophysics). Mathematical probability analysis proving even trillions of years wouldn't allow enough mutations for basic proteins.
This is Part 3 of our series examining credentialed scientists who reject Darwinian evolution based on empirical evidence from their specialized fields.
Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Can a Scientist Believe in God? - Part 3 - SC2536]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>36</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Leading scientists with PhDs in biochemistry and genetics explain why evolution is mathematically impossible. Discover evidence from hormone complexity, genetic conservation, and probability calculations that support intelligent design over naturalistic origins.</p>
<p>In this Science Conversations episode, explore compelling arguments from credentialed researchers including:<br /> **Professor David Gower** - Emeritus Professor of Steroid Biochemistry, University of London. Explains how hormone regulatory systems demonstrate irreducible complexity requiring a Creator.</p>
<p> **Dr. John Cramer** - Senior biochemist, University of Guelph. Reveals how "archaic bacteria" are actually MORE complex than regular bacteria, contradicting evolutionary timlines.</p>
<p> **Dr. James Allen** - Former Senior Lecturer in Genetics, University of Stellenbosch. Former atheist turned creationist who demonstrates genetic conservation patterns that evolution cannot explain.</p>
<p> **Dr. John Baumgardner** - Research scientist, Los Alamos National Laboratory (PhD Geophysics). Mathematical probability analysis proving even trillions of years wouldn't allow enough mutations for basic proteins.</p>
<p>This is Part 3 of our series examining credentialed scientists who reject Darwinian evolution based on empirical evidence from their specialized fields.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2193866/c1e-rkoqfwr46nb2k3d6-xxgkpzn5ux-ykmdhm.mp3" length="14819120"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Leading scientists with PhDs in biochemistry and genetics explain why evolution is mathematically impossible. Discover evidence from hormone complexity, genetic conservation, and probability calculations that support intelligent design over naturalistic origins.
In this Science Conversations episode, explore compelling arguments from credentialed researchers including: **Professor David Gower** - Emeritus Professor of Steroid Biochemistry, University of London. Explains how hormone regulatory systems demonstrate irreducible complexity requiring a Creator.
 **Dr. John Cramer** - Senior biochemist, University of Guelph. Reveals how "archaic bacteria" are actually MORE complex than regular bacteria, contradicting evolutionary timlines.
 **Dr. James Allen** - Former Senior Lecturer in Genetics, University of Stellenbosch. Former atheist turned creationist who demonstrates genetic conservation patterns that evolution cannot explain.
 **Dr. John Baumgardner** - Research scientist, Los Alamos National Laboratory (PhD Geophysics). Mathematical probability analysis proving even trillions of years wouldn't allow enough mutations for basic proteins.
This is Part 3 of our series examining credentialed scientists who reject Darwinian evolution based on empirical evidence from their specialized fields.
Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2193866/c1a-qdxq-v6pv8nr5hg6m-tru1yc.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:26</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Can a Scientist Believe in God? Part 2 - SC2535]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2170822</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/can-a-scientist-believe-in-god-part-2-sc2535</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Can scientists reject evolution without religious bias? Discover why leading scientists like Francis Collins, Anthony Flew, and Thomas Nagel argue evolution is impossible based on biochemical complexity and intelligent design evidence.<br />In this episode of Science Conversations, we explore how prominent scientists from secular universities challenge Neo-Darwinism, not from religious conviction, but from examining reproducible scientific evidence. Learn about the academic pressures scientists face when questioning evolution and why the evidence for intelligent design continues to grow stronger.</p>
<p>Featured Scientists Discussed:<br />• Francis Collins - Human Genome Project Director<br />• Anthony Flew - Nobel Prize Winner &amp; Former Atheist<br />• Thomas Nagel - Philosophy Professor, NYU<br />• Jerry Fodor - Philosopher &amp; Evolution Critic</p>
<p>Key Topics Covered:<br />✅ Why mutations cannot produce complex biochemical systems<br />✅ Academic freedom challenges in evolutionary biology<br />✅ The difference between reproducible evidence vs. assertions<br />✅ Jerry Fodor's "Why Pigs Don't Have Wings" controversy<br />✅ Richard Dawkins vs. Jonathan Sarfati debate analysis</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Can scientists reject evolution without religious bias? Discover why leading scientists like Francis Collins, Anthony Flew, and Thomas Nagel argue evolution is impossible based on biochemical complexity and intelligent design evidence.In this episode of Science Conversations, we explore how prominent scientists from secular universities challenge Neo-Darwinism, not from religious conviction, but from examining reproducible scientific evidence. Learn about the academic pressures scientists face when questioning evolution and why the evidence for intelligent design continues to grow stronger.
Featured Scientists Discussed:• Francis Collins - Human Genome Project Director• Anthony Flew - Nobel Prize Winner & Former Atheist• Thomas Nagel - Philosophy Professor, NYU• Jerry Fodor - Philosopher & Evolution Critic
Key Topics Covered:✅ Why mutations cannot produce complex biochemical systems✅ Academic freedom challenges in evolutionary biology✅ The difference between reproducible evidence vs. assertions✅ Jerry Fodor's "Why Pigs Don't Have Wings" controversy✅ Richard Dawkins vs. Jonathan Sarfati debate analysis
Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Can a Scientist Believe in God? Part 2 - SC2535]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>35</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Can scientists reject evolution without religious bias? Discover why leading scientists like Francis Collins, Anthony Flew, and Thomas Nagel argue evolution is impossible based on biochemical complexity and intelligent design evidence.<br />In this episode of Science Conversations, we explore how prominent scientists from secular universities challenge Neo-Darwinism, not from religious conviction, but from examining reproducible scientific evidence. Learn about the academic pressures scientists face when questioning evolution and why the evidence for intelligent design continues to grow stronger.</p>
<p>Featured Scientists Discussed:<br />• Francis Collins - Human Genome Project Director<br />• Anthony Flew - Nobel Prize Winner &amp; Former Atheist<br />• Thomas Nagel - Philosophy Professor, NYU<br />• Jerry Fodor - Philosopher &amp; Evolution Critic</p>
<p>Key Topics Covered:<br />✅ Why mutations cannot produce complex biochemical systems<br />✅ Academic freedom challenges in evolutionary biology<br />✅ The difference between reproducible evidence vs. assertions<br />✅ Jerry Fodor's "Why Pigs Don't Have Wings" controversy<br />✅ Richard Dawkins vs. Jonathan Sarfati debate analysis</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2170822/c1e-v60qb7d603swz0qr-okjz27p4f19-v2x9bj.mp3" length="14323002"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Can scientists reject evolution without religious bias? Discover why leading scientists like Francis Collins, Anthony Flew, and Thomas Nagel argue evolution is impossible based on biochemical complexity and intelligent design evidence.In this episode of Science Conversations, we explore how prominent scientists from secular universities challenge Neo-Darwinism, not from religious conviction, but from examining reproducible scientific evidence. Learn about the academic pressures scientists face when questioning evolution and why the evidence for intelligent design continues to grow stronger.
Featured Scientists Discussed:• Francis Collins - Human Genome Project Director• Anthony Flew - Nobel Prize Winner & Former Atheist• Thomas Nagel - Philosophy Professor, NYU• Jerry Fodor - Philosopher & Evolution Critic
Key Topics Covered:✅ Why mutations cannot produce complex biochemical systems✅ Academic freedom challenges in evolutionary biology✅ The difference between reproducible evidence vs. assertions✅ Jerry Fodor's "Why Pigs Don't Have Wings" controversy✅ Richard Dawkins vs. Jonathan Sarfati debate analysis
Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2170822/c1a-qdxq-wwp8rg7zbp9m-badpka.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:14:55</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Can a Scientist Believe in God? Part 1 - SC2534]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2170361</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/can-a-scientist-believe-in-god-part-1-sc2534</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Leading creation science evidence reveals major problems with Big Bang theory that scientists can't ignore. Discover why inflation theory fails scientific method and alternative cosmologies that fit biblical creation better. Princeton and Harvard physicists expose Big Bang flaws in this Science Conversations episode.</p>
<p>Join Dr. John Ashton and Kaysie Vokurka as they examine the scientific evidence challenging mainstream cosmology. Learn about the 2017 Scientific American paper "Pop Goes the Universe" where top astrophysicists questioned inflation theory's validity.</p>
<p>KEY TOPICS COVERED:<br />• Why Big Bang theory cannot be falsified<br />• Alternative cosmology models and evidence<br />• Fine tuning of the universe pointing to intelligent design<br />• Scientific community's emotional vs logical arguments<br />• Biblical creation vs secular scientific theories</p>
<p>This episode is part of our ongoing Science Conversations series examining creation science evidence and biblical worldview perspectives on origins.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Leading creation science evidence reveals major problems with Big Bang theory that scientists can't ignore. Discover why inflation theory fails scientific method and alternative cosmologies that fit biblical creation better. Princeton and Harvard physicists expose Big Bang flaws in this Science Conversations episode.
Join Dr. John Ashton and Kaysie Vokurka as they examine the scientific evidence challenging mainstream cosmology. Learn about the 2017 Scientific American paper "Pop Goes the Universe" where top astrophysicists questioned inflation theory's validity.
KEY TOPICS COVERED:• Why Big Bang theory cannot be falsified• Alternative cosmology models and evidence• Fine tuning of the universe pointing to intelligent design• Scientific community's emotional vs logical arguments• Biblical creation vs secular scientific theories
This episode is part of our ongoing Science Conversations series examining creation science evidence and biblical worldview perspectives on origins.
Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Can a Scientist Believe in God? Part 1 - SC2534]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>34</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Leading creation science evidence reveals major problems with Big Bang theory that scientists can't ignore. Discover why inflation theory fails scientific method and alternative cosmologies that fit biblical creation better. Princeton and Harvard physicists expose Big Bang flaws in this Science Conversations episode.</p>
<p>Join Dr. John Ashton and Kaysie Vokurka as they examine the scientific evidence challenging mainstream cosmology. Learn about the 2017 Scientific American paper "Pop Goes the Universe" where top astrophysicists questioned inflation theory's validity.</p>
<p>KEY TOPICS COVERED:<br />• Why Big Bang theory cannot be falsified<br />• Alternative cosmology models and evidence<br />• Fine tuning of the universe pointing to intelligent design<br />• Scientific community's emotional vs logical arguments<br />• Biblical creation vs secular scientific theories</p>
<p>This episode is part of our ongoing Science Conversations series examining creation science evidence and biblical worldview perspectives on origins.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2170361/c1e-gpdmcm9qq5a24rzo-dmx2m42zh2jx-imcnv0.mp3" length="14515264"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Leading creation science evidence reveals major problems with Big Bang theory that scientists can't ignore. Discover why inflation theory fails scientific method and alternative cosmologies that fit biblical creation better. Princeton and Harvard physicists expose Big Bang flaws in this Science Conversations episode.
Join Dr. John Ashton and Kaysie Vokurka as they examine the scientific evidence challenging mainstream cosmology. Learn about the 2017 Scientific American paper "Pop Goes the Universe" where top astrophysicists questioned inflation theory's validity.
KEY TOPICS COVERED:• Why Big Bang theory cannot be falsified• Alternative cosmology models and evidence• Fine tuning of the universe pointing to intelligent design• Scientific community's emotional vs logical arguments• Biblical creation vs secular scientific theories
This episode is part of our ongoing Science Conversations series examining creation science evidence and biblical worldview perspectives on origins.
Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2170361/c1a-qdxq-34m74n77u7jx-hsco05.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:07</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Creation Science vs Big Bang: Why Scientists Are Rejecting It - SC2533]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2166203</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/creation-science-vs-big-bang-why-scientists-are-rejecting-it-sc2533</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Leading creation science evidence reveals major problems with Big Bang theory that scientists can't ignore. Discover why inflation theory fails scientific method and alternative cosmologies that fit biblical creation better. Princeton and Harvard physicists expose Big Bang flaws in this Science Conversations episode.</p>
<p>Join Dr. John Ashton and Kaysie Vokurka as they examine the scientific evidence challenging mainstream cosmology. Learn about the 2017 Scientific American paper "Pop Goes the Universe" where top astrophysicists questioned inflation theory's validity.</p>
<p>KEY TOPICS COVERED:<br />• Why Big Bang theory cannot be falsified<br />• Alternative cosmology models and evidence<br />• Fine tuning of the universe pointing to intelligent design<br />• Scientific community's emotional vs logical arguments<br />• Biblical creation vs secular scientific theories</p>
<p>This episode is part of our ongoing Science Conversations series examining creation science evidence and biblical worldview perspectives on origins.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Leading creation science evidence reveals major problems with Big Bang theory that scientists can't ignore. Discover why inflation theory fails scientific method and alternative cosmologies that fit biblical creation better. Princeton and Harvard physicists expose Big Bang flaws in this Science Conversations episode.
Join Dr. John Ashton and Kaysie Vokurka as they examine the scientific evidence challenging mainstream cosmology. Learn about the 2017 Scientific American paper "Pop Goes the Universe" where top astrophysicists questioned inflation theory's validity.
KEY TOPICS COVERED:• Why Big Bang theory cannot be falsified• Alternative cosmology models and evidence• Fine tuning of the universe pointing to intelligent design• Scientific community's emotional vs logical arguments• Biblical creation vs secular scientific theories
This episode is part of our ongoing Science Conversations series examining creation science evidence and biblical worldview perspectives on origins.
Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Creation Science vs Big Bang: Why Scientists Are Rejecting It - SC2533]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>33</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Leading creation science evidence reveals major problems with Big Bang theory that scientists can't ignore. Discover why inflation theory fails scientific method and alternative cosmologies that fit biblical creation better. Princeton and Harvard physicists expose Big Bang flaws in this Science Conversations episode.</p>
<p>Join Dr. John Ashton and Kaysie Vokurka as they examine the scientific evidence challenging mainstream cosmology. Learn about the 2017 Scientific American paper "Pop Goes the Universe" where top astrophysicists questioned inflation theory's validity.</p>
<p>KEY TOPICS COVERED:<br />• Why Big Bang theory cannot be falsified<br />• Alternative cosmology models and evidence<br />• Fine tuning of the universe pointing to intelligent design<br />• Scientific community's emotional vs logical arguments<br />• Biblical creation vs secular scientific theories</p>
<p>This episode is part of our ongoing Science Conversations series examining creation science evidence and biblical worldview perspectives on origins.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2166203/c1e-7znof97n1wtd6gw4-25m7x4d1u9ok-hvwo7b.mp3" length="14403251"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Leading creation science evidence reveals major problems with Big Bang theory that scientists can't ignore. Discover why inflation theory fails scientific method and alternative cosmologies that fit biblical creation better. Princeton and Harvard physicists expose Big Bang flaws in this Science Conversations episode.
Join Dr. John Ashton and Kaysie Vokurka as they examine the scientific evidence challenging mainstream cosmology. Learn about the 2017 Scientific American paper "Pop Goes the Universe" where top astrophysicists questioned inflation theory's validity.
KEY TOPICS COVERED:• Why Big Bang theory cannot be falsified• Alternative cosmology models and evidence• Fine tuning of the universe pointing to intelligent design• Scientific community's emotional vs logical arguments• Biblical creation vs secular scientific theories
This episode is part of our ongoing Science Conversations series examining creation science evidence and biblical worldview perspectives on origins.
Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2166203/c1a-qdxq-7zx20945h6pw-jeozx9.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:00</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Big Bang Theory Debunked: Leading Astronomers Reveal Problems - SC2532]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2025 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2160599</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/big-bang-theory-debunked-leading-astronomers-reveal-problems-sc2532</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Leading astronomers expose fatal problems with Big Bang theory including dark matter, cosmic background radiation issues, and evidence for supernatural creation. Discover why this cosmological model relies on unobserved fudge factors and contradicts astronomical observations.</p>
<p>Key topics covered:<br />- Dark matter and dark energy as unproven constructs<br />- New Scientist open letter from top astronomers including Hilton Arp<br />- Alternative explanations for cosmic microwave background radiation<br />- Supernova remnant evidence supporting young universe<br />- Fully formed spiral galaxies contradicting Big Bang predictions<br />- Planetary magnetic field measurements indicating recent creation</p>
<p>This Science Conversations episode reveals how the Big Bang theory survives only through adjustable parameters while growing astronomical evidence supports biblical creation accounts. Perfect for those interested in creation science, biblical cosmology, and alternative scientific perspectives.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Leading astronomers expose fatal problems with Big Bang theory including dark matter, cosmic background radiation issues, and evidence for supernatural creation. Discover why this cosmological model relies on unobserved fudge factors and contradicts astronomical observations.
Key topics covered:- Dark matter and dark energy as unproven constructs- New Scientist open letter from top astronomers including Hilton Arp- Alternative explanations for cosmic microwave background radiation- Supernova remnant evidence supporting young universe- Fully formed spiral galaxies contradicting Big Bang predictions- Planetary magnetic field measurements indicating recent creation
This Science Conversations episode reveals how the Big Bang theory survives only through adjustable parameters while growing astronomical evidence supports biblical creation accounts. Perfect for those interested in creation science, biblical cosmology, and alternative scientific perspectives.
Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Big Bang Theory Debunked: Leading Astronomers Reveal Problems - SC2532]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>32</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Leading astronomers expose fatal problems with Big Bang theory including dark matter, cosmic background radiation issues, and evidence for supernatural creation. Discover why this cosmological model relies on unobserved fudge factors and contradicts astronomical observations.</p>
<p>Key topics covered:<br />- Dark matter and dark energy as unproven constructs<br />- New Scientist open letter from top astronomers including Hilton Arp<br />- Alternative explanations for cosmic microwave background radiation<br />- Supernova remnant evidence supporting young universe<br />- Fully formed spiral galaxies contradicting Big Bang predictions<br />- Planetary magnetic field measurements indicating recent creation</p>
<p>This Science Conversations episode reveals how the Big Bang theory survives only through adjustable parameters while growing astronomical evidence supports biblical creation accounts. Perfect for those interested in creation science, biblical cosmology, and alternative scientific perspectives.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2160599/c1e-5zrwf157rwf0x9jg-6zqdzm2mi934-qkojcw.mp3" length="14057180"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Leading astronomers expose fatal problems with Big Bang theory including dark matter, cosmic background radiation issues, and evidence for supernatural creation. Discover why this cosmological model relies on unobserved fudge factors and contradicts astronomical observations.
Key topics covered:- Dark matter and dark energy as unproven constructs- New Scientist open letter from top astronomers including Hilton Arp- Alternative explanations for cosmic microwave background radiation- Supernova remnant evidence supporting young universe- Fully formed spiral galaxies contradicting Big Bang predictions- Planetary magnetic field measurements indicating recent creation
This Science Conversations episode reveals how the Big Bang theory survives only through adjustable parameters while growing astronomical evidence supports biblical creation accounts. Perfect for those interested in creation science, biblical cosmology, and alternative scientific perspectives.
Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2160599/c1a-qdxq-kpn2pv7zsxpr-3vn3vl.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:14:38</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Scientists REJECT Big Bang: Impossible Odds Revealed]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2025 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2154842</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/scientists-reject-big-bang-impossible-odds-revealed</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Scientists REJECT Big Bang theory due to impossible mathematical odds! Discover why leading physicists found fatal flaws in this cosmological model. Universe fine-tuning reveals evidence for design.</p>
<p>Join Kaysie Vokurka in Science Conversations as she explores fundamental problems with Big Bang cosmology. From the mysterious "singularity" and fourth-dimensional hyperspace, to Fred Hoyle’s legendary critique, learn why the odds of our universe forming by chance are mathematically impossible.</p>
<p>Key topics include:</p>
<ul>
<li>What the Big Bang Theory actually claims—and common misconceptions</li>
<li>Fred Hoyle’s rejection and the origin of the “Big Bang” name</li>
<li>Fine-tuning of carbon atoms and universal constants</li>
<li>Mathematical impossibilities: odds as low as 1 in 10^10^123</li>
<li>Why hyperspace expansion lacks evidence</li>
<li>Cosmological constant precision requirements</li>
<li>Evidence pointing to intelligent design</li>
</ul>
<p>Expert analysis breaks down the complex physics and mathematics that challenge naturalistic explanations for the universe’s origin—revealing why the evidence points toward supernatural creation.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Scientists REJECT Big Bang theory due to impossible mathematical odds! Discover why leading physicists found fatal flaws in this cosmological model. Universe fine-tuning reveals evidence for design.
Join Kaysie Vokurka in Science Conversations as she explores fundamental problems with Big Bang cosmology. From the mysterious "singularity" and fourth-dimensional hyperspace, to Fred Hoyle’s legendary critique, learn why the odds of our universe forming by chance are mathematically impossible.
Key topics include:

What the Big Bang Theory actually claims—and common misconceptions
Fred Hoyle’s rejection and the origin of the “Big Bang” name
Fine-tuning of carbon atoms and universal constants
Mathematical impossibilities: odds as low as 1 in 10^10^123
Why hyperspace expansion lacks evidence
Cosmological constant precision requirements
Evidence pointing to intelligent design

Expert analysis breaks down the complex physics and mathematics that challenge naturalistic explanations for the universe’s origin—revealing why the evidence points toward supernatural creation.
Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Scientists REJECT Big Bang: Impossible Odds Revealed]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>31</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Scientists REJECT Big Bang theory due to impossible mathematical odds! Discover why leading physicists found fatal flaws in this cosmological model. Universe fine-tuning reveals evidence for design.</p>
<p>Join Kaysie Vokurka in Science Conversations as she explores fundamental problems with Big Bang cosmology. From the mysterious "singularity" and fourth-dimensional hyperspace, to Fred Hoyle’s legendary critique, learn why the odds of our universe forming by chance are mathematically impossible.</p>
<p>Key topics include:</p>
<ul>
<li>What the Big Bang Theory actually claims—and common misconceptions</li>
<li>Fred Hoyle’s rejection and the origin of the “Big Bang” name</li>
<li>Fine-tuning of carbon atoms and universal constants</li>
<li>Mathematical impossibilities: odds as low as 1 in 10^10^123</li>
<li>Why hyperspace expansion lacks evidence</li>
<li>Cosmological constant precision requirements</li>
<li>Evidence pointing to intelligent design</li>
</ul>
<p>Expert analysis breaks down the complex physics and mathematics that challenge naturalistic explanations for the universe’s origin—revealing why the evidence points toward supernatural creation.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2154842/c1e-5zrwf1v9nzh0x9jg-9jqk7v8whwv-hbwlhj.mp3" length="14498963"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Scientists REJECT Big Bang theory due to impossible mathematical odds! Discover why leading physicists found fatal flaws in this cosmological model. Universe fine-tuning reveals evidence for design.
Join Kaysie Vokurka in Science Conversations as she explores fundamental problems with Big Bang cosmology. From the mysterious "singularity" and fourth-dimensional hyperspace, to Fred Hoyle’s legendary critique, learn why the odds of our universe forming by chance are mathematically impossible.
Key topics include:

What the Big Bang Theory actually claims—and common misconceptions
Fred Hoyle’s rejection and the origin of the “Big Bang” name
Fine-tuning of carbon atoms and universal constants
Mathematical impossibilities: odds as low as 1 in 10^10^123
Why hyperspace expansion lacks evidence
Cosmological constant precision requirements
Evidence pointing to intelligent design

Expert analysis breaks down the complex physics and mathematics that challenge naturalistic explanations for the universe’s origin—revealing why the evidence points toward supernatural creation.
Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2154842/c1a-qdxq-z3k7xng1t8zv-y8ejv2.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:06</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Scientists STUNNED: Carbon-14 Found in Billion-Year-Old Diamonds - SC2530]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2147937</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/scientists-stunned-carbon-14-found-in-billion-year-old-diamonds-sc2530</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Carbon-14 dating controversy: measurable carbon-14 found in dinosaur fossils, coal, and billion-year-old diamonds. Discover why these findings challenge radiometric dating and the evolution timeline.</p>
<p>Unlock the shocking science behind carbon-14 dating! This episode explores how measurable carbon-14 has been found in materials supposedly millions or even billions of years old—like coal, dinosaur fossils, and diamonds. Dr. John Ashton reveals why these results challenge conventional geological timelines and support young earth creation science. Learn about key issues with radiometric dating, including cosmic ray formation, Earth's magnetic field, atmospheric carbon variations, and calibration problems. Plus, real-world dating errors from European artifacts and fossil wood!</p>
<p>Join Kaysie Vokurka for Science Conversations as we dig into the facts, the flaws, and the fascinating evidence that’s rewriting the story of Earth’s age.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts: https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Carbon-14 dating controversy: measurable carbon-14 found in dinosaur fossils, coal, and billion-year-old diamonds. Discover why these findings challenge radiometric dating and the evolution timeline.
Unlock the shocking science behind carbon-14 dating! This episode explores how measurable carbon-14 has been found in materials supposedly millions or even billions of years old—like coal, dinosaur fossils, and diamonds. Dr. John Ashton reveals why these results challenge conventional geological timelines and support young earth creation science. Learn about key issues with radiometric dating, including cosmic ray formation, Earth's magnetic field, atmospheric carbon variations, and calibration problems. Plus, real-world dating errors from European artifacts and fossil wood!
Join Kaysie Vokurka for Science Conversations as we dig into the facts, the flaws, and the fascinating evidence that’s rewriting the story of Earth’s age.
Check out our other podcasts: https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Scientists STUNNED: Carbon-14 Found in Billion-Year-Old Diamonds - SC2530]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>30</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Carbon-14 dating controversy: measurable carbon-14 found in dinosaur fossils, coal, and billion-year-old diamonds. Discover why these findings challenge radiometric dating and the evolution timeline.</p>
<p>Unlock the shocking science behind carbon-14 dating! This episode explores how measurable carbon-14 has been found in materials supposedly millions or even billions of years old—like coal, dinosaur fossils, and diamonds. Dr. John Ashton reveals why these results challenge conventional geological timelines and support young earth creation science. Learn about key issues with radiometric dating, including cosmic ray formation, Earth's magnetic field, atmospheric carbon variations, and calibration problems. Plus, real-world dating errors from European artifacts and fossil wood!</p>
<p>Join Kaysie Vokurka for Science Conversations as we dig into the facts, the flaws, and the fascinating evidence that’s rewriting the story of Earth’s age.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts: https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2147937/c1e-ndjqidv292b9zw36-9jq7ov39ion3-iqh7le.mp3" length="14498963"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Carbon-14 dating controversy: measurable carbon-14 found in dinosaur fossils, coal, and billion-year-old diamonds. Discover why these findings challenge radiometric dating and the evolution timeline.
Unlock the shocking science behind carbon-14 dating! This episode explores how measurable carbon-14 has been found in materials supposedly millions or even billions of years old—like coal, dinosaur fossils, and diamonds. Dr. John Ashton reveals why these results challenge conventional geological timelines and support young earth creation science. Learn about key issues with radiometric dating, including cosmic ray formation, Earth's magnetic field, atmospheric carbon variations, and calibration problems. Plus, real-world dating errors from European artifacts and fossil wood!
Join Kaysie Vokurka for Science Conversations as we dig into the facts, the flaws, and the fascinating evidence that’s rewriting the story of Earth’s age.
