<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:spotify="http://www.spotify.com/ns/rss">
    <channel>
        <title>Action Juice</title>
        <generator>Castos</generator>
        <atom:link href="https://feeds.castos.com/nnzv3" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://actionjuice.castos.com</link>
        <description>A weekly podcast covering action movies and more, from the classics to new releases. The hosts, Will and Isaac, have dedicated their lives to all things blank and squib. For them, the action (genre) is the juice. </description>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 01:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>© 2022</copyright>
        
        <spotify:limit recentCount="25" />
        
        <spotify:countryOfOrigin>
              
        </spotify:countryOfOrigin>
                    
                <itunes:subtitle>A weekly podcast covering action movies and more, from the classics to new releases. The hosts, Will and Isaac, have dedicated their lives to all things blank and squib. For them, the action (genre) is the juice. </itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:author>Action Juice</itunes:author>
        <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
        <itunes:summary>A weekly podcast covering action movies and more, from the classics to new releases. The hosts, Will and Isaac, have dedicated their lives to all things blank and squib. For them, the action (genre) is the juice. </itunes:summary>
        <itunes:owner>
            <itunes:name>Will</itunes:name>
            <itunes:email>wstocker1990@gmail.com</itunes:email>
        </itunes:owner>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/62fd09a55a2ba4-12222585/images/AJ-Podcast-1-Compressed.jpg"></itunes:image>
        
                                    <itunes:category text="TV &amp; Film">
                                            <itunes:category text="Film Reviews" />
                                            <itunes:category text="Film History" />
                                    </itunes:category>
                    
                    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.castos.com/nnzv3</itunes:new-feed-url>
                
        
        <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
                                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Revisiting the 95th Academy Awards One Year Later | AJP #15]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Action Juice</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/43906/episode/1684114</guid>
                                    <link>https://actionjuice.castos.com/episodes/revisiting-the-95th-academy-awards-one-year-later-ajp-15</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>With the 96th Academy Awards airing tonight (March 10), we thought we'd jump back a year and revisit the 95th edition. After all, it ended up being largely a one-movie show, with <em>Everything Everywhere All at Once </em>nearly sweeping the major categories - something that didn't really sit right with us. So, here are our thoughts on the 2023 Oscars and who we thought should've taken home gold.</p>
<p>If you want, check out our website: <a href="https://actionjuicebox.com/">https://actionjuicebox.com</a> and our social media accounts (@ActionJuicePod)</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introduction</p>
<p>00:24 - <strong>Fact/Off </strong>-- Our movie mini-game where D challenges Isaac and Will's knowledge of each other's film preferences. It's kind of like The Newlywed Game, but (somewhat) less romantic.</p>
<p>26:58 - We begin our revisit to last year's 95th Academy Awards</p>
<p>1:39:43 - Conclusion</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[With the 96th Academy Awards airing tonight (March 10), we thought we'd jump back a year and revisit the 95th edition. After all, it ended up being largely a one-movie show, with Everything Everywhere All at Once nearly sweeping the major categories - something that didn't really sit right with us. So, here are our thoughts on the 2023 Oscars and who we thought should've taken home gold.
If you want, check out our website: https://actionjuicebox.com and our social media accounts (@ActionJuicePod)
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introduction
00:24 - Fact/Off -- Our movie mini-game where D challenges Isaac and Will's knowledge of each other's film preferences. It's kind of like The Newlywed Game, but (somewhat) less romantic.
26:58 - We begin our revisit to last year's 95th Academy Awards
1:39:43 - Conclusion]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Revisiting the 95th Academy Awards One Year Later | AJP #15]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>With the 96th Academy Awards airing tonight (March 10), we thought we'd jump back a year and revisit the 95th edition. After all, it ended up being largely a one-movie show, with <em>Everything Everywhere All at Once </em>nearly sweeping the major categories - something that didn't really sit right with us. So, here are our thoughts on the 2023 Oscars and who we thought should've taken home gold.</p>
<p>If you want, check out our website: <a href="https://actionjuicebox.com/">https://actionjuicebox.com</a> and our social media accounts (@ActionJuicePod)</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introduction</p>
<p>00:24 - <strong>Fact/Off </strong>-- Our movie mini-game where D challenges Isaac and Will's knowledge of each other's film preferences. It's kind of like The Newlywed Game, but (somewhat) less romantic.</p>
<p>26:58 - We begin our revisit to last year's 95th Academy Awards</p>
<p>1:39:43 - Conclusion</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/62fd09a55a2ba4-12222585/1684114/c1e-rgv86ujx662c7vxd9-04mzxq76srq0-pg9yoo.mp3" length="193782067"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[With the 96th Academy Awards airing tonight (March 10), we thought we'd jump back a year and revisit the 95th edition. After all, it ended up being largely a one-movie show, with Everything Everywhere All at Once nearly sweeping the major categories - something that didn't really sit right with us. So, here are our thoughts on the 2023 Oscars and who we thought should've taken home gold.
If you want, check out our website: https://actionjuicebox.com and our social media accounts (@ActionJuicePod)
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introduction
00:24 - Fact/Off -- Our movie mini-game where D challenges Isaac and Will's knowledge of each other's film preferences. It's kind of like The Newlywed Game, but (somewhat) less romantic.
26:58 - We begin our revisit to last year's 95th Academy Awards
1:39:43 - Conclusion]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>01:40:55</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Action Juice]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Echo 3 Goes Weapons Free on Apple TV | AJP #14]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Action Juice</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/43906/episode/1657881</guid>
                                    <link>https://actionjuice.castos.com/episodes/echo-3-apple-tvs-forgotten-prestige-action-show-ajp-14</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>When it was announced that Mark Boal, the award-winning writer of films like <em>The Hurt Locker </em>and <em>Zero Dark Thirty</em>, was creating a show for Apple TV+, we were incredibly excited and knew we had to cover it here on the pod. Titled <em>Echo 3</em>, this series follows "Bambi" (Luke Evans) and "Prince" (Michiel Huisman), two US Special Forces operators who set out to Colombia in order to rescue Amber (Jessica Ann Collins), Bambi's sister and Prince's wife. Kidnapped and suspected to be a CIA agent, Amber is being transported to the Venezuelan border, and once across, rescuing her will become a daunting challenge. And so, Bambi and Prince waste no time to lock, load, and let bullets fly.</p>
<p>We're back! It's been nearly a year since our last upload, which was longer than we planned on, but life gets in the way sometimes. But, hey, we're here now and we have many episodes coming down the pike. Some of these episodes, like this one, were pre-recorded a while ago, but most are new and we're eager to share them with you. If you're an old listener who's still here, thank you for your patience and we hope you stick with us.</p>
<p>If you want, check out our website: <a href="https://actionjuicebox.com/">https://actionjuicebox.com</a> and our social media accounts (@ActionJuicePod)</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introduction</p>
<p>01:19 - Our <em>Echo 3</em> discussion begins with a spoiler-free synopsis and review</p>
<p>16:57 - We kick off a long, spoiler-filled synopsis and review of <em>Echo 3</em></p>
<p>1:42:05 - Conclusion</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[When it was announced that Mark Boal, the award-winning writer of films like The Hurt Locker and Zero Dark Thirty, was creating a show for Apple TV+, we were incredibly excited and knew we had to cover it here on the pod. Titled Echo 3, this series follows "Bambi" (Luke Evans) and "Prince" (Michiel Huisman), two US Special Forces operators who set out to Colombia in order to rescue Amber (Jessica Ann Collins), Bambi's sister and Prince's wife. Kidnapped and suspected to be a CIA agent, Amber is being transported to the Venezuelan border, and once across, rescuing her will become a daunting challenge. And so, Bambi and Prince waste no time to lock, load, and let bullets fly.
We're back! It's been nearly a year since our last upload, which was longer than we planned on, but life gets in the way sometimes. But, hey, we're here now and we have many episodes coming down the pike. Some of these episodes, like this one, were pre-recorded a while ago, but most are new and we're eager to share them with you. If you're an old listener who's still here, thank you for your patience and we hope you stick with us.
If you want, check out our website: https://actionjuicebox.com and our social media accounts (@ActionJuicePod)
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introduction
01:19 - Our Echo 3 discussion begins with a spoiler-free synopsis and review
16:57 - We kick off a long, spoiler-filled synopsis and review of Echo 3
1:42:05 - Conclusion]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Echo 3 Goes Weapons Free on Apple TV | AJP #14]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>When it was announced that Mark Boal, the award-winning writer of films like <em>The Hurt Locker </em>and <em>Zero Dark Thirty</em>, was creating a show for Apple TV+, we were incredibly excited and knew we had to cover it here on the pod. Titled <em>Echo 3</em>, this series follows "Bambi" (Luke Evans) and "Prince" (Michiel Huisman), two US Special Forces operators who set out to Colombia in order to rescue Amber (Jessica Ann Collins), Bambi's sister and Prince's wife. Kidnapped and suspected to be a CIA agent, Amber is being transported to the Venezuelan border, and once across, rescuing her will become a daunting challenge. And so, Bambi and Prince waste no time to lock, load, and let bullets fly.</p>
<p>We're back! It's been nearly a year since our last upload, which was longer than we planned on, but life gets in the way sometimes. But, hey, we're here now and we have many episodes coming down the pike. Some of these episodes, like this one, were pre-recorded a while ago, but most are new and we're eager to share them with you. If you're an old listener who's still here, thank you for your patience and we hope you stick with us.</p>
<p>If you want, check out our website: <a href="https://actionjuicebox.com/">https://actionjuicebox.com</a> and our social media accounts (@ActionJuicePod)</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introduction</p>
<p>01:19 - Our <em>Echo 3</em> discussion begins with a spoiler-free synopsis and review</p>
<p>16:57 - We kick off a long, spoiler-filled synopsis and review of <em>Echo 3</em></p>
<p>1:42:05 - Conclusion</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/62fd09a55a2ba4-12222585/1657881/c1e-m9mn6hzrxq5hg1v3z-zo7w18gmf9d8-kqsui9.mp3" length="198541363"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[When it was announced that Mark Boal, the award-winning writer of films like The Hurt Locker and Zero Dark Thirty, was creating a show for Apple TV+, we were incredibly excited and knew we had to cover it here on the pod. Titled Echo 3, this series follows "Bambi" (Luke Evans) and "Prince" (Michiel Huisman), two US Special Forces operators who set out to Colombia in order to rescue Amber (Jessica Ann Collins), Bambi's sister and Prince's wife. Kidnapped and suspected to be a CIA agent, Amber is being transported to the Venezuelan border, and once across, rescuing her will become a daunting challenge. And so, Bambi and Prince waste no time to lock, load, and let bullets fly.
We're back! It's been nearly a year since our last upload, which was longer than we planned on, but life gets in the way sometimes. But, hey, we're here now and we have many episodes coming down the pike. Some of these episodes, like this one, were pre-recorded a while ago, but most are new and we're eager to share them with you. If you're an old listener who's still here, thank you for your patience and we hope you stick with us.
