<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:spotify="http://www.spotify.com/ns/rss">
    <channel>
        <title>Proof Over Precedent</title>
        <generator>Castos</generator>
        <atom:link href="https://feeds.castos.com/oz6rk" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://a2jlab.org/proof-over-precedent/proof-over-precedent/</link>
        <description>The Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School discusses the work of bringing credible evidence to lawyers, judges, and decision makers, to transform the U.S. justice system into an evidence-based field. We bring you weekly one-on-one interviews with experts in the area of access to justice -- researchers, lawyers, professors, law students, data analysts, research participants, and anyone who has an interesting role in this growing area.</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 18:53:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>© 2025</copyright>
        
        <spotify:limit recentCount="100" />
        
        <spotify:countryOfOrigin>
              
        </spotify:countryOfOrigin>
                    
                <itunes:subtitle>The Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School discusses the work of bringing credible evidence to lawyers, judges, and decision makers, to transform the U.S. justice system into an evidence-based field. We bring you weekly one-on-one interviews with experts in the area of access to justice -- researchers, lawyers, professors, law students, data analysts, research participants, and anyone who has an interesting role in this growing area.</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:author>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</itunes:author>
        <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
        <itunes:summary>The Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School discusses the work of bringing credible evidence to lawyers, judges, and decision makers, to transform the U.S. justice system into an evidence-based field. We bring you weekly one-on-one interviews with experts in the area of access to justice -- researchers, lawyers, professors, law students, data analysts, research participants, and anyone who has an interesting role in this growing area.</itunes:summary>
        <itunes:owner>
            <itunes:name>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</itunes:name>
            <itunes:email>a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</itunes:email>
        </itunes:owner>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/podcast/covers/c1a-7o7w6-ndv7x026s2q9-ffya4y.png"></itunes:image>
        
                                    <itunes:category text="Government" />
                                                <itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture" />
                    
                    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.castos.com/oz6rk</itunes:new-feed-url>
                
        
        <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
                                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 43: Navigating Child Custody Challenges From Behind Bars]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 18:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2414851</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-43-navigating-child-custody-challenges-from-behind-bars</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[This week's "Student Voices" episode of Proof Over Precedent explores access to justice issues for incarcerated parents in the child welfare system. HLS student Mia Robertson looks at the process of removing a child from a home, working toward permanent placement and/or reunification, and the numerous barriers an incarcerated parent faces in custody cases, from an inability to show up for in-person hearings to a lack of reliable communication with an attorney (if they have counsel representation at all).]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This week's "Student Voices" episode of Proof Over Precedent explores access to justice issues for incarcerated parents in the child welfare system. HLS student Mia Robertson looks at the process of removing a child from a home, working toward permanent placement and/or reunification, and the numerous barriers an incarcerated parent faces in custody cases, from an inability to show up for in-person hearings to a lack of reliable communication with an attorney (if they have counsel representation at all).]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 43: Navigating Child Custody Challenges From Behind Bars]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[This week's "Student Voices" episode of Proof Over Precedent explores access to justice issues for incarcerated parents in the child welfare system. HLS student Mia Robertson looks at the process of removing a child from a home, working toward permanent placement and/or reunification, and the numerous barriers an incarcerated parent faces in custody cases, from an inability to show up for in-person hearings to a lack of reliable communication with an attorney (if they have counsel representation at all).]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2414851/c1e-6x546t7o89vtz26k8-ww7g9jowuz7z-os2xtm.mp3" length="42126859"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This week's "Student Voices" episode of Proof Over Precedent explores access to justice issues for incarcerated parents in the child welfare system. HLS student Mia Robertson looks at the process of removing a child from a home, working toward permanent placement and/or reunification, and the numerous barriers an incarcerated parent faces in custody cases, from an inability to show up for in-person hearings to a lack of reliable communication with an attorney (if they have counsel representation at all).]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2414851/c1a-7o7w6-kpjm19w1uwjn-z1asik.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:29:16</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 42: Can Financial (and Other) Support Help Reduce Child Welfare Involvement in Neglect Cases?]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 18:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2409944</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-42-can-financial-and-other-support-help-reduce-child-welfare-involvement-in-neglect-cases</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[This week, Proof Over Precedent speaks with Melody Webb, Founder and Executive Director of the Mother's Outreach Network, a Washington, DC-based racial justice and anti-poverty organization that the Access to Justice Lab partnered with in its Mother Up pre-pilot study. Webb shares her vision for the study—which looks at providing Black indigent mothers with guaranteed income to support their children in an effort to reduce child welfare agency involvement—and offers perspective on the preliminary findings from the pilot.]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This week, Proof Over Precedent speaks with Melody Webb, Founder and Executive Director of the Mother's Outreach Network, a Washington, DC-based racial justice and anti-poverty organization that the Access to Justice Lab partnered with in its Mother Up pre-pilot study. Webb shares her vision for the study—which looks at providing Black indigent mothers with guaranteed income to support their children in an effort to reduce child welfare agency involvement—and offers perspective on the preliminary findings from the pilot.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 42: Can Financial (and Other) Support Help Reduce Child Welfare Involvement in Neglect Cases?]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[This week, Proof Over Precedent speaks with Melody Webb, Founder and Executive Director of the Mother's Outreach Network, a Washington, DC-based racial justice and anti-poverty organization that the Access to Justice Lab partnered with in its Mother Up pre-pilot study. Webb shares her vision for the study—which looks at providing Black indigent mothers with guaranteed income to support their children in an effort to reduce child welfare agency involvement—and offers perspective on the preliminary findings from the pilot.]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2409944/c1e-5wp26h7172ofnk2qp-pkw13jx7tj6n-djlv7u.mp3" length="34053769"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This week, Proof Over Precedent speaks with Melody Webb, Founder and Executive Director of the Mother's Outreach Network, a Washington, DC-based racial justice and anti-poverty organization that the Access to Justice Lab partnered with in its Mother Up pre-pilot study. Webb shares her vision for the study—which looks at providing Black indigent mothers with guaranteed income to support their children in an effort to reduce child welfare agency involvement—and offers perspective on the preliminary findings from the pilot.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:23:39</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 41: How Evidence-Based Research Could Transform the Child Welfare System]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 16:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2403822</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-41-how-evidence-based-research-could-transform-the-child-welfare-system</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[A2J Lab Director and Professor Jim Greiner sat down with five A2J Lab staff members to discuss "Mother Up", a DC guaranteed income pre-pilot program with Mothers Outreach Network for Black mothers with recent CFSA involvement. The privately funded program explored how feasible it would be to conduct a larger study on the subject of guaranteed income, but this episode of Proof Over Precedent looks into why the Lab got involved with the program, how we gathered and analyzed data to apply to future evidence-leading studies, and what we're seeing with results so far.]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[A2J Lab Director and Professor Jim Greiner sat down with five A2J Lab staff members to discuss "Mother Up", a DC guaranteed income pre-pilot program with Mothers Outreach Network for Black mothers with recent CFSA involvement. The privately funded program explored how feasible it would be to conduct a larger study on the subject of guaranteed income, but this episode of Proof Over Precedent looks into why the Lab got involved with the program, how we gathered and analyzed data to apply to future evidence-leading studies, and what we're seeing with results so far.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 41: How Evidence-Based Research Could Transform the Child Welfare System]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[A2J Lab Director and Professor Jim Greiner sat down with five A2J Lab staff members to discuss "Mother Up", a DC guaranteed income pre-pilot program with Mothers Outreach Network for Black mothers with recent CFSA involvement. The privately funded program explored how feasible it would be to conduct a larger study on the subject of guaranteed income, but this episode of Proof Over Precedent looks into why the Lab got involved with the program, how we gathered and analyzed data to apply to future evidence-leading studies, and what we're seeing with results so far.]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2403822/c1e-mpn2zs4ng4qawqk0n-v6wxxnm2bvk5-cp2wst.mp3" length="54491937"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[A2J Lab Director and Professor Jim Greiner sat down with five A2J Lab staff members to discuss "Mother Up", a DC guaranteed income pre-pilot program with Mothers Outreach Network for Black mothers with recent CFSA involvement. The privately funded program explored how feasible it would be to conduct a larger study on the subject of guaranteed income, but this episode of Proof Over Precedent looks into why the Lab got involved with the program, how we gathered and analyzed data to apply to future evidence-leading studies, and what we're seeing with results so far.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:56:46</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 40: EmPwR Study–How Financial Support Means Family Support]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 18:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2398331</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-40-empwr-study-how-financial-support-means-family-support</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[The Empower Parents with Resources Study is the largest randomized control trial of the effect of unrestricted cash gifts on child maltreatment in the United States. Researchers aim to find out if a reduction in financial stress equals a reduction in child welfare involvement. In this week's Proof Over Precedent episode, HLS J.D. candidate Julia Saltzman interviews researcher William Schneider, who explains the broad impact the study may have on families, caseworkers, and child welfare policy.]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[The Empower Parents with Resources Study is the largest randomized control trial of the effect of unrestricted cash gifts on child maltreatment in the United States. Researchers aim to find out if a reduction in financial stress equals a reduction in child welfare involvement. In this week's Proof Over Precedent episode, HLS J.D. candidate Julia Saltzman interviews researcher William Schneider, who explains the broad impact the study may have on families, caseworkers, and child welfare policy.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 40: EmPwR Study–How Financial Support Means Family Support]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[The Empower Parents with Resources Study is the largest randomized control trial of the effect of unrestricted cash gifts on child maltreatment in the United States. Researchers aim to find out if a reduction in financial stress equals a reduction in child welfare involvement. In this week's Proof Over Precedent episode, HLS J.D. candidate Julia Saltzman interviews researcher William Schneider, who explains the broad impact the study may have on families, caseworkers, and child welfare policy.]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2398331/c1e-k8r1gidjw6wcx3rgd-dm1gxo8wi8k5-paxixn.mp3" length="35198559"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[The Empower Parents with Resources Study is the largest randomized control trial of the effect of unrestricted cash gifts on child maltreatment in the United States. Researchers aim to find out if a reduction in financial stress equals a reduction in child welfare involvement. In this week's Proof Over Precedent episode, HLS J.D. candidate Julia Saltzman interviews researcher William Schneider, who explains the broad impact the study may have on families, caseworkers, and child welfare policy.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:24:27</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 39: On the Medical-Legal Collaboration Pioneering Child Welfare Solutions]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 18:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2388419</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-39-on-the-medical-legal-collaboration-pioneering-child-welfare-solutions</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[If poverty can sometimes appear as neglect within a family, would better social and legal support help prevent unnecessary child welfare involvement? An Access to Justice Lab ongoing randomized controlled trial aims to find out. This episode gives a research partner's point of view to the trial.]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[If poverty can sometimes appear as neglect within a family, would better social and legal support help prevent unnecessary child welfare involvement? An Access to Justice Lab ongoing randomized controlled trial aims to find out. This episode gives a research partner's point of view to the trial.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 39: On the Medical-Legal Collaboration Pioneering Child Welfare Solutions]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[If poverty can sometimes appear as neglect within a family, would better social and legal support help prevent unnecessary child welfare involvement? An Access to Justice Lab ongoing randomized controlled trial aims to find out. This episode gives a research partner's point of view to the trial.]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2388419/c1e-3w8q6hwjogqc6xpwd-6z9mqd51iw07-jnv44v.mp3" length="79856035"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[If poverty can sometimes appear as neglect within a family, would better social and legal support help prevent unnecessary child welfare involvement? An Access to Justice Lab ongoing randomized controlled trial aims to find out. This episode gives a research partner's point of view to the trial.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2388419/c1a-7o7w6-nd173r70sxqr-uqvrxo.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:55:28</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 38: Fair or Foul--AI in Medicine and Law]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 04:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2381285</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-38-fair-or-foul-ai-in-medicine-and-law</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[In this week's Proof Over Precedent episode, HLS J.D. candidate Strong Ma  discusses how public perceptions of fairness influence the adoption of AI and algorithms in medicine and law, two industries with varying levels of support and trust in AI. The podcast includes interviews with HLS Professors Jim Greiner and Jon Hanson weighing in on AI's strengths and shortcomings in law, particularly as it compares to human decision making.]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this week's Proof Over Precedent episode, HLS J.D. candidate Strong Ma  discusses how public perceptions of fairness influence the adoption of AI and algorithms in medicine and law, two industries with varying levels of support and trust in AI. The podcast includes interviews with HLS Professors Jim Greiner and Jon Hanson weighing in on AI's strengths and shortcomings in law, particularly as it compares to human decision making.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 38: Fair or Foul--AI in Medicine and Law]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[In this week's Proof Over Precedent episode, HLS J.D. candidate Strong Ma  discusses how public perceptions of fairness influence the adoption of AI and algorithms in medicine and law, two industries with varying levels of support and trust in AI. The podcast includes interviews with HLS Professors Jim Greiner and Jon Hanson weighing in on AI's strengths and shortcomings in law, particularly as it compares to human decision making.]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2381285/c1e-zqj6rb3878mfn271v-dm1rnj03u13d-7njwrb.mp3" length="38667411"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this week's Proof Over Precedent episode, HLS J.D. candidate Strong Ma  discusses how public perceptions of fairness influence the adoption of AI and algorithms in medicine and law, two industries with varying levels of support and trust in AI. The podcast includes interviews with HLS Professors Jim Greiner and Jon Hanson weighing in on AI's strengths and shortcomings in law, particularly as it compares to human decision making.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2381285/c1a-7o7w6-gp5m1xn2i3nx-bw0vlb.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:26:51</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 37: Navigating Pretrial Risk Assessments and Cash Bail Reform]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2369397</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-37-navigating-pretrial-risk-assessments-and-cash-bail-reform</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[Is ending cash bail a path to a fairer justice system? California attempted this route in 2018 with its SB10, which would have ended cash bail statewide and replaced it with pretrial risk assessment. The effort could potentially have avoided a two-tiered, wealth-based system, but it fell short with voters. This "Student Voices" episode of Proof Over Precedent dives into the debate over cash bail, what went wrong with the SB 10 campaign, and lessons for future bail reform efforts.]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Is ending cash bail a path to a fairer justice system? California attempted this route in 2018 with its SB10, which would have ended cash bail statewide and replaced it with pretrial risk assessment. The effort could potentially have avoided a two-tiered, wealth-based system, but it fell short with voters. This "Student Voices" episode of Proof Over Precedent dives into the debate over cash bail, what went wrong with the SB 10 campaign, and lessons for future bail reform efforts.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 37: Navigating Pretrial Risk Assessments and Cash Bail Reform]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[Is ending cash bail a path to a fairer justice system? California attempted this route in 2018 with its SB10, which would have ended cash bail statewide and replaced it with pretrial risk assessment. The effort could potentially have avoided a two-tiered, wealth-based system, but it fell short with voters. This "Student Voices" episode of Proof Over Precedent dives into the debate over cash bail, what went wrong with the SB 10 campaign, and lessons for future bail reform efforts.]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2369397/c1e-k8r1gidxqp9sx3rgd-9jwv8k7niw60-aa9j6h.mp3" length="35306392"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Is ending cash bail a path to a fairer justice system? California attempted this route in 2018 with its SB10, which would have ended cash bail statewide and replaced it with pretrial risk assessment. The effort could potentially have avoided a two-tiered, wealth-based system, but it fell short with voters. This "Student Voices" episode of Proof Over Precedent dives into the debate over cash bail, what went wrong with the SB 10 campaign, and lessons for future bail reform efforts.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2369397/c1a-7o7w6-6z9460jncj0p-e7jzip.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:24:31</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 36: Record Clearing Insights: How Data Can Impact Policy]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 04:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2362681</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/record-clearing-insights-how-data-can-impact-policy</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[This episode of Proof Over Precedent looks at predictive modeling research that could be used alongside policy research to answer the question, "What can we do to increase the number of criminal records cleared?" Researchers examined existing data on automatic record sealing in Pennsylvania and petition-based expungements in Kansas and adjusted criteria that could contribute to more effective record clearing. In the process, they made surprising discoveries on the state and future of criminal record clearances.]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This episode of Proof Over Precedent looks at predictive modeling research that could be used alongside policy research to answer the question, "What can we do to increase the number of criminal records cleared?" Researchers examined existing data on automatic record sealing in Pennsylvania and petition-based expungements in Kansas and adjusted criteria that could contribute to more effective record clearing. In the process, they made surprising discoveries on the state and future of criminal record clearances.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 36: Record Clearing Insights: How Data Can Impact Policy]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[This episode of Proof Over Precedent looks at predictive modeling research that could be used alongside policy research to answer the question, "What can we do to increase the number of criminal records cleared?" Researchers examined existing data on automatic record sealing in Pennsylvania and petition-based expungements in Kansas and adjusted criteria that could contribute to more effective record clearing. In the process, they made surprising discoveries on the state and future of criminal record clearances.]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2362681/c1e-wqk5obvd224t0gmq4-z34w7jw0hn5k-5asqio.mp3" length="37867212"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This episode of Proof Over Precedent looks at predictive modeling research that could be used alongside policy research to answer the question, "What can we do to increase the number of criminal records cleared?" Researchers examined existing data on automatic record sealing in Pennsylvania and petition-based expungements in Kansas and adjusted criteria that could contribute to more effective record clearing. In the process, they made surprising discoveries on the state and future of criminal record clearances.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2362681/c1a-7o7w6-pkwrzkq9a832-dixluo.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:39:36</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 35: Legal Hurdles in Expungement: A Kansas Case Study]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 02:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2353530</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/legal-hurdles-in-expungement-a-kansas-case-study</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, the criminal record clearing process gets a close-up examination. Researchers and a former field partner at Kansas Legal Services discuss an expungement study in Kansas that reveals the numerous, and sometimes prohibitive and illogical, steps it takes for an individual to clear a record – a task made exponentially more difficult and less likely to succeed without the aid of legal representation.]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, the criminal record clearing process gets a close-up examination. Researchers and a former field partner at Kansas Legal Services discuss an expungement study in Kansas that reveals the numerous, and sometimes prohibitive and illogical, steps it takes for an individual to clear a record – a task made exponentially more difficult and less likely to succeed without the aid of legal representation.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 35: Legal Hurdles in Expungement: A Kansas Case Study]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, the criminal record clearing process gets a close-up examination. Researchers and a former field partner at Kansas Legal Services discuss an expungement study in Kansas that reveals the numerous, and sometimes prohibitive and illogical, steps it takes for an individual to clear a record – a task made exponentially more difficult and less likely to succeed without the aid of legal representation.]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2353530/c1e-nqm58bz45kwuo05q7-47o92z13t692-dbegsj.mp3" length="82679141"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, the criminal record clearing process gets a close-up examination. Researchers and a former field partner at Kansas Legal Services discuss an expungement study in Kansas that reveals the numerous, and sometimes prohibitive and illogical, steps it takes for an individual to clear a record – a task made exponentially more difficult and less likely to succeed without the aid of legal representation.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2353530/c1a-7o7w6-dm1m622mt7q-6tyw7y.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:57:25</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 34: Studying the Expungement Paradox]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 14:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2344334</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-34-studying-the-expungement-paradox</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[Expungement appears to have all the signs of promising policy including better job and housing outcomes for individuals whose criminal records have been cleared; low recidivism rates; and subsequently better societal outcomes. Where it falls short, researchers in a Michigan study found, is with accessibility and uptake. This episode of "Proof Over Precedent" looks at the findings and dives into the challenges of studying expungement and the areas where the record-clearing process could be improved.]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Expungement appears to have all the signs of promising policy including better job and housing outcomes for individuals whose criminal records have been cleared; low recidivism rates; and subsequently better societal outcomes. Where it falls short, researchers in a Michigan study found, is with accessibility and uptake. This episode of "Proof Over Precedent" looks at the findings and dives into the challenges of studying expungement and the areas where the record-clearing process could be improved.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 34: Studying the Expungement Paradox]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[Expungement appears to have all the signs of promising policy including better job and housing outcomes for individuals whose criminal records have been cleared; low recidivism rates; and subsequently better societal outcomes. Where it falls short, researchers in a Michigan study found, is with accessibility and uptake. This episode of "Proof Over Precedent" looks at the findings and dives into the challenges of studying expungement and the areas where the record-clearing process could be improved.]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2344334/c1e-oqgdvbjworobmp2d1-xx77k6gmc82g-nfgupj.mp3" length="93673766"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Expungement appears to have all the signs of promising policy including better job and housing outcomes for individuals whose criminal records have been cleared; low recidivism rates; and subsequently better societal outcomes. Where it falls short, researchers in a Michigan study found, is with accessibility and uptake. This episode of "Proof Over Precedent" looks at the findings and dives into the challenges of studying expungement and the areas where the record-clearing process could be improved.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>01:05:03</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 33: Are Federal Regulations Protecting Prisoners or Paralyzing Research?]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 11:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2339591</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-33-are-federal-regulations-protecting-prisoners-or-paralyzing-research</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[This episode of "Proof Over Precedent" brings together IRB Director Shannon Sewards and A2J Lab Faculty Director and podcast host Jim Greiner to talk about the complexity of ethical research involving incarcerated individuals and the balance between maintaining those ethical standards and advancing social and behavioral research. The discussion also delves into the differences between protections for biomedical research and those for behavioral research.]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This episode of "Proof Over Precedent" brings together IRB Director Shannon Sewards and A2J Lab Faculty Director and podcast host Jim Greiner to talk about the complexity of ethical research involving incarcerated individuals and the balance between maintaining those ethical standards and advancing social and behavioral research. The discussion also delves into the differences between protections for biomedical research and those for behavioral research.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 33: Are Federal Regulations Protecting Prisoners or Paralyzing Research?]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[This episode of "Proof Over Precedent" brings together IRB Director Shannon Sewards and A2J Lab Faculty Director and podcast host Jim Greiner to talk about the complexity of ethical research involving incarcerated individuals and the balance between maintaining those ethical standards and advancing social and behavioral research. The discussion also delves into the differences between protections for biomedical research and those for behavioral research.]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2339591/c1e-0wgq6h7rjxpc10q68-0v974n1zavjk-i8ae4w.mp3" length="61136897"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This episode of "Proof Over Precedent" brings together IRB Director Shannon Sewards and A2J Lab Faculty Director and podcast host Jim Greiner to talk about the complexity of ethical research involving incarcerated individuals and the balance between maintaining those ethical standards and advancing social and behavioral research. The discussion also delves into the differences between protections for biomedical research and those for behavioral research.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2339591/c1a-7o7w6-9jw31k1xtpvk-0q5hui.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:42:28</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 32: Arbitration vs. Litigation -- Who Benefits?]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 22:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2330131</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-32-arbitration-vs-litigation-who-benefits</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[When it comes to consumer protection, signing off on the fine print may equate to signing off certain legal rights and agreeing not to sue a company in court but rather to use arbitration. Does the process actually matter? Several studies find variances in consumer financial relief and win rates, along with potential incentives in mandatory arbitration that could discredit the integrity of the process. The latest "Proof Over Precedent" episode calls for new research to address the shortcomings of existing studies and to provide definitive findings on mandatory arbitration's impact on consumers.]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[When it comes to consumer protection, signing off on the fine print may equate to signing off certain legal rights and agreeing not to sue a company in court but rather to use arbitration. Does the process actually matter? Several studies find variances in consumer financial relief and win rates, along with potential incentives in mandatory arbitration that could discredit the integrity of the process. The latest "Proof Over Precedent" episode calls for new research to address the shortcomings of existing studies and to provide definitive findings on mandatory arbitration's impact on consumers.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 32: Arbitration vs. Litigation -- Who Benefits?]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[When it comes to consumer protection, signing off on the fine print may equate to signing off certain legal rights and agreeing not to sue a company in court but rather to use arbitration. Does the process actually matter? Several studies find variances in consumer financial relief and win rates, along with potential incentives in mandatory arbitration that could discredit the integrity of the process. The latest "Proof Over Precedent" episode calls for new research to address the shortcomings of existing studies and to provide definitive findings on mandatory arbitration's impact on consumers.]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2330131/c1e-7o7w6av5xrpu29751-1prkzmgqh0q9-96ejfw.mp3" length="22661664"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[When it comes to consumer protection, signing off on the fine print may equate to signing off certain legal rights and agreeing not to sue a company in court but rather to use arbitration. Does the process actually matter? Several studies find variances in consumer financial relief and win rates, along with potential incentives in mandatory arbitration that could discredit the integrity of the process. The latest "Proof Over Precedent" episode calls for new research to address the shortcomings of existing studies and to provide definitive findings on mandatory arbitration's impact on consumers.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2330131/c1a-7o7w6-250nqzk2i6v2-uj5cch.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:45</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 31: Life Without Parole—a Death Sentence in Disguise]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2320098</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-31-life-without-parole-a-death-sentence-in-disguise</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[In this "Student Voices" episode, HLS J.D. candidate Kristen Arnold looks at the procedural shortcomings of life sentences without the possibility of parole, particularly in comparison to capital punishment cases. She dives into the injustices of the LWOP procedure, the no-hope consequences for inmates and the system, and opportunity for a randomized control trial in the field to improve fairness.]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this "Student Voices" episode, HLS J.D. candidate Kristen Arnold looks at the procedural shortcomings of life sentences without the possibility of parole, particularly in comparison to capital punishment cases. She dives into the injustices of the LWOP procedure, the no-hope consequences for inmates and the system, and opportunity for a randomized control trial in the field to improve fairness.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 31: Life Without Parole—a Death Sentence in Disguise]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[In this "Student Voices" episode, HLS J.D. candidate Kristen Arnold looks at the procedural shortcomings of life sentences without the possibility of parole, particularly in comparison to capital punishment cases. She dives into the injustices of the LWOP procedure, the no-hope consequences for inmates and the system, and opportunity for a randomized control trial in the field to improve fairness.]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2320098/c1e-0wgq6hkpn0xh10q68-0v92w53zbzgk-7lrbhg.mp3" length="26082869"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this "Student Voices" episode, HLS J.D. candidate Kristen Arnold looks at the procedural shortcomings of life sentences without the possibility of parole, particularly in comparison to capital punishment cases. She dives into the injustices of the LWOP procedure, the no-hope consequences for inmates and the system, and opportunity for a randomized control trial in the field to improve fairness.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2320098/c1a-7o7w6-9jw09rqkcvok-1wrrkk.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:18:07</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 30: Do Judges Actually Read Search Warrants?]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 11:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2315384</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-30-do-judges-actually-read-search-warrants</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[Despite search warrants being a topic of significant interest in court cases and legal scholarship, the process of obtaining warrants offers comparatively little information. But when researchers found a surprising public data point in this field, their analysis led to sobering findings regarding the time judges spend reviewing warrants and the high approval rates of such warrants. In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, the researchers discuss their work, the data analysis process, and the implications of potentially insufficient judicial review of warrants.]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Despite search warrants being a topic of significant interest in court cases and legal scholarship, the process of obtaining warrants offers comparatively little information. But when researchers found a surprising public data point in this field, their analysis led to sobering findings regarding the time judges spend reviewing warrants and the high approval rates of such warrants. In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, the researchers discuss their work, the data analysis process, and the implications of potentially insufficient judicial review of warrants.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 30: Do Judges Actually Read Search Warrants?]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[Despite search warrants being a topic of significant interest in court cases and legal scholarship, the process of obtaining warrants offers comparatively little information. But when researchers found a surprising public data point in this field, their analysis led to sobering findings regarding the time judges spend reviewing warrants and the high approval rates of such warrants. In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, the researchers discuss their work, the data analysis process, and the implications of potentially insufficient judicial review of warrants.]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2315384/c1e-5wp26h1wvjoank2qp-34mz2g59tdo2-y0t19f.mp3" length="90532176"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Despite search warrants being a topic of significant interest in court cases and legal scholarship, the process of obtaining warrants offers comparatively little information. But when researchers found a surprising public data point in this field, their analysis led to sobering findings regarding the time judges spend reviewing warrants and the high approval rates of such warrants. In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, the researchers discuss their work, the data analysis process, and the implications of potentially insufficient judicial review of warrants.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2315384/c1a-7o7w6-okj7711zujo4-meqwkf.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>01:02:53</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 28: Pretrial Detention Efficacy and Alternatives]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2297273</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-28-pretrial-detention-efficacy-and-alternatives</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[This Student Voices episode focuses on the data and studies pointing to the shortcomings of pretrial detention – the significant costs, lack of impact on reducing crime, and shortage of failure-to-appear connections. HLS JD candidate Leann Poarch instead suggests a low-cost, relatively low-tech alternative that may be more effective.]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This Student Voices episode focuses on the data and studies pointing to the shortcomings of pretrial detention – the significant costs, lack of impact on reducing crime, and shortage of failure-to-appear connections. HLS JD candidate Leann Poarch instead suggests a low-cost, relatively low-tech alternative that may be more effective.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 28: Pretrial Detention Efficacy and Alternatives]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[This Student Voices episode focuses on the data and studies pointing to the shortcomings of pretrial detention – the significant costs, lack of impact on reducing crime, and shortage of failure-to-appear connections. HLS JD candidate Leann Poarch instead suggests a low-cost, relatively low-tech alternative that may be more effective.]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2297273/c1e-6x546tor170ck4zvx-34m633x4ig1w-rxadeu.mp3" length="48845136"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This Student Voices episode focuses on the data and studies pointing to the shortcomings of pretrial detention – the significant costs, lack of impact on reducing crime, and shortage of failure-to-appear connections. HLS JD candidate Leann Poarch instead suggests a low-cost, relatively low-tech alternative that may be more effective.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:25:27</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 27: The Hidden Costs of Pretrial Detention]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 00:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2290481</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-27-the-hidden-costs-of-pretrial-detention</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[In this Student Voices episode, HLS J.D. candidate Leann Poarch discusses the significant costs of detaining individuals who await trial, such as legal fees, loss of employment, and long-term economic and psychological effects. Given that detaining individuals not yet convicted can cost local governments more than $13 billion, is it time to look into reforming the pretrial system?]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this Student Voices episode, HLS J.D. candidate Leann Poarch discusses the significant costs of detaining individuals who await trial, such as legal fees, loss of employment, and long-term economic and psychological effects. Given that detaining individuals not yet convicted can cost local governments more than $13 billion, is it time to look into reforming the pretrial system?]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 27: The Hidden Costs of Pretrial Detention]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[In this Student Voices episode, HLS J.D. candidate Leann Poarch discusses the significant costs of detaining individuals who await trial, such as legal fees, loss of employment, and long-term economic and psychological effects. Given that detaining individuals not yet convicted can cost local governments more than $13 billion, is it time to look into reforming the pretrial system?]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2290481/c1e-jz9gmu5dokpb5403x-6zq2zxqnupv6-ebuvei.mp3" length="49404366"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this Student Voices episode, HLS J.D. candidate Leann Poarch discusses the significant costs of detaining individuals who await trial, such as legal fees, loss of employment, and long-term economic and psychological effects. Given that detaining individuals not yet convicted can cost local governments more than $13 billion, is it time to look into reforming the pretrial system?]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2290481/c1a-7o7w6-gp98p6m5a65d-xvrni6.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:25:44</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 26: When is Informed Consent Unnecessary?]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 07:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2280651</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-26-when-is-informed-consent-unnecessary</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/ShannonSewards_Ethics04.png?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting a soccer player being told by a ref to start using hands in the game." class="wp-image-91520" style="width:683px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, the fourth in a series on Ethics in the Law, host Jim Greiner talks again with IRB expert Shannon Sewards to discuss the complexities and criteria involved in obtaining waivers of informed consent within the realm of social science and legal research, comparing it to the regulations governing medical research. The two dive into an A2J Lab study on pretrial risk assessment tools to use as an example in determining the necessity of obtaining informed consent. When does protecting study participants take precedence, and when do critical research needs supersede those of participants?</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/navigating-informed-consent-challenges-in-legal-research/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Shannon Sewards</strong>, Director of the Human Research Protection Program, Dartmouth Health; former Director, Harvard University Area IRB</li>