Check out our other podcasts: https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2147937/c1a-qdxq-z3kxvnp0hpr2-92oye6.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:06</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[How Accurate Is Radiometric Dating? - SC2529]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2144793</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/is-radiometric-dating-accurate-pt-2-sc2529</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>How accurate is radiometric dating? Discover shocking problems with radiometric dating methods, wild inconsistencies in rock ages, and why rocks of known age often test as millions or billions of years old. Science Conversations exposes the truth about radiometric dating accuracy with real scientific evidence and critical thinking.</p>
<p>Join host Kaysie Vokurka as she interviews a leading scientist to reveal:<br />• Why different radiometric dating methods (rubidium-strontium, potassium-argon, lead-lead, samarium-neodymium) produce wildly different ages for the same rock sample.<br />• Documented cases where rocks of known historical age (like Hawaiian lava flows and Mount St. Helens) are dated as billions of years old.<br />• How selection bias and “cherry-picking” of results shape the accepted geological timeline.<br />• Evidence from top institutions (Australian National University, peer-reviewed textbooks) challenging the reliability of radiometric dating.<br />• The need for a critical reevaluation of dating methods in modern science.</p>
<p>If you’re passionate about science, critical thinking, or want to understand the real evidence behind radiometric dating, this episode is for you. Subscribe for more Science Conversations exploring science, faith, and evidence-based discussion.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[How accurate is radiometric dating? Discover shocking problems with radiometric dating methods, wild inconsistencies in rock ages, and why rocks of known age often test as millions or billions of years old. Science Conversations exposes the truth about radiometric dating accuracy with real scientific evidence and critical thinking.
Join host Kaysie Vokurka as she interviews a leading scientist to reveal:• Why different radiometric dating methods (rubidium-strontium, potassium-argon, lead-lead, samarium-neodymium) produce wildly different ages for the same rock sample.• Documented cases where rocks of known historical age (like Hawaiian lava flows and Mount St. Helens) are dated as billions of years old.• How selection bias and “cherry-picking” of results shape the accepted geological timeline.• Evidence from top institutions (Australian National University, peer-reviewed textbooks) challenging the reliability of radiometric dating.• The need for a critical reevaluation of dating methods in modern science.
If you’re passionate about science, critical thinking, or want to understand the real evidence behind radiometric dating, this episode is for you. Subscribe for more Science Conversations exploring science, faith, and evidence-based discussion.
Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[How Accurate Is Radiometric Dating? - SC2529]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>29</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>How accurate is radiometric dating? Discover shocking problems with radiometric dating methods, wild inconsistencies in rock ages, and why rocks of known age often test as millions or billions of years old. Science Conversations exposes the truth about radiometric dating accuracy with real scientific evidence and critical thinking.</p>
<p>Join host Kaysie Vokurka as she interviews a leading scientist to reveal:<br />• Why different radiometric dating methods (rubidium-strontium, potassium-argon, lead-lead, samarium-neodymium) produce wildly different ages for the same rock sample.<br />• Documented cases where rocks of known historical age (like Hawaiian lava flows and Mount St. Helens) are dated as billions of years old.<br />• How selection bias and “cherry-picking” of results shape the accepted geological timeline.<br />• Evidence from top institutions (Australian National University, peer-reviewed textbooks) challenging the reliability of radiometric dating.<br />• The need for a critical reevaluation of dating methods in modern science.</p>
<p>If you’re passionate about science, critical thinking, or want to understand the real evidence behind radiometric dating, this episode is for you. Subscribe for more Science Conversations exploring science, faith, and evidence-based discussion.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2144793/c1e-dmdrfm1v2jfpdk51-jp3mo9x4h021-dpi9xk.mp3" length="14467198"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[How accurate is radiometric dating? Discover shocking problems with radiometric dating methods, wild inconsistencies in rock ages, and why rocks of known age often test as millions or billions of years old. Science Conversations exposes the truth about radiometric dating accuracy with real scientific evidence and critical thinking.
Join host Kaysie Vokurka as she interviews a leading scientist to reveal:• Why different radiometric dating methods (rubidium-strontium, potassium-argon, lead-lead, samarium-neodymium) produce wildly different ages for the same rock sample.• Documented cases where rocks of known historical age (like Hawaiian lava flows and Mount St. Helens) are dated as billions of years old.• How selection bias and “cherry-picking” of results shape the accepted geological timeline.• Evidence from top institutions (Australian National University, peer-reviewed textbooks) challenging the reliability of radiometric dating.• The need for a critical reevaluation of dating methods in modern science.
If you’re passionate about science, critical thinking, or want to understand the real evidence behind radiometric dating, this episode is for you. Subscribe for more Science Conversations exploring science, faith, and evidence-based discussion.
Check out our other podcasts:www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2144793/c1a-qdxq-2546qz8dc41r-efupnx.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:04</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Radiometric Dating DEBUNKED – Major Scientific Flaws Revealed - SC2528]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2137297</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/radiometric-dating-debunked-major-scientific-flaws-revealed-sc2528</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Radiometric dating accuracy questioned as creation scientist exposes carbon dating flaws, geological dating problems, and uniformitarian assumptions. Major scientific evidence challenges millions of years timeline with erosion rates, catastrophic geology, and biblical flood model supporting young earth creation science.</p>
<p>Join Kaysie Vokurka on Science Conversations as we investigate the fundamental problems with radiometric dating. This episode unpacks the circular reasoning, key assumptions, and scientific inconsistencies that challenge the supposed reliability of geological dating. Discover how catastrophic events, erosion rates, and the biblical flood model present a radically different timeline.</p>
<p>Key Topics:<br />• Radiometric dating assumptions &amp; limitations<br />• Circular reasoning in geological dating<br />• Uniformitarian vs catastrophic geology<br />• Erosion rates vs deep time<br />• Isochron dating methodology flaws<br />• Young earth evidence from creation science</p>
<p>Related Content:<br />• Creation Science Evidence<br />• Biblical Flood Geology<br />• Young Earth Scientific Evidence</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Radiometric dating accuracy questioned as creation scientist exposes carbon dating flaws, geological dating problems, and uniformitarian assumptions. Major scientific evidence challenges millions of years timeline with erosion rates, catastrophic geology, and biblical flood model supporting young earth creation science.
Join Kaysie Vokurka on Science Conversations as we investigate the fundamental problems with radiometric dating. This episode unpacks the circular reasoning, key assumptions, and scientific inconsistencies that challenge the supposed reliability of geological dating. Discover how catastrophic events, erosion rates, and the biblical flood model present a radically different timeline.
Key Topics:• Radiometric dating assumptions & limitations• Circular reasoning in geological dating• Uniformitarian vs catastrophic geology• Erosion rates vs deep time• Isochron dating methodology flaws• Young earth evidence from creation science
Related Content:• Creation Science Evidence• Biblical Flood Geology• Young Earth Scientific Evidence
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Radiometric Dating DEBUNKED – Major Scientific Flaws Revealed - SC2528]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>28</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Radiometric dating accuracy questioned as creation scientist exposes carbon dating flaws, geological dating problems, and uniformitarian assumptions. Major scientific evidence challenges millions of years timeline with erosion rates, catastrophic geology, and biblical flood model supporting young earth creation science.</p>
<p>Join Kaysie Vokurka on Science Conversations as we investigate the fundamental problems with radiometric dating. This episode unpacks the circular reasoning, key assumptions, and scientific inconsistencies that challenge the supposed reliability of geological dating. Discover how catastrophic events, erosion rates, and the biblical flood model present a radically different timeline.</p>
<p>Key Topics:<br />• Radiometric dating assumptions &amp; limitations<br />• Circular reasoning in geological dating<br />• Uniformitarian vs catastrophic geology<br />• Erosion rates vs deep time<br />• Isochron dating methodology flaws<br />• Young earth evidence from creation science</p>
<p>Related Content:<br />• Creation Science Evidence<br />• Biblical Flood Geology<br />• Young Earth Scientific Evidence</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2137297/c1e-jpkzc5gvvmfn1gwr-ndz2zk69s1p9-8w0k1n.mp3" length="14259055"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Radiometric dating accuracy questioned as creation scientist exposes carbon dating flaws, geological dating problems, and uniformitarian assumptions. Major scientific evidence challenges millions of years timeline with erosion rates, catastrophic geology, and biblical flood model supporting young earth creation science.
Join Kaysie Vokurka on Science Conversations as we investigate the fundamental problems with radiometric dating. This episode unpacks the circular reasoning, key assumptions, and scientific inconsistencies that challenge the supposed reliability of geological dating. Discover how catastrophic events, erosion rates, and the biblical flood model present a radically different timeline.
Key Topics:• Radiometric dating assumptions & limitations• Circular reasoning in geological dating• Uniformitarian vs catastrophic geology• Erosion rates vs deep time• Isochron dating methodology flaws• Young earth evidence from creation science
Related Content:• Creation Science Evidence• Biblical Flood Geology• Young Earth Scientific Evidence
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2137297/c1a-qdxq-gpznz76qtppr-orw3by.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:14:51</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[DNA Mutation Rates Expose the Myth of Ancient Earth – Radiometric Dating Debunked - SC2527]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2132526</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/dna-mutation-rates-expose-the-myth-of-ancient-earth-radiometric-dating-debunked-sc2527</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Groundbreaking DNA research is shattering the evolutionary timeline! In this eye-opening episode of Science Conversations, Dr. John Ashton reveals explosive scientific evidence showing life on Earth simply cannot be millions of years old.</p>
<p>What You’ll Discover:</p>
<p>• DNA’s Time Limit: Human DNA accumulates 90,000 errors in just 6,000 years. By 6 million years, 3% of our genetic code would be damaged—making long-term survival impossible.<br />• Genetic Decay Accelerates: Over 10,000 genetic diseases now catalogued, and the number keeps rising.<br />• Soft Tissue Shockers: Collagen, muscle fiber, and DNA fragments found in dinosaur fossils supposedly 70 million years old—biologically impossible!<br />• Living Bacteria in Ancient Salt: Viable bacteria discovered in “250 million year old” salt crystals—contradicting evolutionary dating.<br />• Mitochondrial Mayhem: Just 1% of genes control 10% of our DNA’s function, and errors here rapidly lead to organism failure.<br />• Mutation Rates Confirm Young Life: Dr. John Sanford (Cornell University) calculates a maximum realistic age for life on Earth: 10,000–100,000 years, more closely matching the biblical creation timeline.</p>
<p>Why You Haven’t Heard This in School:</p>
<p>Mainstream science textbooks rarely mention these findings, but top journals like Nature are publishing the data. The evidence is converging on a young Earth, supporting the Bible’s account and challenging the radiometric dating methods taught as fact.</p>
<p>Don’t miss the finale of our radiometric dating series! Subscribe for more faith-affirming, evidence-based science that reveals God’s truth.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:</p>
<p>Browse all playlists here <a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Groundbreaking DNA research is shattering the evolutionary timeline! In this eye-opening episode of Science Conversations, Dr. John Ashton reveals explosive scientific evidence showing life on Earth simply cannot be millions of years old.
What You’ll Discover:
• DNA’s Time Limit: Human DNA accumulates 90,000 errors in just 6,000 years. By 6 million years, 3% of our genetic code would be damaged—making long-term survival impossible.• Genetic Decay Accelerates: Over 10,000 genetic diseases now catalogued, and the number keeps rising.• Soft Tissue Shockers: Collagen, muscle fiber, and DNA fragments found in dinosaur fossils supposedly 70 million years old—biologically impossible!• Living Bacteria in Ancient Salt: Viable bacteria discovered in “250 million year old” salt crystals—contradicting evolutionary dating.• Mitochondrial Mayhem: Just 1% of genes control 10% of our DNA’s function, and errors here rapidly lead to organism failure.• Mutation Rates Confirm Young Life: Dr. John Sanford (Cornell University) calculates a maximum realistic age for life on Earth: 10,000–100,000 years, more closely matching the biblical creation timeline.
Why You Haven’t Heard This in School:
Mainstream science textbooks rarely mention these findings, but top journals like Nature are publishing the data. The evidence is converging on a young Earth, supporting the Bible’s account and challenging the radiometric dating methods taught as fact.
Don’t miss the finale of our radiometric dating series! Subscribe for more faith-affirming, evidence-based science that reveals God’s truth.
Check out our other podcasts:
Browse all playlists here www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[DNA Mutation Rates Expose the Myth of Ancient Earth – Radiometric Dating Debunked - SC2527]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>27</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Groundbreaking DNA research is shattering the evolutionary timeline! In this eye-opening episode of Science Conversations, Dr. John Ashton reveals explosive scientific evidence showing life on Earth simply cannot be millions of years old.</p>
<p>What You’ll Discover:</p>
<p>• DNA’s Time Limit: Human DNA accumulates 90,000 errors in just 6,000 years. By 6 million years, 3% of our genetic code would be damaged—making long-term survival impossible.<br />• Genetic Decay Accelerates: Over 10,000 genetic diseases now catalogued, and the number keeps rising.<br />• Soft Tissue Shockers: Collagen, muscle fiber, and DNA fragments found in dinosaur fossils supposedly 70 million years old—biologically impossible!<br />• Living Bacteria in Ancient Salt: Viable bacteria discovered in “250 million year old” salt crystals—contradicting evolutionary dating.<br />• Mitochondrial Mayhem: Just 1% of genes control 10% of our DNA’s function, and errors here rapidly lead to organism failure.<br />• Mutation Rates Confirm Young Life: Dr. John Sanford (Cornell University) calculates a maximum realistic age for life on Earth: 10,000–100,000 years, more closely matching the biblical creation timeline.</p>
<p>Why You Haven’t Heard This in School:</p>
<p>Mainstream science textbooks rarely mention these findings, but top journals like Nature are publishing the data. The evidence is converging on a young Earth, supporting the Bible’s account and challenging the radiometric dating methods taught as fact.</p>
<p>Don’t miss the finale of our radiometric dating series! Subscribe for more faith-affirming, evidence-based science that reveals God’s truth.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:</p>
<p>Browse all playlists here <a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2132526/c1e-jpkzc5g545un1gwr-jp36r4kxc24o-xq2clq.mp3" length="14162924"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Groundbreaking DNA research is shattering the evolutionary timeline! In this eye-opening episode of Science Conversations, Dr. John Ashton reveals explosive scientific evidence showing life on Earth simply cannot be millions of years old.
