<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:spotify="http://www.spotify.com/ns/rss">
    <channel>
        <title>The Lawmas Podcast</title>
        <generator>Castos</generator>
        <atom:link href="https://feeds.castos.com/ozd2j" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com</link>
        <description>Juggling courtrooms and playrooms, legal briefs, and bedtime stories...
Meet Lauren and Lacey, two powerhouse attorneys and moms who are laying down the law on work-life balance. Lauren handles estate planning, while Lacey is a criminal defense attorney. And together, they&#039;re The Lawmas!
Join them as they dive into into the chaotic world of running law firms while raising families, where they share war stories from the courtroom and the playground, while offering tips on building a thriving practice without missing soccer games and dance class...
These two prove that moms really can do it all - with a little help from coffee and wine! From estate planning emergencies to criminal defense dilemmas, these legal eagles tackle it all with wit, wisdom, and a whole lot of heart.
So whether you&#039;re a working mom, an aspiring attorney, or love a good laugh... Tune in to The Lawmas Podcast. Where justice meets juice boxes!
Court is now in session!
Coming soon to YouTube and major podcast platforms!</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 00:57:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>© 2024</copyright>
        
        <spotify:limit recentCount="100" />
        
        <spotify:countryOfOrigin>
            US  
        </spotify:countryOfOrigin>
                    
                <itunes:subtitle>Juggling courtrooms and playrooms, legal briefs, and bedtime stories...
Meet Lauren and Lacey, two powerhouse attorneys and moms who are laying down the law on work-life balance. Lauren handles estate planning, while Lacey is a criminal defense attorney. And together, they&#039;re The Lawmas!
Join them as they dive into into the chaotic world of running law firms while raising families, where they share war stories from the courtroom and the playground, while offering tips on building a thriving practice without missing soccer games and dance class...
These two prove that moms really can do it all - with a little help from coffee and wine! From estate planning emergencies to criminal defense dilemmas, these legal eagles tackle it all with wit, wisdom, and a whole lot of heart.
So whether you&#039;re a working mom, an aspiring attorney, or love a good laugh... Tune in to The Lawmas Podcast. Where justice meets juice boxes!
Court is now in session!
Coming soon to YouTube and major podcast platforms!</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:author>Lauren &amp; Lacey</itunes:author>
        <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
        <itunes:summary>Juggling courtrooms and playrooms, legal briefs, and bedtime stories...
Meet Lauren and Lacey, two powerhouse attorneys and moms who are laying down the law on work-life balance. Lauren handles estate planning, while Lacey is a criminal defense attorney. And together, they&#039;re The Lawmas!
Join them as they dive into into the chaotic world of running law firms while raising families, where they share war stories from the courtroom and the playground, while offering tips on building a thriving practice without missing soccer games and dance class...
These two prove that moms really can do it all - with a little help from coffee and wine! From estate planning emergencies to criminal defense dilemmas, these legal eagles tackle it all with wit, wisdom, and a whole lot of heart.
So whether you&#039;re a working mom, an aspiring attorney, or love a good laugh... Tune in to The Lawmas Podcast. Where justice meets juice boxes!
Court is now in session!
Coming soon to YouTube and major podcast platforms!</itunes:summary>
        <itunes:owner>
            <itunes:name>Lauren &amp; Lacey</itunes:name>
            <itunes:email>thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</itunes:email>
        </itunes:owner>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/podcast/covers/c1a-5w3p7-xx872rowb4g1-zqpke0.png"></itunes:image>
        
                                    <itunes:category text="Kids &amp; Family">
                                            <itunes:category text="Parenting" />
                                    </itunes:category>
                                                <itunes:category text="Business">
                                            <itunes:category text="Careers" />
                                    </itunes:category>
                                                <itunes:category text="True Crime" />
                    
                    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.castos.com/ozd2j</itunes:new-feed-url>
                