<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a></strong>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://perma.cc/CEC5-UGG8">General Requirements for Informed Consent (45 C.F.R § 46.116)</a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/CEC5-UGG8">General Waiver or Alteration of Consent (45 C.F.R § 46.116(f)</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/index.html">Office of Human Research Protection</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-A/part-46">Common Rule (45 C.F.R § 46(a)</a> </li>
</ul>



<p>Related “Ethics in the Law” series episodes:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/podcast/episode-8-ethics-in-research-irbs-and-the-common-rule-explained/">Episode 8: Ethics in Research — IRBs and the Common Rule Explained</a></li>



<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/podcast/episode-10-what-is-human-subjects-research-in-law/">Episode 10: What is Human Subjects Research in Law?</a></li>



<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/podcast/episode-14-ethical-conundrums-in-legal-research/">Episode 14: Ethical Conundrums in Legal Research</a></li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>



<p></p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, the fourth in a series on Ethics in the Law, host Jim Greiner talks again with IRB expert Shannon Sewards to discuss the complexities and criteria involved in obtaining waivers of informed consent within the realm of social science and legal research, comparing it to the regulations governing medical research. The two dive into an A2J Lab study on pretrial risk assessment tools to use as an example in determining the necessity of obtaining informed consent. When does protecting study participants take precedence, and when do critical research needs supersede those of participants?



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Shannon Sewards, Director of the Human Research Protection Program, Dartmouth Health; former Director, Harvard University Area IRB



Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




General Requirements for Informed Consent (45 C.F.R § 46.116)



General Waiver or Alteration of Consent (45 C.F.R § 46.116(f)



Office of Human Research Protection



Common Rule (45 C.F.R § 46(a) 




Related “Ethics in the Law” series episodes:




Episode 8: Ethics in Research — IRBs and the Common Rule Explained



Episode 10: What is Human Subjects Research in Law?



Episode 14: Ethical Conundrums in Legal Research




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal




]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 26: When is Informed Consent Unnecessary?]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/ShannonSewards_Ethics04.png?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting a soccer player being told by a ref to start using hands in the game." class="wp-image-91520" style="width:683px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, the fourth in a series on Ethics in the Law, host Jim Greiner talks again with IRB expert Shannon Sewards to discuss the complexities and criteria involved in obtaining waivers of informed consent within the realm of social science and legal research, comparing it to the regulations governing medical research. The two dive into an A2J Lab study on pretrial risk assessment tools to use as an example in determining the necessity of obtaining informed consent. When does protecting study participants take precedence, and when do critical research needs supersede those of participants?</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/navigating-informed-consent-challenges-in-legal-research/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Shannon Sewards</strong>, Director of the Human Research Protection Program, Dartmouth Health; former Director, Harvard University Area IRB</li>



<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a></strong>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://perma.cc/CEC5-UGG8">General Requirements for Informed Consent (45 C.F.R § 46.116)</a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/CEC5-UGG8">General Waiver or Alteration of Consent (45 C.F.R § 46.116(f)</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/index.html">Office of Human Research Protection</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-A/part-46">Common Rule (45 C.F.R § 46(a)</a> </li>
</ul>



<p>Related “Ethics in the Law” series episodes:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/podcast/episode-8-ethics-in-research-irbs-and-the-common-rule-explained/">Episode 8: Ethics in Research — IRBs and the Common Rule Explained</a></li>



<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/podcast/episode-10-what-is-human-subjects-research-in-law/">Episode 10: What is Human Subjects Research in Law?</a></li>



<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/podcast/episode-14-ethical-conundrums-in-legal-research/">Episode 14: Ethical Conundrums in Legal Research</a></li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>



<p></p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2280651/c1e-7o7w6a90dw2h502pn-0v7oz14puk83-tdasby.mp3" length="121485609"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, the fourth in a series on Ethics in the Law, host Jim Greiner talks again with IRB expert Shannon Sewards to discuss the complexities and criteria involved in obtaining waivers of informed consent within the realm of social science and legal research, comparing it to the regulations governing medical research. The two dive into an A2J Lab study on pretrial risk assessment tools to use as an example in determining the necessity of obtaining informed consent. When does protecting study participants take precedence, and when do critical research needs supersede those of participants?



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Shannon Sewards, Director of the Human Research Protection Program, Dartmouth Health; former Director, Harvard University Area IRB



Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




General Requirements for Informed Consent (45 C.F.R § 46.116)



General Waiver or Alteration of Consent (45 C.F.R § 46.116(f)



Office of Human Research Protection



Common Rule (45 C.F.R § 46(a) 




Related “Ethics in the Law” series episodes:




Episode 8: Ethics in Research — IRBs and the Common Rule Explained



Episode 10: What is Human Subjects Research in Law?



Episode 14: Ethical Conundrums in Legal Research




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal




]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2280651/c1a-7o7w6-wwp219n8az3z-uluepg.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>01:03:17</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 25: Legal Labyrinths Reveal Divorce Filing Woes]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2263583</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-25-legal-labyrinths-reveal-divorce-filing-woes</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/PhilaDiv01_and_PhilaDiv02.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting an outdated mandate requiring a typewriter in order to file for divorce" class="wp-image-91510" style="width:736px;height:auto;" />Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>Why is it so hard logistically to file for divorce when legally some cases are quite simple and uncomplicated? This second divorce study episode of Proof Over Precedent dives into the data behind the hassle factors and shares the surprising results of measuring the pro se accessibility of a court system. Maybe the answer isn’t more lawyers.</p>



<p>Listen to <a href="https://a2jlab.org/podcast/episode-24-till-death-or-an-affordable-divorce-do-us-part/">Episode 24: Legal Labyrinths Reveal Divorce Filing Woes</a></p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/unveiling-the-complexity-divorce-and-access-to-justice/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a></strong>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><strong><a href="https://michigan.law.umich.edu/faculty-and-scholarship/our-faculty/roseanna-sommers">Roseanna Sommers</a></strong>, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Michigan</li>



<li><strong>Tom Ferriss</strong>, data scientist, Google</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3277900">“Trapped in Marriage”</a>, SSRN</li>



<li><a href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2009086118">“Using random assignment to measure court accessibility for low-income divorce seekers”</a>, PNAS</li>



<li><a href="https://www.courts.phila.gov/pdf/brochures/dr/divorce-brochure.pdf">“Divorce in Philadelphia County” brochure</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.courts.phila.gov/pdf/rules/Domestic-Relations-Compiled-Rules.pdf">Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, Family Division Local Rules</a></li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Why is it so hard logistically to file for divorce when legally some cases are quite simple and uncomplicated? This second divorce study episode of Proof Over Precedent dives into the data behind the hassle factors and shares the surprising results of measuring the pro se accessibility of a court system. Maybe the answer isn’t more lawyers.