What You’ll Discover:
• DNA’s Time Limit: Human DNA accumulates 90,000 errors in just 6,000 years. By 6 million years, 3% of our genetic code would be damaged—making long-term survival impossible.• Genetic Decay Accelerates: Over 10,000 genetic diseases now catalogued, and the number keeps rising.• Soft Tissue Shockers: Collagen, muscle fiber, and DNA fragments found in dinosaur fossils supposedly 70 million years old—biologically impossible!• Living Bacteria in Ancient Salt: Viable bacteria discovered in “250 million year old” salt crystals—contradicting evolutionary dating.• Mitochondrial Mayhem: Just 1% of genes control 10% of our DNA’s function, and errors here rapidly lead to organism failure.• Mutation Rates Confirm Young Life: Dr. John Sanford (Cornell University) calculates a maximum realistic age for life on Earth: 10,000–100,000 years, more closely matching the biblical creation timeline.
Why You Haven’t Heard This in School:
Mainstream science textbooks rarely mention these findings, but top journals like Nature are publishing the data. The evidence is converging on a young Earth, supporting the Bible’s account and challenging the radiometric dating methods taught as fact.
Don’t miss the finale of our radiometric dating series! Subscribe for more faith-affirming, evidence-based science that reveals God’s truth.
Check out our other podcasts:
Browse all playlists here www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2132526/c1a-qdxq-47xjzg99cqp-zidkxt.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:14:45</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Age of the Earth part2 - 2526]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2126044</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/the-shocking-truth-about-erosion-rates-vs-radiometric-dating-2526</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>The evidence is overwhelming: radiometric dating methods simply don’t match up with real-world geological data. In part 2 of this explosive series, Kaysie Vokurka and Dr. John Ashton dig even deeper into the evidence that’s shaking the foundations of evolutionary timelines.<br />What You’ll Discover in This Episode:</p>
<p>• Why erosion rates prove continents couldn’t possibly survive for billions of years<br />• Ocean sediment thickness reveals Earth’s true age (not the claimed 2.5 billion years)<br />• Volcanic evidence that completely upends evolutionary dating<br />• Where all the missing sediment went—according to biblical flood geology<br />• How Grand Canyon rocks show impossible preservation over supposed millions of years</p>
<p>Dr. Ashton shares jaw-dropping calculations: at current volcanic output rates (1 cubic mile per year), Earth should be buried under 12 miles of volcanic material if it were truly billions of years old. Instead, measurements show only 34 million years’ worth—a massive discrepancy that mainstream science can’t explain.</p>
<p>The Biblical Flood Model Explains the Evidence:</p>
<p>• Rapid sedimentation during catastrophic global events<br />• Massive volcanic activity during the “fountains of the deep”<br />• Mountain uplift explains marine fossils found at high elevations<br />• Fossil preservation demands rapid, large-scale burial</p>
<p>Key Evidence Highlighted:</p>
<p>• Tambora volcano (1815): 25–70 cubic miles ejected in a single event<br />• Lake Taupo: 260 cubic miles of material released<br />• Historical lava flows radiometrically dated at millions of years when actually decades old</p>
<p>This is part 2 of 3 in our radiometric dating investigation. Subscribe for more faith-affirming science content that challenges evolutionary assumptions with real evidence.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br />Browse all playlists here <a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[The evidence is overwhelming: radiometric dating methods simply don’t match up with real-world geological data. In part 2 of this explosive series, Kaysie Vokurka and Dr. John Ashton dig even deeper into the evidence that’s shaking the foundations of evolutionary timelines.What You’ll Discover in This Episode:
• Why erosion rates prove continents couldn’t possibly survive for billions of years• Ocean sediment thickness reveals Earth’s true age (not the claimed 2.5 billion years)• Volcanic evidence that completely upends evolutionary dating• Where all the missing sediment went—according to biblical flood geology• How Grand Canyon rocks show impossible preservation over supposed millions of years
Dr. Ashton shares jaw-dropping calculations: at current volcanic output rates (1 cubic mile per year), Earth should be buried under 12 miles of volcanic material if it were truly billions of years old. Instead, measurements show only 34 million years’ worth—a massive discrepancy that mainstream science can’t explain.
The Biblical Flood Model Explains the Evidence:
• Rapid sedimentation during catastrophic global events• Massive volcanic activity during the “fountains of the deep”• Mountain uplift explains marine fossils found at high elevations• Fossil preservation demands rapid, large-scale burial
Key Evidence Highlighted:
• Tambora volcano (1815): 25–70 cubic miles ejected in a single event• Lake Taupo: 260 cubic miles of material released• Historical lava flows radiometrically dated at millions of years when actually decades old
This is part 2 of 3 in our radiometric dating investigation. Subscribe for more faith-affirming science content that challenges evolutionary assumptions with real evidence.
Check out our other podcasts:Browse all playlists here www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Age of the Earth part2 - 2526]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>26</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>The evidence is overwhelming: radiometric dating methods simply don’t match up with real-world geological data. In part 2 of this explosive series, Kaysie Vokurka and Dr. John Ashton dig even deeper into the evidence that’s shaking the foundations of evolutionary timelines.<br />What You’ll Discover in This Episode:</p>
<p>• Why erosion rates prove continents couldn’t possibly survive for billions of years<br />• Ocean sediment thickness reveals Earth’s true age (not the claimed 2.5 billion years)<br />• Volcanic evidence that completely upends evolutionary dating<br />• Where all the missing sediment went—according to biblical flood geology<br />• How Grand Canyon rocks show impossible preservation over supposed millions of years</p>
<p>Dr. Ashton shares jaw-dropping calculations: at current volcanic output rates (1 cubic mile per year), Earth should be buried under 12 miles of volcanic material if it were truly billions of years old. Instead, measurements show only 34 million years’ worth—a massive discrepancy that mainstream science can’t explain.</p>
<p>The Biblical Flood Model Explains the Evidence:</p>
<p>• Rapid sedimentation during catastrophic global events<br />• Massive volcanic activity during the “fountains of the deep”<br />• Mountain uplift explains marine fossils found at high elevations<br />• Fossil preservation demands rapid, large-scale burial</p>
<p>Key Evidence Highlighted:</p>
<p>• Tambora volcano (1815): 25–70 cubic miles ejected in a single event<br />• Lake Taupo: 260 cubic miles of material released<br />• Historical lava flows radiometrically dated at millions of years when actually decades old</p>
<p>This is part 2 of 3 in our radiometric dating investigation. Subscribe for more faith-affirming science content that challenges evolutionary assumptions with real evidence.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br />Browse all playlists here <a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2126044/c1e-ndjqid2093c9zw36-pkx27z2qh8dd-aurvzj.mp3" length="11683172"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[The evidence is overwhelming: radiometric dating methods simply don’t match up with real-world geological data. In part 2 of this explosive series, Kaysie Vokurka and Dr. John Ashton dig even deeper into the evidence that’s shaking the foundations of evolutionary timelines.What You’ll Discover in This Episode:
• Why erosion rates prove continents couldn’t possibly survive for billions of years• Ocean sediment thickness reveals Earth’s true age (not the claimed 2.5 billion years)• Volcanic evidence that completely upends evolutionary dating• Where all the missing sediment went—according to biblical flood geology• How Grand Canyon rocks show impossible preservation over supposed millions of years
Dr. Ashton shares jaw-dropping calculations: at current volcanic output rates (1 cubic mile per year), Earth should be buried under 12 miles of volcanic material if it were truly billions of years old. Instead, measurements show only 34 million years’ worth—a massive discrepancy that mainstream science can’t explain.
The Biblical Flood Model Explains the Evidence:
• Rapid sedimentation during catastrophic global events• Massive volcanic activity during the “fountains of the deep”• Mountain uplift explains marine fossils found at high elevations• Fossil preservation demands rapid, large-scale burial
Key Evidence Highlighted:
• Tambora volcano (1815): 25–70 cubic miles ejected in a single event• Lake Taupo: 260 cubic miles of material released• Historical lava flows radiometrically dated at millions of years when actually decades old
This is part 2 of 3 in our radiometric dating investigation. Subscribe for more faith-affirming science content that challenges evolutionary assumptions with real evidence.
Check out our other podcasts:Browse all playlists here www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2126044/c1a-qdxq-47x3nz3ju5j-17l55f.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:12:10</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Age of the Earth part 1 - SC2525]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2116109</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/age-of-the-earth-part-1-sc2525</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>The age of the earth and radiometric dating. Evolutionary theory depends on assumed long ages of the earth, with fossil bearing strata estimated to be hundreds of millions of years old. Radiometric dating results appear to support and validate these long timeframes. Does all available data converge with this? Other evidence, such as continental and mountain erosion rates, does not align with these long time-periods and instead presents a much younger earth. How does this impact evolutionary assumptions?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:</p>
<p><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists</a></p>
<p><br /><br /></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[The age of the earth and radiometric dating. Evolutionary theory depends on assumed long ages of the earth, with fossil bearing strata estimated to be hundreds of millions of years old. Radiometric dating results appear to support and validate these long timeframes. Does all available data converge with this? Other evidence, such as continental and mountain erosion rates, does not align with these long time-periods and instead presents a much younger earth. How does this impact evolutionary assumptions?
Check out our other podcasts:
https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Age of the Earth part 1 - SC2525]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>25</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>The age of the earth and radiometric dating. Evolutionary theory depends on assumed long ages of the earth, with fossil bearing strata estimated to be hundreds of millions of years old. Radiometric dating results appear to support and validate these long timeframes. Does all available data converge with this? Other evidence, such as continental and mountain erosion rates, does not align with these long time-periods and instead presents a much younger earth. How does this impact evolutionary assumptions?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:</p>
<p><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists</a></p>
<p><br /><br /></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2116109/c1e-dmdrfmjr56updk51-47xqv48ns85z-bp5e2v.mp3" length="14243172"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[The age of the earth and radiometric dating. Evolutionary theory depends on assumed long ages of the earth, with fossil bearing strata estimated to be hundreds of millions of years old. Radiometric dating results appear to support and validate these long timeframes. Does all available data converge with this? Other evidence, such as continental and mountain erosion rates, does not align with these long time-periods and instead presents a much younger earth. How does this impact evolutionary assumptions?
Check out our other podcasts:
https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2116109/c1a-qdxq-v643nv8gh2n4-sbkvfy.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:14:50</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[The Great Flood of Noah part 3 - SC2524]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2105836</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/the-great-flood-of-noah-part-3-sc2524</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>The great flood of Noah. The book of Genesis records the lifespan of key individuals that lived on earth before the flood. It also accurately records when the flood occurred and the age of key individuals after the flood. While the age of those who lived before the flood averaged 900 years, the ages of those living after the flood dropped dramatically to 100-200 years within a few generations. How realistic are these lifespan records? Is there any evidence that supports these ages, along with a dramatic age reduction in a post-flood world scenario?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[The great flood of Noah. The book of Genesis records the lifespan of key individuals that lived on earth before the flood. It also accurately records when the flood occurred and the age of key individuals after the flood. While the age of those who lived before the flood averaged 900 years, the ages of those living after the flood dropped dramatically to 100-200 years within a few generations. How realistic are these lifespan records? Is there any evidence that supports these ages, along with a dramatic age reduction in a post-flood world scenario?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[The Great Flood of Noah part 3 - SC2524]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>24</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>The great flood of Noah. The book of Genesis records the lifespan of key individuals that lived on earth before the flood. It also accurately records when the flood occurred and the age of key individuals after the flood. While the age of those who lived before the flood averaged 900 years, the ages of those living after the flood dropped dramatically to 100-200 years within a few generations. How realistic are these lifespan records? Is there any evidence that supports these ages, along with a dramatic age reduction in a post-flood world scenario?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2105836/c1e-479wi1k8pgiopvqn-47x94576skvv-lykb7u.mp3" length="14722989"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[The great flood of Noah. The book of Genesis records the lifespan of key individuals that lived on earth before the flood. It also accurately records when the flood occurred and the age of key individuals after the flood. While the age of those who lived before the flood averaged 900 years, the ages of those living after the flood dropped dramatically to 100-200 years within a few generations. How realistic are these lifespan records? Is there any evidence that supports these ages, along with a dramatic age reduction in a post-flood world scenario?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2105836/c1a-qdxq-ndzjrxdma15v-6vgzpw.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:20</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[The Great Flood of Noah part 2- SC2523]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2105835</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/the-great-flood-of-noah-part-2-sc2523</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>The great flood of Noah.The flood story tells us that humanity was destroyed by the floodwaters except for 8 people who were spared on the ark. These people multiplied and spread out over the earth after the flood. The Bible records the genealogies of the first generations to be born after the flood, and notes that at a certain point, they spread out extensively over the earth. Is the historical evidence for the founders and starting points of ancient nations consistent with the Biblical record?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[The great flood of Noah.The flood story tells us that humanity was destroyed by the floodwaters except for 8 people who were spared on the ark. These people multiplied and spread out over the earth after the flood. The Bible records the genealogies of the first generations to be born after the flood, and notes that at a certain point, they spread out extensively over the earth. Is the historical evidence for the founders and starting points of ancient nations consistent with the Biblical record?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[The Great Flood of Noah part 2- SC2523]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>23</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>The great flood of Noah.The flood story tells us that humanity was destroyed by the floodwaters except for 8 people who were spared on the ark. These people multiplied and spread out over the earth after the flood. The Bible records the genealogies of the first generations to be born after the flood, and notes that at a certain point, they spread out extensively over the earth. Is the historical evidence for the founders and starting points of ancient nations consistent with the Biblical record?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2105835/c1e-wwnqb37vnza0gw59-8dqm8zj5t8q1-zzxyy0.mp3" length="14371068"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[The great flood of Noah.The flood story tells us that humanity was destroyed by the floodwaters except for 8 people who were spared on the ark. These people multiplied and spread out over the earth after the flood. The Bible records the genealogies of the first generations to be born after the flood, and notes that at a certain point, they spread out extensively over the earth. Is the historical evidence for the founders and starting points of ancient nations consistent with the Biblical record?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2105835/c1a-qdxq-5zorqmjps1d9-uyrrvb.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:14:58</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[The Great Flood of Noah part 1 - SC2522]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2101824</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/what-evidence-is-there-for-evolution-part-1-sc2522</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>The great flood of Noah.The Biblical flood story has been passed off as mythical by many. While there is no doubt that the story is miraculous, extra-biblical records of an ancient "flood story" are incredibly consistent with the Bible's account. These additional flood stories are found in cultures all over the world. What does all this mean for the story of a global flood? Is the story realistic? Is the historical evidence consistent? </p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts: <a href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts">https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts</a> </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[The great flood of Noah.The Biblical flood story has been passed off as mythical by many. While there is no doubt that the story is miraculous, extra-biblical records of an ancient "flood story" are incredibly consistent with the Bible's account. These additional flood stories are found in cultures all over the world. What does all this mean for the story of a global flood? Is the story realistic? Is the historical evidence consistent? 