        
        <podcast:locked>yes</podcast:locked>
                                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 82: Becky Hill, Financial Crimes, and the Retrial Ahead For Murdaugh]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 00:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2470752</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-82-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey continue their discussion of the Alex Murdaugh case after taking time to read the South Carolina Supreme Court’s order granting him a new trial. They talk through the court’s confusing guidance on the use of financial crimes as evidence, explaining why the justices seemed to agree that some of the evidence was relevant but that the prosecution went too far in how much was presented.</p>
<p>The conversation also explores what happens next, including the state’s decision to retry the case, the possibility of seeking the death penalty, and the strategic and political factors influencing those decisions. Lauren and Lacey discuss Murdaugh’s federal lawsuit against former Clerk of Court Becky Hill and whether she could realistically be held financially responsible for the costs of a retrial. Along the way, they share their thoughts on federal sentencing, capital defense, and the many legal questions still surrounding one of South Carolina’s most closely watched cases.</p>
<p>#thelawmas #murdaugh #beckyhill #lawmoms #lawpodcast </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey continue their discussion of the Alex Murdaugh case after taking time to read the South Carolina Supreme Court’s order granting him a new trial. They talk through the court’s confusing guidance on the use of financial crimes as evidence, explaining why the justices seemed to agree that some of the evidence was relevant but that the prosecution went too far in how much was presented.
The conversation also explores what happens next, including the state’s decision to retry the case, the possibility of seeking the death penalty, and the strategic and political factors influencing those decisions. Lauren and Lacey discuss Murdaugh’s federal lawsuit against former Clerk of Court Becky Hill and whether she could realistically be held financially responsible for the costs of a retrial. Along the way, they share their thoughts on federal sentencing, capital defense, and the many legal questions still surrounding one of South Carolina’s most closely watched cases.
#thelawmas #murdaugh #beckyhill #lawmoms #lawpodcast ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 82: Becky Hill, Financial Crimes, and the Retrial Ahead For Murdaugh]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>82</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey continue their discussion of the Alex Murdaugh case after taking time to read the South Carolina Supreme Court’s order granting him a new trial. They talk through the court’s confusing guidance on the use of financial crimes as evidence, explaining why the justices seemed to agree that some of the evidence was relevant but that the prosecution went too far in how much was presented.</p>
<p>The conversation also explores what happens next, including the state’s decision to retry the case, the possibility of seeking the death penalty, and the strategic and political factors influencing those decisions. Lauren and Lacey discuss Murdaugh’s federal lawsuit against former Clerk of Court Becky Hill and whether she could realistically be held financially responsible for the costs of a retrial. Along the way, they share their thoughts on federal sentencing, capital defense, and the many legal questions still surrounding one of South Carolina’s most closely watched cases.</p>
<p>#thelawmas #murdaugh #beckyhill #lawmoms #lawpodcast </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2470752/c1e-7or7div8z75s56qxn-6z87d2wpuj8p-abxz7z.mp3" length="46315798"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey continue their discussion of the Alex Murdaugh case after taking time to read the South Carolina Supreme Court’s order granting him a new trial. They talk through the court’s confusing guidance on the use of financial crimes as evidence, explaining why the justices seemed to agree that some of the evidence was relevant but that the prosecution went too far in how much was presented.
The conversation also explores what happens next, including the state’s decision to retry the case, the possibility of seeking the death penalty, and the strategic and political factors influencing those decisions. Lauren and Lacey discuss Murdaugh’s federal lawsuit against former Clerk of Court Becky Hill and whether she could realistically be held financially responsible for the costs of a retrial. Along the way, they share their thoughts on federal sentencing, capital defense, and the many legal questions still surrounding one of South Carolina’s most closely watched cases.
#thelawmas #murdaugh #beckyhill #lawmoms #lawpodcast ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2470752/c1a-5w3p7-258qdvkgf715-xeiftm.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:23:40</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 81: Inside the Decision to Grant Murdaugh a New Trial]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 01:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2462182</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-81-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this special breaking-news episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey scrap their planned topic to discuss the South Carolina Supreme Court’s decision to grant Alex Murdaugh a new murder trial. Recorded just hours after the ruling, they explain what led to the decision, including jury tampering by former Clerk of Court Becky Hill, and why the right to a fair trial must be protected regardless of the defendant.</p>
<p>The conversation explores the legal and practical implications of retrying one of the most closely watched cases in South Carolina history. Lauren and Lacey discuss whether the state should pursue a new trial, how Murdaugh’s existing federal sentence factors into the equation, and what changes in trial strategy could occur the second time around. They also share candid thoughts on the broader issue of fairness in the justice system and why many defendants without resources may never receive the same opportunity to challenge serious errors.</p>
<p>Contact us: thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</p>
<p>#murdaughmurders #thelawmaspodcast #retrial #retryingacase #breakingnews</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this special breaking-news episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey scrap their planned topic to discuss the South Carolina Supreme Court’s decision to grant Alex Murdaugh a new murder trial. Recorded just hours after the ruling, they explain what led to the decision, including jury tampering by former Clerk of Court Becky Hill, and why the right to a fair trial must be protected regardless of the defendant.
The conversation explores the legal and practical implications of retrying one of the most closely watched cases in South Carolina history. Lauren and Lacey discuss whether the state should pursue a new trial, how Murdaugh’s existing federal sentence factors into the equation, and what changes in trial strategy could occur the second time around. They also share candid thoughts on the broader issue of fairness in the justice system and why many defendants without resources may never receive the same opportunity to challenge serious errors.
Contact us: thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
#murdaughmurders #thelawmaspodcast #retrial #retryingacase #breakingnews]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 81: Inside the Decision to Grant Murdaugh a New Trial]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>81</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this special breaking-news episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey scrap their planned topic to discuss the South Carolina Supreme Court’s decision to grant Alex Murdaugh a new murder trial. Recorded just hours after the ruling, they explain what led to the decision, including jury tampering by former Clerk of Court Becky Hill, and why the right to a fair trial must be protected regardless of the defendant.</p>
<p>The conversation explores the legal and practical implications of retrying one of the most closely watched cases in South Carolina history. Lauren and Lacey discuss whether the state should pursue a new trial, how Murdaugh’s existing federal sentence factors into the equation, and what changes in trial strategy could occur the second time around. They also share candid thoughts on the broader issue of fairness in the justice system and why many defendants without resources may never receive the same opportunity to challenge serious errors.</p>
<p>Contact us: thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</p>
<p>#murdaughmurders #thelawmaspodcast #retrial #retryingacase #breakingnews</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2462182/c1e-830kxhvmkwjird68m-7z8zx24zt2d7-qc2wzr.mp3" length="47927057"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this special breaking-news episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey scrap their planned topic to discuss the South Carolina Supreme Court’s decision to grant Alex Murdaugh a new murder trial. Recorded just hours after the ruling, they explain what led to the decision, including jury tampering by former Clerk of Court Becky Hill, and why the right to a fair trial must be protected regardless of the defendant.
The conversation explores the legal and practical implications of retrying one of the most closely watched cases in South Carolina history. Lauren and Lacey discuss whether the state should pursue a new trial, how Murdaugh’s existing federal sentence factors into the equation, and what changes in trial strategy could occur the second time around. They also share candid thoughts on the broader issue of fairness in the justice system and why many defendants without resources may never receive the same opportunity to challenge serious errors.
Contact us: thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
#murdaughmurders #thelawmaspodcast #retrial #retryingacase #breakingnews]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2462182/c1a-5w3p7-8d8dow4gir74-ptu8vj.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:24:27</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 80: When Arrests Become Public Entertainment]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 01:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2456893</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-80-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey pause their ongoing discussion about the FLDS documentary to talk about several headline-making stories closer to home. They explore the tension between journalism and criminal defense after a well-known retired doctor is arrested on indecent exposure charges, discussing public records, media responsibility, and the importance of reporting outcomes fairly, not just arrests.</p>
<p>The episode also get into a bizarre self-defense case out of their hometown involving an axe, an alleged assault outside a tanning salon, and the complications of public perception when stories unfold online in real time. Along the way, Lauren and Lacey reflect on how quickly communities react to criminal accusations and the role local media plays in shaping those conversations.</p>
<p>The conversation closes with a candid discussion about school bathroom policies after hearing stories from parents and students dealing with health issues, embarrassment, and disciplinary threats for simply needing to use the restroom. As always, the episode blends legal insight with personal stories and real-world frustrations.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey pause their ongoing discussion about the FLDS documentary to talk about several headline-making stories closer to home. They explore the tension between journalism and criminal defense after a well-known retired doctor is arrested on indecent exposure charges, discussing public records, media responsibility, and the importance of reporting outcomes fairly, not just arrests.
The episode also get into a bizarre self-defense case out of their hometown involving an axe, an alleged assault outside a tanning salon, and the complications of public perception when stories unfold online in real time. Along the way, Lauren and Lacey reflect on how quickly communities react to criminal accusations and the role local media plays in shaping those conversations.
The conversation closes with a candid discussion about school bathroom policies after hearing stories from parents and students dealing with health issues, embarrassment, and disciplinary threats for simply needing to use the restroom. As always, the episode blends legal insight with personal stories and real-world frustrations.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 80: When Arrests Become Public Entertainment]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>80</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey pause their ongoing discussion about the FLDS documentary to talk about several headline-making stories closer to home. They explore the tension between journalism and criminal defense after a well-known retired doctor is arrested on indecent exposure charges, discussing public records, media responsibility, and the importance of reporting outcomes fairly, not just arrests.</p>
<p>The episode also get into a bizarre self-defense case out of their hometown involving an axe, an alleged assault outside a tanning salon, and the complications of public perception when stories unfold online in real time. Along the way, Lauren and Lacey reflect on how quickly communities react to criminal accusations and the role local media plays in shaping those conversations.</p>
<p>The conversation closes with a candid discussion about school bathroom policies after hearing stories from parents and students dealing with health issues, embarrassment, and disciplinary threats for simply needing to use the restroom. As always, the episode blends legal insight with personal stories and real-world frustrations.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2456893/c1e-jzq95t47pg6a51283-4744j3pgu3mn-e8d5qq.mp3" length="56204709"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey pause their ongoing discussion about the FLDS documentary to talk about several headline-making stories closer to home. They explore the tension between journalism and criminal defense after a well-known retired doctor is arrested on indecent exposure charges, discussing public records, media responsibility, and the importance of reporting outcomes fairly, not just arrests.
The episode also get into a bizarre self-defense case out of their hometown involving an axe, an alleged assault outside a tanning salon, and the complications of public perception when stories unfold online in real time. Along the way, Lauren and Lacey reflect on how quickly communities react to criminal accusations and the role local media plays in shaping those conversations.
The conversation closes with a candid discussion about school bathroom policies after hearing stories from parents and students dealing with health issues, embarrassment, and disciplinary threats for simply needing to use the restroom. As always, the episode blends legal insight with personal stories and real-world frustrations.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2456893/c1a-5w3p7-v6vvo95ztg5q-c28hxq.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:28:43</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 79:  Breaking Down the Bateman Documentary (Part 1)]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 22:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2442564</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-79-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey explore the Netflix documentary on Samuel Bateman and the evolving story of the FLDS. They begin with a discussion on extradition, breaking down how the process works between states and what can happen when someone has charges in multiple jurisdictions.</p>
<p>The conversation then shifts into a deeper look at the structure of Mormon sects, comparing mainstream LDS, polygamist groups like those seen in <em>Sister Wives</em>, and the more extreme control found in FLDS communities. As they unpack the rise of Samuel Bateman, they question how leadership and influence take hold within isolated groups, and why individuals remain, even when faced with harmful or restrictive environments.</p>
<p>This episode sets the stage for a deeper look into the criminal case and legal implications to come, while also highlighting the human side of these communities and the complexity of leaving them behind.</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #legalpodcast #FLDS #MormonWives #RealityShowPodcast</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey explore the Netflix documentary on Samuel Bateman and the evolving story of the FLDS. They begin with a discussion on extradition, breaking down how the process works between states and what can happen when someone has charges in multiple jurisdictions.
The conversation then shifts into a deeper look at the structure of Mormon sects, comparing mainstream LDS, polygamist groups like those seen in Sister Wives, and the more extreme control found in FLDS communities. As they unpack the rise of Samuel Bateman, they question how leadership and influence take hold within isolated groups, and why individuals remain, even when faced with harmful or restrictive environments.
This episode sets the stage for a deeper look into the criminal case and legal implications to come, while also highlighting the human side of these communities and the complexity of leaving them behind.
#thelawmaspodcast #legalpodcast #FLDS #MormonWives #RealityShowPodcast]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 79:  Breaking Down the Bateman Documentary (Part 1)]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>79</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey explore the Netflix documentary on Samuel Bateman and the evolving story of the FLDS. They begin with a discussion on extradition, breaking down how the process works between states and what can happen when someone has charges in multiple jurisdictions.</p>
<p>The conversation then shifts into a deeper look at the structure of Mormon sects, comparing mainstream LDS, polygamist groups like those seen in <em>Sister Wives</em>, and the more extreme control found in FLDS communities. As they unpack the rise of Samuel Bateman, they question how leadership and influence take hold within isolated groups, and why individuals remain, even when faced with harmful or restrictive environments.</p>
<p>This episode sets the stage for a deeper look into the criminal case and legal implications to come, while also highlighting the human side of these communities and the complexity of leaving them behind.</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #legalpodcast #FLDS #MormonWives #RealityShowPodcast</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2442564/c1e-5w3p7u7o3x5uqx248-jpxnmn38umx6-oklnbu.mp3" length="50890126"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey explore the Netflix documentary on Samuel Bateman and the evolving story of the FLDS. They begin with a discussion on extradition, breaking down how the process works between states and what can happen when someone has charges in multiple jurisdictions.
The conversation then shifts into a deeper look at the structure of Mormon sects, comparing mainstream LDS, polygamist groups like those seen in Sister Wives, and the more extreme control found in FLDS communities. As they unpack the rise of Samuel Bateman, they question how leadership and influence take hold within isolated groups, and why individuals remain, even when faced with harmful or restrictive environments.
This episode sets the stage for a deeper look into the criminal case and legal implications to come, while also highlighting the human side of these communities and the complexity of leaving them behind.
#thelawmaspodcast #legalpodcast #FLDS #MormonWives #RealityShowPodcast]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2442564/c1a-5w3p7-qdpv5voki23n-0tjahq.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:25:58</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 78: Gaslighting, Crime & The Stories Behind It (And Some Susan Smith)]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 23:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2428579</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-78-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey cover a wide range of topics, from true crime headlines to real-life relationship dynamics. They start by breaking down the latest updates on Susan Smith’s potential parole, explaining how parole works, why hearings can happen more frequently than expected, and the emotional impact these repeated hearings have on victims’ families.</p>
<p>The conversation then shifts into a broader discussion on gaslighting, sparked by a true crime case involving manipulation, infidelity, and ultimately tragedy. Using real examples, they unpack how gaslighting shows up in relationships, how it can escalate, and why it’s often difficult to recognize in the moment. The episode blends legal insight with personal perspective, offering listeners a candid look at both the justice system and the complexities of human behavior.</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #susansmith #parole #gaslighting #truecrime #lawpodcast</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey cover a wide range of topics, from true crime headlines to real-life relationship dynamics. They start by breaking down the latest updates on Susan Smith’s potential parole, explaining how parole works, why hearings can happen more frequently than expected, and the emotional impact these repeated hearings have on victims’ families.
The conversation then shifts into a broader discussion on gaslighting, sparked by a true crime case involving manipulation, infidelity, and ultimately tragedy. Using real examples, they unpack how gaslighting shows up in relationships, how it can escalate, and why it’s often difficult to recognize in the moment. The episode blends legal insight with personal perspective, offering listeners a candid look at both the justice system and the complexities of human behavior.
#thelawmaspodcast #susansmith #parole #gaslighting #truecrime #lawpodcast]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 78: Gaslighting, Crime & The Stories Behind It (And Some Susan Smith)]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>78</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey cover a wide range of topics, from true crime headlines to real-life relationship dynamics. They start by breaking down the latest updates on Susan Smith’s potential parole, explaining how parole works, why hearings can happen more frequently than expected, and the emotional impact these repeated hearings have on victims’ families.</p>
<p>The conversation then shifts into a broader discussion on gaslighting, sparked by a true crime case involving manipulation, infidelity, and ultimately tragedy. Using real examples, they unpack how gaslighting shows up in relationships, how it can escalate, and why it’s often difficult to recognize in the moment. The episode blends legal insight with personal perspective, offering listeners a candid look at both the justice system and the complexities of human behavior.</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #susansmith #parole #gaslighting #truecrime #lawpodcast</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2428579/c1e-vqw7gf55v71tdz8oo-pkn4m4w1an5m-snxnws.mp3" length="64767175"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey cover a wide range of topics, from true crime headlines to real-life relationship dynamics. They start by breaking down the latest updates on Susan Smith’s potential parole, explaining how parole works, why hearings can happen more frequently than expected, and the emotional impact these repeated hearings have on victims’ families.
The conversation then shifts into a broader discussion on gaslighting, sparked by a true crime case involving manipulation, infidelity, and ultimately tragedy. Using real examples, they unpack how gaslighting shows up in relationships, how it can escalate, and why it’s often difficult to recognize in the moment. The episode blends legal insight with personal perspective, offering listeners a candid look at both the justice system and the complexities of human behavior.
#thelawmaspodcast #susansmith #parole #gaslighting #truecrime #lawpodcast]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2428579/c1a-5w3p7-ww4x9x7gsog-3oli8g.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:33:12</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 77: The Moment You Have to Say, 'Enough']]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 01:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2424127</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-77-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lacey shares a deeply personal and professional story involving a now-arrested South Carolina trooper and her own past interactions with him in the courtroom. She opens up about inappropriate and offensive comments he made regarding her son with Down syndrome, and how she navigated those moments while balancing her role as both an attorney and a mother.</p>
<p>The episode then connects those experiences to the trooper’s recent arrest on serious assault and battery charges, raising broader questions about professionalism, accountability, and how attorneys handle difficult or inappropriate conduct from opposing counsel, especially when those individuals hold power in the courtroom. Lacey offers an honest look at the emotional weight of these situations and the importance of setting boundaries, advocating for yourself and your family, and choosing how to respond when faced with misconduct.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey shares a deeply personal and professional story involving a now-arrested South Carolina trooper and her own past interactions with him in the courtroom. She opens up about inappropriate and offensive comments he made regarding her son with Down syndrome, and how she navigated those moments while balancing her role as both an attorney and a mother.
The episode then connects those experiences to the trooper’s recent arrest on serious assault and battery charges, raising broader questions about professionalism, accountability, and how attorneys handle difficult or inappropriate conduct from opposing counsel, especially when those individuals hold power in the courtroom. Lacey offers an honest look at the emotional weight of these situations and the importance of setting boundaries, advocating for yourself and your family, and choosing how to respond when faced with misconduct.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 77: The Moment You Have to Say, 'Enough']]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>77</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lacey shares a deeply personal and professional story involving a now-arrested South Carolina trooper and her own past interactions with him in the courtroom. She opens up about inappropriate and offensive comments he made regarding her son with Down syndrome, and how she navigated those moments while balancing her role as both an attorney and a mother.</p>
<p>The episode then connects those experiences to the trooper’s recent arrest on serious assault and battery charges, raising broader questions about professionalism, accountability, and how attorneys handle difficult or inappropriate conduct from opposing counsel, especially when those individuals hold power in the courtroom. Lacey offers an honest look at the emotional weight of these situations and the importance of setting boundaries, advocating for yourself and your family, and choosing how to respond when faced with misconduct.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2424127/c1e-4wo25u88kd8f8pokd-mk9xjkwwbkq5-3gxmry.mp3" length="41435088"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey shares a deeply personal and professional story involving a now-arrested South Carolina trooper and her own past interactions with him in the courtroom. She opens up about inappropriate and offensive comments he made regarding her son with Down syndrome, and how she navigated those moments while balancing her role as both an attorney and a mother.
The episode then connects those experiences to the trooper’s recent arrest on serious assault and battery charges, raising broader questions about professionalism, accountability, and how attorneys handle difficult or inappropriate conduct from opposing counsel, especially when those individuals hold power in the courtroom. Lacey offers an honest look at the emotional weight of these situations and the importance of setting boundaries, advocating for yourself and your family, and choosing how to respond when faced with misconduct.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2424127/c1a-5w3p7-xxkw4xg7updv-6vfrjw.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:21:10</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 76: Real Life Law: Hospice, Wills & Family Conflict]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2417918</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-76-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey are back together for a candid, unfiltered conversation that blends real-life legal questions with the realities of motherhood. The episode begins with a deep dive into a complicated family situation involving hospice care, lack of a will, and rising tensions between family members, offering a practical look at probate, intestacy laws, and what happens when planning is left undone.</p>
<p>The conversation then shifts into a heartfelt discussion about parenting, including navigating ADHD, special needs, and the challenges of balancing structure, health, and social situations. From birthday party dilemmas to public expectations of children’s behavior, the hosts share honest reflections on parenting without perfection and the importance of giving kids space to be themselves.</p>
<p>This episode is a true mix of law and life, highlighting why planning ahead matters and why grace (for both yourself and others) is just as important.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey are back together for a candid, unfiltered conversation that blends real-life legal questions with the realities of motherhood. The episode begins with a deep dive into a complicated family situation involving hospice care, lack of a will, and rising tensions between family members, offering a practical look at probate, intestacy laws, and what happens when planning is left undone.
The conversation then shifts into a heartfelt discussion about parenting, including navigating ADHD, special needs, and the challenges of balancing structure, health, and social situations. From birthday party dilemmas to public expectations of children’s behavior, the hosts share honest reflections on parenting without perfection and the importance of giving kids space to be themselves.
This episode is a true mix of law and life, highlighting why planning ahead matters and why grace (for both yourself and others) is just as important.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 76: Real Life Law: Hospice, Wills & Family Conflict]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey are back together for a candid, unfiltered conversation that blends real-life legal questions with the realities of motherhood. The episode begins with a deep dive into a complicated family situation involving hospice care, lack of a will, and rising tensions between family members, offering a practical look at probate, intestacy laws, and what happens when planning is left undone.</p>
<p>The conversation then shifts into a heartfelt discussion about parenting, including navigating ADHD, special needs, and the challenges of balancing structure, health, and social situations. From birthday party dilemmas to public expectations of children’s behavior, the hosts share honest reflections on parenting without perfection and the importance of giving kids space to be themselves.</p>
<p>This episode is a true mix of law and life, highlighting why planning ahead matters and why grace (for both yourself and others) is just as important.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2417918/c1e-gm5x8hrm21jaw4oj7-7z84nv60ik1q-1hdojk.mp3" length="73476255"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey are back together for a candid, unfiltered conversation that blends real-life legal questions with the realities of motherhood. The episode begins with a deep dive into a complicated family situation involving hospice care, lack of a will, and rising tensions between family members, offering a practical look at probate, intestacy laws, and what happens when planning is left undone.
The conversation then shifts into a heartfelt discussion about parenting, including navigating ADHD, special needs, and the challenges of balancing structure, health, and social situations. From birthday party dilemmas to public expectations of children’s behavior, the hosts share honest reflections on parenting without perfection and the importance of giving kids space to be themselves.
This episode is a true mix of law and life, highlighting why planning ahead matters and why grace (for both yourself and others) is just as important.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:37:39</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 75:  When Is It Wrong? Breaking Down Age Gap Relationships]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 16:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2412493</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-75-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this solo episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren explores the buzz around the Netflix reality show <em>Age of Attraction</em> and the conversations it has sparked about age gaps in relationships. She breaks down the difference between what feels uncomfortable or “icky” and what actually constitutes grooming or predatory behavior, emphasizing the importance of using those terms accurately—especially when discussing fully consenting adults.</p>
<p>Lauren also shares her thoughts on how society reacts to unconventional relationships and why context matters when labeling behavior. She then shifts into a discussion on the Apple TV+ series <em>Severance</em>, diving into the ethical and legal implications of separating work and personal identities. From questions about consent and autonomy to the blurred lines between legality and ethics, this episode challenges listeners to think more deeply about how emerging ideas and technologies could impact our future.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren explores the buzz around the Netflix reality show Age of Attraction and the conversations it has sparked about age gaps in relationships. She breaks down the difference between what feels uncomfortable or “icky” and what actually constitutes grooming or predatory behavior, emphasizing the importance of using those terms accurately—especially when discussing fully consenting adults.
Lauren also shares her thoughts on how society reacts to unconventional relationships and why context matters when labeling behavior. She then shifts into a discussion on the Apple TV+ series Severance, diving into the ethical and legal implications of separating work and personal identities. From questions about consent and autonomy to the blurred lines between legality and ethics, this episode challenges listeners to think more deeply about how emerging ideas and technologies could impact our future.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 75:  When Is It Wrong? Breaking Down Age Gap Relationships]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>75</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this solo episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren explores the buzz around the Netflix reality show <em>Age of Attraction</em> and the conversations it has sparked about age gaps in relationships. She breaks down the difference between what feels uncomfortable or “icky” and what actually constitutes grooming or predatory behavior, emphasizing the importance of using those terms accurately—especially when discussing fully consenting adults.</p>
<p>Lauren also shares her thoughts on how society reacts to unconventional relationships and why context matters when labeling behavior. She then shifts into a discussion on the Apple TV+ series <em>Severance</em>, diving into the ethical and legal implications of separating work and personal identities. From questions about consent and autonomy to the blurred lines between legality and ethics, this episode challenges listeners to think more deeply about how emerging ideas and technologies could impact our future.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2412493/c1e-7or7div97rxh5x3v3-34x29jjjh8k7-jbwyss.mp3" length="30494981"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren explores the buzz around the Netflix reality show Age of Attraction and the conversations it has sparked about age gaps in relationships. She breaks down the difference between what feels uncomfortable or “icky” and what actually constitutes grooming or predatory behavior, emphasizing the importance of using those terms accurately—especially when discussing fully consenting adults.
Lauren also shares her thoughts on how society reacts to unconventional relationships and why context matters when labeling behavior. She then shifts into a discussion on the Apple TV+ series Severance, diving into the ethical and legal implications of separating work and personal identities. From questions about consent and autonomy to the blurred lines between legality and ethics, this episode challenges listeners to think more deeply about how emerging ideas and technologies could impact our future.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2412493/c1a-5w3p7-25013jjrbd8-9hw8sd.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:43</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 74:  The Afroman Trial: Free Speech, Lawsuits & Lemon Pound Cake]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2406728</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-74-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey and Lauren kick things off with a Women’s History Month conversation, sharing the women, both real and fictional, who have influenced and inspired them, from iconic TV characters to modern-day powerhouses.</p>
<p>They then shift gears into a breakdown of the widely discussed Afroman case, talking through all of the legal issues behind the viral headlines. The conversation explores First Amendment rights, satire, and defamation, using Afroman’s response to a police raid as a real-world example of how free speech is protected, even when it’s controversial. Along the way, they highlight the realities of civil litigation, the cost of defending your rights, and how lawsuits can sometimes backfire in the court of public opinion.</p>
<p>The Lawmas can be reached at thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey and Lauren kick things off with a Women’s History Month conversation, sharing the women, both real and fictional, who have influenced and inspired them, from iconic TV characters to modern-day powerhouses.
They then shift gears into a breakdown of the widely discussed Afroman case, talking through all of the legal issues behind the viral headlines. The conversation explores First Amendment rights, satire, and defamation, using Afroman’s response to a police raid as a real-world example of how free speech is protected, even when it’s controversial. Along the way, they highlight the realities of civil litigation, the cost of defending your rights, and how lawsuits can sometimes backfire in the court of public opinion.
The Lawmas can be reached at thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 74:  The Afroman Trial: Free Speech, Lawsuits & Lemon Pound Cake]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>74</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey and Lauren kick things off with a Women’s History Month conversation, sharing the women, both real and fictional, who have influenced and inspired them, from iconic TV characters to modern-day powerhouses.</p>
<p>They then shift gears into a breakdown of the widely discussed Afroman case, talking through all of the legal issues behind the viral headlines. The conversation explores First Amendment rights, satire, and defamation, using Afroman’s response to a police raid as a real-world example of how free speech is protected, even when it’s controversial. Along the way, they highlight the realities of civil litigation, the cost of defending your rights, and how lawsuits can sometimes backfire in the court of public opinion.</p>
<p>The Lawmas can be reached at thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2406728/c1e-nq1mxfzd488sqzj9r-jpqr8rz1aqp5-abuniu.mp3" length="63232407"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey and Lauren kick things off with a Women’s History Month conversation, sharing the women, both real and fictional, who have influenced and inspired them, from iconic TV characters to modern-day powerhouses.
They then shift gears into a breakdown of the widely discussed Afroman case, talking through all of the legal issues behind the viral headlines. The conversation explores First Amendment rights, satire, and defamation, using Afroman’s response to a police raid as a real-world example of how free speech is protected, even when it’s controversial. Along the way, they highlight the realities of civil litigation, the cost of defending your rights, and how lawsuits can sometimes backfire in the court of public opinion.
The Lawmas can be reached at thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2406728/c1a-5w3p7-ww7d2dq1t43d-vjtt4m.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:32:14</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 73:  Reality TV, Real Consequences: The Mormon Wives Drama]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 17:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2401057</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-73-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey digs into the latest drama surrounding The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives, blending pop culture commentary with real-world legal and ethical perspectives. She discusses recent headlines involving domestic assault allegations and how networks like ABC handle situations when talent becomes tied to controversy, raising the question of whether business decisions are driven more by values or ratings.</p>
<p>Lacey also walks through the key relationship dynamics from the show, including toxic cycles, co-parenting challenges, and the realities of navigating careers and parenthood. She offers a candid take on the pressures of being a stay-at-home parent versus pursuing a career, emphasizing that there’s no one-size-fits-all approach. The episode wraps with thoughtful commentary on boundaries, postpartum challenges, and the importance of communication in relationships, both on and off reality TV!</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey digs into the latest drama surrounding The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives, blending pop culture commentary with real-world legal and ethical perspectives. She discusses recent headlines involving domestic assault allegations and how networks like ABC handle situations when talent becomes tied to controversy, raising the question of whether business decisions are driven more by values or ratings.
Lacey also walks through the key relationship dynamics from the show, including toxic cycles, co-parenting challenges, and the realities of navigating careers and parenthood. She offers a candid take on the pressures of being a stay-at-home parent versus pursuing a career, emphasizing that there’s no one-size-fits-all approach. The episode wraps with thoughtful commentary on boundaries, postpartum challenges, and the importance of communication in relationships, both on and off reality TV!]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 73:  Reality TV, Real Consequences: The Mormon Wives Drama]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>73</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey digs into the latest drama surrounding The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives, blending pop culture commentary with real-world legal and ethical perspectives. She discusses recent headlines involving domestic assault allegations and how networks like ABC handle situations when talent becomes tied to controversy, raising the question of whether business decisions are driven more by values or ratings.</p>
<p>Lacey also walks through the key relationship dynamics from the show, including toxic cycles, co-parenting challenges, and the realities of navigating careers and parenthood. She offers a candid take on the pressures of being a stay-at-home parent versus pursuing a career, emphasizing that there’s no one-size-fits-all approach. The episode wraps with thoughtful commentary on boundaries, postpartum challenges, and the importance of communication in relationships, both on and off reality TV!</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2401057/c1e-dr1qguo6x4rtwd4qp-mkgdz919sj21-nfxc4d.mp3" length="39054505"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey digs into the latest drama surrounding The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives, blending pop culture commentary with real-world legal and ethical perspectives. She discusses recent headlines involving domestic assault allegations and how networks like ABC handle situations when talent becomes tied to controversy, raising the question of whether business decisions are driven more by values or ratings.
Lacey also walks through the key relationship dynamics from the show, including toxic cycles, co-parenting challenges, and the realities of navigating careers and parenthood. She offers a candid take on the pressures of being a stay-at-home parent versus pursuing a career, emphasizing that there’s no one-size-fits-all approach. The episode wraps with thoughtful commentary on boundaries, postpartum challenges, and the importance of communication in relationships, both on and off reality TV!]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2401057/c1a-5w3p7-ww71o4mwh71-x7vtub.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:19:56</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 72:  Behind the Runway: The Dark Side of America’s Next Top Model]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 23:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2384001</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-72-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey discuss the recent documentary examining America’s Next Top Model and the culture surrounding reality television in the early 2000s. They reflect on how the modeling industry, and reality TV more broadly, often normalized body shaming, harsh criticism, and questionable treatment of contestants in the name of entertainment.</p>
<p>The conversation also explores accountability and whether figures like Tyra Banks should take responsibility for the environment created on the show. From concerns about consent during filmed situations to broader issues like workplace harassment, industry pressure, and unrealistic beauty standards, the hosts analyze the documentary culturally and legally. The episode wraps up with a reflection on how far conversations about body image, consent, and women’s health have come and why those discussions still matter today.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey discuss the recent documentary examining America’s Next Top Model and the culture surrounding reality television in the early 2000s. They reflect on how the modeling industry, and reality TV more broadly, often normalized body shaming, harsh criticism, and questionable treatment of contestants in the name of entertainment.
The conversation also explores accountability and whether figures like Tyra Banks should take responsibility for the environment created on the show. From concerns about consent during filmed situations to broader issues like workplace harassment, industry pressure, and unrealistic beauty standards, the hosts analyze the documentary culturally and legally. The episode wraps up with a reflection on how far conversations about body image, consent, and women’s health have come and why those discussions still matter today.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 72:  Behind the Runway: The Dark Side of America’s Next Top Model]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>72</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey discuss the recent documentary examining America’s Next Top Model and the culture surrounding reality television in the early 2000s. They reflect on how the modeling industry, and reality TV more broadly, often normalized body shaming, harsh criticism, and questionable treatment of contestants in the name of entertainment.</p>
<p>The conversation also explores accountability and whether figures like Tyra Banks should take responsibility for the environment created on the show. From concerns about consent during filmed situations to broader issues like workplace harassment, industry pressure, and unrealistic beauty standards, the hosts analyze the documentary culturally and legally. The episode wraps up with a reflection on how far conversations about body image, consent, and women’s health have come and why those discussions still matter today.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2384001/c1e-jzq95t42gd7b51j0p-gp5699qvbgzv-irzw1s.mp3" length="49288879"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey discuss the recent documentary examining America’s Next Top Model and the culture surrounding reality television in the early 2000s. They reflect on how the modeling industry, and reality TV more broadly, often normalized body shaming, harsh criticism, and questionable treatment of contestants in the name of entertainment.
The conversation also explores accountability and whether figures like Tyra Banks should take responsibility for the environment created on the show. From concerns about consent during filmed situations to broader issues like workplace harassment, industry pressure, and unrealistic beauty standards, the hosts analyze the documentary culturally and legally. The episode wraps up with a reflection on how far conversations about body image, consent, and women’s health have come and why those discussions still matter today.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2384001/c1a-5w3p7-250jmm1qfwok-2rybmb.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:25:11</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 71: From Hot Dogs to Homicide: When Headlines Take Over]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2372399</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-71-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey discuss the tension between public opinion and the legal standard of “innocent until proven guilty.” Using current headlines, including discussion surrounding the Epstein files and high-profile allegations, they explore how quickly society forms conclusions before all the facts are known. Lacey shares her perspective as a criminal defense attorney, explaining how prosecutors, media coverage, and social media can influence narratives long before a case reaches trial.</p>
<p>The episode also shifts into two local true-crime stories: a bizarre breach-of-peace case involving a gas station meltdown that led to deportation consequences, and the arrest of a former American Idol contestant charged with his wife’s murder. Through their usual humor and candid debate, Lauren and Lacey discuss how public perception, incomplete information, and snap judgments shape both careers and criminal cases.</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #truecrimepodcast </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey discuss the tension between public opinion and the legal standard of “innocent until proven guilty.” Using current headlines, including discussion surrounding the Epstein files and high-profile allegations, they explore how quickly society forms conclusions before all the facts are known. Lacey shares her perspective as a criminal defense attorney, explaining how prosecutors, media coverage, and social media can influence narratives long before a case reaches trial.
The episode also shifts into two local true-crime stories: a bizarre breach-of-peace case involving a gas station meltdown that led to deportation consequences, and the arrest of a former American Idol contestant charged with his wife’s murder. Through their usual humor and candid debate, Lauren and Lacey discuss how public perception, incomplete information, and snap judgments shape both careers and criminal cases.
#thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #truecrimepodcast ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 71: From Hot Dogs to Homicide: When Headlines Take Over]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>71</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey discuss the tension between public opinion and the legal standard of “innocent until proven guilty.” Using current headlines, including discussion surrounding the Epstein files and high-profile allegations, they explore how quickly society forms conclusions before all the facts are known. Lacey shares her perspective as a criminal defense attorney, explaining how prosecutors, media coverage, and social media can influence narratives long before a case reaches trial.</p>
<p>The episode also shifts into two local true-crime stories: a bizarre breach-of-peace case involving a gas station meltdown that led to deportation consequences, and the arrest of a former American Idol contestant charged with his wife’s murder. Through their usual humor and candid debate, Lauren and Lacey discuss how public perception, incomplete information, and snap judgments shape both careers and criminal cases.</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #truecrimepodcast </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2372399/c1e-3wx8puw08m9swqjo2-34xqj7g3i5g3-dwjetv.mp3" length="53606313"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey discuss the tension between public opinion and the legal standard of “innocent until proven guilty.” Using current headlines, including discussion surrounding the Epstein files and high-profile allegations, they explore how quickly society forms conclusions before all the facts are known. Lacey shares her perspective as a criminal defense attorney, explaining how prosecutors, media coverage, and social media can influence narratives long before a case reaches trial.
The episode also shifts into two local true-crime stories: a bizarre breach-of-peace case involving a gas station meltdown that led to deportation consequences, and the arrest of a former American Idol contestant charged with his wife’s murder. Through their usual humor and candid debate, Lauren and Lacey discuss how public perception, incomplete information, and snap judgments shape both careers and criminal cases.
#thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #truecrimepodcast ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2372399/c1a-5w3p7-6z94j3wnt51p-vnxdvp.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:27:24</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 70:  Elder Scams, Cold Case DNA, and Surviving the Chaos]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 05:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2369223</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-70-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Lauren and Lacey are finally back together for this candid, catch-up episode of The Lawmas Podcast. After a season of personal stress, including health scares, office flooding, therapy check-ins, and family illness.From mental health and family stress to leaning on friends during hard seasons, this episode is an honest reflection on navigating real life while running businesses and raising families.</p>
<p>They also dive into trending topics in the news, including elder abuse scams targeting older adults through AI and impersonation tactics, and a cold case conviction solved decades later through genealogy DNA evidence. As always, the conversation blends law, life, and pop culture, touching on everything from true crime developments to comfort TV shows and concert bucket lists. </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren and Lacey are finally back together for this candid, catch-up episode of The Lawmas Podcast. After a season of personal stress, including health scares, office flooding, therapy check-ins, and family illness.From mental health and family stress to leaning on friends during hard seasons, this episode is an honest reflection on navigating real life while running businesses and raising families.
They also dive into trending topics in the news, including elder abuse scams targeting older adults through AI and impersonation tactics, and a cold case conviction solved decades later through genealogy DNA evidence. As always, the conversation blends law, life, and pop culture, touching on everything from true crime developments to comfort TV shows and concert bucket lists. ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 70:  Elder Scams, Cold Case DNA, and Surviving the Chaos]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>70</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Lauren and Lacey are finally back together for this candid, catch-up episode of The Lawmas Podcast. After a season of personal stress, including health scares, office flooding, therapy check-ins, and family illness.From mental health and family stress to leaning on friends during hard seasons, this episode is an honest reflection on navigating real life while running businesses and raising families.</p>
<p>They also dive into trending topics in the news, including elder abuse scams targeting older adults through AI and impersonation tactics, and a cold case conviction solved decades later through genealogy DNA evidence. As always, the conversation blends law, life, and pop culture, touching on everything from true crime developments to comfort TV shows and concert bucket lists. </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2369223/c1e-dr1qguovj68hwdono-5z34jrvgu17-uf68yx.mp3" length="52757976"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren and Lacey are finally back together for this candid, catch-up episode of The Lawmas Podcast. After a season of personal stress, including health scares, office flooding, therapy check-ins, and family illness.From mental health and family stress to leaning on friends during hard seasons, this episode is an honest reflection on navigating real life while running businesses and raising families.
They also dive into trending topics in the news, including elder abuse scams targeting older adults through AI and impersonation tactics, and a cold case conviction solved decades later through genealogy DNA evidence. As always, the conversation blends law, life, and pop culture, touching on everything from true crime developments to comfort TV shows and concert bucket lists. ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2369223/c1a-5w3p7-v6w3o082bjqg-gfio9w.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:26:57</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 69:  From Verdict to Supreme Court: The Murdaugh Appeal Process]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 17:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2362186</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-69-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey breaks down the recent oral arguments in the appeal of the high-profile Alex Murdaugh murder conviction. She walks listeners through what an appeal actually is, what qualifies as an “error of law,” and why appeals focus on judicial mistakes rather than attorney strategy. Lacey unpacks the two major issues raised before the South Carolina Supreme Court: allegations of jury tampering involving the former clerk of court, and whether evidence of Murdaugh's financial crimes was improperly admitted as motive. She explains how concerns about fairness, prejudice versus probative value, and the right to an impartial jury could impact the outcome. With insight from a defense attorney’s perspective, she also discusses what happens next procedurally and what a potential new trial would mean.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey breaks down the recent oral arguments in the appeal of the high-profile Alex Murdaugh murder conviction. She walks listeners through what an appeal actually is, what qualifies as an “error of law,” and why appeals focus on judicial mistakes rather than attorney strategy. Lacey unpacks the two major issues raised before the South Carolina Supreme Court: allegations of jury tampering involving the former clerk of court, and whether evidence of Murdaugh's financial crimes was improperly admitted as motive. She explains how concerns about fairness, prejudice versus probative value, and the right to an impartial jury could impact the outcome. With insight from a defense attorney’s perspective, she also discusses what happens next procedurally and what a potential new trial would mean.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 69:  From Verdict to Supreme Court: The Murdaugh Appeal Process]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>69</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey breaks down the recent oral arguments in the appeal of the high-profile Alex Murdaugh murder conviction. She walks listeners through what an appeal actually is, what qualifies as an “error of law,” and why appeals focus on judicial mistakes rather than attorney strategy. Lacey unpacks the two major issues raised before the South Carolina Supreme Court: allegations of jury tampering involving the former clerk of court, and whether evidence of Murdaugh's financial crimes was improperly admitted as motive. She explains how concerns about fairness, prejudice versus probative value, and the right to an impartial jury could impact the outcome. With insight from a defense attorney’s perspective, she also discusses what happens next procedurally and what a potential new trial would mean.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2362186/c1e-0w9gzu7w43dc6mwoo-dm1m7qwgu7q8-irol14.mp3" length="32024190"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey breaks down the recent oral arguments in the appeal of the high-profile Alex Murdaugh murder conviction. She walks listeners through what an appeal actually is, what qualifies as an “error of law,” and why appeals focus on judicial mistakes rather than attorney strategy. Lacey unpacks the two major issues raised before the South Carolina Supreme Court: allegations of jury tampering involving the former clerk of court, and whether evidence of Murdaugh's financial crimes was improperly admitted as motive. She explains how concerns about fairness, prejudice versus probative value, and the right to an impartial jury could impact the outcome. With insight from a defense attorney’s perspective, she also discusses what happens next procedurally and what a potential new trial would mean.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2362186/c1a-5w3p7-pkwk01zpfd06-daaapy.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:16:22</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 68: More Than a Diagnosis: Luke’s Story]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 23:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2349799</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-68-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this deeply personal solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey steps away from legal analysis and leans fully into mom life. In recognition of Heart Month, she shares the story of her son Luke, his congenital heart defect diagnosis, heart surgery as an infant, and how early medical intervention changed everything. She reflects on the emotional weight of pregnancy diagnoses, the importance of proper screening, and the gratitude she feels for modern medicine and compassionate providers.</p>
<p>The conversation then turns to Luke’s upcoming birthday and a realization Lacey has had about how her son experiences joy differently. From travel over birthday parties to letting go of expectations around gifts, she opens up about parenting a child with special needs, honoring his preferences, and learning to let him lead. It’s an honest, heartfelt episode about advocacy, acceptance, and redefining what celebration looks like.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this deeply personal solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey steps away from legal analysis and leans fully into mom life. In recognition of Heart Month, she shares the story of her son Luke, his congenital heart defect diagnosis, heart surgery as an infant, and how early medical intervention changed everything. She reflects on the emotional weight of pregnancy diagnoses, the importance of proper screening, and the gratitude she feels for modern medicine and compassionate providers.
The conversation then turns to Luke’s upcoming birthday and a realization Lacey has had about how her son experiences joy differently. From travel over birthday parties to letting go of expectations around gifts, she opens up about parenting a child with special needs, honoring his preferences, and learning to let him lead. It’s an honest, heartfelt episode about advocacy, acceptance, and redefining what celebration looks like.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 68: More Than a Diagnosis: Luke’s Story]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>68</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this deeply personal solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey steps away from legal analysis and leans fully into mom life. In recognition of Heart Month, she shares the story of her son Luke, his congenital heart defect diagnosis, heart surgery as an infant, and how early medical intervention changed everything. She reflects on the emotional weight of pregnancy diagnoses, the importance of proper screening, and the gratitude she feels for modern medicine and compassionate providers.</p>
<p>The conversation then turns to Luke’s upcoming birthday and a realization Lacey has had about how her son experiences joy differently. From travel over birthday parties to letting go of expectations around gifts, she opens up about parenting a child with special needs, honoring his preferences, and learning to let him lead. It’s an honest, heartfelt episode about advocacy, acceptance, and redefining what celebration looks like.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2349799/c1e-qq1z9f7n5j7ujvk34-25081qpofv3j-narols.mp3" length="46459118"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this deeply personal solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey steps away from legal analysis and leans fully into mom life. In recognition of Heart Month, she shares the story of her son Luke, his congenital heart defect diagnosis, heart surgery as an infant, and how early medical intervention changed everything. She reflects on the emotional weight of pregnancy diagnoses, the importance of proper screening, and the gratitude she feels for modern medicine and compassionate providers.
The conversation then turns to Luke’s upcoming birthday and a realization Lacey has had about how her son experiences joy differently. From travel over birthday parties to letting go of expectations around gifts, she opens up about parenting a child with special needs, honoring his preferences, and learning to let him lead. It’s an honest, heartfelt episode about advocacy, acceptance, and redefining what celebration looks like.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2349799/c1a-5w3p7-pkwn0m5rb96p-px5f5o.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:23:41</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 67: When Criminal Cases Go Wrong: Famous Mistakes and Their Consequences]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 19:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2342963</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-67-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey dives into what happens when things go wrong in criminal cases and why those mistakes can change outcomes forever. Using some of the most infamous examples in legal history, she explains how errors can occur during investigations, trials, and plea negotiations, and how those mistakes impact both the prosecution and the defense.</p>
<p>From the infamous glove moment in the O.J. Simpson trial to investigative failures in serial killer cases and immunity agreements that backfired, Lacey walks through real-world examples that show how one misstep can alter the course of justice. She also explains key legal concepts like double jeopardy, mistrials, appeals, and post-conviction relief, highlighting why some mistakes can be corrected and others can’t.</p>
<p>The episode offers a candid, behind-the-scenes look at the high stakes of criminal law and the lasting consequences when errors happen inside the courtroom and beyond.</p>
<p></p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #criminalcases #laurenandlacey #lawpodcast #lawmoms</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey dives into what happens when things go wrong in criminal cases and why those mistakes can change outcomes forever. Using some of the most infamous examples in legal history, she explains how errors can occur during investigations, trials, and plea negotiations, and how those mistakes impact both the prosecution and the defense.
From the infamous glove moment in the O.J. Simpson trial to investigative failures in serial killer cases and immunity agreements that backfired, Lacey walks through real-world examples that show how one misstep can alter the course of justice. She also explains key legal concepts like double jeopardy, mistrials, appeals, and post-conviction relief, highlighting why some mistakes can be corrected and others can’t.
The episode offers a candid, behind-the-scenes look at the high stakes of criminal law and the lasting consequences when errors happen inside the courtroom and beyond.