Listen to Episode 24: Legal Labyrinths Reveal Divorce Filing Woes



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Roseanna Sommers, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Michigan



Tom Ferriss, data scientist, Google




Resources mentioned:




“Trapped in Marriage”, SSRN



“Using random assignment to measure court accessibility for low-income divorce seekers”, PNAS



“Divorce in Philadelphia County” brochure



Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, Family Division Local Rules




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 25: Legal Labyrinths Reveal Divorce Filing Woes]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/PhilaDiv01_and_PhilaDiv02.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting an outdated mandate requiring a typewriter in order to file for divorce" class="wp-image-91510" style="width:736px;height:auto;" />Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>Why is it so hard logistically to file for divorce when legally some cases are quite simple and uncomplicated? This second divorce study episode of Proof Over Precedent dives into the data behind the hassle factors and shares the surprising results of measuring the pro se accessibility of a court system. Maybe the answer isn’t more lawyers.</p>



<p>Listen to <a href="https://a2jlab.org/podcast/episode-24-till-death-or-an-affordable-divorce-do-us-part/">Episode 24: Legal Labyrinths Reveal Divorce Filing Woes</a></p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/unveiling-the-complexity-divorce-and-access-to-justice/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a></strong>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><strong><a href="https://michigan.law.umich.edu/faculty-and-scholarship/our-faculty/roseanna-sommers">Roseanna Sommers</a></strong>, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Michigan</li>



<li><strong>Tom Ferriss</strong>, data scientist, Google</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3277900">“Trapped in Marriage”</a>, SSRN</li>



<li><a href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2009086118">“Using random assignment to measure court accessibility for low-income divorce seekers”</a>, PNAS</li>



<li><a href="https://www.courts.phila.gov/pdf/brochures/dr/divorce-brochure.pdf">“Divorce in Philadelphia County” brochure</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.courts.phila.gov/pdf/rules/Domestic-Relations-Compiled-Rules.pdf">Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, Family Division Local Rules</a></li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2263583/c1e-k8r1gig5k5ocg8xnk-1p7w6279bg22-rld1os.mp3" length="112228649"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Why is it so hard logistically to file for divorce when legally some cases are quite simple and uncomplicated? This second divorce study episode of Proof Over Precedent dives into the data behind the hassle factors and shares the surprising results of measuring the pro se accessibility of a court system. Maybe the answer isn’t more lawyers.



Listen to Episode 24: Legal Labyrinths Reveal Divorce Filing Woes



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Roseanna Sommers, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Michigan



Tom Ferriss, data scientist, Google




Resources mentioned:




“Trapped in Marriage”, SSRN



“Using random assignment to measure court accessibility for low-income divorce seekers”, PNAS



“Divorce in Philadelphia County” brochure



Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, Family Division Local Rules




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2263583/c1a-7o7w6-dmxroj3xt9j1-9qoe6k.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:58:28</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 24: Till Death—or an Affordable Divorce—Do Us Part]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2263568</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-24-till-death-or-an-affordable-divorce-do-us-part</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/PhilaDiv01_and_PhilaDiv02.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting an outdated mandate requiring a typewriter in order to file for divorce" class="wp-image-91510" style="width:736px;height:auto;" />Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>When it comes to obtaining a divorce, pro se litigants face significant obstacles, stemming primarily from financial challenges. Without a lawyer, many are ill equipped to undertake the complex paperwork, waiting periods, and logistical hurdles that come with filing for divorce. This first of two divorce study episodes of <em>Proof Over Precedent</em> introduces the randomized controlled trial the A2J Lab undertook to determine how effective pro bono matching services are in providing access to justice for low-income individuals. </p>



<p>Listen to <a href="https://a2jlab.org/podcast/auto-draft/">Episode 25: Legal Labyrinths Reveal Divorce Filing Woes</a></p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/unveiling-the-complexity-divorce-and-access-to-justice/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a></strong>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><strong><a href="https://michigan.law.umich.edu/faculty-and-scholarship/our-faculty/roseanna-sommers">Roseanna Sommers</a></strong>, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Michigan</li>



<li><strong>Tom Ferriss</strong>, data scientist, Google</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3277900">“Trapped in Marriage”</a>, SSRN</li>



<li><a href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2009086118">“Using random assignment to measure court accessibility for low-income divorce seekers”</a>, PNAS</li>



<li><a href="https://www.courts.phila.gov/pdf/brochures/dr/divorce-brochure.pdf">“Divorce in Philadelphia County” brochure</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.courts.phila.gov/pdf/rules/Domestic-Relations-Compiled-Rules.pdf">Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, Family Division Local Rules</a></li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



When it comes to obtaining a divorce, pro se litigants face significant obstacles, stemming primarily from financial challenges. Without a lawyer, many are ill equipped to undertake the complex paperwork, waiting periods, and logistical hurdles that come with filing for divorce. This first of two divorce study episodes of Proof Over Precedent introduces the randomized controlled trial the A2J Lab undertook to determine how effective pro bono matching services are in providing access to justice for low-income individuals. 



Listen to Episode 25: Legal Labyrinths Reveal Divorce Filing Woes



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Roseanna Sommers, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Michigan



Tom Ferriss, data scientist, Google




Resources mentioned:




“Trapped in Marriage”, SSRN



“Using random assignment to measure court accessibility for low-income divorce seekers”, PNAS



“Divorce in Philadelphia County” brochure



Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, Family Division Local Rules




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 24: Till Death—or an Affordable Divorce—Do Us Part]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/PhilaDiv01_and_PhilaDiv02.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting an outdated mandate requiring a typewriter in order to file for divorce" class="wp-image-91510" style="width:736px;height:auto;" />Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>When it comes to obtaining a divorce, pro se litigants face significant obstacles, stemming primarily from financial challenges. Without a lawyer, many are ill equipped to undertake the complex paperwork, waiting periods, and logistical hurdles that come with filing for divorce. This first of two divorce study episodes of <em>Proof Over Precedent</em> introduces the randomized controlled trial the A2J Lab undertook to determine how effective pro bono matching services are in providing access to justice for low-income individuals. </p>



<p>Listen to <a href="https://a2jlab.org/podcast/auto-draft/">Episode 25: Legal Labyrinths Reveal Divorce Filing Woes</a></p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/unveiling-the-complexity-divorce-and-access-to-justice/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a></strong>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><strong><a href="https://michigan.law.umich.edu/faculty-and-scholarship/our-faculty/roseanna-sommers">Roseanna Sommers</a></strong>, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Michigan</li>



<li><strong>Tom Ferriss</strong>, data scientist, Google</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3277900">“Trapped in Marriage”</a>, SSRN</li>



<li><a href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2009086118">“Using random assignment to measure court accessibility for low-income divorce seekers”</a>, PNAS</li>



<li><a href="https://www.courts.phila.gov/pdf/brochures/dr/divorce-brochure.pdf">“Divorce in Philadelphia County” brochure</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.courts.phila.gov/pdf/rules/Domestic-Relations-Compiled-Rules.pdf">Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, Family Division Local Rules</a></li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2263568/c1e-oqgdvb2dqdnbd5mkg-mkwpzggdhk3o-87dys8.mp3" length="89257611"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



When it comes to obtaining a divorce, pro se litigants face significant obstacles, stemming primarily from financial challenges. Without a lawyer, many are ill equipped to undertake the complex paperwork, waiting periods, and logistical hurdles that come with filing for divorce. This first of two divorce study episodes of Proof Over Precedent introduces the randomized controlled trial the A2J Lab undertook to determine how effective pro bono matching services are in providing access to justice for low-income individuals. 



Listen to Episode 25: Legal Labyrinths Reveal Divorce Filing Woes



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Roseanna Sommers, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Michigan



Tom Ferriss, data scientist, Google




Resources mentioned:




“Trapped in Marriage”, SSRN



“Using random assignment to measure court accessibility for low-income divorce seekers”, PNAS



“Divorce in Philadelphia County” brochure



Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, Family Division Local Rules




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2263568/c1a-7o7w6-dmxrojvji3x7-kxdwkz.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:46:30</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 23: Innovative Approaches to Mental Health Hearings]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 07:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2229800</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-23-innovative-approaches-to-mental-health-hearings</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/InvolCommittedAdminJudge_AarushiSolanki_student.png?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting a judge deferring to a mental health professional." class="wp-image-91500" style="width:764px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>Rogers hearings allow Massachusetts judges to approve treatment plans for involuntarily committed individuals, but the process is criticized for its inefficiency and 99% approval rate. What if procedural reforms could improve outcomes? Replacing district court judges with administrative law judges to oversee hearings and substituting public defenders with mental health professionals as patient advocates could improve outcomes for both the involuntarily committed individuals and the courts—reducing delays, improving patient outcomes, and better utilizing court resources, according to HLS student Aarushi Solanki. She outlines the need for a randomized controlled trial to bring evidence to this proposal.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/rogers-hearing-reform-lean-on-mental-health-professionals-and-administrative-law-judges/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/aarushi-solanki">Aarushi Solanki</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/joe-liberman-827495110/">Joe Liberman</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://perma.cc/A5LC-KH5H">Rogers hearing</a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/E87M-BBAS" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><em>Gagnon v. Scarpelli</em></a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/7HGZ-KNRJ" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><em>Vitek v. Jones</em></a></li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Rogers hearings allow Massachusetts judges to approve treatment plans for involuntarily committed individuals, but the process is criticized for its inefficiency and 99% approval rate. What if procedural reforms could improve outcomes? Replacing district court judges with administrative law judges to oversee hearings and substituting public defenders with mental health professionals as patient advocates could improve outcomes for both the involuntarily committed individuals and the courts—reducing delays, improving patient outcomes, and better utilizing court resources, according to HLS student Aarushi Solanki. She outlines the need for a randomized controlled trial to bring evidence to this proposal.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Aarushi Solanki, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Joe Liberman, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Rogers hearing



Gagnon v. Scarpelli



Vitek v. Jones




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 23: Innovative Approaches to Mental Health Hearings]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/InvolCommittedAdminJudge_AarushiSolanki_student.png?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting a judge deferring to a mental health professional." class="wp-image-91500" style="width:764px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>Rogers hearings allow Massachusetts judges to approve treatment plans for involuntarily committed individuals, but the process is criticized for its inefficiency and 99% approval rate. What if procedural reforms could improve outcomes? Replacing district court judges with administrative law judges to oversee hearings and substituting public defenders with mental health professionals as patient advocates could improve outcomes for both the involuntarily committed individuals and the courts—reducing delays, improving patient outcomes, and better utilizing court resources, according to HLS student Aarushi Solanki. She outlines the need for a randomized controlled trial to bring evidence to this proposal.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/rogers-hearing-reform-lean-on-mental-health-professionals-and-administrative-law-judges/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/aarushi-solanki">Aarushi Solanki</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/joe-liberman-827495110/">Joe Liberman</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://perma.cc/A5LC-KH5H">Rogers hearing</a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/E87M-BBAS" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><em>Gagnon v. Scarpelli</em></a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/7HGZ-KNRJ" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><em>Vitek v. Jones</em></a></li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2229800/c1e-7o7w6a9zv3ru502pn-gp9198mvhw8k-pw247e.mp3" length="57071409"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Rogers hearings allow Massachusetts judges to approve treatment plans for involuntarily committed individuals, but the process is criticized for its inefficiency and 99% approval rate. What if procedural reforms could improve outcomes? Replacing district court judges with administrative law judges to oversee hearings and substituting public defenders with mental health professionals as patient advocates could improve outcomes for both the involuntarily committed individuals and the courts—reducing delays, improving patient outcomes, and better utilizing court resources, according to HLS student Aarushi Solanki. She outlines the need for a randomized controlled trial to bring evidence to this proposal.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Aarushi Solanki, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Joe Liberman, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Rogers hearing



Gagnon v. Scarpelli



Vitek v. Jones




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2229800/c1a-7o7w6-7zxvxdj8a9op-nrjfw8.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:29:44</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 22: Exploring Involuntary Commitment and Legal Reforms]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 20:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2202105</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-22-exploring-involuntary-commitment-and-legal-reforms</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/AarushiSolanki_InvolCommittedAdminJudge_student.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting legal delays for involuntarily committed psychiatric patients with schizophrenia seeking treatment in Massachusetts" class="wp-image-91494" style="width:705px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p><br />In this “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS student Aarushi Solanki discusses involuntary commitment laws for psychiatric patients in Massachusetts. Instead of protecting patient rights, the process of holding separate commitment and treatment hearings winds up denying patients access to timely treatment. A look at global leaders in procedural and substantive mental health reforms could help guide changes in Massachusetts’ legal standards and processes.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/delays-in-treatment-for-involuntarily-committed-patients-a-procedural-barrier-to-justice-for-individuals-with-schizophrenia-in-massachusetts/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/aarushi-solanki">Aarushi Solanki</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li>Leanne Poarch, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li>Rachel Barkin, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://perma.cc/A5LC-KH5H">Rogers hearing</a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/YNY7-HKMC">Philadelphia’s Eviction Diversion Program</a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/LZ89-QKWF">New Hampshire Family Law Mediation Program</a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/459L-YMH2">Italy’s “need-for-treatment” standard</a></li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



In this “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS student Aarushi Solanki discusses involuntary commitment laws for psychiatric patients in Massachusetts. Instead of protecting patient rights, the process of holding separate commitment and treatment hearings winds up denying patients access to timely treatment. A look at global leaders in procedural and substantive mental health reforms could help guide changes in Massachusetts’ legal standards and processes.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Aarushi Solanki, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Leanne Poarch, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Rachel Barkin, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Rogers hearing



Philadelphia’s Eviction Diversion Program



New Hampshire Family Law Mediation Program



Italy’s “need-for-treatment” standard




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 22: Exploring Involuntary Commitment and Legal Reforms]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/AarushiSolanki_InvolCommittedAdminJudge_student.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting legal delays for involuntarily committed psychiatric patients with schizophrenia seeking treatment in Massachusetts" class="wp-image-91494" style="width:705px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p><br />In this “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS student Aarushi Solanki discusses involuntary commitment laws for psychiatric patients in Massachusetts. Instead of protecting patient rights, the process of holding separate commitment and treatment hearings winds up denying patients access to timely treatment. A look at global leaders in procedural and substantive mental health reforms could help guide changes in Massachusetts’ legal standards and processes.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/delays-in-treatment-for-involuntarily-committed-patients-a-procedural-barrier-to-justice-for-individuals-with-schizophrenia-in-massachusetts/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/aarushi-solanki">Aarushi Solanki</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li>Leanne Poarch, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li>Rachel Barkin, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://perma.cc/A5LC-KH5H">Rogers hearing</a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/YNY7-HKMC">Philadelphia’s Eviction Diversion Program</a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/LZ89-QKWF">New Hampshire Family Law Mediation Program</a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/459L-YMH2">Italy’s “need-for-treatment” standard</a></li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2202105/c1e-qqz25bd87zksj9ng1-xxgxkwd1ak5m-ove3fc.mp3" length="43043027"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



In this “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS student Aarushi Solanki discusses involuntary commitment laws for psychiatric patients in Massachusetts. Instead of protecting patient rights, the process of holding separate commitment and treatment hearings winds up denying patients access to timely treatment. A look at global leaders in procedural and substantive mental health reforms could help guide changes in Massachusetts’ legal standards and processes.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Aarushi Solanki, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Leanne Poarch, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Rachel Barkin, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Rogers hearing



Philadelphia’s Eviction Diversion Program



New Hampshire Family Law Mediation Program



Italy’s “need-for-treatment” standard




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2202105/c1a-7o7w6-rkpkg3jvhv6n-ij8rys.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:22:25</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 21: What is the Impact of Legal Counsel at First Hearings?]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2183977</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-21-what-is-the-impact-of-legal-counsel-at-first-hearings</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Greiner_CAFAResearchers.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-91478" style="width:772px;height:auto;" />Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School<br />



<p>Can the presence of legal counsel at a criminal justice defendant’s first court hearing transform their journey through the justice system? Two Texas counties examined this possibility in a now-completed A2J Lab study. Director Jim Greiner hosts fellow A2J Lab researcher Renee Danser and Texas A&amp;M researchers George Nafault and Bethany Patterson in a discussion about the project results and their potential impact on legal representation and judicial decision making going forward.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/when-defendants-get-counsel-at-first-appearance/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">D. James Greiner</a>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/lab-staff/">Renee L. Danser</a>, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="https://ppri.tamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Georges-Naufal-Ph.D.-BIO-PPRI-.pdf">George Naufal</a>, Associate Research Scientist, Public Policy Research Institute, Texas A&amp;M University</li>



<li>Bethany Patterson, Research Associate, Public Policy Research Institute, Texas A&amp;M University</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://legalclarity.org/what-is-an-order-of-release-on-recognizance/">Recognizance Release Order</a></li>



<li><a href="https://legalclarity.org/what-is-the-legal-definition-of-indigent/">Indigency Determination</a></li>



<li><a href="https://tidc.texas.gov/">Texas Indigent Defense Commission</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.arnoldventures.org/">Arnold Ventures</a></li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Can the presence of legal counsel at a criminal justice defendant’s first court hearing transform their journey through the justice system? Two Texas counties examined this possibility in a now-completed A2J Lab study. Director Jim Greiner hosts fellow A2J Lab researcher Renee Danser and Texas A&M researchers George Nafault and Bethany Patterson in a discussion about the project results and their potential impact on legal representation and judicial decision making going forward.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




D. James Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Renee L. Danser, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



George Naufal, Associate Research Scientist, Public Policy Research Institute, Texas A&M University



Bethany Patterson, Research Associate, Public Policy Research Institute, Texas A&M University




Resources mentioned:




Recognizance Release Order



Indigency Determination



Texas Indigent Defense Commission



Arnold Ventures




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 21: What is the Impact of Legal Counsel at First Hearings?]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Greiner_CAFAResearchers.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-91478" style="width:772px;height:auto;" />Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School<br />



<p>Can the presence of legal counsel at a criminal justice defendant’s first court hearing transform their journey through the justice system? Two Texas counties examined this possibility in a now-completed A2J Lab study. Director Jim Greiner hosts fellow A2J Lab researcher Renee Danser and Texas A&amp;M researchers George Nafault and Bethany Patterson in a discussion about the project results and their potential impact on legal representation and judicial decision making going forward.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/when-defendants-get-counsel-at-first-appearance/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">D. James Greiner</a>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/lab-staff/">Renee L. Danser</a>, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="https://ppri.tamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Georges-Naufal-Ph.D.-BIO-PPRI-.pdf">George Naufal</a>, Associate Research Scientist, Public Policy Research Institute, Texas A&amp;M University</li>



<li>Bethany Patterson, Research Associate, Public Policy Research Institute, Texas A&amp;M University</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://legalclarity.org/what-is-an-order-of-release-on-recognizance/">Recognizance Release Order</a></li>