If you want, check out our website: https://actionjuicebox.com and our social media accounts (@ActionJuicePod)
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introduction
01:19 - Our Echo 3 discussion begins with a spoiler-free synopsis and review
16:57 - We kick off a long, spoiler-filled synopsis and review of Echo 3
1:42:05 - Conclusion]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>01:43:24</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Action Juice]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Acclaimed Films That Are Overrated (Or Just Suck) | AJP #13]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2023 01:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Action Juice</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/43906/episode/1450069</guid>
                                    <link>https://actionjuicebox.com/overrated-movies-ajp-13</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>At one point or another, we've all watched a movie that's regarded as a tremendous piece of filmmaking - by critics and/or filmgoers - that just didn't impress us. Perhaps it didn't age well, or perhaps it was never that good to begin with. Or maybe, possibly even probably, we're all just wrong in our assessments. Either way, we all have our opinions, and we've decided to share some of ours. After much contemplation, we both picked five films that we think are overrated or even kind of suck. Hopefully you agree with some, but more likely, this will be the moment you lose the speck of respect you had for us.</p>
<p>Again, we apologize for the tardiness of this episode. We're getting back on track and should have the next episode out soon. Since we filmed this over a month ago, the <strong>Off the QT </strong>news is a bit old. Again, sorry about that.</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introduction</p>
<p>01:20 - <strong>Off the QT: </strong>Golden Globe and Critics' Choice Awards results, Liam Neeson's <em>Naked Gun </em>Reboot/Sequel</p>
<p>9:20 - We begin listing our overrated movie picks and explaining our opinions</p>
<p>1:13:39 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[At one point or another, we've all watched a movie that's regarded as a tremendous piece of filmmaking - by critics and/or filmgoers - that just didn't impress us. Perhaps it didn't age well, or perhaps it was never that good to begin with. Or maybe, possibly even probably, we're all just wrong in our assessments. Either way, we all have our opinions, and we've decided to share some of ours. After much contemplation, we both picked five films that we think are overrated or even kind of suck. Hopefully you agree with some, but more likely, this will be the moment you lose the speck of respect you had for us.
Again, we apologize for the tardiness of this episode. We're getting back on track and should have the next episode out soon. Since we filmed this over a month ago, the Off the QT news is a bit old. Again, sorry about that.
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introduction
01:20 - Off the QT: Golden Globe and Critics' Choice Awards results, Liam Neeson's Naked Gun Reboot/Sequel
9:20 - We begin listing our overrated movie picks and explaining our opinions
1:13:39 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Acclaimed Films That Are Overrated (Or Just Suck) | AJP #13]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>At one point or another, we've all watched a movie that's regarded as a tremendous piece of filmmaking - by critics and/or filmgoers - that just didn't impress us. Perhaps it didn't age well, or perhaps it was never that good to begin with. Or maybe, possibly even probably, we're all just wrong in our assessments. Either way, we all have our opinions, and we've decided to share some of ours. After much contemplation, we both picked five films that we think are overrated or even kind of suck. Hopefully you agree with some, but more likely, this will be the moment you lose the speck of respect you had for us.</p>
<p>Again, we apologize for the tardiness of this episode. We're getting back on track and should have the next episode out soon. Since we filmed this over a month ago, the <strong>Off the QT </strong>news is a bit old. Again, sorry about that.</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introduction</p>
<p>01:20 - <strong>Off the QT: </strong>Golden Globe and Critics' Choice Awards results, Liam Neeson's <em>Naked Gun </em>Reboot/Sequel</p>
<p>9:20 - We begin listing our overrated movie picks and explaining our opinions</p>
<p>1:13:39 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/62fd09a55a2ba4-12222585/1450069/AJP-13-Overrated-Movies-Final.mp3" length="179826496"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[At one point or another, we've all watched a movie that's regarded as a tremendous piece of filmmaking - by critics and/or filmgoers - that just didn't impress us. Perhaps it didn't age well, or perhaps it was never that good to begin with. Or maybe, possibly even probably, we're all just wrong in our assessments. Either way, we all have our opinions, and we've decided to share some of ours. After much contemplation, we both picked five films that we think are overrated or even kind of suck. Hopefully you agree with some, but more likely, this will be the moment you lose the speck of respect you had for us.
Again, we apologize for the tardiness of this episode. We're getting back on track and should have the next episode out soon. Since we filmed this over a month ago, the Off the QT news is a bit old. Again, sorry about that.
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introduction
01:20 - Off the QT: Golden Globe and Critics' Choice Awards results, Liam Neeson's Naked Gun Reboot/Sequel
9:20 - We begin listing our overrated movie picks and explaining our opinions
1:13:39 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>01:14:55</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Action Juice]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Hard Target Unrated - Jean Woo's Tour de Force | AJP #12]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Action Juice</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/43906/episode/1425815</guid>
                                    <link>https://actionjuice.castos.com/episodes/hard-target-unrated-jean-woos-tour-de-force-ajp-12</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>When action filmmaking legend John Woo finally decided to head to Hollywood, he chose <em>Hard Target </em>(1993) as his first English-language project. Then he was paired with another icon of action, Jean-Claude Van Damme, and the two set out to make shoot-em-up perfection. Buoyed by two fantastic supporting performances from Lance Henriksen and Arnold Vosloo, <em>Hard Target </em>was nearly a master stroke of violent filmcraft. That is, until the MPAA stepped in, forcing Woo to edit out a lot of the carnage. Jump ahead to 2022 and Kino Lorber has finally released the unrated international cut, in 4K no less. And we couldn't be more grateful.</p>
<p>We apologize for the tardiness of this episode. Life got in the way, but we're back on track. Since we filmed this a month ago, the <strong>Off the QT </strong>news is a bit old. Again, sorry about that.</p>
<p>Oh, and this episode features the second installment of <strong>Fact/Off</strong>, so that's neat. D promised it would be spicier this time, but was he able to keep that promise? Use the Episode Chapters to jump ahead if you can't wait to find out.</p>
<p><strong>Warning: </strong>We spoil <em>Hard Target</em> more than a little bit here, but even if you stick around and listen, you'll still want to watch it. Trust us, watch it.</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introduction</p>
<p>02:00 - <strong>Off the QT: </strong>Misleading headlines about <em>Avatar 2</em>'s box office returns, <em>Gladiator 2 </em>is a go, Aaron Taylor-Johnson meets with James Bond producers, the <em>Evil Dead Rise </em>trailer</p>
<p>08:03 - <strong>Fact/Off: </strong>Is our second ever installment spicier than the first?</p>
<p>21:18 - Our main chat about <em>Hard Target </em>begins</p>
<p>23:44 - The conversation kicks into gear with a comprehensive synopsis</p>
<p>34:44 - We dive into this movie and address the best moments</p>
<p>55:33 - We ask ourselves: where does <em>Hard Target </em>rank in JCVD's filmography? Is it a favorite of ours?</p>
<p>1:02:58 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>
<p><strong>Fact/Off</strong> <strong>(working title)</strong>: A new movie-centric minigame that's similar to The Newlywed Game</p>
<p> </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[When action filmmaking legend John Woo finally decided to head to Hollywood, he chose Hard Target (1993) as his first English-language project. Then he was paired with another icon of action, Jean-Claude Van Damme, and the two set out to make shoot-em-up perfection. Buoyed by two fantastic supporting performances from Lance Henriksen and Arnold Vosloo, Hard Target was nearly a master stroke of violent filmcraft. That is, until the MPAA stepped in, forcing Woo to edit out a lot of the carnage. Jump ahead to 2022 and Kino Lorber has finally released the unrated international cut, in 4K no less. And we couldn't be more grateful.
We apologize for the tardiness of this episode. Life got in the way, but we're back on track. Since we filmed this a month ago, the Off the QT news is a bit old. Again, sorry about that.
Oh, and this episode features the second installment of Fact/Off, so that's neat. D promised it would be spicier this time, but was he able to keep that promise? Use the Episode Chapters to jump ahead if you can't wait to find out.
Warning: We spoil Hard Target more than a little bit here, but even if you stick around and listen, you'll still want to watch it. Trust us, watch it.
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introduction
02:00 - Off the QT: Misleading headlines about Avatar 2's box office returns, Gladiator 2 is a go, Aaron Taylor-Johnson meets with James Bond producers, the Evil Dead Rise trailer
08:03 - Fact/Off: Is our second ever installment spicier than the first?
21:18 - Our main chat about Hard Target begins
23:44 - The conversation kicks into gear with a comprehensive synopsis
34:44 - We dive into this movie and address the best moments
55:33 - We ask ourselves: where does Hard Target rank in JCVD's filmography? Is it a favorite of ours?
1:02:58 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors
Fact/Off (working title): A new movie-centric minigame that's similar to The Newlywed Game
 ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Hard Target Unrated - Jean Woo's Tour de Force | AJP #12]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>When action filmmaking legend John Woo finally decided to head to Hollywood, he chose <em>Hard Target </em>(1993) as his first English-language project. Then he was paired with another icon of action, Jean-Claude Van Damme, and the two set out to make shoot-em-up perfection. Buoyed by two fantastic supporting performances from Lance Henriksen and Arnold Vosloo, <em>Hard Target </em>was nearly a master stroke of violent filmcraft. That is, until the MPAA stepped in, forcing Woo to edit out a lot of the carnage. Jump ahead to 2022 and Kino Lorber has finally released the unrated international cut, in 4K no less. And we couldn't be more grateful.</p>
<p>We apologize for the tardiness of this episode. Life got in the way, but we're back on track. Since we filmed this a month ago, the <strong>Off the QT </strong>news is a bit old. Again, sorry about that.</p>
<p>Oh, and this episode features the second installment of <strong>Fact/Off</strong>, so that's neat. D promised it would be spicier this time, but was he able to keep that promise? Use the Episode Chapters to jump ahead if you can't wait to find out.</p>
<p><strong>Warning: </strong>We spoil <em>Hard Target</em> more than a little bit here, but even if you stick around and listen, you'll still want to watch it. Trust us, watch it.</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introduction</p>
<p>02:00 - <strong>Off the QT: </strong>Misleading headlines about <em>Avatar 2</em>'s box office returns, <em>Gladiator 2 </em>is a go, Aaron Taylor-Johnson meets with James Bond producers, the <em>Evil Dead Rise </em>trailer</p>
<p>08:03 - <strong>Fact/Off: </strong>Is our second ever installment spicier than the first?</p>
<p>21:18 - Our main chat about <em>Hard Target </em>begins</p>
<p>23:44 - The conversation kicks into gear with a comprehensive synopsis</p>
<p>34:44 - We dive into this movie and address the best moments</p>
<p>55:33 - We ask ourselves: where does <em>Hard Target </em>rank in JCVD's filmography? Is it a favorite of ours?</p>
<p>1:02:58 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>
<p><strong>Fact/Off</strong> <strong>(working title)</strong>: A new movie-centric minigame that's similar to The Newlywed Game</p>
<p> </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/62fd09a55a2ba4-12222585/1425815/AJP-12-Hard-Target-Final.mp3" length="161622451"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[When action filmmaking legend John Woo finally decided to head to Hollywood, he chose Hard Target (1993) as his first English-language project. Then he was paired with another icon of action, Jean-Claude Van Damme, and the two set out to make shoot-em-up perfection. Buoyed by two fantastic supporting performances from Lance Henriksen and Arnold Vosloo, Hard Target was nearly a master stroke of violent filmcraft. That is, until the MPAA stepped in, forcing Woo to edit out a lot of the carnage. Jump ahead to 2022 and Kino Lorber has finally released the unrated international cut, in 4K no less. And we couldn't be more grateful.
We apologize for the tardiness of this episode. Life got in the way, but we're back on track. Since we filmed this a month ago, the Off the QT news is a bit old. Again, sorry about that.