#thelawmaspodcast #criminalcases #laurenandlacey #lawpodcast #lawmoms]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 67: When Criminal Cases Go Wrong: Famous Mistakes and Their Consequences]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>67</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey dives into what happens when things go wrong in criminal cases and why those mistakes can change outcomes forever. Using some of the most infamous examples in legal history, she explains how errors can occur during investigations, trials, and plea negotiations, and how those mistakes impact both the prosecution and the defense.</p>
<p>From the infamous glove moment in the O.J. Simpson trial to investigative failures in serial killer cases and immunity agreements that backfired, Lacey walks through real-world examples that show how one misstep can alter the course of justice. She also explains key legal concepts like double jeopardy, mistrials, appeals, and post-conviction relief, highlighting why some mistakes can be corrected and others can’t.</p>
<p>The episode offers a candid, behind-the-scenes look at the high stakes of criminal law and the lasting consequences when errors happen inside the courtroom and beyond.</p>
<p></p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #criminalcases #laurenandlacey #lawpodcast #lawmoms</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2342963/c1e-7or7divgw6wt56qxn-9jww0vxva3q0-b7j1od.mp3" length="39322900"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey dives into what happens when things go wrong in criminal cases and why those mistakes can change outcomes forever. Using some of the most infamous examples in legal history, she explains how errors can occur during investigations, trials, and plea negotiations, and how those mistakes impact both the prosecution and the defense.
From the infamous glove moment in the O.J. Simpson trial to investigative failures in serial killer cases and immunity agreements that backfired, Lacey walks through real-world examples that show how one misstep can alter the course of justice. She also explains key legal concepts like double jeopardy, mistrials, appeals, and post-conviction relief, highlighting why some mistakes can be corrected and others can’t.
The episode offers a candid, behind-the-scenes look at the high stakes of criminal law and the lasting consequences when errors happen inside the courtroom and beyond.

#thelawmaspodcast #criminalcases #laurenandlacey #lawpodcast #lawmoms]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2342963/c1a-5w3p7-okpp3n6ds1rg-bbob1c.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:20:06</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 66: Big Estates, Bigger Problems: What Can Go Wrong After Death]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 01:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2334740</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-66-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this solo episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren continues the New Year focus on estate planning by examining what happens when even well-known, well-documented estates go wrong. Using high-profile examples, including James Brown, Jimmy Buffett, and the Menendez brothers, she explains how wills, trusts, executors, and beneficiaries can still end up tangled in decades of litigation, despite proper planning.</p>
<p>Lauren walks through why James Brown’s estate remained tied up for nearly 20 years, how executor misconduct and family disputes drained estate assets, and why having a will doesn’t guarantee a smooth probate process. She also explains how trusts can still lead to lawsuits, and how laws like the slayer statute prevent inheritance even when someone would otherwise be an heir. The episode reinforces a key takeaway: estate planning is essential, but no plan is completely immune from conflict—and thoughtful planning is about minimizing risk, not eliminating it entirely.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren continues the New Year focus on estate planning by examining what happens when even well-known, well-documented estates go wrong. Using high-profile examples, including James Brown, Jimmy Buffett, and the Menendez brothers, she explains how wills, trusts, executors, and beneficiaries can still end up tangled in decades of litigation, despite proper planning.
Lauren walks through why James Brown’s estate remained tied up for nearly 20 years, how executor misconduct and family disputes drained estate assets, and why having a will doesn’t guarantee a smooth probate process. She also explains how trusts can still lead to lawsuits, and how laws like the slayer statute prevent inheritance even when someone would otherwise be an heir. The episode reinforces a key takeaway: estate planning is essential, but no plan is completely immune from conflict—and thoughtful planning is about minimizing risk, not eliminating it entirely.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 66: Big Estates, Bigger Problems: What Can Go Wrong After Death]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>66</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this solo episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren continues the New Year focus on estate planning by examining what happens when even well-known, well-documented estates go wrong. Using high-profile examples, including James Brown, Jimmy Buffett, and the Menendez brothers, she explains how wills, trusts, executors, and beneficiaries can still end up tangled in decades of litigation, despite proper planning.</p>
<p>Lauren walks through why James Brown’s estate remained tied up for nearly 20 years, how executor misconduct and family disputes drained estate assets, and why having a will doesn’t guarantee a smooth probate process. She also explains how trusts can still lead to lawsuits, and how laws like the slayer statute prevent inheritance even when someone would otherwise be an heir. The episode reinforces a key takeaway: estate planning is essential, but no plan is completely immune from conflict—and thoughtful planning is about minimizing risk, not eliminating it entirely.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2334740/c1e-4wo25u89vkrs8x84x-1pr52oj3h356-kbfaz1.mp3" length="31872094"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren continues the New Year focus on estate planning by examining what happens when even well-known, well-documented estates go wrong. Using high-profile examples, including James Brown, Jimmy Buffett, and the Menendez brothers, she explains how wills, trusts, executors, and beneficiaries can still end up tangled in decades of litigation, despite proper planning.
Lauren walks through why James Brown’s estate remained tied up for nearly 20 years, how executor misconduct and family disputes drained estate assets, and why having a will doesn’t guarantee a smooth probate process. She also explains how trusts can still lead to lawsuits, and how laws like the slayer statute prevent inheritance even when someone would otherwise be an heir. The episode reinforces a key takeaway: estate planning is essential, but no plan is completely immune from conflict—and thoughtful planning is about minimizing risk, not eliminating it entirely.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2334740/c1a-5w3p7-qd1op2docpv-h4uftg.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:16:26</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 65: Behind the Scenes of Trial Prep]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 03:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2326454</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-65-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey talks abut the behind the scenes on what really goes into preparing a criminal case for trial. From highly technical DUI cases involving field sobriety tests, breathalyzer machines, and suppression issues, to credibility-driven “he said, she said” cases, she explains how defense attorneys analyze evidence, build strategy, and prepare witnesses long before stepping into the courtroom.</p>
<p>Lacey also shares the emotional side of trial work, why cases involving innocent clients are often the hardest, how jury decisions can weigh heavily on attorneys, and the mental toll of preparing for high-stakes trials that may fall through at the last minute. It’s an honest look at the pressure, preparation, and responsibility that comes with criminal defense work.</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #laceyandlauren #lawmoms #legalpodcast</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey talks abut the behind the scenes on what really goes into preparing a criminal case for trial. From highly technical DUI cases involving field sobriety tests, breathalyzer machines, and suppression issues, to credibility-driven “he said, she said” cases, she explains how defense attorneys analyze evidence, build strategy, and prepare witnesses long before stepping into the courtroom.
Lacey also shares the emotional side of trial work, why cases involving innocent clients are often the hardest, how jury decisions can weigh heavily on attorneys, and the mental toll of preparing for high-stakes trials that may fall through at the last minute. It’s an honest look at the pressure, preparation, and responsibility that comes with criminal defense work.
#thelawmaspodcast #laceyandlauren #lawmoms #legalpodcast]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 65: Behind the Scenes of Trial Prep]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>65</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey talks abut the behind the scenes on what really goes into preparing a criminal case for trial. From highly technical DUI cases involving field sobriety tests, breathalyzer machines, and suppression issues, to credibility-driven “he said, she said” cases, she explains how defense attorneys analyze evidence, build strategy, and prepare witnesses long before stepping into the courtroom.</p>
<p>Lacey also shares the emotional side of trial work, why cases involving innocent clients are often the hardest, how jury decisions can weigh heavily on attorneys, and the mental toll of preparing for high-stakes trials that may fall through at the last minute. It’s an honest look at the pressure, preparation, and responsibility that comes with criminal defense work.</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #laceyandlauren #lawmoms #legalpodcast</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2326454/c1e-wq7k1fvj3n1f8q057-okpwdmqnfomn-ymtorg.mp3" length="36360288"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey talks abut the behind the scenes on what really goes into preparing a criminal case for trial. From highly technical DUI cases involving field sobriety tests, breathalyzer machines, and suppression issues, to credibility-driven “he said, she said” cases, she explains how defense attorneys analyze evidence, build strategy, and prepare witnesses long before stepping into the courtroom.
Lacey also shares the emotional side of trial work, why cases involving innocent clients are often the hardest, how jury decisions can weigh heavily on attorneys, and the mental toll of preparing for high-stakes trials that may fall through at the last minute. It’s an honest look at the pressure, preparation, and responsibility that comes with criminal defense work.
#thelawmaspodcast #laceyandlauren #lawmoms #legalpodcast]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2326454/c1a-5w3p7-pkwg54q2h1zo-xa0jzt.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:18:29</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 64: Not Fun, But Necessary: Why You Need an Estate Plan]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 02:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2318129</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-64-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren shifts gears for the new year and talks about one resolution that isn’t flashy, but is incredibly important: getting your estate plan in place. Drawing from real-life examples and her experience as an estate planning attorney in South Carolina, she explains why wills and powers of attorney matter at every age, not just later in life.</p>
<p>Lauren walks through the basics of medical and financial powers of attorney, why spouses still need them, and how failing to plan can leave families stuck in court or facing decisions they never wanted to make. Between candid moments of working-from-home chaos and personal reflections on health, parenting, and the new year, this episode serves as a practical reminder that estate planning is less about paperwork and more about protecting the people you love.</p>
<p>Get your estate plan in place!</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #estateplanning #powerofattorney #southcarolinaestateplanning #estateplanningattorney</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren shifts gears for the new year and talks about one resolution that isn’t flashy, but is incredibly important: getting your estate plan in place. Drawing from real-life examples and her experience as an estate planning attorney in South Carolina, she explains why wills and powers of attorney matter at every age, not just later in life.
Lauren walks through the basics of medical and financial powers of attorney, why spouses still need them, and how failing to plan can leave families stuck in court or facing decisions they never wanted to make. Between candid moments of working-from-home chaos and personal reflections on health, parenting, and the new year, this episode serves as a practical reminder that estate planning is less about paperwork and more about protecting the people you love.
Get your estate plan in place!
#thelawmaspodcast #estateplanning #powerofattorney #southcarolinaestateplanning #estateplanningattorney]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 64: Not Fun, But Necessary: Why You Need an Estate Plan]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>64</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren shifts gears for the new year and talks about one resolution that isn’t flashy, but is incredibly important: getting your estate plan in place. Drawing from real-life examples and her experience as an estate planning attorney in South Carolina, she explains why wills and powers of attorney matter at every age, not just later in life.</p>
<p>Lauren walks through the basics of medical and financial powers of attorney, why spouses still need them, and how failing to plan can leave families stuck in court or facing decisions they never wanted to make. Between candid moments of working-from-home chaos and personal reflections on health, parenting, and the new year, this episode serves as a practical reminder that estate planning is less about paperwork and more about protecting the people you love.</p>
<p>Get your estate plan in place!</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #estateplanning #powerofattorney #southcarolinaestateplanning #estateplanningattorney</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2318129/c1e-k8jr7sgo1pktgjqgw-5z3gnoo5sm38-kjyxuu.mp3" length="29861263"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren shifts gears for the new year and talks about one resolution that isn’t flashy, but is incredibly important: getting your estate plan in place. Drawing from real-life examples and her experience as an estate planning attorney in South Carolina, she explains why wills and powers of attorney matter at every age, not just later in life.
Lauren walks through the basics of medical and financial powers of attorney, why spouses still need them, and how failing to plan can leave families stuck in court or facing decisions they never wanted to make. Between candid moments of working-from-home chaos and personal reflections on health, parenting, and the new year, this episode serves as a practical reminder that estate planning is less about paperwork and more about protecting the people you love.
Get your estate plan in place!
#thelawmaspodcast #estateplanning #powerofattorney #southcarolinaestateplanning #estateplanningattorney]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2318129/c1a-5w3p7-9jw5zq35umo9-k12bfo.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:15:22</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 63: Closing Out Holiday Homicide: A Case That Changed Everything (Valerie Zavala Wilson)]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 23:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2310742</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-63-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey reunite to wrap up their Homicide for the Holidays series with a powerful and thought-provoking conversation. After giving updates on binge-worthy shows, cult documentaries, and Disney memories of recent vacations, they turn to a heartbreaking New Year’s Eve murder case involving 19-year-old Valerie Zavala Wilson in California.</p>
<p>The episode walks through the investigation, the role of forensic evidence, and how a 17-year-old suspect was ultimately convicted and sentenced as an adult. From there, the conversation broadens into a deeper legal discussion about juvenile offenders, being tried as adults, parole eligibility, and how the criminal justice system handles age, intent, and future danger to society.</p>
<p>The episode closes with reflection on the emotional weight of covering violent crimes during the holidays and a look ahead to what’s next for the podcast, possibly shifting toward lighter topics in the new year!</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey reunite to wrap up their Homicide for the Holidays series with a powerful and thought-provoking conversation. After giving updates on binge-worthy shows, cult documentaries, and Disney memories of recent vacations, they turn to a heartbreaking New Year’s Eve murder case involving 19-year-old Valerie Zavala Wilson in California.
The episode walks through the investigation, the role of forensic evidence, and how a 17-year-old suspect was ultimately convicted and sentenced as an adult. From there, the conversation broadens into a deeper legal discussion about juvenile offenders, being tried as adults, parole eligibility, and how the criminal justice system handles age, intent, and future danger to society.
The episode closes with reflection on the emotional weight of covering violent crimes during the holidays and a look ahead to what’s next for the podcast, possibly shifting toward lighter topics in the new year!]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 63: Closing Out Holiday Homicide: A Case That Changed Everything (Valerie Zavala Wilson)]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>63</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey reunite to wrap up their Homicide for the Holidays series with a powerful and thought-provoking conversation. After giving updates on binge-worthy shows, cult documentaries, and Disney memories of recent vacations, they turn to a heartbreaking New Year’s Eve murder case involving 19-year-old Valerie Zavala Wilson in California.</p>
<p>The episode walks through the investigation, the role of forensic evidence, and how a 17-year-old suspect was ultimately convicted and sentenced as an adult. From there, the conversation broadens into a deeper legal discussion about juvenile offenders, being tried as adults, parole eligibility, and how the criminal justice system handles age, intent, and future danger to society.</p>
<p>The episode closes with reflection on the emotional weight of covering violent crimes during the holidays and a look ahead to what’s next for the podcast, possibly shifting toward lighter topics in the new year!</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2310742/c1e-0w9gzukpo20t6kod8-5zdv625wukv0-isekv6.mp3" length="66110363"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey reunite to wrap up their Homicide for the Holidays series with a powerful and thought-provoking conversation. After giving updates on binge-worthy shows, cult documentaries, and Disney memories of recent vacations, they turn to a heartbreaking New Year’s Eve murder case involving 19-year-old Valerie Zavala Wilson in California.
The episode walks through the investigation, the role of forensic evidence, and how a 17-year-old suspect was ultimately convicted and sentenced as an adult. From there, the conversation broadens into a deeper legal discussion about juvenile offenders, being tried as adults, parole eligibility, and how the criminal justice system handles age, intent, and future danger to society.
The episode closes with reflection on the emotional weight of covering violent crimes during the holidays and a look ahead to what’s next for the podcast, possibly shifting toward lighter topics in the new year!]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2310742/c1a-5w3p7-xxgp35z1fg18-n2lecy.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:34:08</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 62: Homicide for the Holidays: The Dayton Christmas Murders]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 05:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2305189</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-62-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren continues the Homicide for the Holidays series with one of the most disturbing cases yet, the 1992 Christmas murders in Dayton, Ohio. What began as a group of bored teens and young adults spiraled into a random, brutal killing spree that left six innocent people dead between Christmas Eve and Christmas Day.</p>
<p>Lauren walks through the shocking facts of the case, the senseless motives behind the murders, and the complicated legal aftermath, where minors were tried as adults, sentencing differed by age, and the death penalty was ultimately carried out for one defendant. She also reflects on the emotional toll of covering cases like this during the holidays, sharing a candid look at personal stress, family health scares, and the importance of slowing down and giving ourselves grace during an overwhelming season.</p>
<p></p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #homicidefortheholidays #murderseriespodcast #laurenandlacey #legalpodcast #truecrimepodcast</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren continues the Homicide for the Holidays series with one of the most disturbing cases yet, the 1992 Christmas murders in Dayton, Ohio. What began as a group of bored teens and young adults spiraled into a random, brutal killing spree that left six innocent people dead between Christmas Eve and Christmas Day.
Lauren walks through the shocking facts of the case, the senseless motives behind the murders, and the complicated legal aftermath, where minors were tried as adults, sentencing differed by age, and the death penalty was ultimately carried out for one defendant. She also reflects on the emotional toll of covering cases like this during the holidays, sharing a candid look at personal stress, family health scares, and the importance of slowing down and giving ourselves grace during an overwhelming season.

#thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #homicidefortheholidays #murderseriespodcast #laurenandlacey #legalpodcast #truecrimepodcast]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 62: Homicide for the Holidays: The Dayton Christmas Murders]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>62</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren continues the Homicide for the Holidays series with one of the most disturbing cases yet, the 1992 Christmas murders in Dayton, Ohio. What began as a group of bored teens and young adults spiraled into a random, brutal killing spree that left six innocent people dead between Christmas Eve and Christmas Day.</p>
<p>Lauren walks through the shocking facts of the case, the senseless motives behind the murders, and the complicated legal aftermath, where minors were tried as adults, sentencing differed by age, and the death penalty was ultimately carried out for one defendant. She also reflects on the emotional toll of covering cases like this during the holidays, sharing a candid look at personal stress, family health scares, and the importance of slowing down and giving ourselves grace during an overwhelming season.</p>
<p></p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #homicidefortheholidays #murderseriespodcast #laurenandlacey #legalpodcast #truecrimepodcast</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2305189/c1e-0w9gzuk0xr1t6k58n-25mzkq0gazv-yk4uwg.mp3" length="24192822"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren continues the Homicide for the Holidays series with one of the most disturbing cases yet, the 1992 Christmas murders in Dayton, Ohio. What began as a group of bored teens and young adults spiraled into a random, brutal killing spree that left six innocent people dead between Christmas Eve and Christmas Day.
Lauren walks through the shocking facts of the case, the senseless motives behind the murders, and the complicated legal aftermath, where minors were tried as adults, sentencing differed by age, and the death penalty was ultimately carried out for one defendant. She also reflects on the emotional toll of covering cases like this during the holidays, sharing a candid look at personal stress, family health scares, and the importance of slowing down and giving ourselves grace during an overwhelming season.

#thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #homicidefortheholidays #murderseriespodcast #laurenandlacey #legalpodcast #truecrimepodcast]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2305189/c1a-5w3p7-0v7g2102co8x-1lxrsk.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:12:31</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 61: Homicide for the Holidays: Jealousy, Betrayal, and a Surviving Child]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 07:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2296814</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-61-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey hosts this episode solo during one of the busiest times of the year for working moms in law. Between court schedules, school obligations, and holiday chaos, she shares an honest look at what it’s really like practicing law during the holidays, kids in the background and all!</p>
<p>Continuing the Homicide for the Holidays series, Lacey breaks down a haunting Florida case involving a married couple murdered just days after Christmas, a surviving toddler, and a crime rooted in jealousy, betrayal, and obsession. She walks listeners through the investigation, the twists that led to a mistrial and eventual conviction, and the heartbreaking reality left behind for a child who lost both parents. The episode closes with a reminder to extend grace and support to working moms, especially during the holiday season when the mental load is often invisible but overwhelming.</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #homicideforthehoidays #laurenandlacey #holidaysurvival #lawmoms </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey hosts this episode solo during one of the busiest times of the year for working moms in law. Between court schedules, school obligations, and holiday chaos, she shares an honest look at what it’s really like practicing law during the holidays, kids in the background and all!
Continuing the Homicide for the Holidays series, Lacey breaks down a haunting Florida case involving a married couple murdered just days after Christmas, a surviving toddler, and a crime rooted in jealousy, betrayal, and obsession. She walks listeners through the investigation, the twists that led to a mistrial and eventual conviction, and the heartbreaking reality left behind for a child who lost both parents. The episode closes with a reminder to extend grace and support to working moms, especially during the holiday season when the mental load is often invisible but overwhelming.
#thelawmaspodcast #homicideforthehoidays #laurenandlacey #holidaysurvival #lawmoms ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 61: Homicide for the Holidays: Jealousy, Betrayal, and a Surviving Child]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>61</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey hosts this episode solo during one of the busiest times of the year for working moms in law. Between court schedules, school obligations, and holiday chaos, she shares an honest look at what it’s really like practicing law during the holidays, kids in the background and all!</p>
<p>Continuing the Homicide for the Holidays series, Lacey breaks down a haunting Florida case involving a married couple murdered just days after Christmas, a surviving toddler, and a crime rooted in jealousy, betrayal, and obsession. She walks listeners through the investigation, the twists that led to a mistrial and eventual conviction, and the heartbreaking reality left behind for a child who lost both parents. The episode closes with a reminder to extend grace and support to working moms, especially during the holiday season when the mental load is often invisible but overwhelming.</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #homicideforthehoidays #laurenandlacey #holidaysurvival #lawmoms </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2296814/c1e-0w9gzuk0ozgc6kr79-0v769739c7vq-vtn1ld.mp3" length="27668571"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this solo episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey hosts this episode solo during one of the busiest times of the year for working moms in law. Between court schedules, school obligations, and holiday chaos, she shares an honest look at what it’s really like practicing law during the holidays, kids in the background and all!
Continuing the Homicide for the Holidays series, Lacey breaks down a haunting Florida case involving a married couple murdered just days after Christmas, a surviving toddler, and a crime rooted in jealousy, betrayal, and obsession. She walks listeners through the investigation, the twists that led to a mistrial and eventual conviction, and the heartbreaking reality left behind for a child who lost both parents. The episode closes with a reminder to extend grace and support to working moms, especially during the holiday season when the mental load is often invisible but overwhelming.
#thelawmaspodcast #homicideforthehoidays #laurenandlacey #holidaysurvival #lawmoms ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2296814/c1a-5w3p7-mkwzgwv9fd4j-u2tehp.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:14:13</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 60: When Home Isn’t Safe: Holiday Murders Inside the Family]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 01:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2285345</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-60-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey continue their Homicide for the Holidays series with two devastating family-centered cases that unfolded around Christmas. Before they discuss homicide, they walk through a complex legal question involving immigration, criminal charges, and victims’ rights, asking whether deportation should wait until a criminal case is resolved when victims are involved.</p>
<p>The episode then turns deeply tragic. One case out of Washington details a brutal Christmas Eve family annihilation driven by greed, where parents, a brother, and two young children were murdered over a dispute involving rent and money. The second case, out of Pennsylvania, centers on a mother and her daughters murdered just days before Christmas, a surviving infant, and a father whose crimes were rooted in years of abuse and an impending trial.</p>
<p>Through legal insight and thoughtful discussion, Lauren and Lacey examine motive, prosecution decisions, the cost of justice, and how often holiday violence is tied to family dynamics rather than strangers, making these cases especially haunting.</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #homicidefortheholidays #legalpodcast #lawmoms </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey continue their Homicide for the Holidays series with two devastating family-centered cases that unfolded around Christmas. Before they discuss homicide, they walk through a complex legal question involving immigration, criminal charges, and victims’ rights, asking whether deportation should wait until a criminal case is resolved when victims are involved.
The episode then turns deeply tragic. One case out of Washington details a brutal Christmas Eve family annihilation driven by greed, where parents, a brother, and two young children were murdered over a dispute involving rent and money. The second case, out of Pennsylvania, centers on a mother and her daughters murdered just days before Christmas, a surviving infant, and a father whose crimes were rooted in years of abuse and an impending trial.
Through legal insight and thoughtful discussion, Lauren and Lacey examine motive, prosecution decisions, the cost of justice, and how often holiday violence is tied to family dynamics rather than strangers, making these cases especially haunting.
#thelawmaspodcast #homicidefortheholidays #legalpodcast #lawmoms ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 60: When Home Isn’t Safe: Holiday Murders Inside the Family]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>60</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey continue their Homicide for the Holidays series with two devastating family-centered cases that unfolded around Christmas. Before they discuss homicide, they walk through a complex legal question involving immigration, criminal charges, and victims’ rights, asking whether deportation should wait until a criminal case is resolved when victims are involved.</p>
<p>The episode then turns deeply tragic. One case out of Washington details a brutal Christmas Eve family annihilation driven by greed, where parents, a brother, and two young children were murdered over a dispute involving rent and money. The second case, out of Pennsylvania, centers on a mother and her daughters murdered just days before Christmas, a surviving infant, and a father whose crimes were rooted in years of abuse and an impending trial.</p>
<p>Through legal insight and thoughtful discussion, Lauren and Lacey examine motive, prosecution decisions, the cost of justice, and how often holiday violence is tied to family dynamics rather than strangers, making these cases especially haunting.</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #homicidefortheholidays #legalpodcast #lawmoms </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2285345/c1e-1wr18u5pn1ks6n5d8-0v734r1gurm-ldlfhw.mp3" length="62579006"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey continue their Homicide for the Holidays series with two devastating family-centered cases that unfolded around Christmas. Before they discuss homicide, they walk through a complex legal question involving immigration, criminal charges, and victims’ rights, asking whether deportation should wait until a criminal case is resolved when victims are involved.
The episode then turns deeply tragic. One case out of Washington details a brutal Christmas Eve family annihilation driven by greed, where parents, a brother, and two young children were murdered over a dispute involving rent and money. The second case, out of Pennsylvania, centers on a mother and her daughters murdered just days before Christmas, a surviving infant, and a father whose crimes were rooted in years of abuse and an impending trial.
Through legal insight and thoughtful discussion, Lauren and Lacey examine motive, prosecution decisions, the cost of justice, and how often holiday violence is tied to family dynamics rather than strangers, making these cases especially haunting.
#thelawmaspodcast #homicidefortheholidays #legalpodcast #lawmoms ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2285345/c1a-5w3p7-qdvkxj2otr9q-1toii2.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:32:16</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 59: ‘Tis the Season for Murder: Holiday Homicides Begin]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 03:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2269753</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-59-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>It’s the most wonderful and chilling time of the year on The Lawmas Podcast! Lauren and Lacey kick off their Holiday Homicide Series, mixing Christmas lights with true crime darkness. They start with a horrifying Christmas Eve massacre in California, where a man dressed as Santa turned a family celebration into tragedy, and follow it with a shocking New Year’s Eve story from Colorado involving teenage killers and a cult-like leader.</p>
<p>Between eerie details, legal insights, and late-night laughs in pajamas, this episode shows how quickly holiday cheer can turn to chaos and why family law attorneys might have one of the most dangerous jobs out there.</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #holidayhomicides #laurenandlacey #lawmoms #lawpodcast</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[It’s the most wonderful and chilling time of the year on The Lawmas Podcast! Lauren and Lacey kick off their Holiday Homicide Series, mixing Christmas lights with true crime darkness. They start with a horrifying Christmas Eve massacre in California, where a man dressed as Santa turned a family celebration into tragedy, and follow it with a shocking New Year’s Eve story from Colorado involving teenage killers and a cult-like leader.
Between eerie details, legal insights, and late-night laughs in pajamas, this episode shows how quickly holiday cheer can turn to chaos and why family law attorneys might have one of the most dangerous jobs out there.
#thelawmaspodcast #holidayhomicides #laurenandlacey #lawmoms #lawpodcast]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 59: ‘Tis the Season for Murder: Holiday Homicides Begin]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>59</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>It’s the most wonderful and chilling time of the year on The Lawmas Podcast! Lauren and Lacey kick off their Holiday Homicide Series, mixing Christmas lights with true crime darkness. They start with a horrifying Christmas Eve massacre in California, where a man dressed as Santa turned a family celebration into tragedy, and follow it with a shocking New Year’s Eve story from Colorado involving teenage killers and a cult-like leader.</p>
<p>Between eerie details, legal insights, and late-night laughs in pajamas, this episode shows how quickly holiday cheer can turn to chaos and why family law attorneys might have one of the most dangerous jobs out there.</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #holidayhomicides #laurenandlacey #lawmoms #lawpodcast</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2269753/c1e-x67d2i92pgruk748d-47mj3567b66w-dqzusd.mp3" length="56951535"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[It’s the most wonderful and chilling time of the year on The Lawmas Podcast! Lauren and Lacey kick off their Holiday Homicide Series, mixing Christmas lights with true crime darkness. They start with a horrifying Christmas Eve massacre in California, where a man dressed as Santa turned a family celebration into tragedy, and follow it with a shocking New Year’s Eve story from Colorado involving teenage killers and a cult-like leader.
Between eerie details, legal insights, and late-night laughs in pajamas, this episode shows how quickly holiday cheer can turn to chaos and why family law attorneys might have one of the most dangerous jobs out there.
#thelawmaspodcast #holidayhomicides #laurenandlacey #lawmoms #lawpodcast]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2269753/c1a-5w3p7-9j3824qjbm9r-pebywj.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:29:14</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 58: Gilmore Girls, Gratitude & the Great Snore Debate]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 19:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2252147</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-58-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this laid-back, laughter-filled episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey take a break from true crime to talk about real life, real stress, and the chaos of being working moms during the holidays. From favorite musicals and nostalgic TV re-watches (hello, <em>Gilmore Girls</em> and <em>One Tree Hill</em>) to court deadlines, snoring husbands, and the fine line between saving money and actually enjoying life, this episode is part vent session, part reminder to slow down and live in the moment.</p>
<p>They share personal stories about work, family, loss, and gratitude, reminding listeners that it’s okay to be overwhelmed, it’s okay to spend on memories, and it’s okay to laugh through the exhaustion.</p>
<p></p>
<p>#thelawmas #gilmoregirls #lawmoms #onetrellhill #lawmomspodcast</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this laid-back, laughter-filled episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey take a break from true crime to talk about real life, real stress, and the chaos of being working moms during the holidays. From favorite musicals and nostalgic TV re-watches (hello, Gilmore Girls and One Tree Hill) to court deadlines, snoring husbands, and the fine line between saving money and actually enjoying life, this episode is part vent session, part reminder to slow down and live in the moment.
They share personal stories about work, family, loss, and gratitude, reminding listeners that it’s okay to be overwhelmed, it’s okay to spend on memories, and it’s okay to laugh through the exhaustion.

#thelawmas #gilmoregirls #lawmoms #onetrellhill #lawmomspodcast]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 58: Gilmore Girls, Gratitude & the Great Snore Debate]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>58</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this laid-back, laughter-filled episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey take a break from true crime to talk about real life, real stress, and the chaos of being working moms during the holidays. From favorite musicals and nostalgic TV re-watches (hello, <em>Gilmore Girls</em> and <em>One Tree Hill</em>) to court deadlines, snoring husbands, and the fine line between saving money and actually enjoying life, this episode is part vent session, part reminder to slow down and live in the moment.</p>
<p>They share personal stories about work, family, loss, and gratitude, reminding listeners that it’s okay to be overwhelmed, it’s okay to spend on memories, and it’s okay to laugh through the exhaustion.</p>
<p></p>
<p>#thelawmas #gilmoregirls #lawmoms #onetrellhill #lawmomspodcast</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2252147/c1e-wq7k1f3w2nxi8p7p6-okj2rw6ot490-sa3cxe.mp3" length="58735812"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this laid-back, laughter-filled episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey take a break from true crime to talk about real life, real stress, and the chaos of being working moms during the holidays. From favorite musicals and nostalgic TV re-watches (hello, Gilmore Girls and One Tree Hill) to court deadlines, snoring husbands, and the fine line between saving money and actually enjoying life, this episode is part vent session, part reminder to slow down and live in the moment.
They share personal stories about work, family, loss, and gratitude, reminding listeners that it’s okay to be overwhelmed, it’s okay to spend on memories, and it’s okay to laugh through the exhaustion.

#thelawmas #gilmoregirls #lawmoms #onetrellhill #lawmomspodcast]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2252147/c1a-5w3p7-8don7wj5ak12-zajuj6.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:30:19</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 57: From Nursing Homes to Roller Coasters: The Laws No One Talks About]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 13:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2236097</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-57-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey tackle two very real, but very different topics.</p>
<p>They start with a tough conversation about caring for aging parents and the harsh realities of elder care laws, costs, and responsibilities. From guardianships and Medicaid to what happens when loved ones can no longer care for themselves, they talk through what families need to know, and why the system often fails middle-class Americans.</p>
<p>Then... they switch gears to the headlines surrounding recent incidents at major theme parks like Disney and Universal. The hosts discuss where liability really falls when accidents happen, what those waiver agreements mean when you buy a ticket, and how misinformation can spread faster than the truth online. It’s a mix of real-life law, compassion, and the practical side of navigating complex systems, with a touch of Lawmas humor, of course.</p>
<p></p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #nursinghomes #rollercoasters #DisneyDeaths #lawmoms #lawpodcast #legalpodcast</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey tackle two very real, but very different topics.
They start with a tough conversation about caring for aging parents and the harsh realities of elder care laws, costs, and responsibilities. From guardianships and Medicaid to what happens when loved ones can no longer care for themselves, they talk through what families need to know, and why the system often fails middle-class Americans.
Then... they switch gears to the headlines surrounding recent incidents at major theme parks like Disney and Universal. The hosts discuss where liability really falls when accidents happen, what those waiver agreements mean when you buy a ticket, and how misinformation can spread faster than the truth online. It’s a mix of real-life law, compassion, and the practical side of navigating complex systems, with a touch of Lawmas humor, of course.

#thelawmaspodcast #nursinghomes #rollercoasters #DisneyDeaths #lawmoms #lawpodcast #legalpodcast]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 57: From Nursing Homes to Roller Coasters: The Laws No One Talks About]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>57</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey tackle two very real, but very different topics.</p>
<p>They start with a tough conversation about caring for aging parents and the harsh realities of elder care laws, costs, and responsibilities. From guardianships and Medicaid to what happens when loved ones can no longer care for themselves, they talk through what families need to know, and why the system often fails middle-class Americans.</p>
<p>Then... they switch gears to the headlines surrounding recent incidents at major theme parks like Disney and Universal. The hosts discuss where liability really falls when accidents happen, what those waiver agreements mean when you buy a ticket, and how misinformation can spread faster than the truth online. It’s a mix of real-life law, compassion, and the practical side of navigating complex systems, with a touch of Lawmas humor, of course.</p>
<p></p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #nursinghomes #rollercoasters #DisneyDeaths #lawmoms #lawpodcast #legalpodcast</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2236097/c1e-pqw13f16g86sqxk27-5zd2g8pvsvjw-14m8nl.mp3" length="41042145"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey tackle two very real, but very different topics.
They start with a tough conversation about caring for aging parents and the harsh realities of elder care laws, costs, and responsibilities. From guardianships and Medicaid to what happens when loved ones can no longer care for themselves, they talk through what families need to know, and why the system often fails middle-class Americans.
Then... they switch gears to the headlines surrounding recent incidents at major theme parks like Disney and Universal. The hosts discuss where liability really falls when accidents happen, what those waiver agreements mean when you buy a ticket, and how misinformation can spread faster than the truth online. It’s a mix of real-life law, compassion, and the practical side of navigating complex systems, with a touch of Lawmas humor, of course.

#thelawmaspodcast #nursinghomes #rollercoasters #DisneyDeaths #lawmoms #lawpodcast #legalpodcast]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2236097/c1a-5w3p7-mkw20mn8s0p-5oe6co.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:21:11</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 56: Bar Exams, Bad Info, and Being Nice]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 19:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2204337</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-56-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Lauren and Lacey mix pop culture with a dose of legal reality!</p>
<p>The episode starts with a reminder about kindness and mental health as the holidays approach, reflecting on how stress and silent struggles can affect anyone, even attorneys. The conversation turns to the legal headlines: Kim Kardashian’s latest setback on the California bar exam, and South Carolina politics, where claims about Attorney General Alan Wilson spark a discussion on misinformation and how the justice system really works.</p>
<p>From bond hearings to sentencing, the hosts break down what’s fact versus fiction and remind listeners why understanding the law matters before sharing, or believing, what’s online.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #KimKardashian #AlanWilson #popculturepodcast </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode, Lauren and Lacey mix pop culture with a dose of legal reality!
The episode starts with a reminder about kindness and mental health as the holidays approach, reflecting on how stress and silent struggles can affect anyone, even attorneys. The conversation turns to the legal headlines: Kim Kardashian’s latest setback on the California bar exam, and South Carolina politics, where claims about Attorney General Alan Wilson spark a discussion on misinformation and how the justice system really works.
From bond hearings to sentencing, the hosts break down what’s fact versus fiction and remind listeners why understanding the law matters before sharing, or believing, what’s online.
 
#thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #KimKardashian #AlanWilson #popculturepodcast ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 56: Bar Exams, Bad Info, and Being Nice]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>56</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Lauren and Lacey mix pop culture with a dose of legal reality!</p>
<p>The episode starts with a reminder about kindness and mental health as the holidays approach, reflecting on how stress and silent struggles can affect anyone, even attorneys. The conversation turns to the legal headlines: Kim Kardashian’s latest setback on the California bar exam, and South Carolina politics, where claims about Attorney General Alan Wilson spark a discussion on misinformation and how the justice system really works.</p>
<p>From bond hearings to sentencing, the hosts break down what’s fact versus fiction and remind listeners why understanding the law matters before sharing, or believing, what’s online.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #KimKardashian #AlanWilson #popculturepodcast </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2204337/c1e-pqw13f1zx7otqo046-kpnpzm62av2-r1mu7n.mp3" length="52549337"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode, Lauren and Lacey mix pop culture with a dose of legal reality!
The episode starts with a reminder about kindness and mental health as the holidays approach, reflecting on how stress and silent struggles can affect anyone, even attorneys. The conversation turns to the legal headlines: Kim Kardashian’s latest setback on the California bar exam, and South Carolina politics, where claims about Attorney General Alan Wilson spark a discussion on misinformation and how the justice system really works.
From bond hearings to sentencing, the hosts break down what’s fact versus fiction and remind listeners why understanding the law matters before sharing, or believing, what’s online.
 
#thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #KimKardashian #AlanWilson #popculturepodcast ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2204337/c1a-5w3p7-34m40zjgipw-do8ifs.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:26:59</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 55: The Law, the Lies, and Aileen Wuornos]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 04:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2198610</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-55-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this post-Halloween episode, Lauren and Lacey trade spooky season for true crime as they discuss the new Netflix documentary on serial killer Aileen Wuornos....Lacey’s long-time “favorite case.”</p>
<p>The conversation transitions into how sexism, trauma, and the justice system collided in Wuornos’s trial, from a prosecutor accused of hiding evidence to a judge forced to recuse herself for being “too fair.” They discuss how society’s views of sex work and empathy for victims have evolved, and why Wuornos’s story raises deeper legal and moral questions about accountability, trauma, and the death penalty.</p>
<p>Follow and subscribe and never miss an episode of The Lawmas!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#thelawmas #AileenWuornos #Netflix #truecrime #lawmomspodcast </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this post-Halloween episode, Lauren and Lacey trade spooky season for true crime as they discuss the new Netflix documentary on serial killer Aileen Wuornos....Lacey’s long-time “favorite case.”
The conversation transitions into how sexism, trauma, and the justice system collided in Wuornos’s trial, from a prosecutor accused of hiding evidence to a judge forced to recuse herself for being “too fair.” They discuss how society’s views of sex work and empathy for victims have evolved, and why Wuornos’s story raises deeper legal and moral questions about accountability, trauma, and the death penalty.
Follow and subscribe and never miss an episode of The Lawmas!
 
#thelawmas #AileenWuornos #Netflix #truecrime #lawmomspodcast ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 55: The Law, the Lies, and Aileen Wuornos]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>55</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this post-Halloween episode, Lauren and Lacey trade spooky season for true crime as they discuss the new Netflix documentary on serial killer Aileen Wuornos....Lacey’s long-time “favorite case.”</p>
<p>The conversation transitions into how sexism, trauma, and the justice system collided in Wuornos’s trial, from a prosecutor accused of hiding evidence to a judge forced to recuse herself for being “too fair.” They discuss how society’s views of sex work and empathy for victims have evolved, and why Wuornos’s story raises deeper legal and moral questions about accountability, trauma, and the death penalty.</p>
<p>Follow and subscribe and never miss an episode of The Lawmas!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#thelawmas #AileenWuornos #Netflix #truecrime #lawmomspodcast </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2198610/c1e-2w0zvum69rpfqowxm-jpnkqr89fq94-wuhilj.mp3" length="51990593"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this post-Halloween episode, Lauren and Lacey trade spooky season for true crime as they discuss the new Netflix documentary on serial killer Aileen Wuornos....Lacey’s long-time “favorite case.”
The conversation transitions into how sexism, trauma, and the justice system collided in Wuornos’s trial, from a prosecutor accused of hiding evidence to a judge forced to recuse herself for being “too fair.” They discuss how society’s views of sex work and empathy for victims have evolved, and why Wuornos’s story raises deeper legal and moral questions about accountability, trauma, and the death penalty.
Follow and subscribe and never miss an episode of The Lawmas!
 
#thelawmas #AileenWuornos #Netflix #truecrime #lawmomspodcast ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2198610/c1a-5w3p7-pkv8wzoda94k-qfhfjp.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:26:45</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 54: Our Ghost Stories]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 20:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2175401</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/episode-54-our-ghost-stories</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>It’s the Halloween episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, and things get spooky! Lauren and Lacey are joined by their producer, Wendi Hill, who shares the eerie story of the ghost that’s made itself at home in her house, from unexplained voices to doors flying open and even a spirit that might have followed her family heirlooms.</p>
<p>The conversation moves from ghost stories to personal experiences with the afterlife. Lauren recounts a visit to a shaman that revealed uncanny details about her late mother-in-law, while Lacey opens up about the dreams and visits she’s had from loved ones who’ve passed.</p>
<p>This special episode blends the supernatural with lots of reflections, laughter, and a reminder that sometimes the veil between worlds feels closer than we think.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[It’s the Halloween episode of The Lawmas Podcast, and things get spooky! Lauren and Lacey are joined by their producer, Wendi Hill, who shares the eerie story of the ghost that’s made itself at home in her house, from unexplained voices to doors flying open and even a spirit that might have followed her family heirlooms.
The conversation moves from ghost stories to personal experiences with the afterlife. Lauren recounts a visit to a shaman that revealed uncanny details about her late mother-in-law, while Lacey opens up about the dreams and visits she’s had from loved ones who’ve passed.
This special episode blends the supernatural with lots of reflections, laughter, and a reminder that sometimes the veil between worlds feels closer than we think.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 54: Our Ghost Stories]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>54</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>It’s the Halloween episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, and things get spooky! Lauren and Lacey are joined by their producer, Wendi Hill, who shares the eerie story of the ghost that’s made itself at home in her house, from unexplained voices to doors flying open and even a spirit that might have followed her family heirlooms.</p>
<p>The conversation moves from ghost stories to personal experiences with the afterlife. Lauren recounts a visit to a shaman that revealed uncanny details about her late mother-in-law, while Lacey opens up about the dreams and visits she’s had from loved ones who’ve passed.</p>
<p>This special episode blends the supernatural with lots of reflections, laughter, and a reminder that sometimes the veil between worlds feels closer than we think.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2175401/c1e-6x952ho3q00akp6pd-ndv1og52hkn-rezeff.mp3" length="59489758"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[It’s the Halloween episode of The Lawmas Podcast, and things get spooky! Lauren and Lacey are joined by their producer, Wendi Hill, who shares the eerie story of the ghost that’s made itself at home in her house, from unexplained voices to doors flying open and even a spirit that might have followed her family heirlooms.
The conversation moves from ghost stories to personal experiences with the afterlife. Lauren recounts a visit to a shaman that revealed uncanny details about her late mother-in-law, while Lacey opens up about the dreams and visits she’s had from loved ones who’ve passed.
This special episode blends the supernatural with lots of reflections, laughter, and a reminder that sometimes the veil between worlds feels closer than we think.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2175401/c1a-5w3p7-25m072p6u6ov-ucimri.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:30:44</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 53: When the Law Meets the Supernatural]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 16:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2170619</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-53-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>This week on <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey keep Spooky October going with real-life legal cases that cross into the paranormal. From a man who claimed he murdered his landlord while possessed, to a mother who solved her daughter’s death after being “visited” in her dreams, they explore how the justice system handles claims that seem straight out of a horror movie.</p>
<p>Lacey also shares a chilling office story involving a toy that turns itself on, and a theory about a friendly spirit that might be visiting. The conversation dives into how far lawyers can go with supernatural defenses, what counts as expert testimony, and why some cold cases are reopened while others stay buried.</p>
<p>Tune in for the mix of eerie stories, legal insight, and laughter you expect from <em>The Lawmas Podcast.</em></p>
<p> </p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #spookyoctober #legalpodast</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This week on The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey keep Spooky October going with real-life legal cases that cross into the paranormal. From a man who claimed he murdered his landlord while possessed, to a mother who solved her daughter’s death after being “visited” in her dreams, they explore how the justice system handles claims that seem straight out of a horror movie.
Lacey also shares a chilling office story involving a toy that turns itself on, and a theory about a friendly spirit that might be visiting. The conversation dives into how far lawyers can go with supernatural defenses, what counts as expert testimony, and why some cold cases are reopened while others stay buried.
Tune in for the mix of eerie stories, legal insight, and laughter you expect from The Lawmas Podcast.
 
#thelawmaspodcast #spookyoctober #legalpodast]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 53: When the Law Meets the Supernatural]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>53</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>This week on <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey keep Spooky October going with real-life legal cases that cross into the paranormal. From a man who claimed he murdered his landlord while possessed, to a mother who solved her daughter’s death after being “visited” in her dreams, they explore how the justice system handles claims that seem straight out of a horror movie.</p>
<p>Lacey also shares a chilling office story involving a toy that turns itself on, and a theory about a friendly spirit that might be visiting. The conversation dives into how far lawyers can go with supernatural defenses, what counts as expert testimony, and why some cold cases are reopened while others stay buried.</p>
<p>Tune in for the mix of eerie stories, legal insight, and laughter you expect from <em>The Lawmas Podcast.</em></p>
<p> </p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #spookyoctober #legalpodast</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2170619/c1e-wq7k1f38joxb8pn82-pkvx5kjrf9q9-mtpmrf.mp3" length="41548040"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This week on The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey keep Spooky October going with real-life legal cases that cross into the paranormal. From a man who claimed he murdered his landlord while possessed, to a mother who solved her daughter’s death after being “visited” in her dreams, they explore how the justice system handles claims that seem straight out of a horror movie.
Lacey also shares a chilling office story involving a toy that turns itself on, and a theory about a friendly spirit that might be visiting. The conversation dives into how far lawyers can go with supernatural defenses, what counts as expert testimony, and why some cold cases are reopened while others stay buried.
Tune in for the mix of eerie stories, legal insight, and laughter you expect from The Lawmas Podcast.
 