<li><a href="https://legalclarity.org/what-is-the-legal-definition-of-indigent/">Indigency Determination</a></li>



<li><a href="https://tidc.texas.gov/">Texas Indigent Defense Commission</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.arnoldventures.org/">Arnold Ventures</a></li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2183977/c1e-4w2p6h1dp67i8r9zj-0v70vxpnbmnv-sviulv.mp3" length="128070138"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Can the presence of legal counsel at a criminal justice defendant’s first court hearing transform their journey through the justice system? Two Texas counties examined this possibility in a now-completed A2J Lab study. Director Jim Greiner hosts fellow A2J Lab researcher Renee Danser and Texas A&M researchers George Nafault and Bethany Patterson in a discussion about the project results and their potential impact on legal representation and judicial decision making going forward.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




D. James Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Renee L. Danser, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



George Naufal, Associate Research Scientist, Public Policy Research Institute, Texas A&M University



Bethany Patterson, Research Associate, Public Policy Research Institute, Texas A&M University




Resources mentioned:




Recognizance Release Order



Indigency Determination



Texas Indigent Defense Commission



Arnold Ventures




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2183977/c1a-7o7w6-z3p13w1zh9rx-df9mg0.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>01:06:43</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 20: Caught in the Web — Government Websites and Accessibility]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2173234</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-20-caught-in-the-web-government-websites-and-accessibility</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="655" height="491" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/SpencerThieme_GovtWebsites_student.png?resize=655%2C491&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting website navigation as searching for a needle in a haystack" class="wp-image-91473" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School<br />



<p>Access to justice via government websites should mean ease of digital access to information. But what if your simple search on filing for a restraining order returned lists of forms in legalese or 37 pages of links to weed through for the appropriate form? In this Student Voices episode of Proof Over Precedent, J.D. candidate Spencer Thieme argues for simple and inexpensive upgrades to state and federal government websites to improve accessibility for the nonlawyers and non-government workers.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/government-websites-why-are-they-so-bad-and-can-they-be-better/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Spencer Thieme, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li>Rachel Barkin, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opcl/e-government-act-2002">E-Government Act of 2002</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.gov.uk/">United Kingdom government website</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.ca.gov/">Official California website</a></li>



<li><a href="https://lawsofux.com/hicks-law/">Hick’s Law</a></li>



<li><a href="https://lawsofux.com/fittss-law/">Fitts’s Law</a></li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Access to justice via government websites should mean ease of digital access to information. But what if your simple search on filing for a restraining order returned lists of forms in legalese or 37 pages of links to weed through for the appropriate form? In this Student Voices episode of Proof Over Precedent, J.D. candidate Spencer Thieme argues for simple and inexpensive upgrades to state and federal government websites to improve accessibility for the nonlawyers and non-government workers.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Spencer Thieme, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Rachel Barkin, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




E-Government Act of 2002



United Kingdom government website



Official California website



Hick’s Law



Fitts’s Law




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 20: Caught in the Web — Government Websites and Accessibility]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="655" height="491" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/SpencerThieme_GovtWebsites_student.png?resize=655%2C491&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting website navigation as searching for a needle in a haystack" class="wp-image-91473" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School<br />



<p>Access to justice via government websites should mean ease of digital access to information. But what if your simple search on filing for a restraining order returned lists of forms in legalese or 37 pages of links to weed through for the appropriate form? In this Student Voices episode of Proof Over Precedent, J.D. candidate Spencer Thieme argues for simple and inexpensive upgrades to state and federal government websites to improve accessibility for the nonlawyers and non-government workers.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/government-websites-why-are-they-so-bad-and-can-they-be-better/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Spencer Thieme, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li>Rachel Barkin, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.justice.gov/opcl/e-government-act-2002">E-Government Act of 2002</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.gov.uk/">United Kingdom government website</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.ca.gov/">Official California website</a></li>



<li><a href="https://lawsofux.com/hicks-law/">Hick’s Law</a></li>



<li><a href="https://lawsofux.com/fittss-law/">Fitts’s Law</a></li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2173234/c1e-1w1q6h5qwrdf621mk-8doonjd2bn6g-q0yhtm.mp3" length="26874693"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Access to justice via government websites should mean ease of digital access to information. But what if your simple search on filing for a restraining order returned lists of forms in legalese or 37 pages of links to weed through for the appropriate form? In this Student Voices episode of Proof Over Precedent, J.D. candidate Spencer Thieme argues for simple and inexpensive upgrades to state and federal government websites to improve accessibility for the nonlawyers and non-government workers.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Spencer Thieme, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Rachel Barkin, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




E-Government Act of 2002



United Kingdom government website



Official California website



Hick’s Law



Fitts’s Law




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2173234/c1a-7o7w6-wwppqrz4fqd6-97cnq3.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:14:00</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 19: How to Grow from a Global Study Setback]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2025 17:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2166460</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-19-how-to-grow-from-a-global-study-setback</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="600" height="450" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/ReneeDanser_Africa_sm.jpg?resize=600%2C450&amp;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-91460" style="width:783px;height:auto;" />Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School<br />



<p>Early this year, the A2J Lab was expanding globally for the first time, bringing its mission to study access to justice to both Kenya and Tunisia — and just about half-way through its study — when a federal stop-work order abruptly shut down the project. In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, we have no study results to report about the project that intended to look at whether prompt access to quality representation affects legal and social outcomes for defendants in misdemeanors and petty offenses in the two African nations. Instead, the A2J Lab’s Renee Danser shares her experience working on the lab’s first global project, the intentions of the study and the progress it made through January this year, and the lessons learned from both an international project and the discontinuation of the study. Primary takeaway: remain hopeful and persistent as we continue to look for funding to restart the project.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/denied-global-right-to-counsel-study/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/lab-staff/">Renee Danser</a>, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/lab-staff/">Michelle Blouin</a>, Communications Associate, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.theilf.org/">International Legal Foundation (ILF)</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.jiglobal.org/">Justice Initiatives Global</a></li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Early this year, the A2J Lab was expanding globally for the first time, bringing its mission to study access to justice to both Kenya and Tunisia — and just about half-way through its study — when a federal stop-work order abruptly shut down the project. In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, we have no study results to report about the project that intended to look at whether prompt access to quality representation affects legal and social outcomes for defendants in misdemeanors and petty offenses in the two African nations. Instead, the A2J Lab’s Renee Danser shares her experience working on the lab’s first global project, the intentions of the study and the progress it made through January this year, and the lessons learned from both an international project and the discontinuation of the study. Primary takeaway: remain hopeful and persistent as we continue to look for funding to restart the project.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Renee Danser, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Michelle Blouin, Communications Associate, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




International Legal Foundation (ILF)



Justice Initiatives Global




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 19: How to Grow from a Global Study Setback]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="600" height="450" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/ReneeDanser_Africa_sm.jpg?resize=600%2C450&amp;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-91460" style="width:783px;height:auto;" />Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School<br />



<p>Early this year, the A2J Lab was expanding globally for the first time, bringing its mission to study access to justice to both Kenya and Tunisia — and just about half-way through its study — when a federal stop-work order abruptly shut down the project. In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, we have no study results to report about the project that intended to look at whether prompt access to quality representation affects legal and social outcomes for defendants in misdemeanors and petty offenses in the two African nations. Instead, the A2J Lab’s Renee Danser shares her experience working on the lab’s first global project, the intentions of the study and the progress it made through January this year, and the lessons learned from both an international project and the discontinuation of the study. Primary takeaway: remain hopeful and persistent as we continue to look for funding to restart the project.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/denied-global-right-to-counsel-study/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/lab-staff/">Renee Danser</a>, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/lab-staff/">Michelle Blouin</a>, Communications Associate, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.theilf.org/">International Legal Foundation (ILF)</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.jiglobal.org/">Justice Initiatives Global</a></li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2166460/c1e-3w8q6hkpm5jaw461n-pkvgog16izkr-cwhr03.mp3" length="49894214"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Early this year, the A2J Lab was expanding globally for the first time, bringing its mission to study access to justice to both Kenya and Tunisia — and just about half-way through its study — when a federal stop-work order abruptly shut down the project. In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, we have no study results to report about the project that intended to look at whether prompt access to quality representation affects legal and social outcomes for defendants in misdemeanors and petty offenses in the two African nations. Instead, the A2J Lab’s Renee Danser shares her experience working on the lab’s first global project, the intentions of the study and the progress it made through January this year, and the lessons learned from both an international project and the discontinuation of the study. Primary takeaway: remain hopeful and persistent as we continue to look for funding to restart the project.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Renee Danser, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Michelle Blouin, Communications Associate, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




International Legal Foundation (ILF)



Justice Initiatives Global




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2166460/c1a-7o7w6-25mnv666t9ko-4ufrng.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:26:00</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 18: No Money Down Bankruptcy, Part II — Navigating Possible Solutions]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2164260</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-18-no-money-down-bankruptcy-part-ii-navigating-possible-solutions</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="600" height="450" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Liberman_NoMoneyDown_Part2_sm.png?resize=600%2C450&amp;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-91452" style="width:748px;height:auto;" />Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p><a href="https://perma.cc/MF6E-YQB5" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">More</a> bankruptcy cases were filed in 2024 than <a href="https://www.uscourts.gov/data-news/reports/statistical-reports/federal-judicial-caseload-statistics/federal-judicial-caseload-statistics-2024" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">all other civil cases</a> in federal court combined – a factor that should make access to the bankruptcy filing process a priority in the U.S., HLS student Joe Liberman argues in this Student Voices podcast. Part II of this series discusses potential reforms, including changing attorney fee structures, simplifying the bankruptcy process, and making information about legal representation more accessible.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/what-to-do-about-no-money-down-bankruptcies/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Listen to <a href="https://a2jlab.org/podcast/episode-17-the-inaccessibility-of-a-financial-fresh-start/">Part 1 of the podcast</a> or read <a href="https://a2jlab.org/how-no-money-down-bankruptcies-are-hurting-filers-and-what-we-can-do-about-it/">Part 1 of the blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/joe-liberman-827495110/">Joe Liberman</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/aarushi-solanki">Aarushi Solanki</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://perma.cc/M94E-J8K5">Chapter 7 – Bankruptcy Basics</a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/3BKU-CABA">Chapter 13 – Bankruptcy Basics</a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/7EF2-T9DS">Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005</a></li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



More bankruptcy cases were filed in 2024 than all other civil cases in federal court combined – a factor that should make access to the bankruptcy filing process a priority in the U.S., HLS student Joe Liberman argues in this Student Voices podcast. Part II of this series discusses potential reforms, including changing attorney fee structures, simplifying the bankruptcy process, and making information about legal representation more accessible.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Listen to Part 1 of the podcast or read Part 1 of the blog post.



Speakers:




Joe Liberman, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Aarushi Solanki, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Chapter 7 – Bankruptcy Basics



Chapter 13 – Bankruptcy Basics



Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 18: No Money Down Bankruptcy, Part II — Navigating Possible Solutions]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="600" height="450" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Liberman_NoMoneyDown_Part2_sm.png?resize=600%2C450&amp;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-91452" style="width:748px;height:auto;" />Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p><a href="https://perma.cc/MF6E-YQB5" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">More</a> bankruptcy cases were filed in 2024 than <a href="https://www.uscourts.gov/data-news/reports/statistical-reports/federal-judicial-caseload-statistics/federal-judicial-caseload-statistics-2024" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">all other civil cases</a> in federal court combined – a factor that should make access to the bankruptcy filing process a priority in the U.S., HLS student Joe Liberman argues in this Student Voices podcast. Part II of this series discusses potential reforms, including changing attorney fee structures, simplifying the bankruptcy process, and making information about legal representation more accessible.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/what-to-do-about-no-money-down-bankruptcies/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Listen to <a href="https://a2jlab.org/podcast/episode-17-the-inaccessibility-of-a-financial-fresh-start/">Part 1 of the podcast</a> or read <a href="https://a2jlab.org/how-no-money-down-bankruptcies-are-hurting-filers-and-what-we-can-do-about-it/">Part 1 of the blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/joe-liberman-827495110/">Joe Liberman</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/aarushi-solanki">Aarushi Solanki</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://perma.cc/M94E-J8K5">Chapter 7 – Bankruptcy Basics</a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/3BKU-CABA">Chapter 13 – Bankruptcy Basics</a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/7EF2-T9DS">Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005</a></li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2164260/c1e-x6d53t96gv6ukd084-okj3rpx4b14-47jwrr.mp3" length="38547458"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



More bankruptcy cases were filed in 2024 than all other civil cases in federal court combined – a factor that should make access to the bankruptcy filing process a priority in the U.S., HLS student Joe Liberman argues in this Student Voices podcast. Part II of this series discusses potential reforms, including changing attorney fee structures, simplifying the bankruptcy process, and making information about legal representation more accessible.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Listen to Part 1 of the podcast or read Part 1 of the blog post.



Speakers:




Joe Liberman, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Aarushi Solanki, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Chapter 7 – Bankruptcy Basics



Chapter 13 – Bankruptcy Basics



Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2164260/c1a-7o7w6-ndv7x0jzugzr-va5n9h.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:20:05</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 17: The Inaccessibility of a Financial Fresh Start]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2159223</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-17-the-inaccessibility-of-a-financial-fresh-start</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/date_NoMoneyDownBankruptcy_student_Joe_Liberman_CC.png?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting how" class="wp-image-90907" style="width:647px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>Is the financial reset system too difficult to navigate? In this “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS J.D. candidate Joe Liberman discusses the complexities and accessibility issues associated with “no-money-down” bankruptcy filings that often hurt the people who can least afford these particular filings.Closer scrutiny to legal fees associated with bankruptcy filings may help steer incentives toward the debtor rather than the attorney working with the filer. </p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/how-no-money-down-bankruptcies-are-hurting-filers-and-what-we-can-do-about-it/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/joe-liberman-827495110/">Joe Liberman</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-j-reed/">Andrew Reed</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://perma.cc/M94E-J8K5">Chapter 7 – Bankruptcy Basics</a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/3BKU-CABA">Chapter 13 – Bankruptcy Basics</a></li>



<li><em><a href="https://perma.cc/6LKA-7JEG">Lamie v. United States Trustee</a></em></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/QQF9-FMVD">‘Consumer Bankruptcy and Financial Health’</a>, National Bureau of Economic Research</li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/A4U7-NMXJ">‘How the Bankruptcy System is Failing Black Americans’</a>, <em>ProPublica</em></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/3N44-MB3A">‘No Money Down’ Bankruptcy</a>, <em>Southern California Law Review</em></li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Is the financial reset system too difficult to navigate? In this “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS J.D. candidate Joe Liberman discusses the complexities and accessibility issues associated with “no-money-down” bankruptcy filings that often hurt the people who can least afford these particular filings.Closer scrutiny to legal fees associated with bankruptcy filings may help steer incentives toward the debtor rather than the attorney working with the filer. 



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Joe Liberman, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Andrew Reed, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Chapter 7 – Bankruptcy Basics



Chapter 13 – Bankruptcy Basics



Lamie v. United States Trustee



‘Consumer Bankruptcy and Financial Health’, National Bureau of Economic Research



‘How the Bankruptcy System is Failing Black Americans’, ProPublica



‘No Money Down’ Bankruptcy, Southern California Law Review




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 17: The Inaccessibility of a Financial Fresh Start]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/date_NoMoneyDownBankruptcy_student_Joe_Liberman_CC.png?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting how" class="wp-image-90907" style="width:647px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>Is the financial reset system too difficult to navigate? In this “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS J.D. candidate Joe Liberman discusses the complexities and accessibility issues associated with “no-money-down” bankruptcy filings that often hurt the people who can least afford these particular filings.Closer scrutiny to legal fees associated with bankruptcy filings may help steer incentives toward the debtor rather than the attorney working with the filer. </p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/how-no-money-down-bankruptcies-are-hurting-filers-and-what-we-can-do-about-it/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/joe-liberman-827495110/">Joe Liberman</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-j-reed/">Andrew Reed</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://perma.cc/M94E-J8K5">Chapter 7 – Bankruptcy Basics</a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/3BKU-CABA">Chapter 13 – Bankruptcy Basics</a></li>



<li><em><a href="https://perma.cc/6LKA-7JEG">Lamie v. United States Trustee</a></em></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/QQF9-FMVD">‘Consumer Bankruptcy and Financial Health’</a>, National Bureau of Economic Research</li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/A4U7-NMXJ">‘How the Bankruptcy System is Failing Black Americans’</a>, <em>ProPublica</em></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/3N44-MB3A">‘No Money Down’ Bankruptcy</a>, <em>Southern California Law Review</em></li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2159223/c1e-pq15pb1q9zzcqd4r2-okj4wz1dt196-tez1me.mp3" length="41520819"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Is the financial reset system too difficult to navigate? In this “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS J.D. candidate Joe Liberman discusses the complexities and accessibility issues associated with “no-money-down” bankruptcy filings that often hurt the people who can least afford these particular filings.Closer scrutiny to legal fees associated with bankruptcy filings may help steer incentives toward the debtor rather than the attorney working with the filer. 