Oh, and this episode features the second installment of Fact/Off, so that's neat. D promised it would be spicier this time, but was he able to keep that promise? Use the Episode Chapters to jump ahead if you can't wait to find out.
Warning: We spoil Hard Target more than a little bit here, but even if you stick around and listen, you'll still want to watch it. Trust us, watch it.
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introduction
02:00 - Off the QT: Misleading headlines about Avatar 2's box office returns, Gladiator 2 is a go, Aaron Taylor-Johnson meets with James Bond producers, the Evil Dead Rise trailer
08:03 - Fact/Off: Is our second ever installment spicier than the first?
21:18 - Our main chat about Hard Target begins
23:44 - The conversation kicks into gear with a comprehensive synopsis
34:44 - We dive into this movie and address the best moments
55:33 - We ask ourselves: where does Hard Target rank in JCVD's filmography? Is it a favorite of ours?
1:02:58 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors
Fact/Off (working title): A new movie-centric minigame that's similar to The Newlywed Game
 ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>01:07:20</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Action Juice]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Avatar 2: Blue People Do Blue Stuff | AJP #11]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Action Juice</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/43906/episode/1389259</guid>
                                    <link>https://actionjuice.castos.com/episodes/avatar-2-blue-people-do-blue-stuff-ajp-11</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>After an extended holiday break, Isaac and Will are back to chat about <em>Avatar: The Way of the Water</em>, James Cameron's beautiful follow-up to 2009's smash hit. As lifelong Cameron fans, we're conflicted about the <em>Avatar</em> series, as we long for the good ole days. At the same time, <em>The Way of the Water</em> is truly a spectacle to behold and a compelling theatrical experience. But then again, it's still just blue people doing blue stuff.</p>
<p><strong>Warning:</strong> We spoil both <em>Avatar</em> (2009) and <em>Avatar: The Way of the Water</em> (2022) in this episode. Don't worry, we'll warn you beforehand in the recording, and there's more info on when the spoilers begin down below in the chapters.</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:04 - Introduction</p>
<p>01:10 - <strong>Off the QT:</strong> Judge rules that Ana de Armas fans can sue over misleading <em>Yesterday</em> trailer, but is this actually a good thing?</p>
<p>12:22 - Our <em>Avatar</em>/<em>Avatar 2 </em>discussion begins with a bit of background<strong><br /></strong></p>
<p>13:53 - A synopsis of <em>Avatar </em>(2009)<em><br /></em></p>
<p>16:29 - Isaac &amp; Will offer their thoughts on the 2009 blockbuster<em><br /></em></p>
<p>23:20 - A detailed synopsis of <em>Avatar: The Way of the Water </em>(2022)</p>
<p>30:04 - Our spoiler-free reviews of <em>Avatar 2</em></p>
<p>44:39 - We begin our <strong>spoiler-filled</strong> discussion of <em>Avatar 2</em></p>
<p>1:24:59 - We discuss who James Cameron is as a filmmaker now vs. before</p>
<p>1:33:07 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[After an extended holiday break, Isaac and Will are back to chat about Avatar: The Way of the Water, James Cameron's beautiful follow-up to 2009's smash hit. As lifelong Cameron fans, we're conflicted about the Avatar series, as we long for the good ole days. At the same time, The Way of the Water is truly a spectacle to behold and a compelling theatrical experience. But then again, it's still just blue people doing blue stuff.
Warning: We spoil both Avatar (2009) and Avatar: The Way of the Water (2022) in this episode. Don't worry, we'll warn you beforehand in the recording, and there's more info on when the spoilers begin down below in the chapters.
Episode Chapters:
00:04 - Introduction
01:10 - Off the QT: Judge rules that Ana de Armas fans can sue over misleading Yesterday trailer, but is this actually a good thing?
12:22 - Our Avatar/Avatar 2 discussion begins with a bit of background
13:53 - A synopsis of Avatar (2009)
16:29 - Isaac & Will offer their thoughts on the 2009 blockbuster
23:20 - A detailed synopsis of Avatar: The Way of the Water (2022)
30:04 - Our spoiler-free reviews of Avatar 2
44:39 - We begin our spoiler-filled discussion of Avatar 2
1:24:59 - We discuss who James Cameron is as a filmmaker now vs. before
1:33:07 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Avatar 2: Blue People Do Blue Stuff | AJP #11]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>After an extended holiday break, Isaac and Will are back to chat about <em>Avatar: The Way of the Water</em>, James Cameron's beautiful follow-up to 2009's smash hit. As lifelong Cameron fans, we're conflicted about the <em>Avatar</em> series, as we long for the good ole days. At the same time, <em>The Way of the Water</em> is truly a spectacle to behold and a compelling theatrical experience. But then again, it's still just blue people doing blue stuff.</p>
<p><strong>Warning:</strong> We spoil both <em>Avatar</em> (2009) and <em>Avatar: The Way of the Water</em> (2022) in this episode. Don't worry, we'll warn you beforehand in the recording, and there's more info on when the spoilers begin down below in the chapters.</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:04 - Introduction</p>
<p>01:10 - <strong>Off the QT:</strong> Judge rules that Ana de Armas fans can sue over misleading <em>Yesterday</em> trailer, but is this actually a good thing?</p>
<p>12:22 - Our <em>Avatar</em>/<em>Avatar 2 </em>discussion begins with a bit of background<strong><br /></strong></p>
<p>13:53 - A synopsis of <em>Avatar </em>(2009)<em><br /></em></p>
<p>16:29 - Isaac &amp; Will offer their thoughts on the 2009 blockbuster<em><br /></em></p>
<p>23:20 - A detailed synopsis of <em>Avatar: The Way of the Water </em>(2022)</p>
<p>30:04 - Our spoiler-free reviews of <em>Avatar 2</em></p>
<p>44:39 - We begin our <strong>spoiler-filled</strong> discussion of <em>Avatar 2</em></p>
<p>1:24:59 - We discuss who James Cameron is as a filmmaker now vs. before</p>
<p>1:33:07 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/62fd09a55a2ba4-12222585/43906/c33a2913-5876-4bed-91d7-58be46089f8a/AJP-11-Avatar-WotW-Final.mp3" length="182893363"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[After an extended holiday break, Isaac and Will are back to chat about Avatar: The Way of the Water, James Cameron's beautiful follow-up to 2009's smash hit. As lifelong Cameron fans, we're conflicted about the Avatar series, as we long for the good ole days. At the same time, The Way of the Water is truly a spectacle to behold and a compelling theatrical experience. But then again, it's still just blue people doing blue stuff.
Warning: We spoil both Avatar (2009) and Avatar: The Way of the Water (2022) in this episode. Don't worry, we'll warn you beforehand in the recording, and there's more info on when the spoilers begin down below in the chapters.
Episode Chapters:
00:04 - Introduction
01:10 - Off the QT: Judge rules that Ana de Armas fans can sue over misleading Yesterday trailer, but is this actually a good thing?
12:22 - Our Avatar/Avatar 2 discussion begins with a bit of background
13:53 - A synopsis of Avatar (2009)
16:29 - Isaac & Will offer their thoughts on the 2009 blockbuster
23:20 - A detailed synopsis of Avatar: The Way of the Water (2022)
30:04 - Our spoiler-free reviews of Avatar 2
44:39 - We begin our spoiler-filled discussion of Avatar 2
1:24:59 - We discuss who James Cameron is as a filmmaker now vs. before
1:33:07 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>01:35:15</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Action Juice]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Utah, Get Me Two... Point Breaks | AJP #10]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2022 23:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Action Juice</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/43906/episode/1366685</guid>
                                    <link>https://actionjuice.castos.com/episodes/utah-get-me-two-point-breaks-ajp-10</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In our final podcast episode of 2022, Isaac and Will take on the simple yet daunting task of comparing <em>Point Break</em> (1991), an all-time action classic, to its unsuccessful 2015 remake. If you haven't seen the 2015 <em>Point Break</em>, just know that it's basically a perfect example of how NOT to do a remake. Huh, who would've thought we'd miss Gary Busey this much?</p>
<p>Also in this episode, we play our first ever game of Fact/Off (working title), a new segment that's similar to The Newlywed Game, except for movie buffs. We'd like to give a special thanks to the segment's host, D, for joining us. We hope to have him and Fact/Off return, so let us know if you enjoy it.</p>
<p><strong>Warning: </strong>We spoil both <em>Point Break</em> movies in this episode. In the case of <em>Point Break</em> 2015, we're really doing you a favor. </p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introduction</p>
<p>02:31 - <strong>Off the QT: </strong>Clarence Gilyard Jr. passes away, <em>Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny </em>trailer</p>
<p>05:16 - Isaac and Will chat about what they've watched recently</p>
<p>06:27 - <strong>Fact/Off: </strong>Our first ever game!</p>
<p>26:39 - Main discussion starts with our thoughts on <em>Point Break</em> (1991)</p>
<p>52:50 - We begin our assessment of <em>Point Break</em> (2015)</p>
<p>1:37:50 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>
<p><strong>Fact/Off</strong> <strong>(working title)</strong>: A new movie-centric minigame that's similar to The Newlywed Game</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In our final podcast episode of 2022, Isaac and Will take on the simple yet daunting task of comparing Point Break (1991), an all-time action classic, to its unsuccessful 2015 remake. If you haven't seen the 2015 Point Break, just know that it's basically a perfect example of how NOT to do a remake. Huh, who would've thought we'd miss Gary Busey this much?
Also in this episode, we play our first ever game of Fact/Off (working title), a new segment that's similar to The Newlywed Game, except for movie buffs. We'd like to give a special thanks to the segment's host, D, for joining us. We hope to have him and Fact/Off return, so let us know if you enjoy it.
Warning: We spoil both Point Break movies in this episode. In the case of Point Break 2015, we're really doing you a favor. 
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introduction
02:31 - Off the QT: Clarence Gilyard Jr. passes away, Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny trailer
05:16 - Isaac and Will chat about what they've watched recently
06:27 - Fact/Off: Our first ever game!
26:39 - Main discussion starts with our thoughts on Point Break (1991)
52:50 - We begin our assessment of Point Break (2015)
1:37:50 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors
Fact/Off (working title): A new movie-centric minigame that's similar to The Newlywed Game]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Utah, Get Me Two... Point Breaks | AJP #10]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In our final podcast episode of 2022, Isaac and Will take on the simple yet daunting task of comparing <em>Point Break</em> (1991), an all-time action classic, to its unsuccessful 2015 remake. If you haven't seen the 2015 <em>Point Break</em>, just know that it's basically a perfect example of how NOT to do a remake. Huh, who would've thought we'd miss Gary Busey this much?</p>
<p>Also in this episode, we play our first ever game of Fact/Off (working title), a new segment that's similar to The Newlywed Game, except for movie buffs. We'd like to give a special thanks to the segment's host, D, for joining us. We hope to have him and Fact/Off return, so let us know if you enjoy it.</p>
<p><strong>Warning: </strong>We spoil both <em>Point Break</em> movies in this episode. In the case of <em>Point Break</em> 2015, we're really doing you a favor. </p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introduction</p>
<p>02:31 - <strong>Off the QT: </strong>Clarence Gilyard Jr. passes away, <em>Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny </em>trailer</p>
<p>05:16 - Isaac and Will chat about what they've watched recently</p>
<p>06:27 - <strong>Fact/Off: </strong>Our first ever game!</p>
<p>26:39 - Main discussion starts with our thoughts on <em>Point Break</em> (1991)</p>
<p>52:50 - We begin our assessment of <em>Point Break</em> (2015)</p>
<p>1:37:50 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>
<p><strong>Fact/Off</strong> <strong>(working title)</strong>: A new movie-centric minigame that's similar to The Newlywed Game</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/62fd09a55a2ba4-12222585/43906/78dc6928-b41d-496d-a445-f9adaa931bd2/AJP-10-Point-Break-Final.mp3" length="196019251"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In our final podcast episode of 2022, Isaac and Will take on the simple yet daunting task of comparing Point Break (1991), an all-time action classic, to its unsuccessful 2015 remake. If you haven't seen the 2015 Point Break, just know that it's basically a perfect example of how NOT to do a remake. Huh, who would've thought we'd miss Gary Busey this much?