Check out our other podcasts: https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[The Great Flood of Noah part 1 - SC2522]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>The great flood of Noah.The Biblical flood story has been passed off as mythical by many. While there is no doubt that the story is miraculous, extra-biblical records of an ancient "flood story" are incredibly consistent with the Bible's account. These additional flood stories are found in cultures all over the world. What does all this mean for the story of a global flood? Is the story realistic? Is the historical evidence consistent? </p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts: <a href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts">https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts</a> </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2101824/c1e-wwnqb374jji0gw59-kp9j3oo4ckjo-ao0gop.mp3" length="13043211"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[The great flood of Noah.The Biblical flood story has been passed off as mythical by many. While there is no doubt that the story is miraculous, extra-biblical records of an ancient "flood story" are incredibly consistent with the Bible's account. These additional flood stories are found in cultures all over the world. What does all this mean for the story of a global flood? Is the story realistic? Is the historical evidence consistent? 
Check out our other podcasts: https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2101824/c1a-qdxq-z3k4n11pbdp-43j0cq.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:13:35</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Evidence for the Flood Part 3 - SC2521]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2025 09:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2097081</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/evidence-for-the-flood-part-3-sc2521</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Evidence for the flood. Fossils in sedimentary layers provide clues regarding the nature and dynamics of rock formation conditions. Fossil footprint trackways provide significant evidence for catastrophic conditions. They paint a picture of all kinds of animals fleeing to higher ground while wading through fast moving water. Polystrate fossil trees also point to a dramatic past. Stripped of their tops and roots, these logs floated in an upright position and were buried in the same orientation through multiple different layers of sediment. These logs often contain fossils of animals and sea creatures mixed together. All of this evidence is most consistent with a global catastropic flood...an event which even explains the Ice-Age!  </p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Evidence for the flood. Fossils in sedimentary layers provide clues regarding the nature and dynamics of rock formation conditions. Fossil footprint trackways provide significant evidence for catastrophic conditions. They paint a picture of all kinds of animals fleeing to higher ground while wading through fast moving water. Polystrate fossil trees also point to a dramatic past. Stripped of their tops and roots, these logs floated in an upright position and were buried in the same orientation through multiple different layers of sediment. These logs often contain fossils of animals and sea creatures mixed together. All of this evidence is most consistent with a global catastropic flood...an event which even explains the Ice-Age!  
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Evidence for the Flood Part 3 - SC2521]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Evidence for the flood. Fossils in sedimentary layers provide clues regarding the nature and dynamics of rock formation conditions. Fossil footprint trackways provide significant evidence for catastrophic conditions. They paint a picture of all kinds of animals fleeing to higher ground while wading through fast moving water. Polystrate fossil trees also point to a dramatic past. Stripped of their tops and roots, these logs floated in an upright position and were buried in the same orientation through multiple different layers of sediment. These logs often contain fossils of animals and sea creatures mixed together. All of this evidence is most consistent with a global catastropic flood...an event which even explains the Ice-Age!  </p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2097081/c1e-ok8qf2j43xu8n3v6-mkjjn598bz6v-zjnvb3.mp3" length="15043146"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Evidence for the flood. Fossils in sedimentary layers provide clues regarding the nature and dynamics of rock formation conditions. Fossil footprint trackways provide significant evidence for catastrophic conditions. They paint a picture of all kinds of animals fleeing to higher ground while wading through fast moving water. Polystrate fossil trees also point to a dramatic past. Stripped of their tops and roots, these logs floated in an upright position and were buried in the same orientation through multiple different layers of sediment. These logs often contain fossils of animals and sea creatures mixed together. All of this evidence is most consistent with a global catastropic flood...an event which even explains the Ice-Age!  
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2097081/c1a-qdxq-kp99rv52bxog-izgxe4.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:40</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Evidence for the Flood Part 2 - SC2520]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2025 09:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2091344</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/evidence-for-the-flood-part-2-sc2520</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Evidence for the flood. Sedimentary rock layers lie conformably over each other, without evidence of erosion between them. This is the case even when the layers are unconventional. For example, entire sections of layers are missing in some locations, which represents gaps of tens to hundreds of millions of years, according to the conventional geologic column. Yet there is no evidence of erosion where the missing layers should be. In other instances, older rocks are situated on top of younger rocks, and do so over dozens of square kilometres. Once more, the layers sit perfectly over one another without surface disturbance. What explains this kind of evidence best? Long-age processes or a single global flood event?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Evidence for the flood. Sedimentary rock layers lie conformably over each other, without evidence of erosion between them. This is the case even when the layers are unconventional. For example, entire sections of layers are missing in some locations, which represents gaps of tens to hundreds of millions of years, according to the conventional geologic column. Yet there is no evidence of erosion where the missing layers should be. In other instances, older rocks are situated on top of younger rocks, and do so over dozens of square kilometres. Once more, the layers sit perfectly over one another without surface disturbance. What explains this kind of evidence best? Long-age processes or a single global flood event?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Evidence for the Flood Part 2 - SC2520]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Evidence for the flood. Sedimentary rock layers lie conformably over each other, without evidence of erosion between them. This is the case even when the layers are unconventional. For example, entire sections of layers are missing in some locations, which represents gaps of tens to hundreds of millions of years, according to the conventional geologic column. Yet there is no evidence of erosion where the missing layers should be. In other instances, older rocks are situated on top of younger rocks, and do so over dozens of square kilometres. Once more, the layers sit perfectly over one another without surface disturbance. What explains this kind of evidence best? Long-age processes or a single global flood event?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2091344/c1e-wwnqb3v3m7b0gw59-5zo16469ip6r-juwkdi.mp3" length="14243172"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Evidence for the flood. Sedimentary rock layers lie conformably over each other, without evidence of erosion between them. This is the case even when the layers are unconventional. For example, entire sections of layers are missing in some locations, which represents gaps of tens to hundreds of millions of years, according to the conventional geologic column. Yet there is no evidence of erosion where the missing layers should be. In other instances, older rocks are situated on top of younger rocks, and do so over dozens of square kilometres. Once more, the layers sit perfectly over one another without surface disturbance. What explains this kind of evidence best? Long-age processes or a single global flood event?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2091344/c1a-qdxq-mkjxzrzpf4v6-e5nmnb.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:14:50</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Evidence for the Flood Part 1 - SC2519]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2025 09:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2085831</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/evidence-for-the-flood-part-1-sc2519</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Evidence for the flood. Sedimentary rock makes up about 75% of the earth's surface - a type of rock primarily laid down by water. Sedimentary rock strata combinations have the same deposition patterns around the world. In addition, single, continuous, layers of sedimentary rock can cover areas stretching hundreds of thousands of square kilometres and contain numerous fossils. How did these rocks form? By small, local, catastrophic conditions or a single, global flood situation? If local and spread out over millions of years, why is there a distinct lack of erosion between rock layers?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Evidence for the flood. Sedimentary rock makes up about 75% of the earth's surface - a type of rock primarily laid down by water. Sedimentary rock strata combinations have the same deposition patterns around the world. In addition, single, continuous, layers of sedimentary rock can cover areas stretching hundreds of thousands of square kilometres and contain numerous fossils. How did these rocks form? By small, local, catastrophic conditions or a single, global flood situation? If local and spread out over millions of years, why is there a distinct lack of erosion between rock layers?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Evidence for the Flood Part 1 - SC2519]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Evidence for the flood. Sedimentary rock makes up about 75% of the earth's surface - a type of rock primarily laid down by water. Sedimentary rock strata combinations have the same deposition patterns around the world. In addition, single, continuous, layers of sedimentary rock can cover areas stretching hundreds of thousands of square kilometres and contain numerous fossils. How did these rocks form? By small, local, catastrophic conditions or a single, global flood situation? If local and spread out over millions of years, why is there a distinct lack of erosion between rock layers?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2085831/c1e-7znof99j46bd6gw4-254k048rsz80-qdaepo.mp3" length="13762937"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Evidence for the flood. Sedimentary rock makes up about 75% of the earth's surface - a type of rock primarily laid down by water. Sedimentary rock strata combinations have the same deposition patterns around the world. In addition, single, continuous, layers of sedimentary rock can cover areas stretching hundreds of thousands of square kilometres and contain numerous fossils. How did these rocks form? By small, local, catastrophic conditions or a single, global flood situation? If local and spread out over millions of years, why is there a distinct lack of erosion between rock layers?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2085831/c1a-qdxq-254k048vu99v-0osp8a.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:14:20</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Fossil Evidence for Evolution? part 3 - SC2518]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 09:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2079326</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/fossil-evidence-for-evolution-part-3-sc2518</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Fossil evidence for evolution. Many rock layers contain fossils of both extinct species and species that exist today. This presents a fascinating opportunity to see if the species alive today have evolved compared to their fossilised ancestors. Research examining this found no change between the species, despite the assumed age of the fossils being millions of years in the past. If evolution occurred and continues to occur, why haven't the species alive today changed dramatically?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Fossil evidence for evolution. Many rock layers contain fossils of both extinct species and species that exist today. This presents a fascinating opportunity to see if the species alive today have evolved compared to their fossilised ancestors. Research examining this found no change between the species, despite the assumed age of the fossils being millions of years in the past. If evolution occurred and continues to occur, why haven't the species alive today changed dramatically?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Fossil Evidence for Evolution? part 3 - SC2518]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Fossil evidence for evolution. Many rock layers contain fossils of both extinct species and species that exist today. This presents a fascinating opportunity to see if the species alive today have evolved compared to their fossilised ancestors. Research examining this found no change between the species, despite the assumed age of the fossils being millions of years in the past. If evolution occurred and continues to occur, why haven't the species alive today changed dramatically?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2079326/c1e-479wi11jq2bopvqn-qdmnn4g8anq4-snmlzd.mp3" length="14643159"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Fossil evidence for evolution. Many rock layers contain fossils of both extinct species and species that exist today. This presents a fascinating opportunity to see if the species alive today have evolved compared to their fossilised ancestors. Research examining this found no change between the species, despite the assumed age of the fossils being millions of years in the past. If evolution occurred and continues to occur, why haven't the species alive today changed dramatically?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2079326/c1a-qdxq-gp3qqk1ou665-kwrdmv.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:15</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Fossil Evidence for Evolution? part 2 - SC2517]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2075917</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/fossil-evidence-for-evolution-part-2-sc2517</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Fossil evidence for evolution. Certain rock layers contain numerous different fossilised organisms not found in the layers below them. Cambrian rock is a good example of this. Cambrian fossils are all fully-formed species - no intermediates. The layers underneath have no intermediates either, nor evidence of erosion which would suggest missing rock layers. The fully-formed species just suddenly appear in the so-called "Cambrian Explosion". Where are the intermediate fossils? What does this mean for evolution?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Fossil evidence for evolution. Certain rock layers contain numerous different fossilised organisms not found in the layers below them. Cambrian rock is a good example of this. Cambrian fossils are all fully-formed species - no intermediates. The layers underneath have no intermediates either, nor evidence of erosion which would suggest missing rock layers. The fully-formed species just suddenly appear in the so-called "Cambrian Explosion". Where are the intermediate fossils? What does this mean for evolution?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Fossil Evidence for Evolution? part 2 - SC2517]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Fossil evidence for evolution. Certain rock layers contain numerous different fossilised organisms not found in the layers below them. Cambrian rock is a good example of this. Cambrian fossils are all fully-formed species - no intermediates. The layers underneath have no intermediates either, nor evidence of erosion which would suggest missing rock layers. The fully-formed species just suddenly appear in the so-called "Cambrian Explosion". Where are the intermediate fossils? What does this mean for evolution?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2075917/c1e-25owtmm1rdb673vr-dmzqd85nf295-bqazqk.mp3" length="14083094"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Fossil evidence for evolution. Certain rock layers contain numerous different fossilised organisms not found in the layers below them. Cambrian rock is a good example of this. Cambrian fossils are all fully-formed species - no intermediates. The layers underneath have no intermediates either, nor evidence of erosion which would suggest missing rock layers. The fully-formed species just suddenly appear in the so-called "Cambrian Explosion". Where are the intermediate fossils? What does this mean for evolution?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2075917/c1a-qdxq-mk4nq712f8wm-3qnve8.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:14:40</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Fossil Evidence for Evolution? part 1 - SC2516]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2070454</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/fossil-evidence-for-evolution-sc2516</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Fossil evidence for evolution. Evolutionists claim that the fossil record provides the most fundamental evidence that evolution occurred. If evolution did indeed occur, we would expect evidence for this to permeate all levels of investigation in the fossil record - from first glance to the finest details. Assuming the fossil record represents long ages, examples of intermediate species in evolutionary transition should be found captured in the rock layers. But is this actually what we see?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Fossil evidence for evolution. Evolutionists claim that the fossil record provides the most fundamental evidence that evolution occurred. If evolution did indeed occur, we would expect evidence for this to permeate all levels of investigation in the fossil record - from first glance to the finest details. Assuming the fossil record represents long ages, examples of intermediate species in evolutionary transition should be found captured in the rock layers. But is this actually what we see?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Fossil Evidence for Evolution? part 1 - SC2516]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Fossil evidence for evolution. Evolutionists claim that the fossil record provides the most fundamental evidence that evolution occurred. If evolution did indeed occur, we would expect evidence for this to permeate all levels of investigation in the fossil record - from first glance to the finest details. Assuming the fossil record represents long ages, examples of intermediate species in evolutionary transition should be found captured in the rock layers. But is this actually what we see?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2070454/c1e-5zrwf1mj52f0x9jg-1pk689pmbdow-2xk9vm.mp3" length="13123042"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Fossil evidence for evolution. Evolutionists claim that the fossil record provides the most fundamental evidence that evolution occurred. If evolution did indeed occur, we would expect evidence for this to permeate all levels of investigation in the fossil record - from first glance to the finest details. Assuming the fossil record represents long ages, examples of intermediate species in evolutionary transition should be found captured in the rock layers. But is this actually what we see?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2070454/c1a-qdxq-pk4p37k1a5gj-tqcv70.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:13:40</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Fossils and Archaeology part 3 - SC2515]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2062782</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/fossils-and-archaeology-part-3-sc2515</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Fossils and archaeology. Evolutionary assumptions place fossil formation millions of years in the past. However, fossils themselves present some problems with this assumption. Many palaeontologists have now been able to extract soft tissues from fossils, such as proteins, DNA, collagen, red blood cells and haemoglobin. These molecules are very delicate and degrade in 20,000 years or less in average conditions. This evidence is completely at odds with long age theories. Soft tissue molecules, such as DNA, also provide evidence that directly challenges conventional thought about species evolution.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Fossils and archaeology. Evolutionary assumptions place fossil formation millions of years in the past. However, fossils themselves present some problems with this assumption. Many palaeontologists have now been able to extract soft tissues from fossils, such as proteins, DNA, collagen, red blood cells and haemoglobin. These molecules are very delicate and degrade in 20,000 years or less in average conditions. This evidence is completely at odds with long age theories. Soft tissue molecules, such as DNA, also provide evidence that directly challenges conventional thought about species evolution.