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Joe Liberman, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Andrew Reed, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Chapter 7 – Bankruptcy Basics



Chapter 13 – Bankruptcy Basics



Lamie v. United States Trustee



‘Consumer Bankruptcy and Financial Health’, National Bureau of Economic Research



‘How the Bankruptcy System is Failing Black Americans’, ProPublica



‘No Money Down’ Bankruptcy, Southern California Law Review




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2159223/c1a-7o7w6-z3pzdp43u778-y1enir.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:21:38</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 16: Can Community Diversion Program Help Repeat Offenders Rehabilitate?]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2149653</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-16-can-community-diversion-program-help-repeat-offenders-rehabilitate</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ReneeDanser_CommunityDiversion.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-91428" style="width:768px;height:auto;" />Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p><br />A recently launched A2J Lab study examines the effectiveness of an education and community resource-focused program at reducing recidivism among low-level offenders. The program has been in practice for seven years in Toledo, Ohio, but has not yet been studied thoroughly. In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, the A2J Lab’s Renee Danser discusses the program and the potential it has, if found to be effective, to serve as an affordable blueprint for other municipal court systems.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/education-and-community-support-key-to-avoiding-repeat-arrests/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/lab-staff/">Renee Danser</a>, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/lab-staff/">Michelle Blouin</a>, Communications Associate, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://toledo.oh.gov/news/2025/02/12/toledo-municipal-court-announces-study-of-cutting-edge-diversion-program">Toledo Municipal Court press release</a></li>



<li>“<a href="https://a2jlab.org/study-of-community-diversion-program-launches/">Study of Community Diversion Program Launches</a>,” A2J Lab Blog</li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>



<p></p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



A recently launched A2J Lab study examines the effectiveness of an education and community resource-focused program at reducing recidivism among low-level offenders. The program has been in practice for seven years in Toledo, Ohio, but has not yet been studied thoroughly. In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, the A2J Lab’s Renee Danser discusses the program and the potential it has, if found to be effective, to serve as an affordable blueprint for other municipal court systems.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Renee Danser, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Michelle Blouin, Communications Associate, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Toledo Municipal Court press release



“Study of Community Diversion Program Launches,” A2J Lab Blog




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal




]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 16: Can Community Diversion Program Help Repeat Offenders Rehabilitate?]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ReneeDanser_CommunityDiversion.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-91428" style="width:768px;height:auto;" />Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p><br />A recently launched A2J Lab study examines the effectiveness of an education and community resource-focused program at reducing recidivism among low-level offenders. The program has been in practice for seven years in Toledo, Ohio, but has not yet been studied thoroughly. In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, the A2J Lab’s Renee Danser discusses the program and the potential it has, if found to be effective, to serve as an affordable blueprint for other municipal court systems.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/education-and-community-support-key-to-avoiding-repeat-arrests/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/lab-staff/">Renee Danser</a>, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/lab-staff/">Michelle Blouin</a>, Communications Associate, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://toledo.oh.gov/news/2025/02/12/toledo-municipal-court-announces-study-of-cutting-edge-diversion-program">Toledo Municipal Court press release</a></li>



<li>“<a href="https://a2jlab.org/study-of-community-diversion-program-launches/">Study of Community Diversion Program Launches</a>,” A2J Lab Blog</li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>



<p></p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2149653/c1e-5wp26h1v5r9uq4n83-7z97x40xtq08-sv84iu.mp3" length="62682930"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



A recently launched A2J Lab study examines the effectiveness of an education and community resource-focused program at reducing recidivism among low-level offenders. The program has been in practice for seven years in Toledo, Ohio, but has not yet been studied thoroughly. In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, the A2J Lab’s Renee Danser discusses the program and the potential it has, if found to be effective, to serve as an affordable blueprint for other municipal court systems.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Renee Danser, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Michelle Blouin, Communications Associate, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Toledo Municipal Court press release



“Study of Community Diversion Program Launches,” A2J Lab Blog




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal




]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2149653/c1a-7o7w6-ww8kpz3ki4q7-kdsj0w.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:32:39</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 15: Pro Se Problems — Defining and Deploying Legal Knowledge]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2144503</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-15-pro-se-problems-defining-and-deploying-legal-knowledge</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/date_ProSeInterpOfLaw_student_Rachel_Barkin_FQ-1.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-91423" style="width:765px;height:auto;" />Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>In this “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS J.D. candidate Rachel Barkin discusses the challenges faced by pro se litigants in complying with civil procedure rules. While interpretation of legal language may be an obstacle, she argues that deployability–the ability to effectively use legal knowledge in court–is the more significant hurdle for self-represented litigants. She delves into the quantitative and qualitative research available for addressing the complexities of legal procedures, suggesting that a balance of both may be necessary for a complete understanding of the issues.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/do-pro-se-litigants-struggle-to-interpret-the-law/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Rachel Barkin, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li>Leanne Poarch, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/aarushi-solanki">Aarushi Solanki</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><em><a href="https://perma.cc/52SE-CSV6">Testing Ordinary Meaning</a></em>, Harvard Law Review</li>



<li><em><a href="https://perma.cc/7PH3-2CBL">Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change</a></em>, Cambridge University Press</li>



<li><em><a href="https://perma.cc/5SCZ-6ERQ">Self-Help, Reimagine</a></em>, Indiana Law Journal</li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>



<p></p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



In this “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS J.D. candidate Rachel Barkin discusses the challenges faced by pro se litigants in complying with civil procedure rules. While interpretation of legal language may be an obstacle, she argues that deployability–the ability to effectively use legal knowledge in court–is the more significant hurdle for self-represented litigants. She delves into the quantitative and qualitative research available for addressing the complexities of legal procedures, suggesting that a balance of both may be necessary for a complete understanding of the issues.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Rachel Barkin, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Leanne Poarch, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Aarushi Solanki, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Testing Ordinary Meaning, Harvard Law Review



Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change, Cambridge University Press



Self-Help, Reimagine, Indiana Law Journal




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal




]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 15: Pro Se Problems — Defining and Deploying Legal Knowledge]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/date_ProSeInterpOfLaw_student_Rachel_Barkin_FQ-1.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-91423" style="width:765px;height:auto;" />Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>In this “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS J.D. candidate Rachel Barkin discusses the challenges faced by pro se litigants in complying with civil procedure rules. While interpretation of legal language may be an obstacle, she argues that deployability–the ability to effectively use legal knowledge in court–is the more significant hurdle for self-represented litigants. She delves into the quantitative and qualitative research available for addressing the complexities of legal procedures, suggesting that a balance of both may be necessary for a complete understanding of the issues.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/do-pro-se-litigants-struggle-to-interpret-the-law/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Rachel Barkin, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li>Leanne Poarch, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/aarushi-solanki">Aarushi Solanki</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><em><a href="https://perma.cc/52SE-CSV6">Testing Ordinary Meaning</a></em>, Harvard Law Review</li>



<li><em><a href="https://perma.cc/7PH3-2CBL">Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change</a></em>, Cambridge University Press</li>



<li><em><a href="https://perma.cc/5SCZ-6ERQ">Self-Help, Reimagine</a></em>, Indiana Law Journal</li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/harvarda2jlab/">Instagram</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>



<p></p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2144503/c1e-7o7w6a9w2qvs502pn-25465m37h6g0-xgkaqi.mp3" length="39380868"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



In this “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS J.D. candidate Rachel Barkin discusses the challenges faced by pro se litigants in complying with civil procedure rules. While interpretation of legal language may be an obstacle, she argues that deployability–the ability to effectively use legal knowledge in court–is the more significant hurdle for self-represented litigants. She delves into the quantitative and qualitative research available for addressing the complexities of legal procedures, suggesting that a balance of both may be necessary for a complete understanding of the issues.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Rachel Barkin, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Leanne Poarch, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Aarushi Solanki, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Testing Ordinary Meaning, Harvard Law Review



Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change, Cambridge University Press



Self-Help, Reimagine, Indiana Law Journal




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



Instagram



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal




]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2144503/c1a-7o7w6-34769g38ckd2-jenvdl.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:20:31</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 14: Ethical Conundrums in Legal Research]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2136985</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-14-ethical-conundrums-in-legal-research</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ShannonSewards_Ethics03.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting an official deciding who is a participant in the" class="wp-image-91403" style="width:645px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>In this Proof Over Precedent episode, the third show in the ‘Demystifying IRBs’ series, host Jim Greiner meets with IRB expert Shannon Sewards to answer the tricky question: Who counts as a ‘human subject’? Medical fields can easily point to human subjects in their research; but in social sciences, the definition relies heavily on federal regulations from Institutional Review Boards that require consent from human subjects to participate in research. So, legal researchers need to know about IRBs and how they define ‘human subjects’ and IRBs need to know about legal research and the role of participants in the studies. While the previous episode in the ‘Demystifying IRBs’ series addressed human subject research versus medical research, this third episode discusses:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Legal regulations that define human subjects in social science research</li>



<li>Ethical considerations in applying research to human subjects</li>



<li>Hypothetical scenarios to illustrate IRB challenges in interpreting and applying federal regulations</li>



<li>Risk assessments for human subjects</li>
</ul>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/who-is-a-human-subject-in-legal-field-research/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Shannon Sewards</strong>, Director of the Human Research Protection Program, Dartmouth Health; former Director, Harvard University Area IRB</li>



<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a></strong>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/institutional-review-boards-frequently-asked-questions#IRBOrg">Institutional Review Board FAQs</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-A/part-46">45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 46, Subpart A [“Common Rule”]</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/index.html">Office of Human Research Protection</a></li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



In this Proof Over Precedent episode, the third show in the ‘Demystifying IRBs’ series, host Jim Greiner meets with IRB expert Shannon Sewards to answer the tricky question: Who counts as a ‘human subject’? Medical fields can easily point to human subjects in their research; but in social sciences, the definition relies heavily on federal regulations from Institutional Review Boards that require consent from human subjects to participate in research. So, legal researchers need to know about IRBs and how they define ‘human subjects’ and IRBs need to know about legal research and the role of participants in the studies. While the previous episode in the ‘Demystifying IRBs’ series addressed human subject research versus medical research, this third episode discusses:




Legal regulations that define human subjects in social science research



Ethical considerations in applying research to human subjects



Hypothetical scenarios to illustrate IRB challenges in interpreting and applying federal regulations



Risk assessments for human subjects




Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Shannon Sewards, Director of the Human Research Protection Program, Dartmouth Health; former Director, Harvard University Area IRB



Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Institutional Review Board FAQs



45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 46, Subpart A [“Common Rule”]



Office of Human Research Protection




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 14: Ethical Conundrums in Legal Research]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ShannonSewards_Ethics03.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting an official deciding who is a participant in the" class="wp-image-91403" style="width:645px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>In this Proof Over Precedent episode, the third show in the ‘Demystifying IRBs’ series, host Jim Greiner meets with IRB expert Shannon Sewards to answer the tricky question: Who counts as a ‘human subject’? Medical fields can easily point to human subjects in their research; but in social sciences, the definition relies heavily on federal regulations from Institutional Review Boards that require consent from human subjects to participate in research. So, legal researchers need to know about IRBs and how they define ‘human subjects’ and IRBs need to know about legal research and the role of participants in the studies. While the previous episode in the ‘Demystifying IRBs’ series addressed human subject research versus medical research, this third episode discusses:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Legal regulations that define human subjects in social science research</li>



<li>Ethical considerations in applying research to human subjects</li>



<li>Hypothetical scenarios to illustrate IRB challenges in interpreting and applying federal regulations</li>



<li>Risk assessments for human subjects</li>
</ul>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/who-is-a-human-subject-in-legal-field-research/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Shannon Sewards</strong>, Director of the Human Research Protection Program, Dartmouth Health; former Director, Harvard University Area IRB</li>



<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a></strong>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/institutional-review-boards-frequently-asked-questions#IRBOrg">Institutional Review Board FAQs</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-A/part-46">45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 46, Subpart A [“Common Rule”]</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/index.html">Office of Human Research Protection</a></li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2136985/c1e-jz9gmu5gvmma5403x-gpznk5vofjdw-gc7dfq.mp3" length="87506362"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



In this Proof Over Precedent episode, the third show in the ‘Demystifying IRBs’ series, host Jim Greiner meets with IRB expert Shannon Sewards to answer the tricky question: Who counts as a ‘human subject’? Medical fields can easily point to human subjects in their research; but in social sciences, the definition relies heavily on federal regulations from Institutional Review Boards that require consent from human subjects to participate in research. So, legal researchers need to know about IRBs and how they define ‘human subjects’ and IRBs need to know about legal research and the role of participants in the studies. While the previous episode in the ‘Demystifying IRBs’ series addressed human subject research versus medical research, this third episode discusses:




Legal regulations that define human subjects in social science research



Ethical considerations in applying research to human subjects



Hypothetical scenarios to illustrate IRB challenges in interpreting and applying federal regulations



Risk assessments for human subjects




Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Shannon Sewards, Director of the Human Research Protection Program, Dartmouth Health; former Director, Harvard University Area IRB



Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Institutional Review Board FAQs



45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 46, Subpart A [“Common Rule”]



Office of Human Research Protection




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2136985/c1a-7o7w6-rk3r7q6rsxqg-nvitew.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:45:35</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 13: Criminal Gideon, Civil Gideon, And Gender]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2141869</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-13-justice-for-all-why-no-legal-aid-for-civil-cases</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/date_GenderGideon_student_Laura_Aquino_CC.png?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting a lawyer shown as a wolf evicting the Statue of Liberty and replacing her with Uncle Sam" class="wp-image-90930" style="width:809px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>This “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent discusses the critical need for providing legal representation in civil cases—particularly those in which an individual’s home, family, or safety is at risk. While the right to counsel already extends to criminal cases in both federal and state courts, it does not currently extend to civil cases, where the socioeconomic outcomes often affect women more so than men. HLS LLM Laura Aquino asks why civil cases are not treated with the same level of importance as criminal cases and argues that expanding legal access is a matter of both fairness <em>and</em> justice.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/who-deserves-a-lawyer-the-hidden-gender-bias-in-the-right-to-counsel/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.laura-aquino.com">Laura Alicia Aquino Arriaga</a>, LLM, Harvard Law School</li>



<li>Michael Pusic, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><em><a href="https://www.uclalawreview.org/the-gender-of-gideon/">The Gender of Gideon</a></em>, UCLA Law Review</li>



<li><em><a href="https://perma.cc/5EZH-BPS6">Gideon v. Wainwright</a></em></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/T4DX-9VG5"><em>Shattered Bonds: The Color of Child Welfare</em></a>, by Dorothy Roberts (2001)</li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>



<p></p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



This “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent discusses the critical need for providing legal representation in civil cases—particularly those in which an individual’s home, family, or safety is at risk. While the right to counsel already extends to criminal cases in both federal and state courts, it does not currently extend to civil cases, where the socioeconomic outcomes often affect women more so than men. HLS LLM Laura Aquino asks why civil cases are not treated with the same level of importance as criminal cases and argues that expanding legal access is a matter of both fairness and justice.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Laura Alicia Aquino Arriaga, LLM, Harvard Law School



Michael Pusic, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




The Gender of Gideon, UCLA Law Review



Gideon v. Wainwright



Shattered Bonds: The Color of Child Welfare, by Dorothy Roberts (2001)




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal




]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 13: Criminal Gideon, Civil Gideon, And Gender]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/date_GenderGideon_student_Laura_Aquino_CC.png?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting a lawyer shown as a wolf evicting the Statue of Liberty and replacing her with Uncle Sam" class="wp-image-90930" style="width:809px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>This “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent discusses the critical need for providing legal representation in civil cases—particularly those in which an individual’s home, family, or safety is at risk. While the right to counsel already extends to criminal cases in both federal and state courts, it does not currently extend to civil cases, where the socioeconomic outcomes often affect women more so than men. HLS LLM Laura Aquino asks why civil cases are not treated with the same level of importance as criminal cases and argues that expanding legal access is a matter of both fairness <em>and</em> justice.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/who-deserves-a-lawyer-the-hidden-gender-bias-in-the-right-to-counsel/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.laura-aquino.com">Laura Alicia Aquino Arriaga</a>, LLM, Harvard Law School</li>



<li>Michael Pusic, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><em><a href="https://www.uclalawreview.org/the-gender-of-gideon/">The Gender of Gideon</a></em>, UCLA Law Review</li>



<li><em><a href="https://perma.cc/5EZH-BPS6">Gideon v. Wainwright</a></em></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/T4DX-9VG5"><em>Shattered Bonds: The Color of Child Welfare</em></a>, by Dorothy Roberts (2001)</li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>



<p></p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2141869/c1e-mpn2zsq1x86tg1o95-xx423631f866-nkt0rr.mp3" length="30060378"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



This “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent discusses the critical need for providing legal representation in civil cases—particularly those in which an individual’s home, family, or safety is at risk. While the right to counsel already extends to criminal cases in both federal and state courts, it does not currently extend to civil cases, where the socioeconomic outcomes often affect women more so than men. HLS LLM Laura Aquino asks why civil cases are not treated with the same level of importance as criminal cases and argues that expanding legal access is a matter of both fairness and justice.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Laura Alicia Aquino Arriaga, LLM, Harvard Law School



Michael Pusic, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




The Gender of Gideon, UCLA Law Review



Gideon v. Wainwright



Shattered Bonds: The Color of Child Welfare, by Dorothy Roberts (2001)




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal




]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2141869/c1a-7o7w6-qdo95q80f95-drsk1d.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:40</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 13: Criminal Gideon, Civil Gideon, And Gender]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2137548</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-13-criminal-gideon-civil-gideon-and-gender</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/date_GenderGideon_student_Laura_Aquino_CC.png?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting a lawyer shown as a wolf evicting the Statue of Liberty and replacing her with Uncle Sam" class="wp-image-90930" style="width:809px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>This “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent discusses the critical need for providing legal representation in civil cases—particularly those in which an individual’s home, family, or safety is at risk. While the right to counsel already extends to criminal cases in both federal and state courts, it does not currently extend to civil cases, where the socioeconomic outcomes often affect women more so than men. HLS LLM Laura Aquino asks why civil cases are not treated with the same level of importance as criminal cases and argues that expanding legal access is a matter of both fairness <em>and</em> justice.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/who-deserves-a-lawyer-the-hidden-gender-bias-in-the-right-to-counsel/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.laura-aquino.com">Laura Alicia Aquino Arriaga</a>, LLM, Harvard Law School</li>



<li>Michael Pusic, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><em><a href="https://www.uclalawreview.org/the-gender-of-gideon/">The Gender of Gideon</a></em>, UCLA Law Review</li>



<li><em><a href="https://perma.cc/5EZH-BPS6">Gideon v. Wainwright</a></em></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/T4DX-9VG5"><em>Shattered Bonds: The Color of Child Welfare</em></a>, by Dorothy Roberts (2001)</li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>



<p></p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



This “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent discusses the critical need for providing legal representation in civil cases—particularly those in which an individual’s home, family, or safety is at risk. While the right to counsel already extends to criminal cases in both federal and state courts, it does not currently extend to civil cases, where the socioeconomic outcomes often affect women more so than men. HLS LLM Laura Aquino asks why civil cases are not treated with the same level of importance as criminal cases and argues that expanding legal access is a matter of both fairness and justice.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Laura Alicia Aquino Arriaga, LLM, Harvard Law School



Michael Pusic, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




The Gender of Gideon, UCLA Law Review



Gideon v. Wainwright



Shattered Bonds: The Color of Child Welfare, by Dorothy Roberts (2001)




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal




]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 13: Criminal Gideon, Civil Gideon, And Gender]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/date_GenderGideon_student_Laura_Aquino_CC.png?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting a lawyer shown as a wolf evicting the Statue of Liberty and replacing her with Uncle Sam" class="wp-image-90930" style="width:809px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>This “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent discusses the critical need for providing legal representation in civil cases—particularly those in which an individual’s home, family, or safety is at risk. While the right to counsel already extends to criminal cases in both federal and state courts, it does not currently extend to civil cases, where the socioeconomic outcomes often affect women more so than men. HLS LLM Laura Aquino asks why civil cases are not treated with the same level of importance as criminal cases and argues that expanding legal access is a matter of both fairness <em>and</em> justice.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/who-deserves-a-lawyer-the-hidden-gender-bias-in-the-right-to-counsel/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.laura-aquino.com">Laura Alicia Aquino Arriaga</a>, LLM, Harvard Law School</li>



<li>Michael Pusic, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><em><a href="https://www.uclalawreview.org/the-gender-of-gideon/">The Gender of Gideon</a></em>, UCLA Law Review</li>



<li><em><a href="https://perma.cc/5EZH-BPS6">Gideon v. Wainwright</a></em></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/T4DX-9VG5"><em>Shattered Bonds: The Color of Child Welfare</em></a>, by Dorothy Roberts (2001)</li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J Lab</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>



<p></p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2137548/c1e-0wgq6hkd63zu691np-jp31xp8gtr1d-pnutup.mp3" length="30060378"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