Also in this episode, we play our first ever game of Fact/Off (working title), a new segment that's similar to The Newlywed Game, except for movie buffs. We'd like to give a special thanks to the segment's host, D, for joining us. We hope to have him and Fact/Off return, so let us know if you enjoy it.
Warning: We spoil both Point Break movies in this episode. In the case of Point Break 2015, we're really doing you a favor. 
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introduction
02:31 - Off the QT: Clarence Gilyard Jr. passes away, Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny trailer
05:16 - Isaac and Will chat about what they've watched recently
06:27 - Fact/Off: Our first ever game!
26:39 - Main discussion starts with our thoughts on Point Break (1991)
52:50 - We begin our assessment of Point Break (2015)
1:37:50 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors
Fact/Off (working title): A new movie-centric minigame that's similar to The Newlywed Game]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>01:42:05</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Action Juice]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Sly in the Slammer: A Prelude to Tulsa King | AJP #9]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Action Juice</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/43906/episode/1346564</guid>
                                    <link>https://actionjuice.castos.com/episodes/sly-in-the-slammer-a-prelude-to-tulsa-king-ajp-9</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>As the first season of Tulsa King rolls on, we thought we'd take a look at some other Sylvester Stallone content that involved him being in and/or leaving prison. After some consideration, we decided to pit <em>Lock Up </em>against <em>Tango &amp; Cash</em>, two 1989 movies that don't rank highly in Stallone's filmography. In the end, this comparison got a little fiery, to an extent these movies really don't deserve.</p>
<p>Warning: We spoil both <em>Lock Up </em>and <em>Tango &amp; Cash</em> in this episode. If you haven't seen them yet... well, you're not missing much.</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:04 - Introduction</p>
<p>01:38 - Our website <a href="https://actionjuicebox.com/">actionjuicebox.com</a> is live!</p>
<p>01:57 - <strong>Off the QT: </strong><em>Escape from New York </em>is getting a reboot, Steven Spielberg's <em>Bullitt </em>film moves forward with Bradley Cooper as the lead</p>
<p>06:41 - Isaac and Will chat about what they've watched recently</p>
<p>10:47 - Main Discussion: <em>Lock Up </em>(1989) vs <em>Tango &amp; Cash </em>(1989)</p>
<p>11:43 - Synopsis of <em>Lock Up<br /></em></p>
<p>15:07 - Synopsis of <em>Tango &amp; Cash<br /></em></p>
<p>18:19 - The main debate begins</p>
<p>1:06:25 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[As the first season of Tulsa King rolls on, we thought we'd take a look at some other Sylvester Stallone content that involved him being in and/or leaving prison. After some consideration, we decided to pit Lock Up against Tango & Cash, two 1989 movies that don't rank highly in Stallone's filmography. In the end, this comparison got a little fiery, to an extent these movies really don't deserve.
Warning: We spoil both Lock Up and Tango & Cash in this episode. If you haven't seen them yet... well, you're not missing much.
Episode Chapters:
00:04 - Introduction
01:38 - Our website actionjuicebox.com is live!
01:57 - Off the QT: Escape from New York is getting a reboot, Steven Spielberg's Bullitt film moves forward with Bradley Cooper as the lead
06:41 - Isaac and Will chat about what they've watched recently
10:47 - Main Discussion: Lock Up (1989) vs Tango & Cash (1989)
11:43 - Synopsis of Lock Up
15:07 - Synopsis of Tango & Cash
18:19 - The main debate begins
1:06:25 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Sly in the Slammer: A Prelude to Tulsa King | AJP #9]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>As the first season of Tulsa King rolls on, we thought we'd take a look at some other Sylvester Stallone content that involved him being in and/or leaving prison. After some consideration, we decided to pit <em>Lock Up </em>against <em>Tango &amp; Cash</em>, two 1989 movies that don't rank highly in Stallone's filmography. In the end, this comparison got a little fiery, to an extent these movies really don't deserve.</p>
<p>Warning: We spoil both <em>Lock Up </em>and <em>Tango &amp; Cash</em> in this episode. If you haven't seen them yet... well, you're not missing much.</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:04 - Introduction</p>
<p>01:38 - Our website <a href="https://actionjuicebox.com/">actionjuicebox.com</a> is live!</p>
<p>01:57 - <strong>Off the QT: </strong><em>Escape from New York </em>is getting a reboot, Steven Spielberg's <em>Bullitt </em>film moves forward with Bradley Cooper as the lead</p>
<p>06:41 - Isaac and Will chat about what they've watched recently</p>
<p>10:47 - Main Discussion: <em>Lock Up </em>(1989) vs <em>Tango &amp; Cash </em>(1989)</p>
<p>11:43 - Synopsis of <em>Lock Up<br /></em></p>
<p>15:07 - Synopsis of <em>Tango &amp; Cash<br /></em></p>
<p>18:19 - The main debate begins</p>
<p>1:06:25 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/62fd09a55a2ba4-12222585/43906/3ff7002b-dbf6-467a-906d-dc2525199f7c/AJP-9-Tango-Cash-Final.mp3" length="168415411"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[As the first season of Tulsa King rolls on, we thought we'd take a look at some other Sylvester Stallone content that involved him being in and/or leaving prison. After some consideration, we decided to pit Lock Up against Tango & Cash, two 1989 movies that don't rank highly in Stallone's filmography. In the end, this comparison got a little fiery, to an extent these movies really don't deserve.
Warning: We spoil both Lock Up and Tango & Cash in this episode. If you haven't seen them yet... well, you're not missing much.
Episode Chapters:
00:04 - Introduction
01:38 - Our website actionjuicebox.com is live!
01:57 - Off the QT: Escape from New York is getting a reboot, Steven Spielberg's Bullitt film moves forward with Bradley Cooper as the lead
06:41 - Isaac and Will chat about what they've watched recently
10:47 - Main Discussion: Lock Up (1989) vs Tango & Cash (1989)
11:43 - Synopsis of Lock Up
15:07 - Synopsis of Tango & Cash
18:19 - The main debate begins
1:06:25 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>01:10:10</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Action Juice]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Flight Fights - Air Force One vs Executive Decision | AJP #8]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Action Juice</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/43906/episode/1331700</guid>
                                    <link>https://actionjuice.castos.com/episodes/flight-fights-air-force-one-vs-executive-decision-ajp-8-1</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>For some reason, Hollywood produced a ton of airplane-set, big-budget action movies in the 90s. Today, we're comparing the two that are arguably the best, <em>Executive Decision</em> (1996) and <em>Air Force One</em> (1997). Released in back-to-back years, both films shared many similarities: setting, guns, music, terrorist baddies, illustrious leading men (Harrison Ford and Kurt Russell), and more. That said, it can be debated that one movie did it better than the other, and that's exactly what we're here to do.</p>
<p>Warning: We spoil both <em>Air Force One </em>and <em>Executive Decision</em> in this episode. They're a quarter of a century old, so we don't want to hear any complaints.</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introduction</p>
<p>01:54 - Our website <a href="https://actionjuicebox.com/">actionjuicebox.com</a> is live!</p>
<p>02:27 - <strong>Off the QT: </strong>Danny Boyle and Alex Garland linked to <em>28 Months </em><em>Later</em>, Henry Cavill quits Netflix's <em>The Witcher </em>series</p>
<p>14:10 - <strong>Fave/Off: </strong><em>Executive Decision </em>(1996) vs <em>Air Force One </em>(1997)</p>
<p>16:20 - Synopsis of <em>Executive Decision</em></p>
<p>24:57 - Synopsis of <em>Air Force One</em></p>
<p>29:28 - The main debate begins</p>
<p>1:22:31 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>
<p><strong>Fave/Off</strong>: We pit two of our favorite movies against each other and examine their pros &amp; cons</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[For some reason, Hollywood produced a ton of airplane-set, big-budget action movies in the 90s. Today, we're comparing the two that are arguably the best, Executive Decision (1996) and Air Force One (1997). Released in back-to-back years, both films shared many similarities: setting, guns, music, terrorist baddies, illustrious leading men (Harrison Ford and Kurt Russell), and more. That said, it can be debated that one movie did it better than the other, and that's exactly what we're here to do.
Warning: We spoil both Air Force One and Executive Decision in this episode. They're a quarter of a century old, so we don't want to hear any complaints.
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introduction
01:54 - Our website actionjuicebox.com is live!
02:27 - Off the QT: Danny Boyle and Alex Garland linked to 28 Months Later, Henry Cavill quits Netflix's The Witcher series
14:10 - Fave/Off: Executive Decision (1996) vs Air Force One (1997)
16:20 - Synopsis of Executive Decision
24:57 - Synopsis of Air Force One
29:28 - The main debate begins
1:22:31 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors
Fave/Off: We pit two of our favorite movies against each other and examine their pros & cons]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Flight Fights - Air Force One vs Executive Decision | AJP #8]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>For some reason, Hollywood produced a ton of airplane-set, big-budget action movies in the 90s. Today, we're comparing the two that are arguably the best, <em>Executive Decision</em> (1996) and <em>Air Force One</em> (1997). Released in back-to-back years, both films shared many similarities: setting, guns, music, terrorist baddies, illustrious leading men (Harrison Ford and Kurt Russell), and more. That said, it can be debated that one movie did it better than the other, and that's exactly what we're here to do.</p>
<p>Warning: We spoil both <em>Air Force One </em>and <em>Executive Decision</em> in this episode. They're a quarter of a century old, so we don't want to hear any complaints.</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introduction</p>
<p>01:54 - Our website <a href="https://actionjuicebox.com/">actionjuicebox.com</a> is live!</p>
<p>02:27 - <strong>Off the QT: </strong>Danny Boyle and Alex Garland linked to <em>28 Months </em><em>Later</em>, Henry Cavill quits Netflix's <em>The Witcher </em>series</p>
<p>14:10 - <strong>Fave/Off: </strong><em>Executive Decision </em>(1996) vs <em>Air Force One </em>(1997)</p>
<p>16:20 - Synopsis of <em>Executive Decision</em></p>
<p>24:57 - Synopsis of <em>Air Force One</em></p>
<p>29:28 - The main debate begins</p>
<p>1:22:31 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>
<p><strong>Fave/Off</strong>: We pit two of our favorite movies against each other and examine their pros &amp; cons</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/62fd09a55a2ba4-12222585/43906/016ee6c1-d839-4b80-bcd6-8d7cebe48c68/AJP-8-Executive-Decision-Final.mp3" length="162893875"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[For some reason, Hollywood produced a ton of airplane-set, big-budget action movies in the 90s. Today, we're comparing the two that are arguably the best, Executive Decision (1996) and Air Force One (1997). Released in back-to-back years, both films shared many similarities: setting, guns, music, terrorist baddies, illustrious leading men (Harrison Ford and Kurt Russell), and more. That said, it can be debated that one movie did it better than the other, and that's exactly what we're here to do.