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Fossils and Archaeology part 3 - SC2515]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Fossils and archaeology. Evolutionary assumptions place fossil formation millions of years in the past. However, fossils themselves present some problems with this assumption. Many palaeontologists have now been able to extract soft tissues from fossils, such as proteins, DNA, collagen, red blood cells and haemoglobin. These molecules are very delicate and degrade in 20,000 years or less in average conditions. This evidence is completely at odds with long age theories. Soft tissue molecules, such as DNA, also provide evidence that directly challenges conventional thought about species evolution.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2062782/c1e-qdxqid222dc0vm68-rk4xxqqkajpo-irynvb.mp3" length="13443198"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Fossils and archaeology. Evolutionary assumptions place fossil formation millions of years in the past. However, fossils themselves present some problems with this assumption. Many palaeontologists have now been able to extract soft tissues from fossils, such as proteins, DNA, collagen, red blood cells and haemoglobin. These molecules are very delicate and degrade in 20,000 years or less in average conditions. This evidence is completely at odds with long age theories. Soft tissue molecules, such as DNA, also provide evidence that directly challenges conventional thought about species evolution.
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2062782/c1a-qdxq-5zxmmwwzap3k-g5d5nk.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:14:00</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Fossils & Archaeology part 2 - SC2514]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2058845</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/fossils-archaeology-part-2-sc2514</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>The fossil record presents some stunning realities about what life was like on earth in the past. The diversity of life species was extraordinary compared to what we have today. Fossils also tell a story of massive extinction. And the way the fossil record has preserved evidence of these countless different species can only be conceivable through catastrophic conditions. If at first the fossil record seemed to indicate long age rock layer and fossil formation by gradual processes, the evidence that has now accumulated calls this into serious question.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[The fossil record presents some stunning realities about what life was like on earth in the past. The diversity of life species was extraordinary compared to what we have today. Fossils also tell a story of massive extinction. And the way the fossil record has preserved evidence of these countless different species can only be conceivable through catastrophic conditions. If at first the fossil record seemed to indicate long age rock layer and fossil formation by gradual processes, the evidence that has now accumulated calls this into serious question.
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Fossils & Archaeology part 2 - SC2514]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>The fossil record presents some stunning realities about what life was like on earth in the past. The diversity of life species was extraordinary compared to what we have today. Fossils also tell a story of massive extinction. And the way the fossil record has preserved evidence of these countless different species can only be conceivable through catastrophic conditions. If at first the fossil record seemed to indicate long age rock layer and fossil formation by gradual processes, the evidence that has now accumulated calls this into serious question.</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2058845/c1e-6z0xfo1rn2andgj1-z3282zrkt92z-ffurkd.mp3" length="12962963"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[The fossil record presents some stunning realities about what life was like on earth in the past. The diversity of life species was extraordinary compared to what we have today. Fossils also tell a story of massive extinction. And the way the fossil record has preserved evidence of these countless different species can only be conceivable through catastrophic conditions. If at first the fossil record seemed to indicate long age rock layer and fossil formation by gradual processes, the evidence that has now accumulated calls this into serious question.
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2058845/c1a-qdxq-34drdk6msj6w-yvnmin.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:13:30</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Fossils & Archaeology part 1 - SC2513]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2052046</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/fossils-archaeology-part-1-sc2513</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>The fossil record is considered to be the primary foundational evidence that validates evolution. Geologists have thought it seems to paint a picture of long ages and slow gradual processes in which species grew to be more complex over time. This perspective was a foundational viewpoint for Darwin when he developed his evolutionary theory. But is this the picture the fossil record really paints of the past? Are there clues in the fossil record that suggest what happening in the past was very different?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[The fossil record is considered to be the primary foundational evidence that validates evolution. Geologists have thought it seems to paint a picture of long ages and slow gradual processes in which species grew to be more complex over time. This perspective was a foundational viewpoint for Darwin when he developed his evolutionary theory. But is this the picture the fossil record really paints of the past? Are there clues in the fossil record that suggest what happening in the past was very different?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Fossils & Archaeology part 1 - SC2513]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>The fossil record is considered to be the primary foundational evidence that validates evolution. Geologists have thought it seems to paint a picture of long ages and slow gradual processes in which species grew to be more complex over time. This perspective was a foundational viewpoint for Darwin when he developed his evolutionary theory. But is this the picture the fossil record really paints of the past? Are there clues in the fossil record that suggest what happening in the past was very different?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2052046/c1e-v60qb78xd3swz0qr-5zxw1onzbvzr-0ui3qk.mp3" length="11523094"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[The fossil record is considered to be the primary foundational evidence that validates evolution. Geologists have thought it seems to paint a picture of long ages and slow gradual processes in which species grew to be more complex over time. This perspective was a foundational viewpoint for Darwin when he developed his evolutionary theory. But is this the picture the fossil record really paints of the past? Are there clues in the fossil record that suggest what happening in the past was very different?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2052046/c1a-qdxq-1pkw453os92k-drwrjj.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:12:00</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[What Evidence is There for Evolution? part 3 - SC2512]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2040820</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/what-evidence-is-there-for-evolution-part-3-sc2512</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Brand new genetic code needs to be produced for the evolution of new species and types of organisms to occur. This is essential if a bacteria is to become a yeast, a fish to become a salamander or lizard, or for a flying dinosaur to become a bird. How much new and unique genetic code actually needs to be produced to explain the diversity seen in nature? What is the probability of this occurring? What are the implications of distinction trends and processes resulting in a loss of genetic information?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Brand new genetic code needs to be produced for the evolution of new species and types of organisms to occur. This is essential if a bacteria is to become a yeast, a fish to become a salamander or lizard, or for a flying dinosaur to become a bird. How much new and unique genetic code actually needs to be produced to explain the diversity seen in nature? What is the probability of this occurring? What are the implications of distinction trends and processes resulting in a loss of genetic information?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[What Evidence is There for Evolution? part 3 - SC2512]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Brand new genetic code needs to be produced for the evolution of new species and types of organisms to occur. This is essential if a bacteria is to become a yeast, a fish to become a salamander or lizard, or for a flying dinosaur to become a bird. How much new and unique genetic code actually needs to be produced to explain the diversity seen in nature? What is the probability of this occurring? What are the implications of distinction trends and processes resulting in a loss of genetic information?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2040820/c1e-wwnqb3z6d9t0gw59-6zonmnvrtov3-hmrpsu.mp3" length="13299002"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Brand new genetic code needs to be produced for the evolution of new species and types of organisms to occur. This is essential if a bacteria is to become a yeast, a fish to become a salamander or lizard, or for a flying dinosaur to become a bird. How much new and unique genetic code actually needs to be produced to explain the diversity seen in nature? What is the probability of this occurring? What are the implications of distinction trends and processes resulting in a loss of genetic information?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2040820/c1a-qdxq-8drg1g53irxp-2kiyy4.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:13:51</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[What Evidence is There for Evolution? part 2 - SC2511]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2040814</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/what-evidence-is-there-for-evolution-part-2-sc2511</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Evolution that arises from the production of new and viable genetic information is an essential underpinning of Darwin's theory. Richard Dawkins in his book "The Greatest Show on Earth: Evidence for Evolution" provides evidence for this kind of evolution occurring. What does this evidence show? What type of evidence does it provide? What are the implications of this on Darwinian evolution?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Evolution that arises from the production of new and viable genetic information is an essential underpinning of Darwin's theory. Richard Dawkins in his book "The Greatest Show on Earth: Evidence for Evolution" provides evidence for this kind of evolution occurring. What does this evidence show? What type of evidence does it provide? What are the implications of this on Darwinian evolution?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[What Evidence is There for Evolution? part 2 - SC2511]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Evolution that arises from the production of new and viable genetic information is an essential underpinning of Darwin's theory. Richard Dawkins in his book "The Greatest Show on Earth: Evidence for Evolution" provides evidence for this kind of evolution occurring. What does this evidence show? What type of evidence does it provide? What are the implications of this on Darwinian evolution?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2040814/c1e-7znof926gobd6gw4-pk4rorjjf2r-8djdxg.mp3" length="14083094"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Evolution that arises from the production of new and viable genetic information is an essential underpinning of Darwin's theory. Richard Dawkins in his book "The Greatest Show on Earth: Evidence for Evolution" provides evidence for this kind of evolution occurring. What does this evidence show? What type of evidence does it provide? What are the implications of this on Darwinian evolution?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2040814/c1a-qdxq-qdm03044f8wm-psl4hf.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:14:40</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[What Evidence is There For Evolution? pt 1 - SC2510]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2025761</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/what-evidence-is-there-for-evolution-pt-1-sc2510</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Evolution is a broad term that is applied to different processes of change and development within an organism. It is critical to understand the different types of evolution that occur, and the significance, implications and evidence for each, in order to clarify evolutionary theory. In this discussion, the three types of evolution are defined and explained with examples, as the question is examined "Can new types of organisms arise by random mutations?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Evolution is a broad term that is applied to different processes of change and development within an organism. It is critical to understand the different types of evolution that occur, and the significance, implications and evidence for each, in order to clarify evolutionary theory. In this discussion, the three types of evolution are defined and explained with examples, as the question is examined "Can new types of organisms arise by random mutations?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[What Evidence is There For Evolution? pt 1 - SC2510]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Evolution is a broad term that is applied to different processes of change and development within an organism. It is critical to understand the different types of evolution that occur, and the significance, implications and evidence for each, in order to clarify evolutionary theory. In this discussion, the three types of evolution are defined and explained with examples, as the question is examined "Can new types of organisms arise by random mutations?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2025761/c1e-8dm3ioknjgb1dkpo-6zo01dmdf14j-s0mayk.mp3" length="11907198"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Evolution is a broad term that is applied to different processes of change and development within an organism. It is critical to understand the different types of evolution that occur, and the significance, implications and evidence for each, in order to clarify evolutionary theory. In this discussion, the three types of evolution are defined and explained with examples, as the question is examined "Can new types of organisms arise by random mutations?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2025761/c1a-qdxq-okm8w4x4h1w3-gp0q5a.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:12:24</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[How Did Life Form on Earth? part 3 - SC2509]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2021072</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/how-did-life-form-on-earth-part-3-sc2509</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>How did life on earth start? Even the simplest cells are extremely complex. With thousands of molecules involved that have to be in just the right conformation, concentration, and sequence, just getting all the necessary parts of a cell together is an impossible feat. But even if you had all of this, the cell wouldn't be alive. What would it take for the cell to start living? What would it take to stay alive? How probable is it for this to happen by chance?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[How did life on earth start? Even the simplest cells are extremely complex. With thousands of molecules involved that have to be in just the right conformation, concentration, and sequence, just getting all the necessary parts of a cell together is an impossible feat. But even if you had all of this, the cell wouldn't be alive. What would it take for the cell to start living? What would it take to stay alive? How probable is it for this to happen by chance?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[How Did Life Form on Earth? part 3 - SC2509]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>How did life on earth start? Even the simplest cells are extremely complex. With thousands of molecules involved that have to be in just the right conformation, concentration, and sequence, just getting all the necessary parts of a cell together is an impossible feat. But even if you had all of this, the cell wouldn't be alive. What would it take for the cell to start living? What would it take to stay alive? How probable is it for this to happen by chance?</p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2021072/c1e-wwnqb3d9m7f0gw59-mk4w8d44h1v2-bbqtdm.mp3" length="14403251"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[How did life on earth start? Even the simplest cells are extremely complex. With thousands of molecules involved that have to be in just the right conformation, concentration, and sequence, just getting all the necessary parts of a cell together is an impossible feat. But even if you had all of this, the cell wouldn't be alive. What would it take for the cell to start living? What would it take to stay alive? How probable is it for this to happen by chance?