This “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent discusses the critical need for providing legal representation in civil cases—particularly those in which an individual’s home, family, or safety is at risk. While the right to counsel already extends to criminal cases in both federal and state courts, it does not currently extend to civil cases, where the socioeconomic outcomes often affect women more so than men. HLS LLM Laura Aquino asks why civil cases are not treated with the same level of importance as criminal cases and argues that expanding legal access is a matter of both fairness and justice.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Laura Alicia Aquino Arriaga, LLM, Harvard Law School



Michael Pusic, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




The Gender of Gideon, UCLA Law Review



Gideon v. Wainwright



Shattered Bonds: The Color of Child Welfare, by Dorothy Roberts (2001)




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J Lab



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal




]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2137548/c1a-7o7w6-347059mntj11-eyxcfm.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:40</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 12: Can Texts Help Secure Housing and Avoid Evictions?]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2124315</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-12-can-texts-help-secure-housing-and-avoid-evictions</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/ReneeDanser_EvictionDiversion.png?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting three little pics trying to avoid eviction from the wolf" class="wp-image-91381" style="width:700px;height:auto;" />Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, host Jim Greiner talks with the A2J Lab’s Renee Danser about the recently completed pilot study referred to as the “Eviction Diversion Study.” The study aimed to combat housing security by providing legal information and resources to at-risk populations in the Houston area via text messaging. Ultimately, insights gained from the pilot highlighted the need for and promise of a full-scale study on light-touch intervention as a means of avoiding evictions.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/legal-literacy-an-upstream-eviction-prevention-strategy/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/lab-staff/">Renee L. Danser</a>, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.connectivetx.org/">Connective</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.law.uh.edu/">University of Houston Law Center</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.povertyactionlab.org/na">J-PAL North America, Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab at MIT</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.januaryadvisors.com/">January Advisors</a></li>



<li> <a href="https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/hmis/">Homeless Management Information System</a></li>



<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Final-Report-Upstream-Legal-Literacy-as-an-Eviction-Prevention-Mechanism-an-RCT.pdf">Final Report: Upstream Legal Literacy as an Eviction Prevention Mechanism: an RCT</a></li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, host Jim Greiner talks with the A2J Lab’s Renee Danser about the recently completed pilot study referred to as the “Eviction Diversion Study.” The study aimed to combat housing security by providing legal information and resources to at-risk populations in the Houston area via text messaging. Ultimately, insights gained from the pilot highlighted the need for and promise of a full-scale study on light-touch intervention as a means of avoiding evictions.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Renee L. Danser, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Connective



University of Houston Law Center



J-PAL North America, Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab at MIT



January Advisors



 Homeless Management Information System



Final Report: Upstream Legal Literacy as an Eviction Prevention Mechanism: an RCT




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 12: Can Texts Help Secure Housing and Avoid Evictions?]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/ReneeDanser_EvictionDiversion.png?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting three little pics trying to avoid eviction from the wolf" class="wp-image-91381" style="width:700px;height:auto;" />Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, host Jim Greiner talks with the A2J Lab’s Renee Danser about the recently completed pilot study referred to as the “Eviction Diversion Study.” The study aimed to combat housing security by providing legal information and resources to at-risk populations in the Houston area via text messaging. Ultimately, insights gained from the pilot highlighted the need for and promise of a full-scale study on light-touch intervention as a means of avoiding evictions.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/legal-literacy-an-upstream-eviction-prevention-strategy/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/lab-staff/">Renee L. Danser</a>, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.connectivetx.org/">Connective</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.law.uh.edu/">University of Houston Law Center</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.povertyactionlab.org/na">J-PAL North America, Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab at MIT</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.januaryadvisors.com/">January Advisors</a></li>



<li> <a href="https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/hmis/">Homeless Management Information System</a></li>



<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Final-Report-Upstream-Legal-Literacy-as-an-Eviction-Prevention-Mechanism-an-RCT.pdf">Final Report: Upstream Legal Literacy as an Eviction Prevention Mechanism: an RCT</a></li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2124315/c1e-99dp6td613qswx09n-47x3rp50ugd3-0ctbls.mp3" length="89312782"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, host Jim Greiner talks with the A2J Lab’s Renee Danser about the recently completed pilot study referred to as the “Eviction Diversion Study.” The study aimed to combat housing security by providing legal information and resources to at-risk populations in the Houston area via text messaging. Ultimately, insights gained from the pilot highlighted the need for and promise of a full-scale study on light-touch intervention as a means of avoiding evictions.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Renee L. Danser, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Connective



University of Houston Law Center



J-PAL North America, Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab at MIT



January Advisors



 Homeless Management Information System



Final Report: Upstream Legal Literacy as an Eviction Prevention Mechanism: an RCT




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2124315/c1a-7o7w6-47m05q9mbx91-bs52hz.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:46:31</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 11: Breaking Legal Traditions — Insights from Medicine’s Evidence-Based Evolution]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 03:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2122077</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-11-breaking-legal-traditions-insights-from-medicines-evidence-based-evolution</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AndrewReed_MedHistoryLaw_student.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting a lawyer seeing medical quackery in his mirror reflection" class="wp-image-91377" style="width:680px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>In this “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS student Andrew Reed explores how the legal profession could benefit from adopting data-driven, evidence-based practices similar to those in medicine. The episode examines the historical transformation of medicine from tradition-based to science-based and discusses key lessons that law can learn, including:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>prioritizing hard evidence over tradition</li>



<li>incorporating evidence-based methodologies into legal education</li>



<li>creating centralized databases for legal research</li>
</ul>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/what-law-can-learn-from-the-history-of-medicine/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Resources:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://perma.cc/XNT7-PRMT">James Lind’s scurvy experiment</a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/F652-3P6Y">History of evidence-based medicine</a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/9LPJ-9WJE">Cochrane Collaboration</a></li>
</ul>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-j-reed/">Andrew Reed</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p></p>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



In this “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS student Andrew Reed explores how the legal profession could benefit from adopting data-driven, evidence-based practices similar to those in medicine. The episode examines the historical transformation of medicine from tradition-based to science-based and discusses key lessons that law can learn, including:




prioritizing hard evidence over tradition



incorporating evidence-based methodologies into legal education



creating centralized databases for legal research




Read the corresponding blog post.



Resources:




James Lind’s scurvy experiment



History of evidence-based medicine



Cochrane Collaboration




Speakers:




Andrew Reed, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School








Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 11: Breaking Legal Traditions — Insights from Medicine’s Evidence-Based Evolution]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AndrewReed_MedHistoryLaw_student.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting a lawyer seeing medical quackery in his mirror reflection" class="wp-image-91377" style="width:680px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>In this “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS student Andrew Reed explores how the legal profession could benefit from adopting data-driven, evidence-based practices similar to those in medicine. The episode examines the historical transformation of medicine from tradition-based to science-based and discusses key lessons that law can learn, including:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>prioritizing hard evidence over tradition</li>



<li>incorporating evidence-based methodologies into legal education</li>



<li>creating centralized databases for legal research</li>
</ul>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/what-law-can-learn-from-the-history-of-medicine/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Resources:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://perma.cc/XNT7-PRMT">James Lind’s scurvy experiment</a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/F652-3P6Y">History of evidence-based medicine</a></li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/9LPJ-9WJE">Cochrane Collaboration</a></li>
</ul>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-j-reed/">Andrew Reed</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p></p>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2122077/c1e-83kp2toznq1fr546q-6z3rozpmtzo0-2zihlp.mp3" length="30488368"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



In this “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS student Andrew Reed explores how the legal profession could benefit from adopting data-driven, evidence-based practices similar to those in medicine. The episode examines the historical transformation of medicine from tradition-based to science-based and discusses key lessons that law can learn, including:




prioritizing hard evidence over tradition



incorporating evidence-based methodologies into legal education



creating centralized databases for legal research




Read the corresponding blog post.



Resources:




James Lind’s scurvy experiment



History of evidence-based medicine



Cochrane Collaboration




Speakers:




Andrew Reed, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School








Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2122077/c1a-7o7w6-pkx286xvsz1z-xbqt1c.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:53</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 10: What is Human Subjects Research in Law?]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 07:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2112077</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-10-what-is-human-subjects-research-in-law</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/ShannonSewards_Ethics02.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting different sports players participating in a Human Subjects Bowl" class="wp-image-91367" style="width:643px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>In this second episode in the Proof Over Precedent series on demystifying the institutional review board process in law, host Jim Greiner speaks again with IRB expert Shannon Sewards, this time to define human subjects research and differentiate it from medical research. The pair delve into:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>The nuances of human subjects research in legal studies</li>



<li>Interpretive challenges within IRB regulations</li>



<li>Balancing ethical considerations with regulatory requirements</li>



<li>Exploring private information in research</li>
</ul>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/the-ethics-of-rcts-in-law-navigating-irbs-in-human-subjects-research/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Shannon Sewards, Director of the Human Research Protection Program, Dartmouth Health; former Director, Harvard University Area IRB</li>



<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a></strong>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/institutional-review-boards-frequently-asked-questions#IRBOrg">Institutional Review Board FAQs</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-A/part-46">45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 46, Subpart A [“Common Rule”]</a></li>
</ul>



<p></p>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



In this second episode in the Proof Over Precedent series on demystifying the institutional review board process in law, host Jim Greiner speaks again with IRB expert Shannon Sewards, this time to define human subjects research and differentiate it from medical research. The pair delve into:




The nuances of human subjects research in legal studies



Interpretive challenges within IRB regulations



Balancing ethical considerations with regulatory requirements



Exploring private information in research




Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Shannon Sewards, Director of the Human Research Protection Program, Dartmouth Health; former Director, Harvard University Area IRB



Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Institutional Review Board FAQs



45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 46, Subpart A [“Common Rule”]








Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 10: What is Human Subjects Research in Law?]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/ShannonSewards_Ethics02.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting different sports players participating in a Human Subjects Bowl" class="wp-image-91367" style="width:643px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>In this second episode in the Proof Over Precedent series on demystifying the institutional review board process in law, host Jim Greiner speaks again with IRB expert Shannon Sewards, this time to define human subjects research and differentiate it from medical research. The pair delve into:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>The nuances of human subjects research in legal studies</li>



<li>Interpretive challenges within IRB regulations</li>



<li>Balancing ethical considerations with regulatory requirements</li>



<li>Exploring private information in research</li>
</ul>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/the-ethics-of-rcts-in-law-navigating-irbs-in-human-subjects-research/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Shannon Sewards, Director of the Human Research Protection Program, Dartmouth Health; former Director, Harvard University Area IRB</li>



<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a></strong>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/institutional-review-boards-frequently-asked-questions#IRBOrg">Institutional Review Board FAQs</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-A/part-46">45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 46, Subpart A [“Common Rule”]</a></li>
</ul>



<p></p>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2112077/c1e-zqj6rb796kmt18nm5-ww8j7vo7cp47-pitmc4.mp3" length="100155479"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



In this second episode in the Proof Over Precedent series on demystifying the institutional review board process in law, host Jim Greiner speaks again with IRB expert Shannon Sewards, this time to define human subjects research and differentiate it from medical research. The pair delve into:




The nuances of human subjects research in legal studies



Interpretive challenges within IRB regulations



Balancing ethical considerations with regulatory requirements



Exploring private information in research




Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Shannon Sewards, Director of the Human Research Protection Program, Dartmouth Health; former Director, Harvard University Area IRB



Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Institutional Review Board FAQs



45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 46, Subpart A [“Common Rule”]








Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2112077/c1a-7o7w6-z3kn68xzhdd4-wecd7y.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:52:10</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 9: Cellphone Bans: Courthouse Nuisance or Necessity?]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2109728</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-9-cellphone-bans-courthouse-nuisance-or-necessity</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/250501_CourtPhoneBan_student_Andrew_Reed_CC-3.png?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting courthouse cellphone bans" class="wp-image-91341" style="width:789px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>In this “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS student Joe Lieberman interviews classmate Andrew Reed on the implications of courthouse cell phone bans on access to justice, particularly as it relates to self-represented litigants. Though intended to maintain courtroom order and security, the bans often create more headaches for litigants having to secure their phones outside the courthouse; furthermore, Reed suggests, it can be an impediment to access to justice with some litigants missing hearings entirely due to the bans. The discussion touches on the following topics:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Impact of cell phone bans in courtrooms</li>



<li>Potential alternatives to cell phone bans</li>



<li>Opportunity for empirical studies to research the effect of cell phone bans in courthouses</li>
</ul>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/courthouse-cell-phone-bans-limit-access-to-justice/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-j-reed/">Andrew Reed</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li>Joe Liberman, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p></p>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



In this “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS student Joe Lieberman interviews classmate Andrew Reed on the implications of courthouse cell phone bans on access to justice, particularly as it relates to self-represented litigants. Though intended to maintain courtroom order and security, the bans often create more headaches for litigants having to secure their phones outside the courthouse; furthermore, Reed suggests, it can be an impediment to access to justice with some litigants missing hearings entirely due to the bans. The discussion touches on the following topics:




Impact of cell phone bans in courtrooms



Potential alternatives to cell phone bans



Opportunity for empirical studies to research the effect of cell phone bans in courthouses




Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Andrew Reed, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Joe Liberman, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School








Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 9: Cellphone Bans: Courthouse Nuisance or Necessity?]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/250501_CourtPhoneBan_student_Andrew_Reed_CC-3.png?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting courthouse cellphone bans" class="wp-image-91341" style="width:789px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>In this “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS student Joe Lieberman interviews classmate Andrew Reed on the implications of courthouse cell phone bans on access to justice, particularly as it relates to self-represented litigants. Though intended to maintain courtroom order and security, the bans often create more headaches for litigants having to secure their phones outside the courthouse; furthermore, Reed suggests, it can be an impediment to access to justice with some litigants missing hearings entirely due to the bans. The discussion touches on the following topics:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Impact of cell phone bans in courtrooms</li>



<li>Potential alternatives to cell phone bans</li>



<li>Opportunity for empirical studies to research the effect of cell phone bans in courthouses</li>
</ul>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/courthouse-cell-phone-bans-limit-access-to-justice/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-j-reed/">Andrew Reed</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li>Joe Liberman, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p></p>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2109728/c1e-gmx0rsmnj5nswv0kd-okzkdww2u7x9-myikfs.mp3" length="33352225"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



In this “Student Voices” episode of Proof Over Precedent, HLS student Joe Lieberman interviews classmate Andrew Reed on the implications of courthouse cell phone bans on access to justice, particularly as it relates to self-represented litigants. Though intended to maintain courtroom order and security, the bans often create more headaches for litigants having to secure their phones outside the courthouse; furthermore, Reed suggests, it can be an impediment to access to justice with some litigants missing hearings entirely due to the bans. The discussion touches on the following topics:




Impact of cell phone bans in courtrooms



Potential alternatives to cell phone bans



Opportunity for empirical studies to research the effect of cell phone bans in courthouses




Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Andrew Reed, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Joe Liberman, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School








Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2109728/c1a-7o7w6-8do1xvm0cr24-bpkvp8.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:17:23</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 8: Ethics in Research — IRBs and the Common Rule Explained]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2102229</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-8-ethics-in-research-irbs-and-the-common-rule-explained</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/ShannonSewards_Ethics01.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting Common Rule protections for research participants" class="wp-image-91332" style="width:667px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p></p>



<p>Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) watch over human subjects research to ensure ethical compliance. Ubiquitous in medical research, IRBs may still baffle those working in legal research. This week, in the first of a series of podcast talks demystifying IRBs, Proof Over Precedent host Jim Greiner talks with IRB expert Shannon Sewards about the importance of IRBs and the Common Rule in ensuring ethical research practices. Among the topics:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Understanding IRBs and the Common Rule</li>



<li>Historical context of medical research</li>



<li>Adapting medical-based regulations to legal studies<br /></li>
</ul>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/the-ethics-of-rcts-in-the-law-demystifying-irbs-and-the-common-rule/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Shannon Sewards, Director of the Human Research Protection Program, Dartmouth Health; former Director, Harvard University Area IRB</li>



<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a></strong>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/institutional-review-boards-frequently-asked-questions#IRBOrg">Institutional Review Board FAQs</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-A/part-46">45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 46, Subpart A [“Common Rule”]</a></li>



<li><a href="https://nuremberg.law.harvard.edu/nmt_1_intro">Nuremberg Trials</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.tuskegee.edu/about-us/centers-of-excellence/bioethics-center/about-the-usphs-syphilis-study">Tuskegee Experiment</a></li>



<li><a href="https://ahrp.org/1955-1970-saul-krugman-md-conducted-despicable-medical-experiments-at-willowbrook/">Willowbrook Experiment</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM196606162742405">Beecher Article</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html">Belmont Report</a></li>
</ul>



<p></p>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School







Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) watch over human subjects research to ensure ethical compliance. Ubiquitous in medical research, IRBs may still baffle those working in legal research. This week, in the first of a series of podcast talks demystifying IRBs, Proof Over Precedent host Jim Greiner talks with IRB expert Shannon Sewards about the importance of IRBs and the Common Rule in ensuring ethical research practices. Among the topics:




Understanding IRBs and the Common Rule



Historical context of medical research



Adapting medical-based regulations to legal studies




Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Shannon Sewards, Director of the Human Research Protection Program, Dartmouth Health; former Director, Harvard University Area IRB



Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Institutional Review Board FAQs



45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 46, Subpart A [“Common Rule”]



Nuremberg Trials



Tuskegee Experiment



Willowbrook Experiment



Beecher Article



Belmont Report








Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 8: Ethics in Research — IRBs and the Common Rule Explained]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/ShannonSewards_Ethics01.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting Common Rule protections for research participants" class="wp-image-91332" style="width:667px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p></p>



<p>Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) watch over human subjects research to ensure ethical compliance. Ubiquitous in medical research, IRBs may still baffle those working in legal research. This week, in the first of a series of podcast talks demystifying IRBs, Proof Over Precedent host Jim Greiner talks with IRB expert Shannon Sewards about the importance of IRBs and the Common Rule in ensuring ethical research practices. Among the topics:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Understanding IRBs and the Common Rule</li>



<li>Historical context of medical research</li>



<li>Adapting medical-based regulations to legal studies<br /></li>
</ul>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/the-ethics-of-rcts-in-the-law-demystifying-irbs-and-the-common-rule/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Shannon Sewards, Director of the Human Research Protection Program, Dartmouth Health; former Director, Harvard University Area IRB</li>



<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a></strong>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/institutional-review-boards-frequently-asked-questions#IRBOrg">Institutional Review Board FAQs</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-A/part-46">45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 46, Subpart A [“Common Rule”]</a></li>



<li><a href="https://nuremberg.law.harvard.edu/nmt_1_intro">Nuremberg Trials</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.tuskegee.edu/about-us/centers-of-excellence/bioethics-center/about-the-usphs-syphilis-study">Tuskegee Experiment</a></li>



<li><a href="https://ahrp.org/1955-1970-saul-krugman-md-conducted-despicable-medical-experiments-at-willowbrook/">Willowbrook Experiment</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM196606162742405">Beecher Article</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html">Belmont Report</a></li>
</ul>



<p></p>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2102229/c1e-mpn2zsqdkpghg1o95-2540j12xuz9-sujuxs.mp3" length="77459459"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School







Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) watch over human subjects research to ensure ethical compliance. Ubiquitous in medical research, IRBs may still baffle those working in legal research. This week, in the first of a series of podcast talks demystifying IRBs, Proof Over Precedent host Jim Greiner talks with IRB expert Shannon Sewards about the importance of IRBs and the Common Rule in ensuring ethical research practices. Among the topics:




Understanding IRBs and the Common Rule



Historical context of medical research



Adapting medical-based regulations to legal studies




Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Shannon Sewards, Director of the Human Research Protection Program, Dartmouth Health; former Director, Harvard University Area IRB



Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Institutional Review Board FAQs



45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 46, Subpart A [“Common Rule”]



Nuremberg Trials



Tuskegee Experiment



Willowbrook Experiment



Beecher Article



Belmont Report








Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2102229/c1a-7o7w6-rk326m8pir6k-thbb2t.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:40:21</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 7: Evaluating Online and In-Person Family Law Hearings]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2098904</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-7-evaluating-online-and-in-person-family-law-hearings</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/ReneeDanser_OnlineCourt.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting an online court hearing held from a bedroom" class="wp-image-91321" style="width:635px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>Does the medium of family law cases — online or in-person — factor into procedural justice and the satisfaction of litigants in these cases? In this episode, A2J Lab Associate Director Renee Danser talks with Jim Greiner, faculty director of the A2J Lab, about a study nearing completion, including:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>What led one court system to seek an answer to this question</li>



<li>How the randomized control trial formed (quickly)</li>



<li>Measurable goals for the study</li>



<li>Hypotheses on the findings, due this fall</li>



<li>A third factor to emerge from the findings</li>
</ul>



<p>Join us for a deep dive into this study with some takeaways both for the online vs. in-person courtroom debate and for general judicial demeanor.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/a2j-lab-study-in-the-field-in-person-vs-remote-courtrooms-which-wins-in-family-law-matters/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a></strong>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/lab-staff/">Renee L. Danser</a></strong>, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.lagratta.com/">La Gratta Consulting</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.sji.gov/">State Justice Institute</a></li>



<li><em><a href="https://www.ncsc.org/resources-courts/how-hearing-mediums-impact-family-law-cases">How Hearing Mediums Impact Family Law Cases</a></em>, Trends in State Courts, 2024</li>



<li><em><a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice/remote-testimonial-factfinding/3314A38E36AEB4C98EE71AFED7A75C5E">Remote Testimonial Fact-Finding, from Part II – Legal Tech, Litigation, and the Adversarial System</a></em>, 2023 report published by Cambridge University Press</li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Does the medium of family law cases — online or in-person — factor into procedural justice and the satisfaction of litigants in these cases? In this episode, A2J Lab Associate Director Renee Danser talks with Jim Greiner, faculty director of the A2J Lab, about a study nearing completion, including:




What led one court system to seek an answer to this question



How the randomized control trial formed (quickly)



Measurable goals for the study



Hypotheses on the findings, due this fall



A third factor to emerge from the findings




Join us for a deep dive into this study with some takeaways both for the online vs. in-person courtroom debate and for general judicial demeanor.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Renee L. Danser, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




La Gratta Consulting



State Justice Institute



How Hearing Mediums Impact Family Law Cases, Trends in State Courts, 2024



Remote Testimonial Fact-Finding, from Part II – Legal Tech, Litigation, and the Adversarial System, 2023 report published by Cambridge University Press




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 7: Evaluating Online and In-Person Family Law Hearings]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/ReneeDanser_OnlineCourt.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting an online court hearing held from a bedroom" class="wp-image-91321" style="width:635px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>Does the medium of family law cases — online or in-person — factor into procedural justice and the satisfaction of litigants in these cases? In this episode, A2J Lab Associate Director Renee Danser talks with Jim Greiner, faculty director of the A2J Lab, about a study nearing completion, including:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>What led one court system to seek an answer to this question</li>



<li>How the randomized control trial formed (quickly)</li>



<li>Measurable goals for the study</li>



<li>Hypotheses on the findings, due this fall</li>



<li>A third factor to emerge from the findings</li>
</ul>



<p>Join us for a deep dive into this study with some takeaways both for the online vs. in-person courtroom debate and for general judicial demeanor.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/a2j-lab-study-in-the-field-in-person-vs-remote-courtrooms-which-wins-in-family-law-matters/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a></strong>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/lab-staff/">Renee L. Danser</a></strong>, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.lagratta.com/">La Gratta Consulting</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.sji.gov/">State Justice Institute</a></li>



<li><em><a href="https://www.ncsc.org/resources-courts/how-hearing-mediums-impact-family-law-cases">How Hearing Mediums Impact Family Law Cases</a></em>, Trends in State Courts, 2024</li>



<li><em><a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice/remote-testimonial-factfinding/3314A38E36AEB4C98EE71AFED7A75C5E">Remote Testimonial Fact-Finding, from Part II – Legal Tech, Litigation, and the Adversarial System</a></em>, 2023 report published by Cambridge University Press</li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2098904/c1e-7o7w6a9vpori502pn-kp9n0d5qad6o-p8yl1j.mp3" length="84950960"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Does the medium of family law cases — online or in-person — factor into procedural justice and the satisfaction of litigants in these cases? In this episode, A2J Lab Associate Director Renee Danser talks with Jim Greiner, faculty director of the A2J Lab, about a study nearing completion, including:




What led one court system to seek an answer to this question



How the randomized control trial formed (quickly)



Measurable goals for the study



Hypotheses on the findings, due this fall



A third factor to emerge from the findings




Join us for a deep dive into this study with some takeaways both for the online vs. in-person courtroom debate and for general judicial demeanor.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Renee L. Danser, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




La Gratta Consulting



State Justice Institute



How Hearing Mediums Impact Family Law Cases, Trends in State Courts, 2024



Remote Testimonial Fact-Finding, from Part II – Legal Tech, Litigation, and the Adversarial System, 2023 report published by Cambridge University Press




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2098904/c1a-7o7w6-5zo3kwmkcqm6-bglbp2.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:44:15</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 6: Online Courts Show Promise but Little National FTA Data]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2092371</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-6-online-courts-show-promise-but-little-national-fta-data</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<p class="has-ast-global-color-0-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-be4b0ae4ae05dd407b6251630bb7f0e0"><strong><em>STUDENT VOICES: </em></strong><em>The views expressed are those of the student podcasters and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Access to Justice Lab.</em></p>



<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/250501_OnlineCourt_student_Kristen_Arnold_FQ.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon of effect of Zoom court on failure to appear rates" class="wp-image-90893" style="width:645px;height:auto;" />Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School<br />



<p>Hypothetical situation (that was real for at least one person): You’re issued a traffic ticket requiring appearance in a courthouse 400 miles away from your home. Do you a) absorb the travel costs and skip work to appear in court, b) pay the ticket fine online, if possible, to avoid the hassle, c) hire a lawyer to appear for you, if possible, or d) appear in court via Zoom, if available? The best option seems obvious, but data on Zoom’s effect on court hearings and failure to appear rates are still elusive.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/what-effect-does-zoom-court-have-on-failure-to-appear-rates/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Kristen Arnold, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li>Spencer Thieme, J.D. candidate. Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
STUDENT VOICES: The views expressed are those of the student podcasters and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Access to Justice Lab.



Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Hypothetical situation (that was real for at least one person): You’re issued a traffic ticket requiring appearance in a courthouse 400 miles away from your home. Do you a) absorb the travel costs and skip work to appear in court, b) pay the ticket fine online, if possible, to avoid the hassle, c) hire a lawyer to appear for you, if possible, or d) appear in court via Zoom, if available? The best option seems obvious, but data on Zoom’s effect on court hearings and failure to appear rates are still elusive.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Kristen Arnold, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Spencer Thieme, J.D. candidate. Harvard Law School




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



BlueSky



Facebook



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 6: Online Courts Show Promise but Little National FTA Data]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<p class="has-ast-global-color-0-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-be4b0ae4ae05dd407b6251630bb7f0e0"><strong><em>STUDENT VOICES: </em></strong><em>The views expressed are those of the student podcasters and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Access to Justice Lab.</em></p>



<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/250501_OnlineCourt_student_Kristen_Arnold_FQ.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon of effect of Zoom court on failure to appear rates" class="wp-image-90893" style="width:645px;height:auto;" />Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School<br />



<p>Hypothetical situation (that was real for at least one person): You’re issued a traffic ticket requiring appearance in a courthouse 400 miles away from your home. Do you a) absorb the travel costs and skip work to appear in court, b) pay the ticket fine online, if possible, to avoid the hassle, c) hire a lawyer to appear for you, if possible, or d) appear in court via Zoom, if available? The best option seems obvious, but data on Zoom’s effect on court hearings and failure to appear rates are still elusive.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/what-effect-does-zoom-court-have-on-failure-to-appear-rates/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Kristen Arnold, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li>Spencer Thieme, J.D. candidate. Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2092371/c1e-2wzp6hmqkz0aqg52n-0vpk7wn2uk97-yiyoht.mp3" length="32533025"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
STUDENT VOICES: The views expressed are those of the student podcasters and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Access to Justice Lab.



Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Hypothetical situation (that was real for at least one person): You’re issued a traffic ticket requiring appearance in a courthouse 400 miles away from your home. Do you a) absorb the travel costs and skip work to appear in court, b) pay the ticket fine online, if possible, to avoid the hassle, c) hire a lawyer to appear for you, if possible, or d) appear in court via Zoom, if available? The best option seems obvious, but data on Zoom’s effect on court hearings and failure to appear rates are still elusive.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Kristen Arnold, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Spencer Thieme, J.D. candidate. Harvard Law School




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



BlueSky



Facebook



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2092371/c1a-7o7w6-qdv39gx1c2p2-ggatyr.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:16:57</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 5: Can Simple, Affordable Ideas Improve Courts’ Costly Failure-to-Appear Rates?]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2088154</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-5-can-simple-affordable-ideas-improve-courts-costly-failure-to-appear-rates</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/AlissaFishbane_Ideas42_TrafficTickets.png?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-91305" style="width:637px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School<br />



<p>Failure to appear in criminal cases can lead defendants to jail time, draining resources from police, courts, and taxpayer dollars. But according to Alissa Fishbane, managing director at ideas42, a nonprofit think tank, the solution may be cheaper and easier than expected. A2J Lab Faculty Director Jim Greiner spoke with Fishbane in this episode of <strong><em>Proof Over President</em></strong> about her research into informational gaps that may be a root cause for several court issues like failure to appear and payment of traffic tickets.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/outside-research-simple-solutions-to-courts-failure-to-">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="https://www.ideas42.org/about-us/people/#263">Alissa Fishbane</a>, Managing Director, ideas42</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.ideas42.org/">ideas42</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.cjinstitute.org/assets/sites/2/2025/02/What-Really-Prevents-Court-Appearance.pdf">What Really Prevents Court Appearance?: Survey Findings from People Who Failed to Appear in Two Counties</a>, Crime and Justice Institute, Feb. 2025</li>



<li><a href="https://www.ideas42.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/I42-954_SummonsForm_exp_3-1.pdf">New York City Summons Redesign</a>, ideas42</li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/KXC8-GL3Z">Stamping Out Missed Court Dates</a>, ideas42</li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/KZ9R-583J">Paying the Price: New Mexico’s Practice of Arresting and Incarcerating People for Nonpayment of Court Debt</a>, Vera Institute of Justice</li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</p>



<p></p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Failure to appear in criminal cases can lead defendants to jail time, draining resources from police, courts, and taxpayer dollars. But according to Alissa Fishbane, managing director at ideas42, a nonprofit think tank, the solution may be cheaper and easier than expected. A2J Lab Faculty Director Jim Greiner spoke with Fishbane in this episode of Proof Over President about her research into informational gaps that may be a root cause for several court issues like failure to appear and payment of traffic tickets.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Alissa Fishbane, Managing Director, ideas42




Resources mentioned:




ideas42



What Really Prevents Court Appearance?: Survey Findings from People Who Failed to Appear in Two Counties, Crime and Justice Institute, Feb. 2025



New York City Summons Redesign, ideas42



Stamping Out Missed Court Dates, ideas42



Paying the Price: New Mexico’s Practice of Arresting and Incarcerating People for Nonpayment of Court Debt, Vera Institute of Justice




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



BlueSky



Facebook



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 5: Can Simple, Affordable Ideas Improve Courts’ Costly Failure-to-Appear Rates?]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/AlissaFishbane_Ideas42_TrafficTickets.png?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-91305" style="width:637px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School<br />



<p>Failure to appear in criminal cases can lead defendants to jail time, draining resources from police, courts, and taxpayer dollars. But according to Alissa Fishbane, managing director at ideas42, a nonprofit think tank, the solution may be cheaper and easier than expected. A2J Lab Faculty Director Jim Greiner spoke with Fishbane in this episode of <strong><em>Proof Over President</em></strong> about her research into informational gaps that may be a root cause for several court issues like failure to appear and payment of traffic tickets.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/outside-research-simple-solutions-to-courts-failure-to-">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="https://www.ideas42.org/about-us/people/#263">Alissa Fishbane</a>, Managing Director, ideas42</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.ideas42.org/">ideas42</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.cjinstitute.org/assets/sites/2/2025/02/What-Really-Prevents-Court-Appearance.pdf">What Really Prevents Court Appearance?: Survey Findings from People Who Failed to Appear in Two Counties</a>, Crime and Justice Institute, Feb. 2025</li>



<li><a href="https://www.ideas42.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/I42-954_SummonsForm_exp_3-1.pdf">New York City Summons Redesign</a>, ideas42</li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/KXC8-GL3Z">Stamping Out Missed Court Dates</a>, ideas42</li>



<li><a href="https://perma.cc/KZ9R-583J">Paying the Price: New Mexico’s Practice of Arresting and Incarcerating People for Nonpayment of Court Debt</a>, Vera Institute of Justice</li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</p>



<p></p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2088154/c1e-x6d53t91r93skd084-6z31qq2ws912-1xivio.mp3" length="96779205"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Failure to appear in criminal cases can lead defendants to jail time, draining resources from police, courts, and taxpayer dollars. But according to Alissa Fishbane, managing director at ideas42, a nonprofit think tank, the solution may be cheaper and easier than expected. A2J Lab Faculty Director Jim Greiner spoke with Fishbane in this episode of Proof Over President about her research into informational gaps that may be a root cause for several court issues like failure to appear and payment of traffic tickets.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Alissa Fishbane, Managing Director, ideas42




Resources mentioned:




ideas42



What Really Prevents Court Appearance?: Survey Findings from People Who Failed to Appear in Two Counties, Crime and Justice Institute, Feb. 2025



New York City Summons Redesign, ideas42



Stamping Out Missed Court Dates, ideas42



Paying the Price: New Mexico’s Practice of Arresting and Incarcerating People for Nonpayment of Court Debt, Vera Institute of Justice




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



BlueSky



Facebook



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2088154/c1a-7o7w6-9jqn3g39h3xp-q7abfq.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:50:25</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 4: Can Immigration Courts Save Time, Money, AND Noncitizen Dignity with Legal Information Programs?]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2025 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2076344</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-4-can-immigration-courts-save-time-money-and-noncitizen-dignity-with-legal-information-programs</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<p class="has-ast-global-color-0-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-be4b0ae4ae05dd407b6251630bb7f0e0"><strong><em>STUDENT VOICES: </em></strong><em>The views expressed are those of the student podcasters and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Access to Justice Lab.</em></p>



<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/250501_ImmigrationLegalInfoPrograms_student_julia.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting legal information programs' role in supporting unrepresented noncitizens navigating the U.S. immigration system" class="wp-image-90880" style="width:572px;height:auto;" />Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p><br />Harvard Law School student Julia Saltzman leads a Student Voices episode of <strong><em>Proof Over Precedent</em></strong> to discuss legal information programs amid immigration court proceedings for unrepresented noncitizens. Prior evaluations support the programs from a quantitative view — they reduce detention rates and save taxpayer money. But what about evidence-based research focused on due process? Reframing the angle and the study, she argues, could produce better advocacy tools and improved access to justice.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/legal-information-programs-a-possible-way-to-reduce-harm-for-unrepresented-noncitizens-in-immigration-proceedings/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/julia-saltzman-64537584/">Julia Saltzman</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li>Strong Ma, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.justice.gov/eoir">Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR)</a></li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</p>



<p></p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
STUDENT VOICES: The views expressed are those of the student podcasters and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Access to Justice Lab.



Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Harvard Law School student Julia Saltzman leads a Student Voices episode of Proof Over Precedent to discuss legal information programs amid immigration court proceedings for unrepresented noncitizens. Prior evaluations support the programs from a quantitative view — they reduce detention rates and save taxpayer money. But what about evidence-based research focused on due process? Reframing the angle and the study, she argues, could produce better advocacy tools and improved access to justice.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Julia Saltzman, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Strong Ma, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR)




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



BlueSky



Facebook



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 4: Can Immigration Courts Save Time, Money, AND Noncitizen Dignity with Legal Information Programs?]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<p class="has-ast-global-color-0-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-be4b0ae4ae05dd407b6251630bb7f0e0"><strong><em>STUDENT VOICES: </em></strong><em>The views expressed are those of the student podcasters and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Access to Justice Lab.</em></p>



<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/250501_ImmigrationLegalInfoPrograms_student_julia.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting legal information programs' role in supporting unrepresented noncitizens navigating the U.S. immigration system" class="wp-image-90880" style="width:572px;height:auto;" />Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p><br />Harvard Law School student Julia Saltzman leads a Student Voices episode of <strong><em>Proof Over Precedent</em></strong> to discuss legal information programs amid immigration court proceedings for unrepresented noncitizens. Prior evaluations support the programs from a quantitative view — they reduce detention rates and save taxpayer money. But what about evidence-based research focused on due process? Reframing the angle and the study, she argues, could produce better advocacy tools and improved access to justice.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/legal-information-programs-a-possible-way-to-reduce-harm-for-unrepresented-noncitizens-in-immigration-proceedings/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/julia-saltzman-64537584/">Julia Saltzman</a>, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li>Strong Ma, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.justice.gov/eoir">Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR)</a></li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</p>



<p></p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2076344/c1e-mpn2zsqqzvdbg1o95-5zxp2214u1qn-sty26j.mp3" length="40570380"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
STUDENT VOICES: The views expressed are those of the student podcasters and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Access to Justice Lab.