Warning: We spoil both Air Force One and Executive Decision in this episode. They're a quarter of a century old, so we don't want to hear any complaints.
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introduction
01:54 - Our website actionjuicebox.com is live!
02:27 - Off the QT: Danny Boyle and Alex Garland linked to 28 Months Later, Henry Cavill quits Netflix's The Witcher series
14:10 - Fave/Off: Executive Decision (1996) vs Air Force One (1997)
16:20 - Synopsis of Executive Decision
24:57 - Synopsis of Air Force One
29:28 - The main debate begins
1:22:31 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors
Fave/Off: We pit two of our favorite movies against each other and examine their pros & cons]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>01:24:50</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Action Juice]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[The Mummy Sequels: Bringers of Death | AJP #7]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Action Juice</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/43906/episode/1317227</guid>
                                    <link>https://actionjuice.castos.com/episodes/the-mummy-sequels-bringers-of-death-ajp-7-1</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago, Isaac and Will did a deep dive into The Mummy Trilogy (1999-2008), aiming to illuminate how and why the sequels failed to live up to the original. It's rare to find a movie series that gets gradually worse every second it continues beyond its first installment, but that's what we have here. Imhotep and the O'Connells deserved better. And I think we can all agree, so did Brendan Fraser, especially.</p>
<p>Warning: We spoil <em>The Mummy</em>, <em>The Mummy Returns</em>, and <em>The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor</em>, but they're old, so you really can't complain.</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:06 - Introduction</p>
<p>01:14 - Our website, <a href="https://actionjuicebox.com/">actionjuicebox.com</a>, is live!</p>
<p>02:14 - <strong>Off the QT</strong><strong>: </strong>Kevin Bacon joins <em>Beverly Hills Cop 4</em>, <em>Amsterdam </em>struggles to find an audience, <em>Blade </em>reboot delayed after losing its director, <em>Deadpool 3 </em>also delayed, Brendan Fraser open to doing <em>Mummy 4</em></p>
<p>15:32 - <strong>TWaDiPA: </strong>a detailed breakdown of <em>The Mummy </em>Trilogy, focusing on how/why its sequels struggled to recapture the excitement of the first one and subsequently killed the franchise</p>
<p>17:21 - Why <em>The Mummy</em> (1999) works so well as an action-adventure-horror movie</p>
<p>41:17 - How <em>The Mummy Returns </em>(2001) lost its way and kicked off the decline of the series</p>
<p>1:06:02 - Things didn't get any better with <em>The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor </em>(2008)</p>
<p>1:34:11 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>
<p><strong>To Watch and Die in PA (TWaDiPA)</strong>: An in-depth discussion of a movie(s) that we've recently watched</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[A few weeks ago, Isaac and Will did a deep dive into The Mummy Trilogy (1999-2008), aiming to illuminate how and why the sequels failed to live up to the original. It's rare to find a movie series that gets gradually worse every second it continues beyond its first installment, but that's what we have here. Imhotep and the O'Connells deserved better. And I think we can all agree, so did Brendan Fraser, especially.
Warning: We spoil The Mummy, The Mummy Returns, and The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor, but they're old, so you really can't complain.
Episode Chapters:
00:06 - Introduction
01:14 - Our website, actionjuicebox.com, is live!
02:14 - Off the QT: Kevin Bacon joins Beverly Hills Cop 4, Amsterdam struggles to find an audience, Blade reboot delayed after losing its director, Deadpool 3 also delayed, Brendan Fraser open to doing Mummy 4
15:32 - TWaDiPA: a detailed breakdown of The Mummy Trilogy, focusing on how/why its sequels struggled to recapture the excitement of the first one and subsequently killed the franchise
17:21 - Why The Mummy (1999) works so well as an action-adventure-horror movie
41:17 - How The Mummy Returns (2001) lost its way and kicked off the decline of the series
1:06:02 - Things didn't get any better with The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor (2008)
1:34:11 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors
To Watch and Die in PA (TWaDiPA): An in-depth discussion of a movie(s) that we've recently watched]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[The Mummy Sequels: Bringers of Death | AJP #7]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago, Isaac and Will did a deep dive into The Mummy Trilogy (1999-2008), aiming to illuminate how and why the sequels failed to live up to the original. It's rare to find a movie series that gets gradually worse every second it continues beyond its first installment, but that's what we have here. Imhotep and the O'Connells deserved better. And I think we can all agree, so did Brendan Fraser, especially.</p>
<p>Warning: We spoil <em>The Mummy</em>, <em>The Mummy Returns</em>, and <em>The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor</em>, but they're old, so you really can't complain.</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:06 - Introduction</p>
<p>01:14 - Our website, <a href="https://actionjuicebox.com/">actionjuicebox.com</a>, is live!</p>
<p>02:14 - <strong>Off the QT</strong><strong>: </strong>Kevin Bacon joins <em>Beverly Hills Cop 4</em>, <em>Amsterdam </em>struggles to find an audience, <em>Blade </em>reboot delayed after losing its director, <em>Deadpool 3 </em>also delayed, Brendan Fraser open to doing <em>Mummy 4</em></p>
<p>15:32 - <strong>TWaDiPA: </strong>a detailed breakdown of <em>The Mummy </em>Trilogy, focusing on how/why its sequels struggled to recapture the excitement of the first one and subsequently killed the franchise</p>
<p>17:21 - Why <em>The Mummy</em> (1999) works so well as an action-adventure-horror movie</p>
<p>41:17 - How <em>The Mummy Returns </em>(2001) lost its way and kicked off the decline of the series</p>
<p>1:06:02 - Things didn't get any better with <em>The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor </em>(2008)</p>
<p>1:34:11 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>
<p><strong>To Watch and Die in PA (TWaDiPA)</strong>: An in-depth discussion of a movie(s) that we've recently watched</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/62fd09a55a2ba4-12222585/43906/29796623-5035-434a-9b6d-6e86c82bd907/AJP-7-Mummy-Trilogy-Final.mp3" length="184493875"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[A few weeks ago, Isaac and Will did a deep dive into The Mummy Trilogy (1999-2008), aiming to illuminate how and why the sequels failed to live up to the original. It's rare to find a movie series that gets gradually worse every second it continues beyond its first installment, but that's what we have here. Imhotep and the O'Connells deserved better. And I think we can all agree, so did Brendan Fraser, especially.
Warning: We spoil The Mummy, The Mummy Returns, and The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor, but they're old, so you really can't complain.
Episode Chapters:
00:06 - Introduction
01:14 - Our website, actionjuicebox.com, is live!
02:14 - Off the QT: Kevin Bacon joins Beverly Hills Cop 4, Amsterdam struggles to find an audience, Blade reboot delayed after losing its director, Deadpool 3 also delayed, Brendan Fraser open to doing Mummy 4
15:32 - TWaDiPA: a detailed breakdown of The Mummy Trilogy, focusing on how/why its sequels struggled to recapture the excitement of the first one and subsequently killed the franchise
17:21 - Why The Mummy (1999) works so well as an action-adventure-horror movie
41:17 - How The Mummy Returns (2001) lost its way and kicked off the decline of the series
1:06:02 - Things didn't get any better with The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor (2008)
1:34:11 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors
To Watch and Die in PA (TWaDiPA): An in-depth discussion of a movie(s) that we've recently watched]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>01:36:05</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Action Juice]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[After Halloween Ends, Does It Need a Resurrection? | AJP #6]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Action Juice</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/43906/episode/1308974</guid>
                                    <link>https://actionjuice.castos.com/episodes/after-halloween-ends-does-it-need-a-resurrection-ajp-6</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Is there a better day to discuss <em>Halloween Ends </em>than October 31? How about to discuss <em>Halloween: Resurrection</em>? Yeah, you're right; it's never a good day to discuss <em>Resurrection</em>. But hey, we did it anyway, comparing the disastrous 2002 slasher to <em>Ends</em>, the latest addition to the <em>Halloween </em>franchise. Both movies were intended to act as the conclusion to Laurie Strode's lifelong struggle against Michael Myers, so they're related in that regard. But as we fans know well, <em>Resurrection </em>was a catastrophe. So, did <em>Halloween Ends </em>finally get it right and honor Jamie Lee Curtis and her iconic character? Or is it another colossal failure?</p>
<p>Warning: We spoil <em>Halloween Ends</em> and<em> Halloween: Resurrection</em>. If you haven't seen <em>Ends </em>yet, you might want to avoid this episode. If you haven't seen <em>Resurrection </em>yet, you don't know how lucky you are.</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introduction</p>
<p>01:33 - We announce that our website - actionjuicebox.com - is live</p>
<p>02:23 - <strong>Off the QT: </strong><em>Twister </em>gets a reboot/sequel, Robbie Coltrane passes away, the <em>Echo 3 </em>trailer, the latest <em>Tulsa King </em>trailer, <em>Halloween Ends </em>underperforms at the box office</p>
<p>12:21 - Our <em>Halloween </em>discussion begins with a chat about what scares us and what horror tropes we like<strong><br /></strong></p>
<p>17:37 - An overly detailed, spoiler-filled synopsis and review of <em>Halloween: Resurrection</em><em><br /></em></p>
<p>27:51 - Our matchup of <em>Halloween Ends </em>vs <em>Resurrection </em>kicks off<em><br /></em></p>
<p>33:33 - An overly detailed, spoiler-filled synopsis and review of <em>Halloween Ends</em></p>
<p>55:06 - Is <em>Halloween Ends </em>somehow worse than <em>Resurrection</em>?</p>
<p>1:12:17 - We wrap-up and make our final determinations</p>
<p>1:14:43 - Where we would take the <em>Halloween </em>franchise after <em>Ends</em></p>
<p>1:18:10 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Is there a better day to discuss Halloween Ends than October 31? How about to discuss Halloween: Resurrection? Yeah, you're right; it's never a good day to discuss Resurrection. But hey, we did it anyway, comparing the disastrous 2002 slasher to Ends, the latest addition to the Halloween franchise. Both movies were intended to act as the conclusion to Laurie Strode's lifelong struggle against Michael Myers, so they're related in that regard. But as we fans know well, Resurrection was a catastrophe. So, did Halloween Ends finally get it right and honor Jamie Lee Curtis and her iconic character? Or is it another colossal failure?
Warning: We spoil Halloween Ends and Halloween: Resurrection. If you haven't seen Ends yet, you might want to avoid this episode. If you haven't seen Resurrection yet, you don't know how lucky you are.
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introduction
01:33 - We announce that our website - actionjuicebox.com - is live
02:23 - Off the QT: Twister gets a reboot/sequel, Robbie Coltrane passes away, the Echo 3 trailer, the latest Tulsa King trailer, Halloween Ends underperforms at the box office
12:21 - Our Halloween discussion begins with a chat about what scares us and what horror tropes we like
17:37 - An overly detailed, spoiler-filled synopsis and review of Halloween: Resurrection
27:51 - Our matchup of Halloween Ends vs Resurrection kicks off
33:33 - An overly detailed, spoiler-filled synopsis and review of Halloween Ends
55:06 - Is Halloween Ends somehow worse than Resurrection?