#thelawmaspodcast #spookyoctober #legalpodast]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2170619/c1a-5w3p7-v6p456z3bxmg-zypupu.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:21:24</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 52: Ed Gein: The Killer Who Changed Horror Forever - Part Two]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 05:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2167014</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-52-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>This week on <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey wrap up their two-part discussion into Ed Gein, separating fact from fiction and unpacking what the Netflix series got wrong. From misrepresented murders to exaggerated rumors, they walk through the real story behind one of true crime’s most infamous figures.</p>
<p>The conversation also explores how mental competency is determined in criminal cases, what “not guilty by reason of insanity” really means, and why those rulings matter today. Along the way, Lacey shares a personal story about falling down the stairs that turns into a real-world lesson on teaching kids how to call for help in an emergency.</p>
<p>This episode connects horror, law, and humanity, proving that even the darkest cases raise questions about mental health, justice, and compassion.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #legalpodast #edgein #spookyoctober</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This week on The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey wrap up their two-part discussion into Ed Gein, separating fact from fiction and unpacking what the Netflix series got wrong. From misrepresented murders to exaggerated rumors, they walk through the real story behind one of true crime’s most infamous figures.
The conversation also explores how mental competency is determined in criminal cases, what “not guilty by reason of insanity” really means, and why those rulings matter today. Along the way, Lacey shares a personal story about falling down the stairs that turns into a real-world lesson on teaching kids how to call for help in an emergency.
This episode connects horror, law, and humanity, proving that even the darkest cases raise questions about mental health, justice, and compassion.
 
#thelawmaspodcast #legalpodast #edgein #spookyoctober]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 52: Ed Gein: The Killer Who Changed Horror Forever - Part Two]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>52</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>This week on <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey wrap up their two-part discussion into Ed Gein, separating fact from fiction and unpacking what the Netflix series got wrong. From misrepresented murders to exaggerated rumors, they walk through the real story behind one of true crime’s most infamous figures.</p>
<p>The conversation also explores how mental competency is determined in criminal cases, what “not guilty by reason of insanity” really means, and why those rulings matter today. Along the way, Lacey shares a personal story about falling down the stairs that turns into a real-world lesson on teaching kids how to call for help in an emergency.</p>
<p>This episode connects horror, law, and humanity, proving that even the darkest cases raise questions about mental health, justice, and compassion.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #legalpodast #edgein #spookyoctober</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2167014/c1e-zq4jvf7x687s1wdzg-rkpz7wkzbr52-cwgy9x.mp3" length="56505547"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This week on The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey wrap up their two-part discussion into Ed Gein, separating fact from fiction and unpacking what the Netflix series got wrong. From misrepresented murders to exaggerated rumors, they walk through the real story behind one of true crime’s most infamous figures.
The conversation also explores how mental competency is determined in criminal cases, what “not guilty by reason of insanity” really means, and why those rulings matter today. Along the way, Lacey shares a personal story about falling down the stairs that turns into a real-world lesson on teaching kids how to call for help in an emergency.
This episode connects horror, law, and humanity, proving that even the darkest cases raise questions about mental health, justice, and compassion.
 
#thelawmaspodcast #legalpodast #edgein #spookyoctober]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2167014/c1a-5w3p7-jpn2m0p3bvzn-n2wq2n.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:29:08</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 51: Ed Gein: The Killer Who Changed Horror Forever Part One]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 21:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2161853</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-51-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey continue their spooky-season series with a look at one of true crime’s most infamous, and misunderstood, figures: Ed Gein. Known as the inspiration for <em>Psycho</em> and <em>The Texas Chainsaw Massacre</em>, the hosts explore whether he truly fits the definition of a serial killer.</p>
<p>Before diving in, Lacey shares a story from a Down Syndrome fundraiser that sparks an honest talk about parenting, advocacy, and knowing when to speak up.</p>
<p>Then the conversation turns to Gein’s isolated upbringing, his troubled relationship with his mother, and how his crimes changed horror movies and pop culture forever.</p>
<p>This is Part 1 of a two-part deep dive into Ed Gein, the Netflix series, and the legal side of mental competency.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey continue their spooky-season series with a look at one of true crime’s most infamous, and misunderstood, figures: Ed Gein. Known as the inspiration for Psycho and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, the hosts explore whether he truly fits the definition of a serial killer.
Before diving in, Lacey shares a story from a Down Syndrome fundraiser that sparks an honest talk about parenting, advocacy, and knowing when to speak up.
Then the conversation turns to Gein’s isolated upbringing, his troubled relationship with his mother, and how his crimes changed horror movies and pop culture forever.
This is Part 1 of a two-part deep dive into Ed Gein, the Netflix series, and the legal side of mental competency.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 51: Ed Gein: The Killer Who Changed Horror Forever Part One]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>51</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey continue their spooky-season series with a look at one of true crime’s most infamous, and misunderstood, figures: Ed Gein. Known as the inspiration for <em>Psycho</em> and <em>The Texas Chainsaw Massacre</em>, the hosts explore whether he truly fits the definition of a serial killer.</p>
<p>Before diving in, Lacey shares a story from a Down Syndrome fundraiser that sparks an honest talk about parenting, advocacy, and knowing when to speak up.</p>
<p>Then the conversation turns to Gein’s isolated upbringing, his troubled relationship with his mother, and how his crimes changed horror movies and pop culture forever.</p>
<p>This is Part 1 of a two-part deep dive into Ed Gein, the Netflix series, and the legal side of mental competency.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2161853/c1e-1wr18u58vjjb6vwqj-47mg8m79t84p-gfdb7n.mp3" length="54820798"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey continue their spooky-season series with a look at one of true crime’s most infamous, and misunderstood, figures: Ed Gein. Known as the inspiration for Psycho and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, the hosts explore whether he truly fits the definition of a serial killer.
Before diving in, Lacey shares a story from a Down Syndrome fundraiser that sparks an honest talk about parenting, advocacy, and knowing when to speak up.
Then the conversation turns to Gein’s isolated upbringing, his troubled relationship with his mother, and how his crimes changed horror movies and pop culture forever.
This is Part 1 of a two-part deep dive into Ed Gein, the Netflix series, and the legal side of mental competency.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2161853/c1a-5w3p7-5zdgvdzzb67k-yz7b9d.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:28:08</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 50: Do You Have to Disclose a Haunted House? The Amityville Horror in Court]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 04:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2155916</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-50-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>This week on The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey kick off Spooky October by asking a surprising question: if your house is haunted, do you legally have to tell buyers? Inspired by the infamous Amityville Horror case, they explore how a true crime turned ghost story ended up shaping real estate law.</p>
<p>Along the way, they tackle Halloween trespassing rules, self-defense and costumes (can you really carry that fake knife as Michael Myers?), and how far “defending your property” can go before the law steps in. The conversation mixes legal analysis with personal stories, from family costumes to unexplained encounters that bring both laughs and chills.</p>
<p>If you’ve ever wondered where the courtroom meets the supernatural, this episode has the answers.</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #spookyoctober #amityvillehorror #lawmoms </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This week on The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey kick off Spooky October by asking a surprising question: if your house is haunted, do you legally have to tell buyers? Inspired by the infamous Amityville Horror case, they explore how a true crime turned ghost story ended up shaping real estate law.
Along the way, they tackle Halloween trespassing rules, self-defense and costumes (can you really carry that fake knife as Michael Myers?), and how far “defending your property” can go before the law steps in. The conversation mixes legal analysis with personal stories, from family costumes to unexplained encounters that bring both laughs and chills.
If you’ve ever wondered where the courtroom meets the supernatural, this episode has the answers.
#thelawmaspodcast #spookyoctober #amityvillehorror #lawmoms ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 50: Do You Have to Disclose a Haunted House? The Amityville Horror in Court]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>This week on The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey kick off Spooky October by asking a surprising question: if your house is haunted, do you legally have to tell buyers? Inspired by the infamous Amityville Horror case, they explore how a true crime turned ghost story ended up shaping real estate law.</p>
<p>Along the way, they tackle Halloween trespassing rules, self-defense and costumes (can you really carry that fake knife as Michael Myers?), and how far “defending your property” can go before the law steps in. The conversation mixes legal analysis with personal stories, from family costumes to unexplained encounters that bring both laughs and chills.</p>
<p>If you’ve ever wondered where the courtroom meets the supernatural, this episode has the answers.</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #spookyoctober #amityvillehorror #lawmoms </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2155916/c1e-3wx8pukqzv4sw2j94-v64n4p6duqdp-phr8zq.mp3" length="52452318"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This week on The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey kick off Spooky October by asking a surprising question: if your house is haunted, do you legally have to tell buyers? Inspired by the infamous Amityville Horror case, they explore how a true crime turned ghost story ended up shaping real estate law.
Along the way, they tackle Halloween trespassing rules, self-defense and costumes (can you really carry that fake knife as Michael Myers?), and how far “defending your property” can go before the law steps in. The conversation mixes legal analysis with personal stories, from family costumes to unexplained encounters that bring both laughs and chills.
If you’ve ever wondered where the courtroom meets the supernatural, this episode has the answers.
#thelawmaspodcast #spookyoctober #amityvillehorror #lawmoms ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2155916/c1a-5w3p7-jp303npna7m7-gxligo.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:27:05</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 49: Serial Killer September Finale: Todd Kohlhepp and Pee Wee Gaskins]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 14:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2149623</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-49-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>This week, Lauren and Lacey wrap up “Serial Killer September” with a look at two of South Carolina’s most infamous killers, Todd Kohlhepp and Donald “Pee Wee” Gaskins.</p>
<p>From Kohlhepp’s shocking crimes in the Upstate, including the Superbike murders and his disturbing use of a shipping container, to Gaskins’ decades-long spree that earned him the title “the meanest man in America.” Along the way, the hosts explore how gaps in licensing and background checks allowed Kohlhepp to blend into everyday life as a realtor, and how Gaskins’ brutal history defied any single pattern. They also discuss broader issues, like how laws spill across areas of criminal, family, and even estate law, and how public policy struggles to balance safety, rights, and justice.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #serialkillerseptember #peeweegaskins #toddkohlhepp #lawmoms </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This week, Lauren and Lacey wrap up “Serial Killer September” with a look at two of South Carolina’s most infamous killers, Todd Kohlhepp and Donald “Pee Wee” Gaskins.
From Kohlhepp’s shocking crimes in the Upstate, including the Superbike murders and his disturbing use of a shipping container, to Gaskins’ decades-long spree that earned him the title “the meanest man in America.” Along the way, the hosts explore how gaps in licensing and background checks allowed Kohlhepp to blend into everyday life as a realtor, and how Gaskins’ brutal history defied any single pattern. They also discuss broader issues, like how laws spill across areas of criminal, family, and even estate law, and how public policy struggles to balance safety, rights, and justice.
 
#thelawmaspodcast #serialkillerseptember #peeweegaskins #toddkohlhepp #lawmoms ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 49: Serial Killer September Finale: Todd Kohlhepp and Pee Wee Gaskins]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>49</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>This week, Lauren and Lacey wrap up “Serial Killer September” with a look at two of South Carolina’s most infamous killers, Todd Kohlhepp and Donald “Pee Wee” Gaskins.</p>
<p>From Kohlhepp’s shocking crimes in the Upstate, including the Superbike murders and his disturbing use of a shipping container, to Gaskins’ decades-long spree that earned him the title “the meanest man in America.” Along the way, the hosts explore how gaps in licensing and background checks allowed Kohlhepp to blend into everyday life as a realtor, and how Gaskins’ brutal history defied any single pattern. They also discuss broader issues, like how laws spill across areas of criminal, family, and even estate law, and how public policy struggles to balance safety, rights, and justice.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #serialkillerseptember #peeweegaskins #toddkohlhepp #lawmoms </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2149623/c1e-oqpgof2pp61hdn0p5-47x2x2m8i76j-xbu4bk.mp3" length="57999541"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This week, Lauren and Lacey wrap up “Serial Killer September” with a look at two of South Carolina’s most infamous killers, Todd Kohlhepp and Donald “Pee Wee” Gaskins.
From Kohlhepp’s shocking crimes in the Upstate, including the Superbike murders and his disturbing use of a shipping container, to Gaskins’ decades-long spree that earned him the title “the meanest man in America.” Along the way, the hosts explore how gaps in licensing and background checks allowed Kohlhepp to blend into everyday life as a realtor, and how Gaskins’ brutal history defied any single pattern. They also discuss broader issues, like how laws spill across areas of criminal, family, and even estate law, and how public policy struggles to balance safety, rights, and justice.
 
#thelawmaspodcast #serialkillerseptember #peeweegaskins #toddkohlhepp #lawmoms ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2149623/c1a-5w3p7-8dqkqko6sd57-dkrbfs.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:29:50</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 48: Serial Killer September: The Golden State Killer]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 05:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2144825</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-48-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Lauren and Lacey dig into the case of the Golden State Killer, Joseph James DeAngelo, a man whose crimes spanned burglary, sexual assault, and murder across California in the 1970s and ’80s.</p>
<p>They discuss how DNA evidence, once unimaginable in criminal investigations, ultimately linked his crimes together decades later and led to his arrest in 2018. They also discuss the science behind DNA profiling, the ethical concerns of law enforcement accessing genetic data from medical providers and ancestry services, and how law and science don’t always evolve at the same pace. The conversation also turns personal, as the hosts reflect on privacy, public health, and the balance between protecting communities and protecting individual rights.</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #laurenandlacey #lawmoms #lawpodcast #goldenstatekiller #josephjamesdeangelo #serieskillerseptember</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode, Lauren and Lacey dig into the case of the Golden State Killer, Joseph James DeAngelo, a man whose crimes spanned burglary, sexual assault, and murder across California in the 1970s and ’80s.
They discuss how DNA evidence, once unimaginable in criminal investigations, ultimately linked his crimes together decades later and led to his arrest in 2018. They also discuss the science behind DNA profiling, the ethical concerns of law enforcement accessing genetic data from medical providers and ancestry services, and how law and science don’t always evolve at the same pace. The conversation also turns personal, as the hosts reflect on privacy, public health, and the balance between protecting communities and protecting individual rights.
#thelawmaspodcast #laurenandlacey #lawmoms #lawpodcast #goldenstatekiller #josephjamesdeangelo #serieskillerseptember]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 48: Serial Killer September: The Golden State Killer]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>48</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Lauren and Lacey dig into the case of the Golden State Killer, Joseph James DeAngelo, a man whose crimes spanned burglary, sexual assault, and murder across California in the 1970s and ’80s.</p>
<p>They discuss how DNA evidence, once unimaginable in criminal investigations, ultimately linked his crimes together decades later and led to his arrest in 2018. They also discuss the science behind DNA profiling, the ethical concerns of law enforcement accessing genetic data from medical providers and ancestry services, and how law and science don’t always evolve at the same pace. The conversation also turns personal, as the hosts reflect on privacy, public health, and the balance between protecting communities and protecting individual rights.</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #laurenandlacey #lawmoms #lawpodcast #goldenstatekiller #josephjamesdeangelo #serieskillerseptember</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2144825/c1e-vqw7gf72rz4advpk2-5zo69g87fogj-tncotz.mp3" length="57828927"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode, Lauren and Lacey dig into the case of the Golden State Killer, Joseph James DeAngelo, a man whose crimes spanned burglary, sexual assault, and murder across California in the 1970s and ’80s.
They discuss how DNA evidence, once unimaginable in criminal investigations, ultimately linked his crimes together decades later and led to his arrest in 2018. They also discuss the science behind DNA profiling, the ethical concerns of law enforcement accessing genetic data from medical providers and ancestry services, and how law and science don’t always evolve at the same pace. The conversation also turns personal, as the hosts reflect on privacy, public health, and the balance between protecting communities and protecting individual rights.
#thelawmaspodcast #laurenandlacey #lawmoms #lawpodcast #goldenstatekiller #josephjamesdeangelo #serieskillerseptember]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2144825/c1a-5w3p7-pkxp29zpao2d-5uwztt.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:29:47</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 47: Serial Killer September: Ted Bundy]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 16:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2135933</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-47-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Lauren and Lacey kick off <em>Serial Killer September</em> with a look into one of the most notorious names in true crime, Ted Bundy. They revisit his cross-country crimes, his shocking prison escapes, and the troubling way his appearance and charm shaped public perception and even courtroom treatment. Along the way, they explore the legal angles: what it meant for Bundy to represent himself, how attorney–client privilege works even in extreme cases, and why fair trials matter even for the worst offenders.</p>
<p>The conversation also raises questions about whether Bundy could have operated as long in today’s world of DNA evidence and interstate cooperation, and why the public spectacle of his execution still lingers in cultural memory. What do you think?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#thelawmas #serialkillerseptember #lawmoms #lawpodcast #LaurenandLacey #legalpodcast #tedbundy</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren and Lacey kick off Serial Killer September with a look into one of the most notorious names in true crime, Ted Bundy. They revisit his cross-country crimes, his shocking prison escapes, and the troubling way his appearance and charm shaped public perception and even courtroom treatment. Along the way, they explore the legal angles: what it meant for Bundy to represent himself, how attorney–client privilege works even in extreme cases, and why fair trials matter even for the worst offenders.
The conversation also raises questions about whether Bundy could have operated as long in today’s world of DNA evidence and interstate cooperation, and why the public spectacle of his execution still lingers in cultural memory. What do you think?
 
#thelawmas #serialkillerseptember #lawmoms #lawpodcast #LaurenandLacey #legalpodcast #tedbundy]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 47: Serial Killer September: Ted Bundy]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>47</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Lauren and Lacey kick off <em>Serial Killer September</em> with a look into one of the most notorious names in true crime, Ted Bundy. They revisit his cross-country crimes, his shocking prison escapes, and the troubling way his appearance and charm shaped public perception and even courtroom treatment. Along the way, they explore the legal angles: what it meant for Bundy to represent himself, how attorney–client privilege works even in extreme cases, and why fair trials matter even for the worst offenders.</p>
<p>The conversation also raises questions about whether Bundy could have operated as long in today’s world of DNA evidence and interstate cooperation, and why the public spectacle of his execution still lingers in cultural memory. What do you think?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#thelawmas #serialkillerseptember #lawmoms #lawpodcast #LaurenandLacey #legalpodcast #tedbundy</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2135933/c1e-830kxhomn99urwk7o-rk3974voiq0d-njsc31.mp3" length="45230039"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren and Lacey kick off Serial Killer September with a look into one of the most notorious names in true crime, Ted Bundy. They revisit his cross-country crimes, his shocking prison escapes, and the troubling way his appearance and charm shaped public perception and even courtroom treatment. Along the way, they explore the legal angles: what it meant for Bundy to represent himself, how attorney–client privilege works even in extreme cases, and why fair trials matter even for the worst offenders.
The conversation also raises questions about whether Bundy could have operated as long in today’s world of DNA evidence and interstate cooperation, and why the public spectacle of his execution still lingers in cultural memory. What do you think?
 
#thelawmas #serialkillerseptember #lawmoms #lawpodcast #LaurenandLacey #legalpodcast #tedbundy]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2135933/c1a-5w3p7-8dq12r5dhd94-znsviq.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:23:18</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 46: Serial Killer September: DNA, Investigations, and the Making of a Killer]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 19:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2132386</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-46-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Lauren and Lacey kick off their brand-new <em>Serial Killer September</em> series by discussing how investigations into serial crimes have changed over the decades. From the days when police departments rarely shared information across state lines to today’s use of CODIS, DNA databases, and even familial DNA through ancestry websites, the tools for catching killers look dramatically different.</p>
<p>The conversation explores both the promise and pitfalls of DNA evidence, how it has freed the innocent, convicted the guilty, and in some cases raised concerns about privacy, contamination, and misuse. They also dig into the psychological side of serial killers, comparing public perceptions of “likable” figures like Ted Bundy to the disturbing patterns seen in cases such as Pee Wee Gaskins, John Wayne Gacy, and South Carolina’s Todd Kohlhepp.</p>
<p>The hosts tackle the differences between mass murderers and serial killers, the debate over whether genetics could ever play a role in sentencing, and how cases like the Golden State Killer changed the game with new science. To wrap things up on a lighter note, Lauren and Lacey share their thoughts on Cardi B’s hilarious courtroom moments and what they reveal about how celebrity clients are treated differently on the stand.</p>
<p>This episode sets the stage for a month-long dive into infamous serial killers.</p>
<p>Next up: Ted Bundy.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#thelawamaspodcast #serialkillerseptember #laurenandlacey #lawmoms #legalpodcast</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren and Lacey kick off their brand-new Serial Killer September series by discussing how investigations into serial crimes have changed over the decades. From the days when police departments rarely shared information across state lines to today’s use of CODIS, DNA databases, and even familial DNA through ancestry websites, the tools for catching killers look dramatically different.
The conversation explores both the promise and pitfalls of DNA evidence, how it has freed the innocent, convicted the guilty, and in some cases raised concerns about privacy, contamination, and misuse. They also dig into the psychological side of serial killers, comparing public perceptions of “likable” figures like Ted Bundy to the disturbing patterns seen in cases such as Pee Wee Gaskins, John Wayne Gacy, and South Carolina’s Todd Kohlhepp.
The hosts tackle the differences between mass murderers and serial killers, the debate over whether genetics could ever play a role in sentencing, and how cases like the Golden State Killer changed the game with new science. To wrap things up on a lighter note, Lauren and Lacey share their thoughts on Cardi B’s hilarious courtroom moments and what they reveal about how celebrity clients are treated differently on the stand.
This episode sets the stage for a month-long dive into infamous serial killers.
Next up: Ted Bundy.
 
#thelawamaspodcast #serialkillerseptember #laurenandlacey #lawmoms #legalpodcast]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 46: Serial Killer September: DNA, Investigations, and the Making of a Killer]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>46</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Lauren and Lacey kick off their brand-new <em>Serial Killer September</em> series by discussing how investigations into serial crimes have changed over the decades. From the days when police departments rarely shared information across state lines to today’s use of CODIS, DNA databases, and even familial DNA through ancestry websites, the tools for catching killers look dramatically different.</p>
<p>The conversation explores both the promise and pitfalls of DNA evidence, how it has freed the innocent, convicted the guilty, and in some cases raised concerns about privacy, contamination, and misuse. They also dig into the psychological side of serial killers, comparing public perceptions of “likable” figures like Ted Bundy to the disturbing patterns seen in cases such as Pee Wee Gaskins, John Wayne Gacy, and South Carolina’s Todd Kohlhepp.</p>
<p>The hosts tackle the differences between mass murderers and serial killers, the debate over whether genetics could ever play a role in sentencing, and how cases like the Golden State Killer changed the game with new science. To wrap things up on a lighter note, Lauren and Lacey share their thoughts on Cardi B’s hilarious courtroom moments and what they reveal about how celebrity clients are treated differently on the stand.</p>
<p>This episode sets the stage for a month-long dive into infamous serial killers.</p>
<p>Next up: Ted Bundy.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#thelawamaspodcast #serialkillerseptember #laurenandlacey #lawmoms #legalpodcast</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2132386/c1e-gm5x8hm0mg0iw4qon-ww831k3zir2o-po7fjd.mp3" length="42107185"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren and Lacey kick off their brand-new Serial Killer September series by discussing how investigations into serial crimes have changed over the decades. From the days when police departments rarely shared information across state lines to today’s use of CODIS, DNA databases, and even familial DNA through ancestry websites, the tools for catching killers look dramatically different.
The conversation explores both the promise and pitfalls of DNA evidence, how it has freed the innocent, convicted the guilty, and in some cases raised concerns about privacy, contamination, and misuse. They also dig into the psychological side of serial killers, comparing public perceptions of “likable” figures like Ted Bundy to the disturbing patterns seen in cases such as Pee Wee Gaskins, John Wayne Gacy, and South Carolina’s Todd Kohlhepp.
The hosts tackle the differences between mass murderers and serial killers, the debate over whether genetics could ever play a role in sentencing, and how cases like the Golden State Killer changed the game with new science. To wrap things up on a lighter note, Lauren and Lacey share their thoughts on Cardi B’s hilarious courtroom moments and what they reveal about how celebrity clients are treated differently on the stand.
This episode sets the stage for a month-long dive into infamous serial killers.
Next up: Ted Bundy.
 