Image by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Harvard Law School student Julia Saltzman leads a Student Voices episode of Proof Over Precedent to discuss legal information programs amid immigration court proceedings for unrepresented noncitizens. Prior evaluations support the programs from a quantitative view — they reduce detention rates and save taxpayer money. But what about evidence-based research focused on due process? Reframing the angle and the study, she argues, could produce better advocacy tools and improved access to justice.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Julia Saltzman, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Strong Ma, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR)




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



BlueSky



Facebook



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2076344/c1a-7o7w6-1pkg229dtqmg-ffypov.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:21:08</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 3: Can Non-Lawyers Offer Relief and Expertise in Deportation Cases?]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2074998</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-3-can-non-lawyers-offer-relief-and-expertise-in-deportation-cases</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<p class="has-ast-global-color-0-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-be4b0ae4ae05dd407b6251630bb7f0e0"><strong><em>STUDENT VOICES: </em></strong><em>The views expressed are those of the student podcasters and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Access to Justice Lab.</em></p>



<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/date_NonlawyerImmRep_student_Michael_Pusic_CC-1.png?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting non-lawyer legal services in agency immigration litigation" class="wp-image-90928" style="width:631px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p><br />With a growing backlog of deportation cases, overwhelmed U.S. immigration courts are struggling to deliver due process. In this first Student Voices podcast episode of <em><strong>Proof Over Precedent</strong></em>, Harvard Law School student Michael Pusic proposes a possible solution for the 86% of immigrants detained without a lawyer: Enable non-lawyers with specialized training and experience to represent individuals facing deportation. It’s passed observational tests; now, he says, it’s time for a randomized control trial.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/non-lawyer-legal-services-in-agency-immigration-litigation/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Michael Pusic, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="https://www.laura-aquino.com">Laura Aquino</a>, J.D. candidate. Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.catholiccharitiesusa.org/">Catholic Charities</a></li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
STUDENT VOICES: The views expressed are those of the student podcasters and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Access to Justice Lab.



Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



With a growing backlog of deportation cases, overwhelmed U.S. immigration courts are struggling to deliver due process. In this first Student Voices podcast episode of Proof Over Precedent, Harvard Law School student Michael Pusic proposes a possible solution for the 86% of immigrants detained without a lawyer: Enable non-lawyers with specialized training and experience to represent individuals facing deportation. It’s passed observational tests; now, he says, it’s time for a randomized control trial.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Michael Pusic, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Laura Aquino, J.D. candidate. Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Catholic Charities




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



BlueSky



Facebook



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 3: Can Non-Lawyers Offer Relief and Expertise in Deportation Cases?]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<p class="has-ast-global-color-0-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-be4b0ae4ae05dd407b6251630bb7f0e0"><strong><em>STUDENT VOICES: </em></strong><em>The views expressed are those of the student podcasters and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Access to Justice Lab.</em></p>



<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/date_NonlawyerImmRep_student_Michael_Pusic_CC-1.png?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting non-lawyer legal services in agency immigration litigation" class="wp-image-90928" style="width:631px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p><br />With a growing backlog of deportation cases, overwhelmed U.S. immigration courts are struggling to deliver due process. In this first Student Voices podcast episode of <em><strong>Proof Over Precedent</strong></em>, Harvard Law School student Michael Pusic proposes a possible solution for the 86% of immigrants detained without a lawyer: Enable non-lawyers with specialized training and experience to represent individuals facing deportation. It’s passed observational tests; now, he says, it’s time for a randomized control trial.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/non-lawyer-legal-services-in-agency-immigration-litigation/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Michael Pusic, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="https://www.laura-aquino.com">Laura Aquino</a>, J.D. candidate. Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.catholiccharitiesusa.org/">Catholic Charities</a></li>
</ul>



<p><br />Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2074998/c1e-4w2p6h11nx1u8r9zj-rk480xr0ukv3-7mlcwr.mp3" length="31534938"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
STUDENT VOICES: The views expressed are those of the student podcasters and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Access to Justice Lab.



Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



With a growing backlog of deportation cases, overwhelmed U.S. immigration courts are struggling to deliver due process. In this first Student Voices podcast episode of Proof Over Precedent, Harvard Law School student Michael Pusic proposes a possible solution for the 86% of immigrants detained without a lawyer: Enable non-lawyers with specialized training and experience to represent individuals facing deportation. It’s passed observational tests; now, he says, it’s time for a randomized control trial.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Michael Pusic, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



Laura Aquino, J.D. candidate. Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Catholic Charities




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



BlueSky



Facebook



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2074998/c1a-7o7w6-gp3x8nogc9v5-yy9s0c.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:16:26</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 2: Should AI Dole Out Legal Advice to Lawyers?]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2068020</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-2-should-ai-dole-out-legal-advice-to-lawyers</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/MandyMobleyLi_AI_image.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting pro bono attorneys getting legal information and advice from AI" class="wp-image-91266" style="width:465px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>This episode looks into the OpenJustice project, a study combining access to justice and artificial intelligence. It’s just a year in development but already moving relatively quickly through its randomized control trial. A2J Lab Faculty Director Jim Greiner spoke with Mandy Mobley Li, Assistant Director of Research Innovations at the A2J Lab, about project developments and addressing the question: Will AI help improve attorney/staff conversations with clients?</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/a2j-lab-project-in-development-ai-assistance-in-provision-of-legal-information-advice/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/lab-staff/">Mandy Mobley Li</a>, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://conflictanalytics.queenslaw.ca/">Conflict Analytics Lab</a> at <a href="https://www.queensu.ca/">Queens University</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.probonoontario.org/">Pro Bono Ontario</a></li>



<li><a href="https://sshrc-crsh.canada.ca/en/funding/opportunities/insight-grants.aspx">Insight Grants</a>, awarded by <a href="https://sshrc-crsh.canada.ca/en.aspx">Canada’s Social Science and Humanities Research Council</a></li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</p>



<p></p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



This episode looks into the OpenJustice project, a study combining access to justice and artificial intelligence. It’s just a year in development but already moving relatively quickly through its randomized control trial. A2J Lab Faculty Director Jim Greiner spoke with Mandy Mobley Li, Assistant Director of Research Innovations at the A2J Lab, about project developments and addressing the question: Will AI help improve attorney/staff conversations with clients?



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Mandy Mobley Li, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Conflict Analytics Lab at Queens University



Pro Bono Ontario



Insight Grants, awarded by Canada’s Social Science and Humanities Research Council




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



BlueSky



Facebook



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 2: Should AI Dole Out Legal Advice to Lawyers?]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/MandyMobleyLi_AI_image.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon depicting pro bono attorneys getting legal information and advice from AI" class="wp-image-91266" style="width:465px;height:auto;" />Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



<p>This episode looks into the OpenJustice project, a study combining access to justice and artificial intelligence. It’s just a year in development but already moving relatively quickly through its randomized control trial. A2J Lab Faculty Director Jim Greiner spoke with Mandy Mobley Li, Assistant Director of Research Innovations at the A2J Lab, about project developments and addressing the question: Will AI help improve attorney/staff conversations with clients?</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/a2j-lab-project-in-development-ai-assistance-in-provision-of-legal-information-advice/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><a href="https://a2jlab.org/lab-staff/">Mandy Mobley Li</a>, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://conflictanalytics.queenslaw.ca/">Conflict Analytics Lab</a> at <a href="https://www.queensu.ca/">Queens University</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.probonoontario.org/">Pro Bono Ontario</a></li>



<li><a href="https://sshrc-crsh.canada.ca/en/funding/opportunities/insight-grants.aspx">Insight Grants</a>, awarded by <a href="https://sshrc-crsh.canada.ca/en.aspx">Canada’s Social Science and Humanities Research Council</a></li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School</p>



<p></p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2068020/c1e-pq15pb153wqsqd4r2-47k6xd35udoq-3tq96e.mp3" length="58783370"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School



This episode looks into the OpenJustice project, a study combining access to justice and artificial intelligence. It’s just a year in development but already moving relatively quickly through its randomized control trial. A2J Lab Faculty Director Jim Greiner spoke with Mandy Mobley Li, Assistant Director of Research Innovations at the A2J Lab, about project developments and addressing the question: Will AI help improve attorney/staff conversations with clients?



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Mandy Mobley Li, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Conflict Analytics Lab at Queens University



Pro Bono Ontario



Insight Grants, awarded by Canada’s Social Science and Humanities Research Council




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



BlueSky



Facebook



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School




]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2068020/c1a-7o7w6-pk4z3m5kfpz6-ohl4m8.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:30:37</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 1: Could Holistic Legal Services Help Families Avoid the Child Welfare System?]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 22:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2067726</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-1-could-holistic-legal-services-help-families-avoid-the-child-welfare-system</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/250501_childwelfare_renee.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon reflecting whether legal services can help families avoid child welfare involvement" class="wp-image-91204" style="width:555px;height:auto;" />



<p>This episode offers a mid-study update on a decades-long randomized control trial, unofficially referred to as the “Child Welfare” project. Proof Over Precedent host and Access to Justice Lab Director Jim Greiner interviews Project Director Renee Danser about the study, which evaluates whether families with children who face poverty-related legal and social challenges can avoid unnecessary entries into the child welfare system with the assistance of holistic legal services – a combination of social worker services and a traditional attorney-client relationship. Listen now.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/could-holistic-legal-services-help-families-avoid-the-child-welfare-system/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a></strong>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/lab-staff/">Renee L. Danser</a></strong>, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.arnoldventures.org/">Arnold Ventures</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.dukeendowment.org/">Duke Endowment</a></li>



<li><a href="https://sc.edu/study/colleges_schools/law/academics/experiential_learning/clinics/champs_clinic/index.php">University of South Carolina School of Law’s “CHAMPS” Clinic (Carolina Health Advocacy Medicolegal Partnership)</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.kansasholisticdefenders.org/">Kansas Holistic Defenders</a></li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[




This episode offers a mid-study update on a decades-long randomized control trial, unofficially referred to as the “Child Welfare” project. Proof Over Precedent host and Access to Justice Lab Director Jim Greiner interviews Project Director Renee Danser about the study, which evaluates whether families with children who face poverty-related legal and social challenges can avoid unnecessary entries into the child welfare system with the assistance of holistic legal services – a combination of social worker services and a traditional attorney-client relationship. Listen now.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Renee L. Danser, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Arnold Ventures



Duke Endowment



University of South Carolina School of Law’s “CHAMPS” Clinic (Carolina Health Advocacy Medicolegal Partnership)



Kansas Holistic Defenders




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 1: Could Holistic Legal Services Help Families Avoid the Child Welfare System?]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://i0.wp.com/a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/250501_childwelfare_renee.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&amp;ssl=1" alt="Cartoon reflecting whether legal services can help families avoid child welfare involvement" class="wp-image-91204" style="width:555px;height:auto;" />



<p>This episode offers a mid-study update on a decades-long randomized control trial, unofficially referred to as the “Child Welfare” project. Proof Over Precedent host and Access to Justice Lab Director Jim Greiner interviews Project Director Renee Danser about the study, which evaluates whether families with children who face poverty-related legal and social challenges can avoid unnecessary entries into the child welfare system with the assistance of holistic legal services – a combination of social worker services and a traditional attorney-client relationship. Listen now.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/could-holistic-legal-services-help-families-avoid-the-child-welfare-system/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p>Speakers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a></strong>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/lab-staff/">Renee L. Danser</a></strong>, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.arnoldventures.org/">Arnold Ventures</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.dukeendowment.org/">Duke Endowment</a></li>



<li><a href="https://sc.edu/study/colleges_schools/law/academics/experiential_learning/clinics/champs_clinic/index.php">University of South Carolina School of Law’s “CHAMPS” Clinic (Carolina Health Advocacy Medicolegal Partnership)</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.kansasholisticdefenders.org/">Kansas Holistic Defenders</a></li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2067726/c1e-zqj6rb7m1k7sd16vd-8dr24z9rtoo5-r4i2dg.mp3" length="110296338"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[




This episode offers a mid-study update on a decades-long randomized control trial, unofficially referred to as the “Child Welfare” project. Proof Over Precedent host and Access to Justice Lab Director Jim Greiner interviews Project Director Renee Danser about the study, which evaluates whether families with children who face poverty-related legal and social challenges can avoid unnecessary entries into the child welfare system with the assistance of holistic legal services – a combination of social worker services and a traditional attorney-client relationship. Listen now.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers:




Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Renee L. Danser, Associate Director of Research and Strategic Partnerships, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Arnold Ventures



Duke Endowment



University of South Carolina School of Law’s “CHAMPS” Clinic (Carolina Health Advocacy Medicolegal Partnership)



Kansas Holistic Defenders




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



BlueSky



LinkedIn



YouTube




Support the A2J



Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2067726/c1a-7o7w6-dmzo69zqh2w8-z2rc5v.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:45:58</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 0: Get to Know Us Again]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 06:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/64473/episode/2060824</guid>
                                    <link>https://proof-over-precedent.castos.com/episodes/episode-0-get-to-know-us-again</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[
<p>This episode introduces listeners to the Proof Over Precedent podcast and the work of the <a href="https://a2jlab.org/">Access to Justice Lab</a> at Harvard Law School. The lab focuses on bringing empirical research into the legal field for both civil and criminal justice systems. Professor Jim Greiner shares plans for future episodes to address randomized control trials conducted by the lab and its research partners; ethical issues around RCT trials; challenges of the legal system as it currently operates; the future of legal reform, including AI in legal processes; and student takes on access to justice.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/get-to-know-us-again/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-left">Speakers: </p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a></strong>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><strong>Michelle Blouin</strong>, Communications Associate, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/372/335" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Gideon v. Wainwright</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/s0025-6196(13)00405-9/fulltext" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Professional reversals in medicine</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.npr.org/2007/11/10/5470430/timeline-the-rise-and-fall-of-vioxx#:~:text=By%20the%20time%20Vioxx%20is,and%2038%2C000%20of%20them%20died" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Vioxx</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(17)32714-9/abstract" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Heart stents</a></li>



<li><a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1326430/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Hormone replacement therapy</a></li>



<li><a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.4073/csr.2013.5" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Scared Straight</a></li>



<li><a href="https://cuhs.harvard.edu/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Harvard’s IRB</a></li>



<li><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3807349" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Gender of Gideon</a></li>



<li><a href="https://crimelab.uchicago.edu/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Chicago Crime Lab</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.law.upenn.edu/institutes/quattronecenter/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Quattrone Center</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.povertyactionlab.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jameel Poverty Action Lab</a></li>



<li><a href="https://capolicylab.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">California Policy Lab</a></li>



<li><a href="https://thelabprojects.dc.gov/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lab in DC</a></li>



<li><a href="https://cels2025.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Conference on Empirical Legal Studies</a></li>



<li><a href="https://community.lawschool.cornell.edu/sels/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Society for Empirical Legal Studies</a></li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a></a></li></ul>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[
This episode introduces listeners to the Proof Over Precedent podcast and the work of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School. The lab focuses on bringing empirical research into the legal field for both civil and criminal justice systems. Professor Jim Greiner shares plans for future episodes to address randomized control trials conducted by the lab and its research partners; ethical issues around RCT trials; challenges of the legal system as it currently operates; the future of legal reform, including AI in legal processes; and student takes on access to justice.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers: 




Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Michelle Blouin, Communications Associate, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Gideon v. Wainwright



Professional reversals in medicine



Vioxx



Heart stents



Hormone replacement therapy



Scared Straight



Harvard’s IRB



The Gender of Gideon



Chicago Crime Lab



Quattrone Center



Jameel Poverty Action Lab



California Policy Lab



Lab in DC



Conference on Empirical Legal Studies



Society for Empirical Legal Studies




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 0: Get to Know Us Again]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[
<p>This episode introduces listeners to the Proof Over Precedent podcast and the work of the <a href="https://a2jlab.org/">Access to Justice Lab</a> at Harvard Law School. The lab focuses on bringing empirical research into the legal field for both civil and criminal justice systems. Professor Jim Greiner shares plans for future episodes to address randomized control trials conducted by the lab and its research partners; ethical issues around RCT trials; challenges of the legal system as it currently operates; the future of legal reform, including AI in legal processes; and student takes on access to justice.</p>



<p>Read the corresponding <a href="https://a2jlab.org/get-to-know-us-again/">blog post</a>.</p>



<p class="has-text-align-left">Speakers: </p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong><a href="https://a2jlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GreinerCV20171024.pdf">Jim Greiner</a></strong>, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>



<li><strong>Michelle Blouin</strong>, Communications Associate, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School</li>
</ul>



<p>Resources mentioned:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/372/335" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Gideon v. Wainwright</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/s0025-6196(13)00405-9/fulltext" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Professional reversals in medicine</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.npr.org/2007/11/10/5470430/timeline-the-rise-and-fall-of-vioxx#:~:text=By%20the%20time%20Vioxx%20is,and%2038%2C000%20of%20them%20died" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Vioxx</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(17)32714-9/abstract" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Heart stents</a></li>



<li><a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1326430/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Hormone replacement therapy</a></li>



<li><a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.4073/csr.2013.5" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Scared Straight</a></li>



<li><a href="https://cuhs.harvard.edu/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Harvard’s IRB</a></li>



<li><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3807349" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Gender of Gideon</a></li>



<li><a href="https://crimelab.uchicago.edu/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Chicago Crime Lab</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.law.upenn.edu/institutes/quattronecenter/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Quattrone Center</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.povertyactionlab.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jameel Poverty Action Lab</a></li>



<li><a href="https://capolicylab.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">California Policy Lab</a></li>



<li><a href="https://thelabprojects.dc.gov/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lab in DC</a></li>



<li><a href="https://cels2025.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Conference on Empirical Legal Studies</a></li>



<li><a href="https://community.lawschool.cornell.edu/sels/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Society for Empirical Legal Studies</a></li>
</ul>



<p>Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: <a href="mailto:a2jlab@law.harvard.edu">a2jlab@law.harvard.edu</a></p>



<p>Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://sibforms.com/serve/MUIFAA0oJ_uWzjT3cNzH85ET8S_HNgN8F2b6N6_3oftQLKCrZb7h4jje5gVuSuKy3NYzBa-9LeJG1MQPNnDeAgKna-LZ4o_2Tj703tMODtNIrJoCpfXQd8QbuDm_tFOnsEYxnDlgBNgZ-pvmvYKv1aIXq-WVeFYdAi1-nmf0_bGdJQY_V0X7NQUkA-K9ZrY5umD9bzev0IjQ75Ax">Email newsletter</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/harvarda2jlab">Facebook</a></li>



<li><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/a2jlab.bsky.social">BlueSky</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/harvarda2jlab/">LinkedIn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@a2jlab487">YouTube</a></li>
</ul>



<p><a href="https://community.alumni.harvard.edu/give/40177333">Support the A2J</a></p>



<p>Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal</p>



<p></p>
]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/2060824/c1e-vq75xb79j1vhd63jx-gp3nwn2wb3pg-j6ab0s.mp3" length="39864029"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[
This episode introduces listeners to the Proof Over Precedent podcast and the work of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School. The lab focuses on bringing empirical research into the legal field for both civil and criminal justice systems. Professor Jim Greiner shares plans for future episodes to address randomized control trials conducted by the lab and its research partners; ethical issues around RCT trials; challenges of the legal system as it currently operates; the future of legal reform, including AI in legal processes; and student takes on access to justice.



Read the corresponding blog post.



Speakers: 




Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School



Michelle Blouin, Communications Associate, Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School




Resources mentioned:




Gideon v. Wainwright



Professional reversals in medicine



Vioxx



Heart stents



Hormone replacement therapy



Scared Straight



Harvard’s IRB



The Gender of Gideon



Chicago Crime Lab



Quattrone Center



Jameel Poverty Action Lab



California Policy Lab



Lab in DC



Conference on Empirical Legal Studies



Society for Empirical Legal Studies




Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu



Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:




Email newsletter



Facebook



]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/67d061eaad7341-50126521/images/2060824/c1a-7o7w6-rk4xjo63bomz-fqxgll.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:20:46</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>