1:12:17 - We wrap-up and make our final determinations
1:14:43 - Where we would take the Halloween franchise after Ends
1:18:10 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[After Halloween Ends, Does It Need a Resurrection? | AJP #6]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Is there a better day to discuss <em>Halloween Ends </em>than October 31? How about to discuss <em>Halloween: Resurrection</em>? Yeah, you're right; it's never a good day to discuss <em>Resurrection</em>. But hey, we did it anyway, comparing the disastrous 2002 slasher to <em>Ends</em>, the latest addition to the <em>Halloween </em>franchise. Both movies were intended to act as the conclusion to Laurie Strode's lifelong struggle against Michael Myers, so they're related in that regard. But as we fans know well, <em>Resurrection </em>was a catastrophe. So, did <em>Halloween Ends </em>finally get it right and honor Jamie Lee Curtis and her iconic character? Or is it another colossal failure?</p>
<p>Warning: We spoil <em>Halloween Ends</em> and<em> Halloween: Resurrection</em>. If you haven't seen <em>Ends </em>yet, you might want to avoid this episode. If you haven't seen <em>Resurrection </em>yet, you don't know how lucky you are.</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introduction</p>
<p>01:33 - We announce that our website - actionjuicebox.com - is live</p>
<p>02:23 - <strong>Off the QT: </strong><em>Twister </em>gets a reboot/sequel, Robbie Coltrane passes away, the <em>Echo 3 </em>trailer, the latest <em>Tulsa King </em>trailer, <em>Halloween Ends </em>underperforms at the box office</p>
<p>12:21 - Our <em>Halloween </em>discussion begins with a chat about what scares us and what horror tropes we like<strong><br /></strong></p>
<p>17:37 - An overly detailed, spoiler-filled synopsis and review of <em>Halloween: Resurrection</em><em><br /></em></p>
<p>27:51 - Our matchup of <em>Halloween Ends </em>vs <em>Resurrection </em>kicks off<em><br /></em></p>
<p>33:33 - An overly detailed, spoiler-filled synopsis and review of <em>Halloween Ends</em></p>
<p>55:06 - Is <em>Halloween Ends </em>somehow worse than <em>Resurrection</em>?</p>
<p>1:12:17 - We wrap-up and make our final determinations</p>
<p>1:14:43 - Where we would take the <em>Halloween </em>franchise after <em>Ends</em></p>
<p>1:18:10 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/62fd09a55a2ba4-12222585/43906/94426bb1-e851-4d24-8b68-6f16d4d744e7/AJP-6-Halloween-Ends-Final.mp3" length="156013363"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Is there a better day to discuss Halloween Ends than October 31? How about to discuss Halloween: Resurrection? Yeah, you're right; it's never a good day to discuss Resurrection. But hey, we did it anyway, comparing the disastrous 2002 slasher to Ends, the latest addition to the Halloween franchise. Both movies were intended to act as the conclusion to Laurie Strode's lifelong struggle against Michael Myers, so they're related in that regard. But as we fans know well, Resurrection was a catastrophe. So, did Halloween Ends finally get it right and honor Jamie Lee Curtis and her iconic character? Or is it another colossal failure?
Warning: We spoil Halloween Ends and Halloween: Resurrection. If you haven't seen Ends yet, you might want to avoid this episode. If you haven't seen Resurrection yet, you don't know how lucky you are.
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introduction
01:33 - We announce that our website - actionjuicebox.com - is live
02:23 - Off the QT: Twister gets a reboot/sequel, Robbie Coltrane passes away, the Echo 3 trailer, the latest Tulsa King trailer, Halloween Ends underperforms at the box office
12:21 - Our Halloween discussion begins with a chat about what scares us and what horror tropes we like
17:37 - An overly detailed, spoiler-filled synopsis and review of Halloween: Resurrection
27:51 - Our matchup of Halloween Ends vs Resurrection kicks off
33:33 - An overly detailed, spoiler-filled synopsis and review of Halloween Ends
55:06 - Is Halloween Ends somehow worse than Resurrection?
1:12:17 - We wrap-up and make our final determinations
1:14:43 - Where we would take the Halloween franchise after Ends
1:18:10 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>01:21:15</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Action Juice]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[We Talk Mann to Mann About Heat 2 | AJP #5]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2022 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Action Juice</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/43906/episode/1305201</guid>
                                    <link>https://actionjuice.castos.com/episodes/we-talk-mann-to-mann-about-heat-2-ajp-5</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Few films mean as much to Isaac and Will, and Action Juice, as <em>Heat </em>does. This was why we were understandably giddy when Michael Mann announced that he was writing a sequel novel called <em>Heat 2</em>. Now that we've both finished reading it, it's time for us to release our extra-large <em>Heat</em> + <em>Heat 2 </em>episode. Over the next 2 hours, we briefly discuss the 1995 film before moving on to review the novel, first spoiler-free and then in-depth. After that, we hold a casting couch for the movie adaptation of <em>Heat 2</em>, debating our choices for both the new and existing characters. Who do we feel should take over the roles of Vincent Hanna and Neil McCauley? Listen to the end and find out.</p>
<p>Warning: We spoil both <em>Heat </em>and <em>Heat 2 </em>in this episode. We don't feel bad about the <em>Heat </em>spoilers; it came out in 1995. But we understand that the <em>Heat 2</em> spoilers might bother some people, so check out the chapters below if you want to avoid them.</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introduction</p>
<p>01:34 - <strong>Off the QT: </strong>John McTiernan finally returns to directing, <em>Lethal Weapon 5 </em>update, the <em>Violent Night </em>trailer, and Stuart Beattie dishes on Jason Statham's cameo in <em>Collateral</em> (2004)</p>
<p>12:27 - Our <em>Heat </em>discussion begins with a brief chat on what the 1995 film means to us <strong><br /></strong></p>
<p>20:37 - Will points out his main issue with <em>Heat</em></p>
<p>25:40 - Our spoiler-free synopsis and reviews of <em>Heat 2</em></p>
<p>41:52 - How <em>Heat 2</em> affects the way we view <em>Heat </em>and its characters</p>
<p>43:59 - SPOILERS for <em>Heat 2</em> start here</p>
<p>54:39 - The rest of our spoiler-filled, in-depth discussion/review begins</p>
<p>1:23:56 - <strong>Cast Off: </strong>We try our best to choose the cast for <em>Heat 2</em>, ending with our casting picks for McCauley, Hanna, and Shiherlis</p>
<p>1:58:32 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>
<p><strong>Cast Off </strong>(working title): We give our casting choices for a hypothetical or upcoming film</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Few films mean as much to Isaac and Will, and Action Juice, as Heat does. This was why we were understandably giddy when Michael Mann announced that he was writing a sequel novel called Heat 2. Now that we've both finished reading it, it's time for us to release our extra-large Heat + Heat 2 episode. Over the next 2 hours, we briefly discuss the 1995 film before moving on to review the novel, first spoiler-free and then in-depth. After that, we hold a casting couch for the movie adaptation of Heat 2, debating our choices for both the new and existing characters. Who do we feel should take over the roles of Vincent Hanna and Neil McCauley? Listen to the end and find out.
Warning: We spoil both Heat and Heat 2 in this episode. We don't feel bad about the Heat spoilers; it came out in 1995. But we understand that the Heat 2 spoilers might bother some people, so check out the chapters below if you want to avoid them.
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introduction
01:34 - Off the QT: John McTiernan finally returns to directing, Lethal Weapon 5 update, the Violent Night trailer, and Stuart Beattie dishes on Jason Statham's cameo in Collateral (2004)
12:27 - Our Heat discussion begins with a brief chat on what the 1995 film means to us 
20:37 - Will points out his main issue with Heat
25:40 - Our spoiler-free synopsis and reviews of Heat 2
41:52 - How Heat 2 affects the way we view Heat and its characters
43:59 - SPOILERS for Heat 2 start here
54:39 - The rest of our spoiler-filled, in-depth discussion/review begins
1:23:56 - Cast Off: We try our best to choose the cast for Heat 2, ending with our casting picks for McCauley, Hanna, and Shiherlis
1:58:32 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors
Cast Off (working title): We give our casting choices for a hypothetical or upcoming film]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[We Talk Mann to Mann About Heat 2 | AJP #5]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Few films mean as much to Isaac and Will, and Action Juice, as <em>Heat </em>does. This was why we were understandably giddy when Michael Mann announced that he was writing a sequel novel called <em>Heat 2</em>. Now that we've both finished reading it, it's time for us to release our extra-large <em>Heat</em> + <em>Heat 2 </em>episode. Over the next 2 hours, we briefly discuss the 1995 film before moving on to review the novel, first spoiler-free and then in-depth. After that, we hold a casting couch for the movie adaptation of <em>Heat 2</em>, debating our choices for both the new and existing characters. Who do we feel should take over the roles of Vincent Hanna and Neil McCauley? Listen to the end and find out.</p>
<p>Warning: We spoil both <em>Heat </em>and <em>Heat 2 </em>in this episode. We don't feel bad about the <em>Heat </em>spoilers; it came out in 1995. But we understand that the <em>Heat 2</em> spoilers might bother some people, so check out the chapters below if you want to avoid them.</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introduction</p>
<p>01:34 - <strong>Off the QT: </strong>John McTiernan finally returns to directing, <em>Lethal Weapon 5 </em>update, the <em>Violent Night </em>trailer, and Stuart Beattie dishes on Jason Statham's cameo in <em>Collateral</em> (2004)</p>
<p>12:27 - Our <em>Heat </em>discussion begins with a brief chat on what the 1995 film means to us <strong><br /></strong></p>
<p>20:37 - Will points out his main issue with <em>Heat</em></p>
<p>25:40 - Our spoiler-free synopsis and reviews of <em>Heat 2</em></p>
<p>41:52 - How <em>Heat 2</em> affects the way we view <em>Heat </em>and its characters</p>
<p>43:59 - SPOILERS for <em>Heat 2</em> start here</p>
<p>54:39 - The rest of our spoiler-filled, in-depth discussion/review begins</p>
<p>1:23:56 - <strong>Cast Off: </strong>We try our best to choose the cast for <em>Heat 2</em>, ending with our casting picks for McCauley, Hanna, and Shiherlis</p>
<p>1:58:32 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>
<p><strong>Cast Off </strong>(working title): We give our casting choices for a hypothetical or upcoming film</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/62fd09a55a2ba4-12222585/43906/8e0b645c-1db4-4551-b97f-16e37dfa9b9e/AJP-5-Heat-2-Final-C.mp3" length="171835526"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Few films mean as much to Isaac and Will, and Action Juice, as Heat does. This was why we were understandably giddy when Michael Mann announced that he was writing a sequel novel called Heat 2. Now that we've both finished reading it, it's time for us to release our extra-large Heat + Heat 2 episode. Over the next 2 hours, we briefly discuss the 1995 film before moving on to review the novel, first spoiler-free and then in-depth. After that, we hold a casting couch for the movie adaptation of Heat 2, debating our choices for both the new and existing characters. Who do we feel should take over the roles of Vincent Hanna and Neil McCauley? Listen to the end and find out.
Warning: We spoil both Heat and Heat 2 in this episode. We don't feel bad about the Heat spoilers; it came out in 1995. But we understand that the Heat 2 spoilers might bother some people, so check out the chapters below if you want to avoid them.