#thelawamaspodcast #serialkillerseptember #laurenandlacey #lawmoms #legalpodcast]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2132386/c1a-5w3p7-xx492d98fg19-u2tniv.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:21:39</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 45: The Menendez Brothers and the Biggest Loser: Legal Lessons from Pop Culture]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2127153</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-45-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey mix pop culture with legal insight. After a quick story about Lacey’s trip to Atlanta to see basketball star A’ja Wilson, they discuss two trending topics: the Menendez brothers’ parole hearings and Netflix’s new <em>Biggest Loser</em> documentary.</p>
<p>Lauren explains why both Eric and Lyle Menendez were denied parole, citing contraband cell phones and questions about remorse. The hosts explore how prison cell phones have fueled nationwide scams and how that plays into parole decisions, while also asking whether the brothers still pose a real threat to society.</p>
<p>They then shift to the <em>Biggest Loser</em> documentary, highlighting troubling contracts that pressured contestants to waive legal rights and exposing unsafe health practices that put entertainment above wellbeing. Lauren and Lacey question whether such contracts should be enforceable and imagine how a healthier, more responsible version of the show could work today.</p>
<p>Next Up: Serial Killer September and a paranormal lineup for October! It's going to be a fun fall with The Lawmas!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#legalpodcast #thebiggestloser #laurenandlacey #menendezbrothers #thelawmaspodcast </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey mix pop culture with legal insight. After a quick story about Lacey’s trip to Atlanta to see basketball star A’ja Wilson, they discuss two trending topics: the Menendez brothers’ parole hearings and Netflix’s new Biggest Loser documentary.
Lauren explains why both Eric and Lyle Menendez were denied parole, citing contraband cell phones and questions about remorse. The hosts explore how prison cell phones have fueled nationwide scams and how that plays into parole decisions, while also asking whether the brothers still pose a real threat to society.
They then shift to the Biggest Loser documentary, highlighting troubling contracts that pressured contestants to waive legal rights and exposing unsafe health practices that put entertainment above wellbeing. Lauren and Lacey question whether such contracts should be enforceable and imagine how a healthier, more responsible version of the show could work today.
Next Up: Serial Killer September and a paranormal lineup for October! It's going to be a fun fall with The Lawmas!
 
#legalpodcast #thebiggestloser #laurenandlacey #menendezbrothers #thelawmaspodcast ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 45: The Menendez Brothers and the Biggest Loser: Legal Lessons from Pop Culture]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>45</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey mix pop culture with legal insight. After a quick story about Lacey’s trip to Atlanta to see basketball star A’ja Wilson, they discuss two trending topics: the Menendez brothers’ parole hearings and Netflix’s new <em>Biggest Loser</em> documentary.</p>
<p>Lauren explains why both Eric and Lyle Menendez were denied parole, citing contraband cell phones and questions about remorse. The hosts explore how prison cell phones have fueled nationwide scams and how that plays into parole decisions, while also asking whether the brothers still pose a real threat to society.</p>
<p>They then shift to the <em>Biggest Loser</em> documentary, highlighting troubling contracts that pressured contestants to waive legal rights and exposing unsafe health practices that put entertainment above wellbeing. Lauren and Lacey question whether such contracts should be enforceable and imagine how a healthier, more responsible version of the show could work today.</p>
<p>Next Up: Serial Killer September and a paranormal lineup for October! It's going to be a fun fall with The Lawmas!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#legalpodcast #thebiggestloser #laurenandlacey #menendezbrothers #thelawmaspodcast </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2127153/c1e-zq4jvf7dzqdf1k099-z3kq9kp5sm17-aamded.mp3" length="54815895"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey mix pop culture with legal insight. After a quick story about Lacey’s trip to Atlanta to see basketball star A’ja Wilson, they discuss two trending topics: the Menendez brothers’ parole hearings and Netflix’s new Biggest Loser documentary.
Lauren explains why both Eric and Lyle Menendez were denied parole, citing contraband cell phones and questions about remorse. The hosts explore how prison cell phones have fueled nationwide scams and how that plays into parole decisions, while also asking whether the brothers still pose a real threat to society.
They then shift to the Biggest Loser documentary, highlighting troubling contracts that pressured contestants to waive legal rights and exposing unsafe health practices that put entertainment above wellbeing. Lauren and Lacey question whether such contracts should be enforceable and imagine how a healthier, more responsible version of the show could work today.
Next Up: Serial Killer September and a paranormal lineup for October! It's going to be a fun fall with The Lawmas!
 
#legalpodcast #thebiggestloser #laurenandlacey #menendezbrothers #thelawmaspodcast ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2127153/c1a-5w3p7-347wg7xkb8nw-kdti3j.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:28:11</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 44: Infamous Women in Crime: The Story of Aileen Wuornos]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 18:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2114236</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-44-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey continue their <em>Infamous Women</em> series with one of the most notorious names in true crime: Aileen Wuornos.</p>
<p>They discuss Wuornos’ troubled childhood, her history of violence, and the series of murders that led to her place on death row. Along the way, they explore key legal questions around wills, inheritance, and the complexities of the death penalty. Was Wuornos’ first killing really self-defense? Should the jury have heard about the victim’s violent past? And how does her case compare to others, like Susan Smith?</p>
<p>Lauren and Lacey also discuss the rarity of women on death row, how different states handle capital punishment, and why context matters when weighing “heinousness” against public safety.</p>
<p>If you’re fascinated by the intersection of law and true crime, this episode will keep you thinking long after it ends.</p>
<p>Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more episodes every Friday!</p>
<p>#TrueCrime #AileenWuornos #DeathPenalty #LawPodcast #LegalAnalysis #TheLawmasPodcast</p>
<hr />]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey continue their Infamous Women series with one of the most notorious names in true crime: Aileen Wuornos.
They discuss Wuornos’ troubled childhood, her history of violence, and the series of murders that led to her place on death row. Along the way, they explore key legal questions around wills, inheritance, and the complexities of the death penalty. Was Wuornos’ first killing really self-defense? Should the jury have heard about the victim’s violent past? And how does her case compare to others, like Susan Smith?
Lauren and Lacey also discuss the rarity of women on death row, how different states handle capital punishment, and why context matters when weighing “heinousness” against public safety.
If you’re fascinated by the intersection of law and true crime, this episode will keep you thinking long after it ends.
Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more episodes every Friday!
#TrueCrime #AileenWuornos #DeathPenalty #LawPodcast #LegalAnalysis #TheLawmasPodcast
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 44: Infamous Women in Crime: The Story of Aileen Wuornos]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>44</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey continue their <em>Infamous Women</em> series with one of the most notorious names in true crime: Aileen Wuornos.</p>
<p>They discuss Wuornos’ troubled childhood, her history of violence, and the series of murders that led to her place on death row. Along the way, they explore key legal questions around wills, inheritance, and the complexities of the death penalty. Was Wuornos’ first killing really self-defense? Should the jury have heard about the victim’s violent past? And how does her case compare to others, like Susan Smith?</p>
<p>Lauren and Lacey also discuss the rarity of women on death row, how different states handle capital punishment, and why context matters when weighing “heinousness” against public safety.</p>
<p>If you’re fascinated by the intersection of law and true crime, this episode will keep you thinking long after it ends.</p>
<p>Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more episodes every Friday!</p>
<p>#TrueCrime #AileenWuornos #DeathPenalty #LawPodcast #LegalAnalysis #TheLawmasPodcast</p>
<hr />]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2114236/c1e-jzq95t58962t51xwn-1p5zxxdkck07-awdqxf.mp3" length="59322902"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey continue their Infamous Women series with one of the most notorious names in true crime: Aileen Wuornos.
They discuss Wuornos’ troubled childhood, her history of violence, and the series of murders that led to her place on death row. Along the way, they explore key legal questions around wills, inheritance, and the complexities of the death penalty. Was Wuornos’ first killing really self-defense? Should the jury have heard about the victim’s violent past? And how does her case compare to others, like Susan Smith?
Lauren and Lacey also discuss the rarity of women on death row, how different states handle capital punishment, and why context matters when weighing “heinousness” against public safety.
If you’re fascinated by the intersection of law and true crime, this episode will keep you thinking long after it ends.
Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more episodes every Friday!
#TrueCrime #AileenWuornos #DeathPenalty #LawPodcast #LegalAnalysis #TheLawmasPodcast
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2114236/c1a-5w3p7-rk31ood2t5n-jfnugl.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:30:35</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 43: Mary Kay Letourneau: Crime, Consequences, and Controversy]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 02:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2110445</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-43-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this week’s episode, Lauren and Lacey continue their “Infamous Women” series with a case that shocked the 90s, the story of Mary Kay Letourneau. They revisit the headlines, the court case, and the deeply troubling facts of a 30-something teacher who began a sexual relationship with her 12-year-old student, ultimately having two children with him.</p>
<p>Lauren and Lacey break down the legal implications, sentencing, and how the justice system treated her compared to how it might have treated a man in the same position. They also dig into how cultural attitudes, then and now, shape public perception of these cases, and why the age and power dynamics make consent impossible.</p>
<p>From the courtroom to the lasting impact on the victim’s life, this conversation examines not only the legal side, but also the human cost. The hosts also weigh in on other recent teacher-related headlines, privacy issues, and double standards in punishment.</p>
<p>It’s a candid, eye-opening discussion on justice, gender, and the law, and why some cases still make us question how far we’ve really come.</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this week’s episode, Lauren and Lacey continue their “Infamous Women” series with a case that shocked the 90s, the story of Mary Kay Letourneau. They revisit the headlines, the court case, and the deeply troubling facts of a 30-something teacher who began a sexual relationship with her 12-year-old student, ultimately having two children with him.
Lauren and Lacey break down the legal implications, sentencing, and how the justice system treated her compared to how it might have treated a man in the same position. They also dig into how cultural attitudes, then and now, shape public perception of these cases, and why the age and power dynamics make consent impossible.
From the courtroom to the lasting impact on the victim’s life, this conversation examines not only the legal side, but also the human cost. The hosts also weigh in on other recent teacher-related headlines, privacy issues, and double standards in punishment.
It’s a candid, eye-opening discussion on justice, gender, and the law, and why some cases still make us question how far we’ve really come.]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 43: Mary Kay Letourneau: Crime, Consequences, and Controversy]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>43</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this week’s episode, Lauren and Lacey continue their “Infamous Women” series with a case that shocked the 90s, the story of Mary Kay Letourneau. They revisit the headlines, the court case, and the deeply troubling facts of a 30-something teacher who began a sexual relationship with her 12-year-old student, ultimately having two children with him.</p>
<p>Lauren and Lacey break down the legal implications, sentencing, and how the justice system treated her compared to how it might have treated a man in the same position. They also dig into how cultural attitudes, then and now, shape public perception of these cases, and why the age and power dynamics make consent impossible.</p>
<p>From the courtroom to the lasting impact on the victim’s life, this conversation examines not only the legal side, but also the human cost. The hosts also weigh in on other recent teacher-related headlines, privacy issues, and double standards in punishment.</p>
<p>It’s a candid, eye-opening discussion on justice, gender, and the law, and why some cases still make us question how far we’ve really come.</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2110445/c1e-oqpgof2n16vcdxx6n-0vpvworwion-7zcopr.mp3" length="45274875"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this week’s episode, Lauren and Lacey continue their “Infamous Women” series with a case that shocked the 90s, the story of Mary Kay Letourneau. They revisit the headlines, the court case, and the deeply troubling facts of a 30-something teacher who began a sexual relationship with her 12-year-old student, ultimately having two children with him.
Lauren and Lacey break down the legal implications, sentencing, and how the justice system treated her compared to how it might have treated a man in the same position. They also dig into how cultural attitudes, then and now, shape public perception of these cases, and why the age and power dynamics make consent impossible.
From the courtroom to the lasting impact on the victim’s life, this conversation examines not only the legal side, but also the human cost. The hosts also weigh in on other recent teacher-related headlines, privacy issues, and double standards in punishment.
It’s a candid, eye-opening discussion on justice, gender, and the law, and why some cases still make us question how far we’ve really come.]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2110445/c1a-5w3p7-dm2mr0kpukdg-pvylt4.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:23:15</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 42: Fraud, Fame & Ankle Monitors: The Anna Delvey Episode]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 17:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2106139</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-42-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Can you really fraud your way onto <em>Dancing with the Stars</em>?</p>
<p>In this week’s episode, Lauren and Lacey discuss Anna Delvey’s white collar crimes, her surprising light sentence, and why she’s still living (and profiting) in the U.S. despite not being a citizen. They also compare <em>The Hunting Wives</em> to real courtroom dynamics, because let’s be honest, we’ve all watched it in secret. </p>
<p>Listen now and tell us: Should someone get rich from committing a crime?</p>
<p>#TheLawmasPodcast #AnnaDelvey #WhiteCollarCrime #TrueCrimeTalk #LegalBreakdown #FraudCases #ImmigrationLaw #LawyerLife #TheHuntingWives</p>
<p> </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Can you really fraud your way onto Dancing with the Stars?
In this week’s episode, Lauren and Lacey discuss Anna Delvey’s white collar crimes, her surprising light sentence, and why she’s still living (and profiting) in the U.S. despite not being a citizen. They also compare The Hunting Wives to real courtroom dynamics, because let’s be honest, we’ve all watched it in secret. 
Listen now and tell us: Should someone get rich from committing a crime?
#TheLawmasPodcast #AnnaDelvey #WhiteCollarCrime #TrueCrimeTalk #LegalBreakdown #FraudCases #ImmigrationLaw #LawyerLife #TheHuntingWives
 ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 42: Fraud, Fame & Ankle Monitors: The Anna Delvey Episode]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>42</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Can you really fraud your way onto <em>Dancing with the Stars</em>?</p>
<p>In this week’s episode, Lauren and Lacey discuss Anna Delvey’s white collar crimes, her surprising light sentence, and why she’s still living (and profiting) in the U.S. despite not being a citizen. They also compare <em>The Hunting Wives</em> to real courtroom dynamics, because let’s be honest, we’ve all watched it in secret. </p>
<p>Listen now and tell us: Should someone get rich from committing a crime?</p>
<p>#TheLawmasPodcast #AnnaDelvey #WhiteCollarCrime #TrueCrimeTalk #LegalBreakdown #FraudCases #ImmigrationLaw #LawyerLife #TheHuntingWives</p>
<p> </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2106139/c1e-pqw13f1mmn2uqxpgm-47x9qr9oag78-jzbef7.mp3" length="46951518"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Can you really fraud your way onto Dancing with the Stars?
In this week’s episode, Lauren and Lacey discuss Anna Delvey’s white collar crimes, her surprising light sentence, and why she’s still living (and profiting) in the U.S. despite not being a citizen. They also compare The Hunting Wives to real courtroom dynamics, because let’s be honest, we’ve all watched it in secret. 
Listen now and tell us: Should someone get rich from committing a crime?
#TheLawmasPodcast #AnnaDelvey #WhiteCollarCrime #TrueCrimeTalk #LegalBreakdown #FraudCases #ImmigrationLaw #LawyerLife #TheHuntingWives
 ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2106139/c1a-5w3p7-47x9qr94bjnn-8joabp.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:24:08</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 41: The Karen Read Roller Coaster]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 04:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2101175</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-41-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>This week, Lauren and Lacey break down the twists and turns of the Karen Read case, from the hung jury to the eventual not-guilty verdict and everything in between. They get into the legal side of things: what a hung jury really means, how third-party guilt works, and whether Read might have a case to get her legal fees or property back.</p>
<p>Before that, they kick things off with a quick mention take on the Amy Bradley Netflix doc and the mystery of her disappearance from a cruise ship. </p>
<p>From questionable police conduct to financial fallout for defendants, this episode offers a sharp but approachable look at the real-life impacts of criminal defense cases.</p>
<p>If you want them to dive deeper into the Amy Bradley case or suggest another infamous woman to feature, send the Lawmas an email at <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a> or DM them on Instagram</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #karenreadpodcast #amybradley #lawmoms #hungjuries #karenreadpodcast </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This week, Lauren and Lacey break down the twists and turns of the Karen Read case, from the hung jury to the eventual not-guilty verdict and everything in between. They get into the legal side of things: what a hung jury really means, how third-party guilt works, and whether Read might have a case to get her legal fees or property back.
Before that, they kick things off with a quick mention take on the Amy Bradley Netflix doc and the mystery of her disappearance from a cruise ship. 
From questionable police conduct to financial fallout for defendants, this episode offers a sharp but approachable look at the real-life impacts of criminal defense cases.
If you want them to dive deeper into the Amy Bradley case or suggest another infamous woman to feature, send the Lawmas an email at thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com or DM them on Instagram
#thelawmaspodcast #karenreadpodcast #amybradley #lawmoms #hungjuries #karenreadpodcast ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 41: The Karen Read Roller Coaster]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>41</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>This week, Lauren and Lacey break down the twists and turns of the Karen Read case, from the hung jury to the eventual not-guilty verdict and everything in between. They get into the legal side of things: what a hung jury really means, how third-party guilt works, and whether Read might have a case to get her legal fees or property back.</p>
<p>Before that, they kick things off with a quick mention take on the Amy Bradley Netflix doc and the mystery of her disappearance from a cruise ship. </p>
<p>From questionable police conduct to financial fallout for defendants, this episode offers a sharp but approachable look at the real-life impacts of criminal defense cases.</p>
<p>If you want them to dive deeper into the Amy Bradley case or suggest another infamous woman to feature, send the Lawmas an email at <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a> or DM them on Instagram</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #karenreadpodcast #amybradley #lawmoms #hungjuries #karenreadpodcast </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2101175/c1e-3wx8pukw949bwq66g-jp3qqjojcv9r-lc3gca.mp3" length="52034047"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This week, Lauren and Lacey break down the twists and turns of the Karen Read case, from the hung jury to the eventual not-guilty verdict and everything in between. They get into the legal side of things: what a hung jury really means, how third-party guilt works, and whether Read might have a case to get her legal fees or property back.
Before that, they kick things off with a quick mention take on the Amy Bradley Netflix doc and the mystery of her disappearance from a cruise ship. 
From questionable police conduct to financial fallout for defendants, this episode offers a sharp but approachable look at the real-life impacts of criminal defense cases.
If you want them to dive deeper into the Amy Bradley case or suggest another infamous woman to feature, send the Lawmas an email at thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com or DM them on Instagram
#thelawmaspodcast #karenreadpodcast #amybradley #lawmoms #hungjuries #karenreadpodcast ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2101175/c1a-5w3p7-okzpp3nmtw53-vdz8aj.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:26:45</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 40: Understanding the Death Penalty]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 18:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2096059</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-40-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-normal break-words">This week, Lauren and Lacey explore why some murder cases result in death penalty charges while others end in plea deals, sparked by the controversial Brian Kohlberger plea agreement and a divisive Indiana case where victim families disagreed with prosecutors' decisions.</p>
<p class="whitespace-normal break-words">The hosts address a key misconception about victim trauma in the legal system. When cases involve child victims, prosecutors often accept plea deals to avoid forcing traumatized children to testify in open court and face cross-examination by defense attorneys. Parents frequently choose plea agreements over subjecting their children to additional trauma, even when it results in sentences that seem inadequate to the public.</p>
<p class="whitespace-normal break-words">The practical realities of death penalty cases explain why prosecutors negotiate plea deals. Capital cases require two separate trials, extensive jury selection, and automatic appeals lasting 20 to 40 years. South Carolina has 32 inmates on death row, with executions rarely occurring. The state faces shortages of death penalty certified attorneys, requiring expensive private counsel. </p>
<p class="whitespace-normal break-words">While the Victims' Bill of Rights requires prosecutors to notify families about proceedings, ultimate charging decisions belong to the state to ensure objective justice rather than emotionally-driven outcomes. They criticize how the Kohlberger case was handled, arguing families deserved earlier notification about removing the death penalty from consideration.</p>
<p class="whitespace-normal break-words">The episode touches on systemic court challenges including judge shortages and the emotional toll on legal professionals handling capital cases. They conclude by discussing attorney Dick Harpootlian's involvement in a recent local murder case, highlighting how lawyers often switch between prosecution and defense roles throughout their careers.</p>
<p class="whitespace-normal break-words">The hosts emphasize that understanding these behind-the-scenes factors is crucial for forming informed opinions about seemingly lenient sentences, as prosecutors must balance evidence strength, victim trauma, resources, and the reality that death sentences often result in the same outcome as life imprisonment.</p>
<p class="whitespace-normal break-words">Contact The Lawmas at <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-normal break-words">#deathpenalty #thelawmaspodcast #legalmoms #lawmoms #BrianKohlberger</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This week, Lauren and Lacey explore why some murder cases result in death penalty charges while others end in plea deals, sparked by the controversial Brian Kohlberger plea agreement and a divisive Indiana case where victim families disagreed with prosecutors' decisions.
The hosts address a key misconception about victim trauma in the legal system. When cases involve child victims, prosecutors often accept plea deals to avoid forcing traumatized children to testify in open court and face cross-examination by defense attorneys. Parents frequently choose plea agreements over subjecting their children to additional trauma, even when it results in sentences that seem inadequate to the public.
The practical realities of death penalty cases explain why prosecutors negotiate plea deals. Capital cases require two separate trials, extensive jury selection, and automatic appeals lasting 20 to 40 years. South Carolina has 32 inmates on death row, with executions rarely occurring. The state faces shortages of death penalty certified attorneys, requiring expensive private counsel. 
While the Victims' Bill of Rights requires prosecutors to notify families about proceedings, ultimate charging decisions belong to the state to ensure objective justice rather than emotionally-driven outcomes. They criticize how the Kohlberger case was handled, arguing families deserved earlier notification about removing the death penalty from consideration.
The episode touches on systemic court challenges including judge shortages and the emotional toll on legal professionals handling capital cases. They conclude by discussing attorney Dick Harpootlian's involvement in a recent local murder case, highlighting how lawyers often switch between prosecution and defense roles throughout their careers.
The hosts emphasize that understanding these behind-the-scenes factors is crucial for forming informed opinions about seemingly lenient sentences, as prosecutors must balance evidence strength, victim trauma, resources, and the reality that death sentences often result in the same outcome as life imprisonment.
Contact The Lawmas at thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
#deathpenalty #thelawmaspodcast #legalmoms #lawmoms #BrianKohlberger]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 40: Understanding the Death Penalty]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>40</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-normal break-words">This week, Lauren and Lacey explore why some murder cases result in death penalty charges while others end in plea deals, sparked by the controversial Brian Kohlberger plea agreement and a divisive Indiana case where victim families disagreed with prosecutors' decisions.</p>
<p class="whitespace-normal break-words">The hosts address a key misconception about victim trauma in the legal system. When cases involve child victims, prosecutors often accept plea deals to avoid forcing traumatized children to testify in open court and face cross-examination by defense attorneys. Parents frequently choose plea agreements over subjecting their children to additional trauma, even when it results in sentences that seem inadequate to the public.</p>
<p class="whitespace-normal break-words">The practical realities of death penalty cases explain why prosecutors negotiate plea deals. Capital cases require two separate trials, extensive jury selection, and automatic appeals lasting 20 to 40 years. South Carolina has 32 inmates on death row, with executions rarely occurring. The state faces shortages of death penalty certified attorneys, requiring expensive private counsel. </p>
<p class="whitespace-normal break-words">While the Victims' Bill of Rights requires prosecutors to notify families about proceedings, ultimate charging decisions belong to the state to ensure objective justice rather than emotionally-driven outcomes. They criticize how the Kohlberger case was handled, arguing families deserved earlier notification about removing the death penalty from consideration.</p>
<p class="whitespace-normal break-words">The episode touches on systemic court challenges including judge shortages and the emotional toll on legal professionals handling capital cases. They conclude by discussing attorney Dick Harpootlian's involvement in a recent local murder case, highlighting how lawyers often switch between prosecution and defense roles throughout their careers.</p>
<p class="whitespace-normal break-words">The hosts emphasize that understanding these behind-the-scenes factors is crucial for forming informed opinions about seemingly lenient sentences, as prosecutors must balance evidence strength, victim trauma, resources, and the reality that death sentences often result in the same outcome as life imprisonment.</p>
<p class="whitespace-normal break-words">Contact The Lawmas at <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-normal break-words">#deathpenalty #thelawmaspodcast #legalmoms #lawmoms #BrianKohlberger</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2096059/c1e-gm5x8hmrjqziwgkxj-6z33rg20uzpd-wrgqkk.mp3" length="58611882"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This week, Lauren and Lacey explore why some murder cases result in death penalty charges while others end in plea deals, sparked by the controversial Brian Kohlberger plea agreement and a divisive Indiana case where victim families disagreed with prosecutors' decisions.
The hosts address a key misconception about victim trauma in the legal system. When cases involve child victims, prosecutors often accept plea deals to avoid forcing traumatized children to testify in open court and face cross-examination by defense attorneys. Parents frequently choose plea agreements over subjecting their children to additional trauma, even when it results in sentences that seem inadequate to the public.
The practical realities of death penalty cases explain why prosecutors negotiate plea deals. Capital cases require two separate trials, extensive jury selection, and automatic appeals lasting 20 to 40 years. South Carolina has 32 inmates on death row, with executions rarely occurring. The state faces shortages of death penalty certified attorneys, requiring expensive private counsel. 
While the Victims' Bill of Rights requires prosecutors to notify families about proceedings, ultimate charging decisions belong to the state to ensure objective justice rather than emotionally-driven outcomes. They criticize how the Kohlberger case was handled, arguing families deserved earlier notification about removing the death penalty from consideration.
The episode touches on systemic court challenges including judge shortages and the emotional toll on legal professionals handling capital cases. They conclude by discussing attorney Dick Harpootlian's involvement in a recent local murder case, highlighting how lawyers often switch between prosecution and defense roles throughout their careers.
The hosts emphasize that understanding these behind-the-scenes factors is crucial for forming informed opinions about seemingly lenient sentences, as prosecutors must balance evidence strength, victim trauma, resources, and the reality that death sentences often result in the same outcome as life imprisonment.
Contact The Lawmas at thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
#deathpenalty #thelawmaspodcast #legalmoms #lawmoms #BrianKohlberger]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2096059/c1a-5w3p7-v6449rg6i5jz-bubd9j.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:30:08</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 39: Murdaugh, Menendez and Diddy]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 14:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2091603</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-39-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey and Lauren return with updates on some of the biggest legal cases they've discussed on the show. First, coming off of the July 4th holiday, they cover fireworks laws, then dig into major developments in the Alex Murdaugh appeal (including possible Brady violations), discuss new evidence that could impact the Menendez brothers’ case, and share a candid take on the P. Diddy verdicts and what the jury likely considered. They also weigh in on whether the Epstein files should be made public, and what that means for public perception vs. legal reality.</p>
<p>Appeals, parole, prosecutorial missteps, and public opinion—it's all here in this roundup episode!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #laceyandlauren #legalpodcast #murdaugh #pdiddy #menendezbrothers #lawmoms </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey and Lauren return with updates on some of the biggest legal cases they've discussed on the show. First, coming off of the July 4th holiday, they cover fireworks laws, then dig into major developments in the Alex Murdaugh appeal (including possible Brady violations), discuss new evidence that could impact the Menendez brothers’ case, and share a candid take on the P. Diddy verdicts and what the jury likely considered. They also weigh in on whether the Epstein files should be made public, and what that means for public perception vs. legal reality.
Appeals, parole, prosecutorial missteps, and public opinion—it's all here in this roundup episode!
 