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2021072/c1a-qdxq-v6dpngd4f836-pyqeyd.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:00</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[How Did Life on Earth Start? part 2 - SC2508]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2017355</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/how-did-life-on-earth-start-part-2-sc2508</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>How did life on earth start? When scientists talk about life beginning, they are referring to "simple" life forms or single-celled organisms. But how "simple" are these life forms? We know today that these cells are made of thousands of different parts. What would it take for these molecules to form naturally from elemental atoms? How likely is it for this to occur?</p>
<p>Watch series on Youtube:<br /><a title="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq" href="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6%E2%80%A6O63aUlz98PEggxygq" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq</a></p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[How did life on earth start? When scientists talk about life beginning, they are referring to "simple" life forms or single-celled organisms. But how "simple" are these life forms? We know today that these cells are made of thousands of different parts. What would it take for these molecules to form naturally from elemental atoms? How likely is it for this to occur?
Watch series on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[How Did Life on Earth Start? part 2 - SC2508]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>How did life on earth start? When scientists talk about life beginning, they are referring to "simple" life forms or single-celled organisms. But how "simple" are these life forms? We know today that these cells are made of thousands of different parts. What would it take for these molecules to form naturally from elemental atoms? How likely is it for this to occur?</p>
<p>Watch series on Youtube:<br /><a title="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq" href="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6%E2%80%A6O63aUlz98PEggxygq" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq</a></p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2017355/c1e-dmdrfmrp91spdk51-ndnz0080ix75-xnoonu.mp3" length="14687463"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[How did life on earth start? When scientists talk about life beginning, they are referring to "simple" life forms or single-celled organisms. But how "simple" are these life forms? We know today that these cells are made of thousands of different parts. What would it take for these molecules to form naturally from elemental atoms? How likely is it for this to occur?
Watch series on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2017355/c1a-qdxq-jpd3oomgi28r-mbgnj5.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:17</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[How Did Life on Earth Start? part 1 - SC2507]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2014723</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/how-did-life-on-earth-start-part-1-sc2507</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>How did life on earth start? Evolutionists assert that life began on earth about 3.7-4.5 billion years ago. This is based on radiometric dating of the fossil record and the rock beds they are found in. While this time frame is questionable, a bigger question is how did life arise at that time? Could it have emerged spontaneously from non-living material? Could it have come to earth from outer space?</p>
<p>Watch series on Youtube:<br /><a title="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq" href="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6%E2%80%A6O63aUlz98PEggxygq" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq</a></p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[How did life on earth start? Evolutionists assert that life began on earth about 3.7-4.5 billion years ago. This is based on radiometric dating of the fossil record and the rock beds they are found in. While this time frame is questionable, a bigger question is how did life arise at that time? Could it have emerged spontaneously from non-living material? Could it have come to earth from outer space?
Watch series on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[How Did Life on Earth Start? part 1 - SC2507]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>How did life on earth start? Evolutionists assert that life began on earth about 3.7-4.5 billion years ago. This is based on radiometric dating of the fossil record and the rock beds they are found in. While this time frame is questionable, a bigger question is how did life arise at that time? Could it have emerged spontaneously from non-living material? Could it have come to earth from outer space?</p>
<p>Watch series on Youtube:<br /><a title="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq" href="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6%E2%80%A6O63aUlz98PEggxygq" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq</a></p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2014723/c1e-8dm3iorg46f1dkpo-25nnnrznuvwr-vdoutk.mp3" length="9123172"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[How did life on earth start? Evolutionists assert that life began on earth about 3.7-4.5 billion years ago. This is based on radiometric dating of the fossil record and the rock beds they are found in. While this time frame is questionable, a bigger question is how did life arise at that time? Could it have emerged spontaneously from non-living material? Could it have come to earth from outer space?
Watch series on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2014723/c1a-qdxq-dmzzz9q2s970-gu8mqw.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:09:30</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[What Was Darwin's Theory of Evolution Really About? part 3 - SC2506]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 03:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2014716</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/what-was-darwins-theory-of-evolution-really-about-part-3-sc2506</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>What is the evidence for evolution? Darwin's belief about human evolution was influenced by Thomas H. Huxley, who proposed that humans descended from apes. This was evident to Darwin because of the anatomical similarities shared between humans and apes. Darwin also was persuaded that humans descended from fish, based on the notion that the embryonic state of each species indicates the structure of their less developed ancient progenitors. At that time, it was assumed that the embryos of many different species were fish-like. Subsequent scientific research has given evidence that these ideas are highly inconclusive at best, and in the case of the embryos, false.</p>
<p>Watch series on Youtube:<br /><a title="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq" href="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6%E2%80%A6O63aUlz98PEggxygq" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq</a></p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[What is the evidence for evolution? Darwin's belief about human evolution was influenced by Thomas H. Huxley, who proposed that humans descended from apes. This was evident to Darwin because of the anatomical similarities shared between humans and apes. Darwin also was persuaded that humans descended from fish, based on the notion that the embryonic state of each species indicates the structure of their less developed ancient progenitors. At that time, it was assumed that the embryos of many different species were fish-like. Subsequent scientific research has given evidence that these ideas are highly inconclusive at best, and in the case of the embryos, false.
Watch series on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[What Was Darwin's Theory of Evolution Really About? part 3 - SC2506]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>What is the evidence for evolution? Darwin's belief about human evolution was influenced by Thomas H. Huxley, who proposed that humans descended from apes. This was evident to Darwin because of the anatomical similarities shared between humans and apes. Darwin also was persuaded that humans descended from fish, based on the notion that the embryonic state of each species indicates the structure of their less developed ancient progenitors. At that time, it was assumed that the embryos of many different species were fish-like. Subsequent scientific research has given evidence that these ideas are highly inconclusive at best, and in the case of the embryos, false.</p>
<p>Watch series on Youtube:<br /><a title="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq" href="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6%E2%80%A6O63aUlz98PEggxygq" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq</a></p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2014716/c1e-rkoqfwx03qi2k3d6-5zxxxmgvc160-brsk36.mp3" length="9330898"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[What is the evidence for evolution? Darwin's belief about human evolution was influenced by Thomas H. Huxley, who proposed that humans descended from apes. This was evident to Darwin because of the anatomical similarities shared between humans and apes. Darwin also was persuaded that humans descended from fish, based on the notion that the embryonic state of each species indicates the structure of their less developed ancient progenitors. At that time, it was assumed that the embryos of many different species were fish-like. Subsequent scientific research has given evidence that these ideas are highly inconclusive at best, and in the case of the embryos, false.
Watch series on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2014716/c1a-qdxq-rk444x0miqrx-ifdzmj.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:09:43</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[What Was Darwin's Theory of Evolution Really About? part 2 - SC2505]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 03:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2014660</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/what-was-darwins-theory-of-evolution-really-about-part-2-sc2505</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>What is the evidence for evolution? Biologists have worked hard through the one and a half centuries since Darwin published his theory of evolution to gather supporting evidence for it. Much of the initial evidence was rooted in the fossil record, which suggested species evolution from lower to more advanced organisms in context of a long age time reference. Evolutionary links between species were assumed based on skeletal and physical similarities, and stemmed back from an unknown universal common ancestor. But the understanding of genetics has challenged these initial views due to the surprising and unlikely gene matches that have been discovered. This leaves the accumulated evidence for Darwin's tree of life model in a conflicted position.</p>
<p>Watch series on Youtube:<br /><a title="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq" href="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6%E2%80%A6O63aUlz98PEggxygq" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq</a></p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[What is the evidence for evolution? Biologists have worked hard through the one and a half centuries since Darwin published his theory of evolution to gather supporting evidence for it. Much of the initial evidence was rooted in the fossil record, which suggested species evolution from lower to more advanced organisms in context of a long age time reference. Evolutionary links between species were assumed based on skeletal and physical similarities, and stemmed back from an unknown universal common ancestor. But the understanding of genetics has challenged these initial views due to the surprising and unlikely gene matches that have been discovered. This leaves the accumulated evidence for Darwin's tree of life model in a conflicted position.
Watch series on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[What Was Darwin's Theory of Evolution Really About? part 2 - SC2505]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>What is the evidence for evolution? Biologists have worked hard through the one and a half centuries since Darwin published his theory of evolution to gather supporting evidence for it. Much of the initial evidence was rooted in the fossil record, which suggested species evolution from lower to more advanced organisms in context of a long age time reference. Evolutionary links between species were assumed based on skeletal and physical similarities, and stemmed back from an unknown universal common ancestor. But the understanding of genetics has challenged these initial views due to the surprising and unlikely gene matches that have been discovered. This leaves the accumulated evidence for Darwin's tree of life model in a conflicted position.</p>
<p>Watch series on Youtube:<br /><a title="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq" href="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6%E2%80%A6O63aUlz98PEggxygq" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq</a></p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2014660/c1e-6z0xfo5081fndgj1-1pkkk3r8umm-m2toue.mp3" length="12483146"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[What is the evidence for evolution? Biologists have worked hard through the one and a half centuries since Darwin published his theory of evolution to gather supporting evidence for it. Much of the initial evidence was rooted in the fossil record, which suggested species evolution from lower to more advanced organisms in context of a long age time reference. Evolutionary links between species were assumed based on skeletal and physical similarities, and stemmed back from an unknown universal common ancestor. But the understanding of genetics has challenged these initial views due to the surprising and unlikely gene matches that have been discovered. This leaves the accumulated evidence for Darwin's tree of life model in a conflicted position.
Watch series on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2014660/c1a-qdxq-gp333g5rf28-nt2axl.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:13:00</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[What Was Darwin's Theory of Evolution Really About? part 1 - SC2504]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 03:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2014657</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/what-was-darwins-theory-of-evolution-really-about-part-1-sc2504</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>What is the evidence for evolution? Darwin was a keen and thoughtful observer of the things around him. Influenced by the mechanistic mindset of his time, Darwin sought to understand and explain the diversity of species and their traits through natural processes. This investigation led him to develop his concept of natural selection, which combined with a long-age time reference, became his theory of evolution.</p>
<p>Watch series on Youtube:<br /><a title="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq" href="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6%E2%80%A6O63aUlz98PEggxygq" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq</a></p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[What is the evidence for evolution? Darwin was a keen and thoughtful observer of the things around him. Influenced by the mechanistic mindset of his time, Darwin sought to understand and explain the diversity of species and their traits through natural processes. This investigation led him to develop his concept of natural selection, which combined with a long-age time reference, became his theory of evolution.
Watch series on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[What Was Darwin's Theory of Evolution Really About? part 1 - SC2504]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>What is the evidence for evolution? Darwin was a keen and thoughtful observer of the things around him. Influenced by the mechanistic mindset of his time, Darwin sought to understand and explain the diversity of species and their traits through natural processes. This investigation led him to develop his concept of natural selection, which combined with a long-age time reference, became his theory of evolution.</p>
<p>Watch series on Youtube:<br /><a title="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq" href="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6%E2%80%A6O63aUlz98PEggxygq" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq</a></p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:<br /><a title="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" href="https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2014657/c1e-dmdrfmrzxrapdk51-25nnnjp8ijpq-k0jk1t.mp3" length="12483146"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[What is the evidence for evolution? Darwin was a keen and thoughtful observer of the things around him. Influenced by the mechanistic mindset of his time, Darwin sought to understand and explain the diversity of species and their traits through natural processes. This investigation led him to develop his concept of natural selection, which combined with a long-age time reference, became his theory of evolution.
Watch series on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq
Check out our other podcasts:studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2014657/c1a-qdxq-pk44465nfd9o-pwffbm.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:13:00</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Is Evolution a Fact? part 3 - SC2503]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 02:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2014645</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/is-evolution-a-fact-part-3-sc2503</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Is Evolution a fact? Has evolution ever been observed in action? Does the fossil record reflect the evolutionary process? Is there any case where species mutations naturally gain genetic information? The short answer is No. How do evolutionary scientists respond to this? Where does this leave evolution?</p>
<p>Watch seried on Youtube:<br /><a title="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq" href="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6%E2%80%A6O63aUlz98PEggxygq" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq</a></p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:</p>
<p><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Is Evolution a fact? Has evolution ever been observed in action? Does the fossil record reflect the evolutionary process? Is there any case where species mutations naturally gain genetic information? The short answer is No. How do evolutionary scientists respond to this? Where does this leave evolution?
Watch seried on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq
Check out our other podcasts:
https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Is Evolution a Fact? part 3 - SC2503]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Is Evolution a fact? Has evolution ever been observed in action? Does the fossil record reflect the evolutionary process? Is there any case where species mutations naturally gain genetic information? The short answer is No. How do evolutionary scientists respond to this? Where does this leave evolution?</p>
<p>Watch seried on Youtube:<br /><a title="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq" href="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6%E2%80%A6O63aUlz98PEggxygq" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq</a></p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:</p>
<p><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2014645/c1e-z3oqb72op1iok6d3-47kkk9vda15v-i5tjh5.mp3" length="14610976"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Is Evolution a fact? Has evolution ever been observed in action? Does the fossil record reflect the evolutionary process? Is there any case where species mutations naturally gain genetic information? The short answer is No. How do evolutionary scientists respond to this? Where does this leave evolution?
Watch seried on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq
Check out our other podcasts:
https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2014645/c1a-qdxq-7z333nq2a674-h4kmkq.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:13</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Is Evolution a Fact? part 2 - SC2502]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 02:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2014638</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/is-evolution-a-fact-part-2-sc2502</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Is evolution a fact? Evolution has a zero probability, yet it is regarded as an "inescapable fact". Is there any real world evidence that show life forms evolving from primitive organisms? Mathematically, the probability of this has been deemed impossible. Some have even acknowledged that "no one knows how it [evolution] works". How then is evolutionary theory maintaining a foothold? Watch this video to get some clear answers.</p>
<p>Watch series on Youtube:<br /><a title="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq" href="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6%E2%80%A6O63aUlz98PEggxygq" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq</a></p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:</p>
<p><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists</a></p>
<p> </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Is evolution a fact? Evolution has a zero probability, yet it is regarded as an "inescapable fact". Is there any real world evidence that show life forms evolving from primitive organisms? Mathematically, the probability of this has been deemed impossible. Some have even acknowledged that "no one knows how it [evolution] works". How then is evolutionary theory maintaining a foothold? Watch this video to get some clear answers.