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introduction
01:34 - Off the QT: John McTiernan finally returns to directing, Lethal Weapon 5 update, the Violent Night trailer, and Stuart Beattie dishes on Jason Statham's cameo in Collateral (2004)
12:27 - Our Heat discussion begins with a brief chat on what the 1995 film means to us 
20:37 - Will points out his main issue with Heat
25:40 - Our spoiler-free synopsis and reviews of Heat 2
41:52 - How Heat 2 affects the way we view Heat and its characters
43:59 - SPOILERS for Heat 2 start here
54:39 - The rest of our spoiler-filled, in-depth discussion/review begins
1:23:56 - Cast Off: We try our best to choose the cast for Heat 2, ending with our casting picks for McCauley, Hanna, and Shiherlis
1:58:32 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors
Cast Off (working title): We give our casting choices for a hypothetical or upcoming film]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>01:59:19</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Action Juice]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[We're Not Too Old for Lethal Weapon 5... Right? | AJP #4]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Action Juice</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/43906/episode/1280382</guid>
                                    <link>https://actionjuice.castos.com/episodes/we39re-not-too-old-for-lethal-weapon-5-right-ajp-4-1</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Just a few days ago, there was another update about <em>Lethal Weapon 5</em>, a seemingly unlikely but increasingly impending addition to the <em>Lethal Weapon </em>series. This got Isaac and Will thinking: what would we like to see in a new <em>Lethal Weapon </em>movie? How would we write it? Well, in order to figure that out, we dove back into the original four films and discussed their pros and cons. Then, we gave our pitches for <em>Lethal Weapon 5</em>. Warner Bros., if you're reading this, the answer is yes, we'll gladly write the script.</p>
<p>Warning: We spoil the <em>Lethal Weapon</em> movies. If you haven't seen them... well they're old, so spoilers are fair game.</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introduction</p>
<p>00:47 - <strong>Off the QT: </strong>Netflix cancels <em>Resident Evil </em>TV series, Netflix's <em>Bioshock </em>movie has a director, Matt Reeves re-ups with WB Discovery for more <em>Batman </em>films</p>
<p>06:57 - <strong>Fave/Off: </strong><em>Lethal Weapon</em> (1987) vs <em>Lethal Weapon 2 </em>(1989), <em>Lethal Weapon 3 </em>(1992) vs <em>Lethal Weapon 4 </em>(1998)</p>
<p>54:59 - <strong>Pitchin': </strong>Our story pitches for <em>Lethal Weapon 5</em></p>
<p>1:19:46 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>
<p><strong>Fave/Off</strong>: We pit two of our favorite movies against each other and examine their pros &amp; cons</p>
<p><strong>Pitchin' </strong>(working title): We pitch our story concepts for an upcoming movie</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Just a few days ago, there was another update about Lethal Weapon 5, a seemingly unlikely but increasingly impending addition to the Lethal Weapon series. This got Isaac and Will thinking: what would we like to see in a new Lethal Weapon movie? How would we write it? Well, in order to figure that out, we dove back into the original four films and discussed their pros and cons. Then, we gave our pitches for Lethal Weapon 5. Warner Bros., if you're reading this, the answer is yes, we'll gladly write the script.
Warning: We spoil the Lethal Weapon movies. If you haven't seen them... well they're old, so spoilers are fair game.
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introduction
00:47 - Off the QT: Netflix cancels Resident Evil TV series, Netflix's Bioshock movie has a director, Matt Reeves re-ups with WB Discovery for more Batman films
06:57 - Fave/Off: Lethal Weapon (1987) vs Lethal Weapon 2 (1989), Lethal Weapon 3 (1992) vs Lethal Weapon 4 (1998)
54:59 - Pitchin': Our story pitches for Lethal Weapon 5
1:19:46 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors
Fave/Off: We pit two of our favorite movies against each other and examine their pros & cons
Pitchin' (working title): We pitch our story concepts for an upcoming movie]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[We're Not Too Old for Lethal Weapon 5... Right? | AJP #4]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Just a few days ago, there was another update about <em>Lethal Weapon 5</em>, a seemingly unlikely but increasingly impending addition to the <em>Lethal Weapon </em>series. This got Isaac and Will thinking: what would we like to see in a new <em>Lethal Weapon </em>movie? How would we write it? Well, in order to figure that out, we dove back into the original four films and discussed their pros and cons. Then, we gave our pitches for <em>Lethal Weapon 5</em>. Warner Bros., if you're reading this, the answer is yes, we'll gladly write the script.</p>
<p>Warning: We spoil the <em>Lethal Weapon</em> movies. If you haven't seen them... well they're old, so spoilers are fair game.</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introduction</p>
<p>00:47 - <strong>Off the QT: </strong>Netflix cancels <em>Resident Evil </em>TV series, Netflix's <em>Bioshock </em>movie has a director, Matt Reeves re-ups with WB Discovery for more <em>Batman </em>films</p>
<p>06:57 - <strong>Fave/Off: </strong><em>Lethal Weapon</em> (1987) vs <em>Lethal Weapon 2 </em>(1989), <em>Lethal Weapon 3 </em>(1992) vs <em>Lethal Weapon 4 </em>(1998)</p>
<p>54:59 - <strong>Pitchin': </strong>Our story pitches for <em>Lethal Weapon 5</em></p>
<p>1:19:46 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>
<p><strong>Fave/Off</strong>: We pit two of our favorite movies against each other and examine their pros &amp; cons</p>
<p><strong>Pitchin' </strong>(working title): We pitch our story concepts for an upcoming movie</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/62fd09a55a2ba4-12222585/43906/9ceefd91-130b-4a44-ae6b-3d174b564b77/AJP-4-Lethal-Weapon-Final.mp3" length="162637938"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Just a few days ago, there was another update about Lethal Weapon 5, a seemingly unlikely but increasingly impending addition to the Lethal Weapon series. This got Isaac and Will thinking: what would we like to see in a new Lethal Weapon movie? How would we write it? Well, in order to figure that out, we dove back into the original four films and discussed their pros and cons. Then, we gave our pitches for Lethal Weapon 5. Warner Bros., if you're reading this, the answer is yes, we'll gladly write the script.
Warning: We spoil the Lethal Weapon movies. If you haven't seen them... well they're old, so spoilers are fair game.
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introduction
00:47 - Off the QT: Netflix cancels Resident Evil TV series, Netflix's Bioshock movie has a director, Matt Reeves re-ups with WB Discovery for more Batman films
06:57 - Fave/Off: Lethal Weapon (1987) vs Lethal Weapon 2 (1989), Lethal Weapon 3 (1992) vs Lethal Weapon 4 (1998)
54:59 - Pitchin': Our story pitches for Lethal Weapon 5
1:19:46 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors
Fave/Off: We pit two of our favorite movies against each other and examine their pros & cons
Pitchin' (working title): We pitch our story concepts for an upcoming movie]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>01:23:20</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Action Juice]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[A Good Day to [Discuss] Die Hard | AJP #3]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Action Juice</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://actionjuice.castos.com/podcasts/43906/episodes/a-good-day-to-discuss-die-hard-ajp-3</guid>
                                    <link>https://actionjuice.castos.com/episodes/a-good-day-to-discuss-die-hard-ajp-3</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Isaac and Will both adore <em>Die Hard</em>, but it's fair to say that not all <em>Die Hard</em>s are created equal. Taking that into consideration, they decided to pit them against each other in a Fave/Off: <em>Die Hard </em>(1988) vs <em>Die Hard with a Vengeance </em>(1995), followed by <em>Die Hard 2</em> (1990) vs <em>Live Free or Die Hard </em>(2007). And please don't bring up the fifth one; it's triggering.</p>
<p>Warning: We spoil these movies. If you haven't seen them... well they're old, so spoilers are fair game.</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introduction</p>
<p>00:31 - <strong>Off the QT</strong><strong>:</strong> HBO Max discounts, Will Smith's popularity, <em>Good Burger 2</em>, the search for the next James Bond, Michael Mann criticizes modern action movies, Wolfgang Petersen passes away</p>
<p>14:41 - We discuss the trailer for <em>The</em> <em>Greatest Beer Run Ever </em></p>
<p>16:04 - Will finally watched the first two <em>Insidious</em> movies</p>
<p>19:20 - <strong>Fave/Off: </strong><em>Die Hard </em>vs <em>Die Hard with a Vengeance</em></p>
<p>1:06:27 - <strong>Fave/Off: </strong><em>Die Hard 2 </em>vs <em>Live Free or Die Hard</em></p>
<p>1:38:17 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>
<p><strong>Fave/Off</strong>: We pit two of our favorite movies against each other and examine their pros &amp; cons</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Isaac and Will both adore Die Hard, but it's fair to say that not all Die Hards are created equal. Taking that into consideration, they decided to pit them against each other in a Fave/Off: Die Hard (1988) vs Die Hard with a Vengeance (1995), followed by Die Hard 2 (1990) vs Live Free or Die Hard (2007). And please don't bring up the fifth one; it's triggering.
Warning: We spoil these movies. If you haven't seen them... well they're old, so spoilers are fair game.
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introduction
00:31 - Off the QT: HBO Max discounts, Will Smith's popularity, Good Burger 2, the search for the next James Bond, Michael Mann criticizes modern action movies, Wolfgang Petersen passes away
14:41 - We discuss the trailer for The Greatest Beer Run Ever 
16:04 - Will finally watched the first two Insidious movies
19:20 - Fave/Off: Die Hard vs Die Hard with a Vengeance
1:06:27 - Fave/Off: Die Hard 2 vs Live Free or Die Hard
1:38:17 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors
Fave/Off: We pit two of our favorite movies against each other and examine their pros & cons
 
 
 ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[A Good Day to [Discuss] Die Hard | AJP #3]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Isaac and Will both adore <em>Die Hard</em>, but it's fair to say that not all <em>Die Hard</em>s are created equal. Taking that into consideration, they decided to pit them against each other in a Fave/Off: <em>Die Hard </em>(1988) vs <em>Die Hard with a Vengeance </em>(1995), followed by <em>Die Hard 2</em> (1990) vs <em>Live Free or Die Hard </em>(2007). And please don't bring up the fifth one; it's triggering.</p>
<p>Warning: We spoil these movies. If you haven't seen them... well they're old, so spoilers are fair game.</p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introduction</p>
<p>00:31 - <strong>Off the QT</strong><strong>:</strong> HBO Max discounts, Will Smith's popularity, <em>Good Burger 2</em>, the search for the next James Bond, Michael Mann criticizes modern action movies, Wolfgang Petersen passes away</p>
<p>14:41 - We discuss the trailer for <em>The</em> <em>Greatest Beer Run Ever </em></p>
<p>16:04 - Will finally watched the first two <em>Insidious</em> movies</p>
<p>19:20 - <strong>Fave/Off: </strong><em>Die Hard </em>vs <em>Die Hard with a Vengeance</em></p>
<p>1:06:27 - <strong>Fave/Off: </strong><em>Die Hard 2 </em>vs <em>Live Free or Die Hard</em></p>
<p>1:38:17 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>
<p><strong>Fave/Off</strong>: We pit two of our favorite movies against each other and examine their pros &amp; cons</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/62fd09a55a2ba4-12222585/43906/cad1fa0f-a165-4a83-96c4-492bac56c2f2/AJP-3-Die-Hard-Final.mp3" length="196598575"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Isaac and Will both adore Die Hard, but it's fair to say that not all Die Hards are created equal. Taking that into consideration, they decided to pit them against each other in a Fave/Off: Die Hard (1988) vs Die Hard with a Vengeance (1995), followed by Die Hard 2 (1990) vs Live Free or Die Hard (2007). And please don't bring up the fifth one; it's triggering.