#thelawmaspodcast #laceyandlauren #legalpodcast #murdaugh #pdiddy #menendezbrothers #lawmoms ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 39: Murdaugh, Menendez and Diddy]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>39</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey and Lauren return with updates on some of the biggest legal cases they've discussed on the show. First, coming off of the July 4th holiday, they cover fireworks laws, then dig into major developments in the Alex Murdaugh appeal (including possible Brady violations), discuss new evidence that could impact the Menendez brothers’ case, and share a candid take on the P. Diddy verdicts and what the jury likely considered. They also weigh in on whether the Epstein files should be made public, and what that means for public perception vs. legal reality.</p>
<p>Appeals, parole, prosecutorial missteps, and public opinion—it's all here in this roundup episode!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #laceyandlauren #legalpodcast #murdaugh #pdiddy #menendezbrothers #lawmoms </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2091603/c1e-nq1mxfdzzd1cqzo65-rk3zwpv8hv6j-w0j3yw.mp3" length="67674715"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey and Lauren return with updates on some of the biggest legal cases they've discussed on the show. First, coming off of the July 4th holiday, they cover fireworks laws, then dig into major developments in the Alex Murdaugh appeal (including possible Brady violations), discuss new evidence that could impact the Menendez brothers’ case, and share a candid take on the P. Diddy verdicts and what the jury likely considered. They also weigh in on whether the Epstein files should be made public, and what that means for public perception vs. legal reality.
Appeals, parole, prosecutorial missteps, and public opinion—it's all here in this roundup episode!
 
#thelawmaspodcast #laceyandlauren #legalpodcast #murdaugh #pdiddy #menendezbrothers #lawmoms ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2091603/c1a-5w3p7-mkjx8wm8b03w-7qoepx.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:34:47</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 38: Verdicts, Stay-at-Home Dads, and the Weight of Judgment]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2025 18:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2082810</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-38-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey dig into the legal side of the P. Diddy trial, breaking down the leaked verdict sheet, the concept of an Allen charge, jury deliberations, and what happens when a juror wants out.</p>
<p>But first, they share a candid conversation about the double standards facing stay-at-home dads and the challenges working moms face when juggling court dates, client obligations, and sick kids. It’s an honest, insightful mix of legal analysis and real-life lawyer-mom perspective.</p>
<p>(Note: This episode was recorded before the verdict.)</p>
<p>Plus, get a sneak peek at the upcoming series on infamous female criminals!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Contact The Lawmas at <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #pdiddycase #podcastpdiddy #stayathomedads #legalpodcast</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey dig into the legal side of the P. Diddy trial, breaking down the leaked verdict sheet, the concept of an Allen charge, jury deliberations, and what happens when a juror wants out.
But first, they share a candid conversation about the double standards facing stay-at-home dads and the challenges working moms face when juggling court dates, client obligations, and sick kids. It’s an honest, insightful mix of legal analysis and real-life lawyer-mom perspective.
(Note: This episode was recorded before the verdict.)
Plus, get a sneak peek at the upcoming series on infamous female criminals!
 
Contact The Lawmas at thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
#thelawmaspodcast #pdiddycase #podcastpdiddy #stayathomedads #legalpodcast]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 38: Verdicts, Stay-at-Home Dads, and the Weight of Judgment]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>38</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey dig into the legal side of the P. Diddy trial, breaking down the leaked verdict sheet, the concept of an Allen charge, jury deliberations, and what happens when a juror wants out.</p>
<p>But first, they share a candid conversation about the double standards facing stay-at-home dads and the challenges working moms face when juggling court dates, client obligations, and sick kids. It’s an honest, insightful mix of legal analysis and real-life lawyer-mom perspective.</p>
<p>(Note: This episode was recorded before the verdict.)</p>
<p>Plus, get a sneak peek at the upcoming series on infamous female criminals!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Contact The Lawmas at <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #pdiddycase #podcastpdiddy #stayathomedads #legalpodcast</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2082810/c1e-3wx8pukk69ouw2q88-jp34p1xwb513-nqd6yx.mp3" length="54542075"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey dig into the legal side of the P. Diddy trial, breaking down the leaked verdict sheet, the concept of an Allen charge, jury deliberations, and what happens when a juror wants out.
But first, they share a candid conversation about the double standards facing stay-at-home dads and the challenges working moms face when juggling court dates, client obligations, and sick kids. It’s an honest, insightful mix of legal analysis and real-life lawyer-mom perspective.
(Note: This episode was recorded before the verdict.)
Plus, get a sneak peek at the upcoming series on infamous female criminals!
 
Contact The Lawmas at thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
#thelawmaspodcast #pdiddycase #podcastpdiddy #stayathomedads #legalpodcast]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2082810/c1a-5w3p7-7z94z18qamzp-fbfmps.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:28:06</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 37: What Happens When the Law Overrides Your Wishes?]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 18:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2080789</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-37-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this Fourth of July episode, Lauren and Lacey take a closer look at what it really means to have personal freedom, especially when legal, medical, and ethical questions collide.</p>
<p>They discuss a recent case in Georgia involving a woman who was declared brain dead but kept on life support to carry her pregnancy to term. They also discuss tough topics like healthcare decisions, abortion laws, and the rights outlined in the Constitution.</p>
<p>From their legal perspectives as an estate planning and a criminal defense attorney, they explore:</p>
<p>How healthcare power of attorney documents work, and why they matter</p>
<p>The challenges doctors face when laws restrict medical judgment</p>
<p>The emotional and financial toll on families caught in these situations</p>
<p>Why black-and-white laws often don’t fit real-life cases</p>
<p>How women can take steps now to document their wishes clearly</p>
<p>Lauren and Lacey share their own views on life, family, faith, and the importance of letting people make the decisions that are right for them. Be safe this holiday weekend, don’t drink and drive, and if you ever need legal help, you know who to call.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><span>#thelawmaspodcast</span> #4thofJuly #lawmoms #personalfreedom #constitution</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this Fourth of July episode, Lauren and Lacey take a closer look at what it really means to have personal freedom, especially when legal, medical, and ethical questions collide.
They discuss a recent case in Georgia involving a woman who was declared brain dead but kept on life support to carry her pregnancy to term. They also discuss tough topics like healthcare decisions, abortion laws, and the rights outlined in the Constitution.
From their legal perspectives as an estate planning and a criminal defense attorney, they explore:
How healthcare power of attorney documents work, and why they matter
The challenges doctors face when laws restrict medical judgment
The emotional and financial toll on families caught in these situations
Why black-and-white laws often don’t fit real-life cases
How women can take steps now to document their wishes clearly
Lauren and Lacey share their own views on life, family, faith, and the importance of letting people make the decisions that are right for them. Be safe this holiday weekend, don’t drink and drive, and if you ever need legal help, you know who to call.
 
#thelawmaspodcast #4thofJuly #lawmoms #personalfreedom #constitution]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 37: What Happens When the Law Overrides Your Wishes?]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>37</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this Fourth of July episode, Lauren and Lacey take a closer look at what it really means to have personal freedom, especially when legal, medical, and ethical questions collide.</p>
<p>They discuss a recent case in Georgia involving a woman who was declared brain dead but kept on life support to carry her pregnancy to term. They also discuss tough topics like healthcare decisions, abortion laws, and the rights outlined in the Constitution.</p>
<p>From their legal perspectives as an estate planning and a criminal defense attorney, they explore:</p>
<p>How healthcare power of attorney documents work, and why they matter</p>
<p>The challenges doctors face when laws restrict medical judgment</p>
<p>The emotional and financial toll on families caught in these situations</p>
<p>Why black-and-white laws often don’t fit real-life cases</p>
<p>How women can take steps now to document their wishes clearly</p>
<p>Lauren and Lacey share their own views on life, family, faith, and the importance of letting people make the decisions that are right for them. Be safe this holiday weekend, don’t drink and drive, and if you ever need legal help, you know who to call.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><span>#thelawmaspodcast</span> #4thofJuly #lawmoms #personalfreedom #constitution</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2080789/c1e-wq7k1f33qx8i8p2nd-mk48qd08imx1-6rwdvd.mp3" length="55147276"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this Fourth of July episode, Lauren and Lacey take a closer look at what it really means to have personal freedom, especially when legal, medical, and ethical questions collide.
They discuss a recent case in Georgia involving a woman who was declared brain dead but kept on life support to carry her pregnancy to term. They also discuss tough topics like healthcare decisions, abortion laws, and the rights outlined in the Constitution.
From their legal perspectives as an estate planning and a criminal defense attorney, they explore:
How healthcare power of attorney documents work, and why they matter
The challenges doctors face when laws restrict medical judgment
The emotional and financial toll on families caught in these situations
Why black-and-white laws often don’t fit real-life cases
How women can take steps now to document their wishes clearly
Lauren and Lacey share their own views on life, family, faith, and the importance of letting people make the decisions that are right for them. Be safe this holiday weekend, don’t drink and drive, and if you ever need legal help, you know who to call.
 
#thelawmaspodcast #4thofJuly #lawmoms #personalfreedom #constitution]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2080789/c1a-5w3p7-xxozm287ik71-oowhle.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:28:24</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 36: Underage Marriage & AI Lawyering: Don’t Try This at Home]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 04:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2076657</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-36-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey close out their reality TV legal series with a breakdown of <em>Mormon Wives, </em>but not before tackling a timely topic: AI in the legal world. From estate planning to criminal defense, they explain why tools like ChatGPT can’t replace a real lawyer and how relying on AI could land you in legal trouble.</p>
<p>They then turn their focus to <em>Mormon Wives</em> and the complicated issues around underage marriage, statutory rape laws, and cultural pressure. They dive into age of consent laws, “Romeo and Juliet” exceptions, and why pushing girls into marriage so young is legally and ethically problematic.</p>
<p>The Lawmas also highlight celebrity double standards, like Kylie Jenner and Elvis, where teen-adult relationships get a pass. Finally, they wrap with a quick legal take on cease-and-desist letters and defamation in reality TV drama.</p>
<p>Message The Lawmas on Instagram or <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>#podcast #thelawmas #momlawyers #mormonwives #realitytvpodcast #chatGPT</p>
<p> </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey close out their reality TV legal series with a breakdown of Mormon Wives, but not before tackling a timely topic: AI in the legal world. From estate planning to criminal defense, they explain why tools like ChatGPT can’t replace a real lawyer and how relying on AI could land you in legal trouble.
They then turn their focus to Mormon Wives and the complicated issues around underage marriage, statutory rape laws, and cultural pressure. They dive into age of consent laws, “Romeo and Juliet” exceptions, and why pushing girls into marriage so young is legally and ethically problematic.
The Lawmas also highlight celebrity double standards, like Kylie Jenner and Elvis, where teen-adult relationships get a pass. Finally, they wrap with a quick legal take on cease-and-desist letters and defamation in reality TV drama.
Message The Lawmas on Instagram or thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
 
#podcast #thelawmas #momlawyers #mormonwives #realitytvpodcast #chatGPT
 ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 36: Underage Marriage & AI Lawyering: Don’t Try This at Home]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>36</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey close out their reality TV legal series with a breakdown of <em>Mormon Wives, </em>but not before tackling a timely topic: AI in the legal world. From estate planning to criminal defense, they explain why tools like ChatGPT can’t replace a real lawyer and how relying on AI could land you in legal trouble.</p>
<p>They then turn their focus to <em>Mormon Wives</em> and the complicated issues around underage marriage, statutory rape laws, and cultural pressure. They dive into age of consent laws, “Romeo and Juliet” exceptions, and why pushing girls into marriage so young is legally and ethically problematic.</p>
<p>The Lawmas also highlight celebrity double standards, like Kylie Jenner and Elvis, where teen-adult relationships get a pass. Finally, they wrap with a quick legal take on cease-and-desist letters and defamation in reality TV drama.</p>
<p>Message The Lawmas on Instagram or <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>#podcast #thelawmas #momlawyers #mormonwives #realitytvpodcast #chatGPT</p>
<p> </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2076657/c1e-0w9gzukkj7qh6kk74-xxod96p9up43-wac1uk.mp3" length="56709468"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey close out their reality TV legal series with a breakdown of Mormon Wives, but not before tackling a timely topic: AI in the legal world. From estate planning to criminal defense, they explain why tools like ChatGPT can’t replace a real lawyer and how relying on AI could land you in legal trouble.
They then turn their focus to Mormon Wives and the complicated issues around underage marriage, statutory rape laws, and cultural pressure. They dive into age of consent laws, “Romeo and Juliet” exceptions, and why pushing girls into marriage so young is legally and ethically problematic.
The Lawmas also highlight celebrity double standards, like Kylie Jenner and Elvis, where teen-adult relationships get a pass. Finally, they wrap with a quick legal take on cease-and-desist letters and defamation in reality TV drama.
Message The Lawmas on Instagram or thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
 
#podcast #thelawmas #momlawyers #mormonwives #realitytvpodcast #chatGPT
 ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2076657/c1a-5w3p7-7z37jo5gtqxz-x9ftct.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:29:10</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 35: Sister Wives & the Law: Who Really Has the Rights?]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 17:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2069426</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-35-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey continue talking through legal issues of reality TV, this time digging into the world of <em>Sister Wives</em>. From the complexities of property ownership and inheritance to health care decisions and estate planning, the hosts unpack what happens when legal systems don’t account for polygamous family structures. Using Coyote Pass as a case study, they explain how lack of legal marriage impacts real estate rights, medical decision-making, child custody, taxes, and more.</p>
<p>While recognizing the personal freedom of spiritual marriages, they emphasize the importance of legal planning, like health care proxies, wills, and contracts, to protect everyone involved. The conversation also touches on public policy concerns and why legalizing plural marriage remains unlikely. Looking ahead, Lauren and Lacey tease an upcoming episode on fertility law and reproductive rights, highlighting how modern family structures continue to challenge outdated legal norms.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#lawmaspodcast #legalpodcast #lawmoms #realityTVpodcast #sisterwivespodcast #laurenandlacey</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey continue talking through legal issues of reality TV, this time digging into the world of Sister Wives. From the complexities of property ownership and inheritance to health care decisions and estate planning, the hosts unpack what happens when legal systems don’t account for polygamous family structures. Using Coyote Pass as a case study, they explain how lack of legal marriage impacts real estate rights, medical decision-making, child custody, taxes, and more.
While recognizing the personal freedom of spiritual marriages, they emphasize the importance of legal planning, like health care proxies, wills, and contracts, to protect everyone involved. The conversation also touches on public policy concerns and why legalizing plural marriage remains unlikely. Looking ahead, Lauren and Lacey tease an upcoming episode on fertility law and reproductive rights, highlighting how modern family structures continue to challenge outdated legal norms.
 
#lawmaspodcast #legalpodcast #lawmoms #realityTVpodcast #sisterwivespodcast #laurenandlacey]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 35: Sister Wives & the Law: Who Really Has the Rights?]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>35</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey continue talking through legal issues of reality TV, this time digging into the world of <em>Sister Wives</em>. From the complexities of property ownership and inheritance to health care decisions and estate planning, the hosts unpack what happens when legal systems don’t account for polygamous family structures. Using Coyote Pass as a case study, they explain how lack of legal marriage impacts real estate rights, medical decision-making, child custody, taxes, and more.</p>
<p>While recognizing the personal freedom of spiritual marriages, they emphasize the importance of legal planning, like health care proxies, wills, and contracts, to protect everyone involved. The conversation also touches on public policy concerns and why legalizing plural marriage remains unlikely. Looking ahead, Lauren and Lacey tease an upcoming episode on fertility law and reproductive rights, highlighting how modern family structures continue to challenge outdated legal norms.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#lawmaspodcast #legalpodcast #lawmoms #realityTVpodcast #sisterwivespodcast #laurenandlacey</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2069426/c1e-0w9gzukj2xws6m2q0-7z36md5rc4zx-bhuvia.mp3" length="40196531"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey continue talking through legal issues of reality TV, this time digging into the world of Sister Wives. From the complexities of property ownership and inheritance to health care decisions and estate planning, the hosts unpack what happens when legal systems don’t account for polygamous family structures. Using Coyote Pass as a case study, they explain how lack of legal marriage impacts real estate rights, medical decision-making, child custody, taxes, and more.
While recognizing the personal freedom of spiritual marriages, they emphasize the importance of legal planning, like health care proxies, wills, and contracts, to protect everyone involved. The conversation also touches on public policy concerns and why legalizing plural marriage remains unlikely. Looking ahead, Lauren and Lacey tease an upcoming episode on fertility law and reproductive rights, highlighting how modern family structures continue to challenge outdated legal norms.
 