Watch series on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq
Check out our other podcasts:
https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists
 ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Is Evolution a Fact? part 2 - SC2502]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Is evolution a fact? Evolution has a zero probability, yet it is regarded as an "inescapable fact". Is there any real world evidence that show life forms evolving from primitive organisms? Mathematically, the probability of this has been deemed impossible. Some have even acknowledged that "no one knows how it [evolution] works". How then is evolutionary theory maintaining a foothold? Watch this video to get some clear answers.</p>
<p>Watch series on Youtube:<br /><a title="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq" href="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6%E2%80%A6O63aUlz98PEggxygq" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq</a></p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:</p>
<p><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists</a></p>
<p> </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2014638/c1e-9j29id3v5dsdvq42-pk4448goupo-dwelpd.mp3" length="12195172"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Is evolution a fact? Evolution has a zero probability, yet it is regarded as an "inescapable fact". Is there any real world evidence that show life forms evolving from primitive organisms? Mathematically, the probability of this has been deemed impossible. Some have even acknowledged that "no one knows how it [evolution] works". How then is evolutionary theory maintaining a foothold? Watch this video to get some clear answers.
Watch series on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq
Check out our other podcasts:
https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists
 ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2014638/c1a-qdxq-1pkkkx43t8kj-z9wyfg.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:12:42</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Is Evolution a Fact? part 1 - SC2501]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 01:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/6387/episode/2014627</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/is-evolution-a-fact-part-1-sc2501</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Is evolution a fact? Many people think so, and it's easy to see why, considering how widely this idea is taught. But does what seems irrefutable have strong underpinning evidence? How much of the evidence needed to establish evolution as an unequivocal fact do we actually have?</p>
<p>Watch on Youtube:<br /><a title="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL65y7saKkuQ1oAmIO63aUlz98PEggxygq" href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL65y7saKkuQ1oAmIO63aUlz98PEggxygq" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq</a></p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:</p>
<p><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists</a></p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Is evolution a fact? Many people think so, and it's easy to see why, considering how widely this idea is taught. But does what seems irrefutable have strong underpinning evidence? How much of the evidence needed to establish evolution as an unequivocal fact do we actually have?
Watch on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq
Check out our other podcasts:
https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Is Evolution a Fact? part 1 - SC2501]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Is evolution a fact? Many people think so, and it's easy to see why, considering how widely this idea is taught. But does what seems irrefutable have strong underpinning evidence? How much of the evidence needed to establish evolution as an unequivocal fact do we actually have?</p>
<p>Watch on Youtube:<br /><a title="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL65y7saKkuQ1oAmIO63aUlz98PEggxygq" href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL65y7saKkuQ1oAmIO63aUlz98PEggxygq" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq</a></p>
<p>Check out our other podcasts:</p>
<p><a title="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" href="https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists</a></p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/2014627/c1e-kp58cgzk35a94wz6-47kkkojxu668-zt9y39.mp3" length="10771185"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Is evolution a fact? Many people think so, and it's easy to see why, considering how widely this idea is taught. But does what seems irrefutable have strong underpinning evidence? How much of the evidence needed to establish evolution as an unequivocal fact do we actually have?
Watch on Youtube:www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6…O63aUlz98PEggxygq
Check out our other podcasts:
https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/2014627/c1a-qdxq-47kkkojmf8rv-ysj0nt.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:11:13</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[A Summary of Why Scientific Evidence Makes Evolution Impossible - 1513]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 05:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/podcasts/6387/episodes/a-summary-of-why-scientific-evidence-makes-evolution-impossible-1513</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/a-summary-of-why-scientific-evidence-makes-evolution-impossible-1513</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Over the last twelve programs, Dr. Ashton has been explaining why scientific evidence makes evolution impossible. Today, Dr. Ashton will summarise the evidence before telling us why he is a Christian and something of his life and work.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Over the last twelve programs, Dr. Ashton has been explaining why scientific evidence makes evolution impossible. Today, Dr. Ashton will summarise the evidence before telling us why he is a Christian and something of his life and work.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[A Summary of Why Scientific Evidence Makes Evolution Impossible - 1513]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Over the last twelve programs, Dr. Ashton has been explaining why scientific evidence makes evolution impossible. Today, Dr. Ashton will summarise the evidence before telling us why he is a Christian and something of his life and work.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/R-SC01513-J-Ashton-Final-Podcast.mp3" length="54483030"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Over the last twelve programs, Dr. Ashton has been explaining why scientific evidence makes evolution impossible. Today, Dr. Ashton will summarise the evidence before telling us why he is a Christian and something of his life and work.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/R-SC-SC1400.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:56:45</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Is There Such a Thing As An Intervening God? - 1512]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/podcasts/6387/episodes/is-there-such-a-thing-as-an-intervening-god-1512</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/is-there-such-a-thing-as-an-intervening-god-1512</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Dr. Ashton is going to explore evidence for the existence of an intervening God.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode, Dr. Ashton is going to explore evidence for the existence of an intervening God.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Is There Such a Thing As An Intervening God? - 1512]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Dr. Ashton is going to explore evidence for the existence of an intervening God.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/R-SC01512-J-Ashton-Final-Podcast.mp3" length="56403134"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode, Dr. Ashton is going to explore evidence for the existence of an intervening God.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/R-SC-SC1400.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:58:45</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Are There any Scientists that Believe in Creation? - 1511]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2015 23:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/podcasts/6387/episodes/are-there-any-scientists-that-believe-in-creation-1511</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/are-there-any-scientists-that-believe-in-creation-1511</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In today's episode, Dr. Ashton is going to review the work of a number of scientists who believe in creation.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In today's episode, Dr. Ashton is going to review the work of a number of scientists who believe in creation.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Are There any Scientists that Believe in Creation? - 1511]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In today's episode, Dr. Ashton is going to review the work of a number of scientists who believe in creation.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/R-SC01511-J-Ashton-Final-Podcast.mp3" length="56403134"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In today's episode, Dr. Ashton is going to review the work of a number of scientists who believe in creation.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/R-SC-SC1400.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:58:45</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[How Accurate is Carbon 14 Dating? - 1510]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2015 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/podcasts/6387/episodes/how-accurate-is-carbon-14-dating-1510</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/how-accurate-is-carbon-14-dating-1510</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Dr. Ashton will address briefly the accuracy of Carbon 14 dating before outlining problems with the Big-Bang model.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode, Dr. Ashton will address briefly the accuracy of Carbon 14 dating before outlining problems with the Big-Bang model.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[How Accurate is Carbon 14 Dating? - 1510]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Dr. Ashton will address briefly the accuracy of Carbon 14 dating before outlining problems with the Big-Bang model.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/R-SC01510-J-Ashton-Final-Podcast.mp3" length="56403134"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode, Dr. Ashton will address briefly the accuracy of Carbon 14 dating before outlining problems with the Big-Bang model.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/R-SC-SC1400.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:58:45</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Is There a Problem With Radiometric Dating? - 1509]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/podcasts/6387/episodes/is-there-a-problem-with-radiometric-dating-1509</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/is-there-a-problem-with-radiometric-dating-1509</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>This episodes examines erosion rates, sedimentation rates and other evidence in conflict with radiometric dating ages. We’ll also begin to discuss problems with radiometric dating.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This episodes examines erosion rates, sedimentation rates and other evidence in conflict with radiometric dating ages. We’ll also begin to discuss problems with radiometric dating.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Is There a Problem With Radiometric Dating? - 1509]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>This episodes examines erosion rates, sedimentation rates and other evidence in conflict with radiometric dating ages. We’ll also begin to discuss problems with radiometric dating.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/R-SC01509-J-Ashton-Final-Podcast.mp3" length="56403134"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This episodes examines erosion rates, sedimentation rates and other evidence in conflict with radiometric dating ages. We’ll also begin to discuss problems with radiometric dating.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/R-SC-SC1400.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:58:45</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Is There Any Historical Evidence For a Worldwide Flood? - 1508]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 23:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/podcasts/6387/episodes/is-there-any-historical-evidence-for-a-worldwide-flood-1508</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/is-there-any-historical-evidence-for-a-worldwide-flood-1508</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>This episode examines the historical evidence for a worldwide flood.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This episode examines the historical evidence for a worldwide flood.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Is There Any Historical Evidence For a Worldwide Flood? - 1508]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>This episode examines the historical evidence for a worldwide flood.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/R-SC01508-J-Ashton-Final-Podcast.mp3" length="56403134"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This episode examines the historical evidence for a worldwide flood.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/R-SC-SC1400.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:58:45</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Is There Any Geological Evidence of a Catastrophic Global Flood? - 1507]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 23:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/podcasts/6387/episodes/is-there-any-geological-evidence-of-a-catastrophic-global-flood-1507</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/is-there-any-geological-evidence-of-a-catastrophic-global-flood-1507</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>This episode examines the geological evidence for a catastrophic global flood.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This episode examines the geological evidence for a catastrophic global flood.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Is There Any Geological Evidence of a Catastrophic Global Flood? - 1507]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>This episode examines the geological evidence for a catastrophic global flood.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/R-SC01507-J-Ashton-Final-Podcast.mp3" length="56403134"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This episode examines the geological evidence for a catastrophic global flood.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/R-SC-SC1400.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:58:45</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Is There Any Evidence of Fossil Intermediates? - 1506]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/podcasts/6387/episodes/is-there-any-evidence-of-fossil-intermediates-1506</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/is-there-any-evidence-of-fossil-intermediates-1506</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>This episode continues the examination of the fossil record. We will find that there are no fossil intermediates, a further indication that evolution never occurred.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This episode continues the examination of the fossil record. We will find that there are no fossil intermediates, a further indication that evolution never occurred.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Is There Any Evidence of Fossil Intermediates? - 1506]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>This episode continues the examination of the fossil record. We will find that there are no fossil intermediates, a further indication that evolution never occurred.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/R-SC01506-J-Ashton-Final-Podcast.mp3" length="55203174"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This episode continues the examination of the fossil record. We will find that there are no fossil intermediates, a further indication that evolution never occurred.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/R-SC-SC1400.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:57:30</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Are Fossils Evidence for Evolution? - 1505]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/podcasts/6387/episodes/are-fossils-evidence-for-evolution-1505</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/are-fossils-evidence-for-evolution-1505</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>This episode examines the reasons why the fossil record is evidence for extinction, not evolution.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This episode examines the reasons why the fossil record is evidence for extinction, not evolution.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Are Fossils Evidence for Evolution? - 1505]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>This episode examines the reasons why the fossil record is evidence for extinction, not evolution.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/R-SC01505-J-Ashton-Final-Podcast.mp3" length="56403134"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This episode examines the reasons why the fossil record is evidence for extinction, not evolution.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/R-SC-SC1400.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:58:45</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[New Organisms From Random Mutations? - 1504]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2015 22:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/podcasts/6387/episodes/new-organisms-from-random-mutations-1504</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/new-organisms-from-random-mutations-1504</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>This episode examines the reasons why new types of organisms cannot evolve by random mutations.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This episode examines the reasons why new types of organisms cannot evolve by random mutations.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[New Organisms From Random Mutations? - 1504]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>This episode examines the reasons why new types of organisms cannot evolve by random mutations.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/R-SC01504-J-Ashton-Final-Podcast.mp3" length="56403134"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This episode examines the reasons why new types of organisms cannot evolve by random mutations.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/R-SC-SC1400.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:58:45</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Living Cells - Arisen by Chance? - 1503]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2015 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/podcasts/6387/episodes/living-cells-arisen-by-chance-1503</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/living-cells-arisen-by-chance-1503</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>This episode examines why a living cell cannot arise by chance.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This episode examines why a living cell cannot arise by chance.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Living Cells - Arisen by Chance? - 1503]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>This episode examines why a living cell cannot arise by chance.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/R-SC01503-J-Ashton-Final-Podcast.mp3" length="56403134"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This episode examines why a living cell cannot arise by chance.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/R-SC-SC1400.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:58:45</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Evolution? Where Does the Evidence Lead? - 1502]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/podcasts/6387/episodes/evolution-where-does-the-evidence-lead-1502</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/evolution-where-does-the-evidence-lead-1502</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>This episode explores Darwin's Theory of evolution, to better understand the theory and to see where the evidence leads.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This episode explores Darwin's Theory of evolution, to better understand the theory and to see where the evidence leads.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Evolution? Where Does the Evidence Lead? - 1502]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>This episode explores Darwin's Theory of evolution, to better understand the theory and to see where the evidence leads.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/R-SC01502-J-Ashton-Final-Podcast.mp3" length="54483030"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This episode explores Darwin's Theory of evolution, to better understand the theory and to see where the evidence leads.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/R-SC-SC1400.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:56:45</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Isn't Evolution a Fact? - 1501]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 23:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>3ABN Australia Radio</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/podcasts/6387/episodes/isn39t-evolution-a-fact-1501</guid>
                                    <link>https://3abnau-sc.castos.com/episodes/isn39t-evolution-a-fact-1501</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>This episode looks at the background of the book "Evolution Impossible: 12 Reasons Why Evolution Cannot Explain the Origin of Life on Earth". We will also hear about Dr John Ashton's personal story of faith.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This episode looks at the background of the book "Evolution Impossible: 12 Reasons Why Evolution Cannot Explain the Origin of Life on Earth". We will also hear about Dr John Ashton's personal story of faith.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Isn't Evolution a Fact? - 1501]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
                                                    <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>This episode looks at the background of the book "Evolution Impossible: 12 Reasons Why Evolution Cannot Explain the Origin of Life on Earth". We will also hear about Dr John Ashton's personal story of faith.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/R-SC01501-J-Ashton-Final-Podcast.mp3" length="55922899"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This episode looks at the background of the book "Evolution Impossible: 12 Reasons Why Evolution Cannot Explain the Origin of Life on Earth". We will also hear about Dr John Ashton's personal story of faith.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/5e6eee2aead991-85588515/images/R-SC-SC1400.jpg"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:58:15</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[3ABN Australia Radio]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>