Warning: We spoil these movies. If you haven't seen them... well they're old, so spoilers are fair game.
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introduction
00:31 - Off the QT: HBO Max discounts, Will Smith's popularity, Good Burger 2, the search for the next James Bond, Michael Mann criticizes modern action movies, Wolfgang Petersen passes away
14:41 - We discuss the trailer for The Greatest Beer Run Ever 
16:04 - Will finally watched the first two Insidious movies
19:20 - Fave/Off: Die Hard vs Die Hard with a Vengeance
1:06:27 - Fave/Off: Die Hard 2 vs Live Free or Die Hard
1:38:17 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors
Fave/Off: We pit two of our favorite movies against each other and examine their pros & cons
 
 
 ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>01:40:15</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Action Juice]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Prey Has the Dumbest Predator Yet (It's Still Good) | AJP #2]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Action Juice</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/43906/episode/1244727</guid>
                                    <link>https://actionjuice.castos.com/episodes/prey-has-the-dumbest-predator-yet-it39s-still-good-ajp-2</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Movie lovers have been abuzz about <em>Prey</em>, 2022's prequel to John McTiernan's 1987 action/sci-fi classic, <em>Predator</em>. But how do Will and Isaac feel about it? As lifelong fans of the franchise, they might be difficult to please. Also discussed: the <em>Road House </em>and <em>Highlander </em>remakes, <em>Thirteen Lives</em>, and <em>Black Bird</em>.</p>
<p>Warning: things get spoiler-y toward the end (but we'll warn you beforehand). </p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introductions</p>
<p>00:27 - <strong>Off the QT</strong><strong>: </strong><em>Heat 2</em>, <em>Road House</em> and <em>Highlander</em> remakes, Jason Momoa trashes his <em>Conan </em>movie</p>
<p>07:31 - Will recommends Amazon and Ron Howard's film, <em>Thirteen</em> Lives, and Apple TV+'s show, <em>Black Bird</em></p>
<p>10:36 - <strong>TWaDiPA: </strong>a detailed, spoiler-free breakdown of <em>Prey</em>, its protagonists, and its place in the series</p>
<p>38:28 - Spoiler Warning: our <em>Prey</em> discussion veers into the nitty gritty</p>
<p>1:07:07 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>
<p><strong>To Watch and Die in PA (TWaDiPA)</strong>: An in-depth discussion of a new movie that we've recently watched</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Movie lovers have been abuzz about Prey, 2022's prequel to John McTiernan's 1987 action/sci-fi classic, Predator. But how do Will and Isaac feel about it? As lifelong fans of the franchise, they might be difficult to please. Also discussed: the Road House and Highlander remakes, Thirteen Lives, and Black Bird.
Warning: things get spoiler-y toward the end (but we'll warn you beforehand). 
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introductions
00:27 - Off the QT: Heat 2, Road House and Highlander remakes, Jason Momoa trashes his Conan movie
07:31 - Will recommends Amazon and Ron Howard's film, Thirteen Lives, and Apple TV+'s show, Black Bird
10:36 - TWaDiPA: a detailed, spoiler-free breakdown of Prey, its protagonists, and its place in the series
38:28 - Spoiler Warning: our Prey discussion veers into the nitty gritty
1:07:07 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors
To Watch and Die in PA (TWaDiPA): An in-depth discussion of a new movie that we've recently watched]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Prey Has the Dumbest Predator Yet (It's Still Good) | AJP #2]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Movie lovers have been abuzz about <em>Prey</em>, 2022's prequel to John McTiernan's 1987 action/sci-fi classic, <em>Predator</em>. But how do Will and Isaac feel about it? As lifelong fans of the franchise, they might be difficult to please. Also discussed: the <em>Road House </em>and <em>Highlander </em>remakes, <em>Thirteen Lives</em>, and <em>Black Bird</em>.</p>
<p>Warning: things get spoiler-y toward the end (but we'll warn you beforehand). </p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introductions</p>
<p>00:27 - <strong>Off the QT</strong><strong>: </strong><em>Heat 2</em>, <em>Road House</em> and <em>Highlander</em> remakes, Jason Momoa trashes his <em>Conan </em>movie</p>
<p>07:31 - Will recommends Amazon and Ron Howard's film, <em>Thirteen</em> Lives, and Apple TV+'s show, <em>Black Bird</em></p>
<p>10:36 - <strong>TWaDiPA: </strong>a detailed, spoiler-free breakdown of <em>Prey</em>, its protagonists, and its place in the series</p>
<p>38:28 - Spoiler Warning: our <em>Prey</em> discussion veers into the nitty gritty</p>
<p>1:07:07 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors</p>
<p><strong>To Watch and Die in PA (TWaDiPA)</strong>: An in-depth discussion of a new movie that we've recently watched</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/62fd09a55a2ba4-12222585/43906/91ead2ca-01e4-4eb3-a804-c2c8e9551a36/AJP-2-Prey-Final.mp3" length="133920295"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Movie lovers have been abuzz about Prey, 2022's prequel to John McTiernan's 1987 action/sci-fi classic, Predator. But how do Will and Isaac feel about it? As lifelong fans of the franchise, they might be difficult to please. Also discussed: the Road House and Highlander remakes, Thirteen Lives, and Black Bird.
Warning: things get spoiler-y toward the end (but we'll warn you beforehand). 
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introductions
00:27 - Off the QT: Heat 2, Road House and Highlander remakes, Jason Momoa trashes his Conan movie
07:31 - Will recommends Amazon and Ron Howard's film, Thirteen Lives, and Apple TV+'s show, Black Bird
10:36 - TWaDiPA: a detailed, spoiler-free breakdown of Prey, its protagonists, and its place in the series
38:28 - Spoiler Warning: our Prey discussion veers into the nitty gritty
1:07:07 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie/TV news and rumors
To Watch and Die in PA (TWaDiPA): An in-depth discussion of a new movie that we've recently watched]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>01:08:30</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Action Juice]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[The Gray Man Reminds Us Why We Miss the 90s | AJP #1]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Action Juice</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://actionjuice.castos.com/podcasts/43906/episodes/the-gray-man-reminds-us-why-we-miss-the-90s-ajp-1</guid>
                                    <link>https://actionjuice.castos.com/episodes/the-gray-man-reminds-us-why-we-miss-the-90s-ajp-1</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>After introducing themselves via a discussion of 3 scenes that laid the foundation for their action movie fandom, Will and Isaac break down the good and bad of <em>The Gray Man</em>. For $200 million, you'd think Netflix would've gotten more for their money. Also, they share their thoughts on the recent Warner Bros. Discovery news and how that's been affecting HBO and HBO Max.</p>
<p>Warning: things get spoiler-y toward the end (but we'll warn you beforehand). </p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introductions</p>
<p>00:59 -<strong> Off the QT:</strong> Warner Bros. Discovery news: <em>Batgirl</em> cancelled and the future of HBO Max</p>
<p>10:59 - Will and Isaac each pick 3 scenes/sequences that made them fall in love with [action] movies</p>
<p>41:13 - <strong>TWaDiPA:</strong> a detailed, spoiler-free breakdown of <em>The Gray Man</em>, and what we felt worked/didn't work</p>
<p>59:48 - Spoiler Warning: our<em> Gray Man </em>convo gets very specific... and vinegary</p>
<p>1:14:53 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie news and stories</p>
<p><strong>To Watch and Die in PA (TWaDiPA)</strong>: An in-depth discussion of a new movie that we've recently watched</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[After introducing themselves via a discussion of 3 scenes that laid the foundation for their action movie fandom, Will and Isaac break down the good and bad of The Gray Man. For $200 million, you'd think Netflix would've gotten more for their money. Also, they share their thoughts on the recent Warner Bros. Discovery news and how that's been affecting HBO and HBO Max.
Warning: things get spoiler-y toward the end (but we'll warn you beforehand). 
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introductions
00:59 - Off the QT: Warner Bros. Discovery news: Batgirl cancelled and the future of HBO Max
10:59 - Will and Isaac each pick 3 scenes/sequences that made them fall in love with [action] movies
41:13 - TWaDiPA: a detailed, spoiler-free breakdown of The Gray Man, and what we felt worked/didn't work
59:48 - Spoiler Warning: our Gray Man convo gets very specific... and vinegary
1:14:53 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie news and stories
To Watch and Die in PA (TWaDiPA): An in-depth discussion of a new movie that we've recently watched]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[The Gray Man Reminds Us Why We Miss the 90s | AJP #1]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>After introducing themselves via a discussion of 3 scenes that laid the foundation for their action movie fandom, Will and Isaac break down the good and bad of <em>The Gray Man</em>. For $200 million, you'd think Netflix would've gotten more for their money. Also, they share their thoughts on the recent Warner Bros. Discovery news and how that's been affecting HBO and HBO Max.</p>
<p>Warning: things get spoiler-y toward the end (but we'll warn you beforehand). </p>
<p>Episode Chapters:</p>
<p>00:05 - Introductions</p>
<p>00:59 -<strong> Off the QT:</strong> Warner Bros. Discovery news: <em>Batgirl</em> cancelled and the future of HBO Max</p>
<p>10:59 - Will and Isaac each pick 3 scenes/sequences that made them fall in love with [action] movies</p>
<p>41:13 - <strong>TWaDiPA:</strong> a detailed, spoiler-free breakdown of <em>The Gray Man</em>, and what we felt worked/didn't work</p>
<p>59:48 - Spoiler Warning: our<em> Gray Man </em>convo gets very specific... and vinegary</p>
<p>1:14:53 - Conclusion</p>
<p>Segments:</p>
<p><strong>Off the QT</strong>: A breakdown of the latest movie news and stories</p>
<p><strong>To Watch and Die in PA (TWaDiPA)</strong>: An in-depth discussion of a new movie that we've recently watched</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/62fd09a55a2ba4-12222585/43906/092e322e-d84a-47e7-83f5-c579c9341525/AJP-1-Gray-Man-Final.mp3" length="185615731"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[After introducing themselves via a discussion of 3 scenes that laid the foundation for their action movie fandom, Will and Isaac break down the good and bad of The Gray Man. For $200 million, you'd think Netflix would've gotten more for their money. Also, they share their thoughts on the recent Warner Bros. Discovery news and how that's been affecting HBO and HBO Max.
Warning: things get spoiler-y toward the end (but we'll warn you beforehand). 
Episode Chapters:
00:05 - Introductions
00:59 - Off the QT: Warner Bros. Discovery news: Batgirl cancelled and the future of HBO Max
10:59 - Will and Isaac each pick 3 scenes/sequences that made them fall in love with [action] movies
41:13 - TWaDiPA: a detailed, spoiler-free breakdown of The Gray Man, and what we felt worked/didn't work
59:48 - Spoiler Warning: our Gray Man convo gets very specific... and vinegary
1:14:53 - Conclusion
Segments:
Off the QT: A breakdown of the latest movie news and stories
To Watch and Die in PA (TWaDiPA): An in-depth discussion of a new movie that we've recently watched]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>01:17:20</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Action Juice]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>