#lawmaspodcast #legalpodcast #lawmoms #realityTVpodcast #sisterwivespodcast #laurenandlacey]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2069426/c1a-5w3p7-1pk6o8g2h3rw-uk9gc2.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:20:38</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 34: Sister Wives, Polygamy & the Law]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 03:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2064078</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this listener-voted episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey dig into the wild world of reality TV and the legal complexities behind shows like <em>Sister Wives</em> and <em>The Poly Family</em>. From the history of anti-polygamy laws to modern custody battles and property rights, the Lauren and Lacey unpack how the law views these unconventional family structures and where it gets messy.</p>
<p>They also discuss the darker history of cults like FLDS and the Kingstons, the role of public policy, fraud concerns, and what really happens when reality TV meets real legal risk.</p>
<p> Spoiler: Cody Brown’s biggest issue might not be the sister wives, it might be the paperwork!!</p>
<p>Stay tuned for future episodes exploring estate planning, custody, and more drama from reality TV's most legally chaotic families.</p>
<p>TheLawmasPodcast.com</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #sisterwives #realitytvpodcast #lawpodcast #laurenandlacey #FLDS #Kingstons, polygamy </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this listener-voted episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey dig into the wild world of reality TV and the legal complexities behind shows like Sister Wives and The Poly Family. From the history of anti-polygamy laws to modern custody battles and property rights, the Lauren and Lacey unpack how the law views these unconventional family structures and where it gets messy.
They also discuss the darker history of cults like FLDS and the Kingstons, the role of public policy, fraud concerns, and what really happens when reality TV meets real legal risk.
 Spoiler: Cody Brown’s biggest issue might not be the sister wives, it might be the paperwork!!
Stay tuned for future episodes exploring estate planning, custody, and more drama from reality TV's most legally chaotic families.
TheLawmasPodcast.com
#thelawmaspodcast #sisterwives #realitytvpodcast #lawpodcast #laurenandlacey #FLDS #Kingstons, polygamy ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 34: Sister Wives, Polygamy & the Law]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this listener-voted episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey dig into the wild world of reality TV and the legal complexities behind shows like <em>Sister Wives</em> and <em>The Poly Family</em>. From the history of anti-polygamy laws to modern custody battles and property rights, the Lauren and Lacey unpack how the law views these unconventional family structures and where it gets messy.</p>
<p>They also discuss the darker history of cults like FLDS and the Kingstons, the role of public policy, fraud concerns, and what really happens when reality TV meets real legal risk.</p>
<p> Spoiler: Cody Brown’s biggest issue might not be the sister wives, it might be the paperwork!!</p>
<p>Stay tuned for future episodes exploring estate planning, custody, and more drama from reality TV's most legally chaotic families.</p>
<p>TheLawmasPodcast.com</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #sisterwives #realitytvpodcast #lawpodcast #laurenandlacey #FLDS #Kingstons, polygamy </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2064078/c1e-vqw7gf79527udvvd3-xxonzp7zspdp-l0frx9.mp3" length="51642392"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this listener-voted episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey dig into the wild world of reality TV and the legal complexities behind shows like Sister Wives and The Poly Family. From the history of anti-polygamy laws to modern custody battles and property rights, the Lauren and Lacey unpack how the law views these unconventional family structures and where it gets messy.
They also discuss the darker history of cults like FLDS and the Kingstons, the role of public policy, fraud concerns, and what really happens when reality TV meets real legal risk.
 Spoiler: Cody Brown’s biggest issue might not be the sister wives, it might be the paperwork!!
Stay tuned for future episodes exploring estate planning, custody, and more drama from reality TV's most legally chaotic families.
TheLawmasPodcast.com
#thelawmaspodcast #sisterwives #realitytvpodcast #lawpodcast #laurenandlacey #FLDS #Kingstons, polygamy ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2064078/c1a-5w3p7-ndn2p9rwfv4p-fjz98n.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:26:34</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 33: Millennial Daughters Talk Fatherhood, Family Drama, and Healing]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 04:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2059016</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-33-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, hosts Lauren and Lacey reflect on Father’s Day through the lens of their own personal experiences. Kicking off with a quick legal Q&amp;A about locating a will and navigating probate when one isn't readily available, the conversation soon shifts into an emotional discussion about the complex roles fathers play in their children's lives—especially for millennials.</p>
<p>Lacey opens up about her strained relationship with her father, sharing vulnerable stories about abandonment, longing for connection, and the emotional toll of growing up without the stability and love she craved. She draws a poignant parallel to a recent <em>Teen Mom</em> episode, touching on themes of accountability and the need for children to reclaim their narratives. Lauren offers a contrasting but equally powerful perspective, recounting her own experience with a supportive and present father, as well as the challenges her husband faced growing up with a largely absent, troubled dad and an overbearing grandmother.</p>
<p>Together, they explore how different father figures, and how the presence or absence of them shape us as individuals and parents. The episode closes with love and gratitude for their current partners and a Father’s Day tribute. It’s an honest, emotional, and insightful conversation that will resonate with anyone navigating family complexities during this time of year.</p>
<p>#thelawmas #fathersday #mompreneurs #lawpodcast #applepodcasts #mompodcast #millennialpodcast</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey reflect on Father’s Day through the lens of their own personal experiences. Kicking off with a quick legal Q&A about locating a will and navigating probate when one isn't readily available, the conversation soon shifts into an emotional discussion about the complex roles fathers play in their children's lives—especially for millennials.
Lacey opens up about her strained relationship with her father, sharing vulnerable stories about abandonment, longing for connection, and the emotional toll of growing up without the stability and love she craved. She draws a poignant parallel to a recent Teen Mom episode, touching on themes of accountability and the need for children to reclaim their narratives. Lauren offers a contrasting but equally powerful perspective, recounting her own experience with a supportive and present father, as well as the challenges her husband faced growing up with a largely absent, troubled dad and an overbearing grandmother.
Together, they explore how different father figures, and how the presence or absence of them shape us as individuals and parents. The episode closes with love and gratitude for their current partners and a Father’s Day tribute. It’s an honest, emotional, and insightful conversation that will resonate with anyone navigating family complexities during this time of year.
#thelawmas #fathersday #mompreneurs #lawpodcast #applepodcasts #mompodcast #millennialpodcast]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 33: Millennial Daughters Talk Fatherhood, Family Drama, and Healing]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>33</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, hosts Lauren and Lacey reflect on Father’s Day through the lens of their own personal experiences. Kicking off with a quick legal Q&amp;A about locating a will and navigating probate when one isn't readily available, the conversation soon shifts into an emotional discussion about the complex roles fathers play in their children's lives—especially for millennials.</p>
<p>Lacey opens up about her strained relationship with her father, sharing vulnerable stories about abandonment, longing for connection, and the emotional toll of growing up without the stability and love she craved. She draws a poignant parallel to a recent <em>Teen Mom</em> episode, touching on themes of accountability and the need for children to reclaim their narratives. Lauren offers a contrasting but equally powerful perspective, recounting her own experience with a supportive and present father, as well as the challenges her husband faced growing up with a largely absent, troubled dad and an overbearing grandmother.</p>
<p>Together, they explore how different father figures, and how the presence or absence of them shape us as individuals and parents. The episode closes with love and gratitude for their current partners and a Father’s Day tribute. It’s an honest, emotional, and insightful conversation that will resonate with anyone navigating family complexities during this time of year.</p>
<p>#thelawmas #fathersday #mompreneurs #lawpodcast #applepodcasts #mompodcast #millennialpodcast</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2059016/c1e-6x952ho1r8qbkpd70-mk45j2ojtq5o-qu4d0j.mp3" length="54041161"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey reflect on Father’s Day through the lens of their own personal experiences. Kicking off with a quick legal Q&A about locating a will and navigating probate when one isn't readily available, the conversation soon shifts into an emotional discussion about the complex roles fathers play in their children's lives—especially for millennials.
Lacey opens up about her strained relationship with her father, sharing vulnerable stories about abandonment, longing for connection, and the emotional toll of growing up without the stability and love she craved. She draws a poignant parallel to a recent Teen Mom episode, touching on themes of accountability and the need for children to reclaim their narratives. Lauren offers a contrasting but equally powerful perspective, recounting her own experience with a supportive and present father, as well as the challenges her husband faced growing up with a largely absent, troubled dad and an overbearing grandmother.
Together, they explore how different father figures, and how the presence or absence of them shape us as individuals and parents. The episode closes with love and gratitude for their current partners and a Father’s Day tribute. It’s an honest, emotional, and insightful conversation that will resonate with anyone navigating family complexities during this time of year.
#thelawmas #fathersday #mompreneurs #lawpodcast #applepodcasts #mompodcast #millennialpodcast]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2059016/c1a-5w3p7-7z3g9wmxh70p-xhutli.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:27:48</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 32: Redefining Hustle: The Millennial Lawyer Life]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 02:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2052023</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-32-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey wrap up their millennial series by getting candid about the realities of being business owners, attorneys, and moms navigating hustle culture.</p>
<p>From choosing business structures to managing sick days and setting boundaries with clients, Lauren and Lacey share personal stories that reflect the unique challenges millennials face and how their generation is shifting expectations in the legal profession.</p>
<p>The conversation discusses how they balance family life, prioritizing mental health, and creating workplace cultures rooted in empathy and flexibility. Lacey and Lauren also reflect on how millennial attorneys are rethinking advocacy and client care, particularly when it comes to addiction, rehabilitation, and second chances. This episode is a tribute to working moms, fur baby parents, and every millennial trying to build a fulfilling life with boundaries that matter!</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #mompreneur #lawmoms #millennials #boundaries </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey wrap up their millennial series by getting candid about the realities of being business owners, attorneys, and moms navigating hustle culture.
From choosing business structures to managing sick days and setting boundaries with clients, Lauren and Lacey share personal stories that reflect the unique challenges millennials face and how their generation is shifting expectations in the legal profession.
The conversation discusses how they balance family life, prioritizing mental health, and creating workplace cultures rooted in empathy and flexibility. Lacey and Lauren also reflect on how millennial attorneys are rethinking advocacy and client care, particularly when it comes to addiction, rehabilitation, and second chances. This episode is a tribute to working moms, fur baby parents, and every millennial trying to build a fulfilling life with boundaries that matter!
#thelawmaspodcast #mompreneur #lawmoms #millennials #boundaries ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 32: Redefining Hustle: The Millennial Lawyer Life]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>32</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of <em>The Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey wrap up their millennial series by getting candid about the realities of being business owners, attorneys, and moms navigating hustle culture.</p>
<p>From choosing business structures to managing sick days and setting boundaries with clients, Lauren and Lacey share personal stories that reflect the unique challenges millennials face and how their generation is shifting expectations in the legal profession.</p>
<p>The conversation discusses how they balance family life, prioritizing mental health, and creating workplace cultures rooted in empathy and flexibility. Lacey and Lauren also reflect on how millennial attorneys are rethinking advocacy and client care, particularly when it comes to addiction, rehabilitation, and second chances. This episode is a tribute to working moms, fur baby parents, and every millennial trying to build a fulfilling life with boundaries that matter!</p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #mompreneur #lawmoms #millennials #boundaries </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2052023/c1e-x67d2i9p36jck75ov-mk4p1zg4u8zn-afzuix.mp3" length="57601850"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey wrap up their millennial series by getting candid about the realities of being business owners, attorneys, and moms navigating hustle culture.
From choosing business structures to managing sick days and setting boundaries with clients, Lauren and Lacey share personal stories that reflect the unique challenges millennials face and how their generation is shifting expectations in the legal profession.
The conversation discusses how they balance family life, prioritizing mental health, and creating workplace cultures rooted in empathy and flexibility. Lacey and Lauren also reflect on how millennial attorneys are rethinking advocacy and client care, particularly when it comes to addiction, rehabilitation, and second chances. This episode is a tribute to working moms, fur baby parents, and every millennial trying to build a fulfilling life with boundaries that matter!
#thelawmaspodcast #mompreneur #lawmoms #millennials #boundaries ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2052023/c1a-5w3p7-gp3mkr5zsgj5-dm61bp.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:29:33</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 31: Concerts, Guilt Trips, and Grandma Drama]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 18:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2044089</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-31-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of the <em>Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey get real about the complicated dynamics millennials face with their parents and grandparents. What starts as part two of parenting as millennials quickly turns into a candid conversation about the emotional tug-of-war between generational expectations and modern family realities.</p>
<p>Lauren &amp; Lacey share personal stories about caregiving, proximity to family, and the often-unseen pressures they face as busy professionals, moms, and daughters. They reflect on how geography, family structure, and life stages impact their ability, and willingness, to show up for extended family in the ways older generations might expect. Lacey opens up about being labeled “the favorite,” while Lauren shares how being an only child changes her support system.</p>
<p>They also explore how millennial parents are redefining what “family” means today, including the shift toward prioritizing their immediate household. Get ready for cultural expectations, sibling comparisons, and a little Kardashian commentary.</p>
<p>Get ready for laughs, real talk, and a refreshing reminder that family relationships are never one-size-fits-all.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #laurenandlacey #millennials #parentingasmillenials #lawmoms</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of the Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey get real about the complicated dynamics millennials face with their parents and grandparents. What starts as part two of parenting as millennials quickly turns into a candid conversation about the emotional tug-of-war between generational expectations and modern family realities.
Lauren & Lacey share personal stories about caregiving, proximity to family, and the often-unseen pressures they face as busy professionals, moms, and daughters. They reflect on how geography, family structure, and life stages impact their ability, and willingness, to show up for extended family in the ways older generations might expect. Lacey opens up about being labeled “the favorite,” while Lauren shares how being an only child changes her support system.
They also explore how millennial parents are redefining what “family” means today, including the shift toward prioritizing their immediate household. Get ready for cultural expectations, sibling comparisons, and a little Kardashian commentary.
Get ready for laughs, real talk, and a refreshing reminder that family relationships are never one-size-fits-all.
 
#thelawmaspodcast #laurenandlacey #millennials #parentingasmillenials #lawmoms]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 31: Concerts, Guilt Trips, and Grandma Drama]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>31</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of the <em>Lawmas Podcast</em>, Lauren and Lacey get real about the complicated dynamics millennials face with their parents and grandparents. What starts as part two of parenting as millennials quickly turns into a candid conversation about the emotional tug-of-war between generational expectations and modern family realities.</p>
<p>Lauren &amp; Lacey share personal stories about caregiving, proximity to family, and the often-unseen pressures they face as busy professionals, moms, and daughters. They reflect on how geography, family structure, and life stages impact their ability, and willingness, to show up for extended family in the ways older generations might expect. Lacey opens up about being labeled “the favorite,” while Lauren shares how being an only child changes her support system.</p>
<p>They also explore how millennial parents are redefining what “family” means today, including the shift toward prioritizing their immediate household. Get ready for cultural expectations, sibling comparisons, and a little Kardashian commentary.</p>
<p>Get ready for laughs, real talk, and a refreshing reminder that family relationships are never one-size-fits-all.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#thelawmaspodcast #laurenandlacey #millennials #parentingasmillenials #lawmoms</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2044089/c1e-gm5x8hmwk17hwg1px-0vkqkmgwsg3d-xvluss.mp3" length="50936185"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of the Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey get real about the complicated dynamics millennials face with their parents and grandparents. What starts as part two of parenting as millennials quickly turns into a candid conversation about the emotional tug-of-war between generational expectations and modern family realities.
Lauren & Lacey share personal stories about caregiving, proximity to family, and the often-unseen pressures they face as busy professionals, moms, and daughters. They reflect on how geography, family structure, and life stages impact their ability, and willingness, to show up for extended family in the ways older generations might expect. Lacey opens up about being labeled “the favorite,” while Lauren shares how being an only child changes her support system.
They also explore how millennial parents are redefining what “family” means today, including the shift toward prioritizing their immediate household. Get ready for cultural expectations, sibling comparisons, and a little Kardashian commentary.
Get ready for laughs, real talk, and a refreshing reminder that family relationships are never one-size-fits-all.
 
#thelawmaspodcast #laurenandlacey #millennials #parentingasmillenials #lawmoms]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2044089/c1a-5w3p7-mk4243nvhzk2-yrvgm5.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:26:12</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 30: Tiny Judges & Open Bathroom Doors: Life as Millennial Moms]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 16:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2040610</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-30-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-normal">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lacey and Lauren discuss what it means to be millennial moms compared to previous generations. They share humorous stories about their children's brutal honesty before diving into key differences in parenting approaches.</p>
<p class="whitespace-normal">Lacey and Lauren explain their generation's parenting style with how they were raised, highlighting their focus on emotional validation while still teaching resilience. Lauren discusses how her move away from spanking as discipline, finding it ineffective with her children. They discuss increased safety concerns around sleepovers and neighborhood play, while acknowledging some parenting norms remain consistent across generations.</p>
<p class="whitespace-normal">Other millennial parenting shifts include avoiding gender stereotypes, respecting children's body autonomy, teaching body positivity, and being less judgmental of other parents when children misbehave. The hosts admit they're not perfect parents but strive to combine the positive aspects of their upbringing with evolving approaches to child development.</p>
<p class="whitespace-normal">Next week, they'll discuss being millennial business owners and balancing work with family life.</p>
<p class="whitespace-normal"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-normal">#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #millenialparenting #lawmoms #mompreneurs #laurenandlacey #truecrimepodcast #lawpodcast</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lacey and Lauren discuss what it means to be millennial moms compared to previous generations. They share humorous stories about their children's brutal honesty before diving into key differences in parenting approaches.
Lacey and Lauren explain their generation's parenting style with how they were raised, highlighting their focus on emotional validation while still teaching resilience. Lauren discusses how her move away from spanking as discipline, finding it ineffective with her children. They discuss increased safety concerns around sleepovers and neighborhood play, while acknowledging some parenting norms remain consistent across generations.
Other millennial parenting shifts include avoiding gender stereotypes, respecting children's body autonomy, teaching body positivity, and being less judgmental of other parents when children misbehave. The hosts admit they're not perfect parents but strive to combine the positive aspects of their upbringing with evolving approaches to child development.
Next week, they'll discuss being millennial business owners and balancing work with family life.
 
#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #millenialparenting #lawmoms #mompreneurs #laurenandlacey #truecrimepodcast #lawpodcast]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 30: Tiny Judges & Open Bathroom Doors: Life as Millennial Moms]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>30</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-normal">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lacey and Lauren discuss what it means to be millennial moms compared to previous generations. They share humorous stories about their children's brutal honesty before diving into key differences in parenting approaches.</p>
<p class="whitespace-normal">Lacey and Lauren explain their generation's parenting style with how they were raised, highlighting their focus on emotional validation while still teaching resilience. Lauren discusses how her move away from spanking as discipline, finding it ineffective with her children. They discuss increased safety concerns around sleepovers and neighborhood play, while acknowledging some parenting norms remain consistent across generations.</p>
<p class="whitespace-normal">Other millennial parenting shifts include avoiding gender stereotypes, respecting children's body autonomy, teaching body positivity, and being less judgmental of other parents when children misbehave. The hosts admit they're not perfect parents but strive to combine the positive aspects of their upbringing with evolving approaches to child development.</p>
<p class="whitespace-normal">Next week, they'll discuss being millennial business owners and balancing work with family life.</p>
<p class="whitespace-normal"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-normal">#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #millenialparenting #lawmoms #mompreneurs #laurenandlacey #truecrimepodcast #lawpodcast</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2040610/c1e-mpgndfq3721tg4m38-xxoj6ojvi3q-9pcadg.mp3" length="62705934"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lacey and Lauren discuss what it means to be millennial moms compared to previous generations. They share humorous stories about their children's brutal honesty before diving into key differences in parenting approaches.
Lacey and Lauren explain their generation's parenting style with how they were raised, highlighting their focus on emotional validation while still teaching resilience. Lauren discusses how her move away from spanking as discipline, finding it ineffective with her children. They discuss increased safety concerns around sleepovers and neighborhood play, while acknowledging some parenting norms remain consistent across generations.
Other millennial parenting shifts include avoiding gender stereotypes, respecting children's body autonomy, teaching body positivity, and being less judgmental of other parents when children misbehave. The hosts admit they're not perfect parents but strive to combine the positive aspects of their upbringing with evolving approaches to child development.
Next week, they'll discuss being millennial business owners and balancing work with family life.
 
#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #millenialparenting #lawmoms #mompreneurs #laurenandlacey #truecrimepodcast #lawpodcast]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:32:14</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 29: Raising Our Boomer Parents]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 16:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2027413</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-29-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey and Lauren kick off their millennial series by discussing the unique challenges of having Boomer parents. The hosts begin with Lacey delivering a Kanye West update, detailing his recent lawsuit against his dentist over laughing gas addiction.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The main discussion focuses on the struggles millennials face "raising" their stubborn Boomer parents. Lauren and Lacey share frustrations about their parents' resistance to health advice, from refusing to drink water instead of sweet tea to ignoring doctor's orders after surgery. They note how their generation approaches health more holistically, focusing on nutrition, exercise, and mental wellbeing, while their parents often resist these concepts.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Social media usage creates another generational divide, with Lauren and Lacey talking about their parents' questionable photo selections and inappropriate posts. Lauren and Lacey discuss boomer parents often struggle to understand the difference between venting and asking for solutions, leading to communication breakdowns.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren points out that despite these challenges, millennials maintain closer relationships with their parents than previous generations did, partly because Boomer grandparents are more involved with their grandchildren. This creates both stronger bonds and more opportunities for friction.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The episode wraps up with reflections on how millennials are trying to help their aging parents navigate health and technology while respecting their independence. As Lacey says, "It is hard raising these Boomer parents," before teasing the next installment in their millennial series about raising their own children.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The Lawmas can be reached on their website: TheLawmasPodcast.com</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren and Lacey are attorneys and law firm owners in South Carolina and have been friends since high school. If you have a topic you would like for them to discuss, send us a message! <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#truecrimepodcast #lawmoms #thelawmaspodcast #boomerparents #millenials #raisingparents</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey and Lauren kick off their millennial series by discussing the unique challenges of having Boomer parents. The hosts begin with Lacey delivering a Kanye West update, detailing his recent lawsuit against his dentist over laughing gas addiction.
The main discussion focuses on the struggles millennials face "raising" their stubborn Boomer parents. Lauren and Lacey share frustrations about their parents' resistance to health advice, from refusing to drink water instead of sweet tea to ignoring doctor's orders after surgery. They note how their generation approaches health more holistically, focusing on nutrition, exercise, and mental wellbeing, while their parents often resist these concepts.
Social media usage creates another generational divide, with Lauren and Lacey talking about their parents' questionable photo selections and inappropriate posts. Lauren and Lacey discuss boomer parents often struggle to understand the difference between venting and asking for solutions, leading to communication breakdowns.
Lauren points out that despite these challenges, millennials maintain closer relationships with their parents than previous generations did, partly because Boomer grandparents are more involved with their grandchildren. This creates both stronger bonds and more opportunities for friction.
The episode wraps up with reflections on how millennials are trying to help their aging parents navigate health and technology while respecting their independence. As Lacey says, "It is hard raising these Boomer parents," before teasing the next installment in their millennial series about raising their own children.
The Lawmas can be reached on their website: TheLawmasPodcast.com
Lauren and Lacey are attorneys and law firm owners in South Carolina and have been friends since high school. If you have a topic you would like for them to discuss, send us a message! thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
 
#truecrimepodcast #lawmoms #thelawmaspodcast #boomerparents #millenials #raisingparents]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 29: Raising Our Boomer Parents]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>29</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey and Lauren kick off their millennial series by discussing the unique challenges of having Boomer parents. The hosts begin with Lacey delivering a Kanye West update, detailing his recent lawsuit against his dentist over laughing gas addiction.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The main discussion focuses on the struggles millennials face "raising" their stubborn Boomer parents. Lauren and Lacey share frustrations about their parents' resistance to health advice, from refusing to drink water instead of sweet tea to ignoring doctor's orders after surgery. They note how their generation approaches health more holistically, focusing on nutrition, exercise, and mental wellbeing, while their parents often resist these concepts.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Social media usage creates another generational divide, with Lauren and Lacey talking about their parents' questionable photo selections and inappropriate posts. Lauren and Lacey discuss boomer parents often struggle to understand the difference between venting and asking for solutions, leading to communication breakdowns.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren points out that despite these challenges, millennials maintain closer relationships with their parents than previous generations did, partly because Boomer grandparents are more involved with their grandchildren. This creates both stronger bonds and more opportunities for friction.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The episode wraps up with reflections on how millennials are trying to help their aging parents navigate health and technology while respecting their independence. As Lacey says, "It is hard raising these Boomer parents," before teasing the next installment in their millennial series about raising their own children.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The Lawmas can be reached on their website: TheLawmasPodcast.com</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren and Lacey are attorneys and law firm owners in South Carolina and have been friends since high school. If you have a topic you would like for them to discuss, send us a message! <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#truecrimepodcast #lawmoms #thelawmaspodcast #boomerparents #millenials #raisingparents</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2027413/c1e-830kxhok260srw2jm-0vk4z7q3u65q-3mdo9r.mp3" length="61316740"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey and Lauren kick off their millennial series by discussing the unique challenges of having Boomer parents. The hosts begin with Lacey delivering a Kanye West update, detailing his recent lawsuit against his dentist over laughing gas addiction.
The main discussion focuses on the struggles millennials face "raising" their stubborn Boomer parents. Lauren and Lacey share frustrations about their parents' resistance to health advice, from refusing to drink water instead of sweet tea to ignoring doctor's orders after surgery. They note how their generation approaches health more holistically, focusing on nutrition, exercise, and mental wellbeing, while their parents often resist these concepts.
Social media usage creates another generational divide, with Lauren and Lacey talking about their parents' questionable photo selections and inappropriate posts. Lauren and Lacey discuss boomer parents often struggle to understand the difference between venting and asking for solutions, leading to communication breakdowns.
Lauren points out that despite these challenges, millennials maintain closer relationships with their parents than previous generations did, partly because Boomer grandparents are more involved with their grandchildren. This creates both stronger bonds and more opportunities for friction.
The episode wraps up with reflections on how millennials are trying to help their aging parents navigate health and technology while respecting their independence. As Lacey says, "It is hard raising these Boomer parents," before teasing the next installment in their millennial series about raising their own children.
The Lawmas can be reached on their website: TheLawmasPodcast.com
Lauren and Lacey are attorneys and law firm owners in South Carolina and have been friends since high school. If you have a topic you would like for them to discuss, send us a message! thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
 
#truecrimepodcast #lawmoms #thelawmaspodcast #boomerparents #millenials #raisingparents]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2027413/c1a-5w3p7-25nogrj7u9x4-by8d3k.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:31:30</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 28: Tunnel Vision: How an Innocent Man Served 11 Years]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 05:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2023547</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-28-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lacey and Lauren explore a powerful story of potential wrongful conviction. Lacey shares the case of Thomas James, her former client whom she believes was wrongfully convicted of murder. Despite cell phone records showing Thomas was never at the crime scene, eyewitness descriptions that didn't match him, and minimal evidence beyond the testimony of a getaway driver named Kier Johnson, Thomas received a 32-year sentence while Kier got probation. Lacey discovered after the trial that Kier had previously falsely accused someone in another murder case—information that wasn't disclosed to the defense. Despite these revelations and efforts to secure post-conviction relief, Thomas remains incarcerated after 11 years.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren offers insights about jury deliberation pressures and the challenges of overturning convictions. The hosts conclude their series on wrongful convictions with a plea for listeners to share Thomas's story, hoping to bring attention to his case. Next week, The Lawmas Podcast will begin a new series focusing on millennial experiences!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Questions for The Lawmas? Email us! <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#thelawmaspodcast #tunnelvision #wrongfullyconvicted #thomasjames #lawmoms </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lacey and Lauren explore a powerful story of potential wrongful conviction. Lacey shares the case of Thomas James, her former client whom she believes was wrongfully convicted of murder. Despite cell phone records showing Thomas was never at the crime scene, eyewitness descriptions that didn't match him, and minimal evidence beyond the testimony of a getaway driver named Kier Johnson, Thomas received a 32-year sentence while Kier got probation. Lacey discovered after the trial that Kier had previously falsely accused someone in another murder case—information that wasn't disclosed to the defense. Despite these revelations and efforts to secure post-conviction relief, Thomas remains incarcerated after 11 years.
Lauren offers insights about jury deliberation pressures and the challenges of overturning convictions. The hosts conclude their series on wrongful convictions with a plea for listeners to share Thomas's story, hoping to bring attention to his case. Next week, The Lawmas Podcast will begin a new series focusing on millennial experiences!
Questions for The Lawmas? Email us! thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
#thelawmaspodcast #tunnelvision #wrongfullyconvicted #thomasjames #lawmoms ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 28: Tunnel Vision: How an Innocent Man Served 11 Years]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>28</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lacey and Lauren explore a powerful story of potential wrongful conviction. Lacey shares the case of Thomas James, her former client whom she believes was wrongfully convicted of murder. Despite cell phone records showing Thomas was never at the crime scene, eyewitness descriptions that didn't match him, and minimal evidence beyond the testimony of a getaway driver named Kier Johnson, Thomas received a 32-year sentence while Kier got probation. Lacey discovered after the trial that Kier had previously falsely accused someone in another murder case—information that wasn't disclosed to the defense. Despite these revelations and efforts to secure post-conviction relief, Thomas remains incarcerated after 11 years.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren offers insights about jury deliberation pressures and the challenges of overturning convictions. The hosts conclude their series on wrongful convictions with a plea for listeners to share Thomas's story, hoping to bring attention to his case. Next week, The Lawmas Podcast will begin a new series focusing on millennial experiences!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Questions for The Lawmas? Email us! <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#thelawmaspodcast #tunnelvision #wrongfullyconvicted #thomasjames #lawmoms </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2023547/c1e-wq7k1f3dkdxt8g3x9-8dr8w9g4axov-dje2of.mp3" length="61760193"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lacey and Lauren explore a powerful story of potential wrongful conviction. Lacey shares the case of Thomas James, her former client whom she believes was wrongfully convicted of murder. Despite cell phone records showing Thomas was never at the crime scene, eyewitness descriptions that didn't match him, and minimal evidence beyond the testimony of a getaway driver named Kier Johnson, Thomas received a 32-year sentence while Kier got probation. Lacey discovered after the trial that Kier had previously falsely accused someone in another murder case—information that wasn't disclosed to the defense. Despite these revelations and efforts to secure post-conviction relief, Thomas remains incarcerated after 11 years.
Lauren offers insights about jury deliberation pressures and the challenges of overturning convictions. The hosts conclude their series on wrongful convictions with a plea for listeners to share Thomas's story, hoping to bring attention to his case. Next week, The Lawmas Podcast will begin a new series focusing on millennial experiences!
Questions for The Lawmas? Email us! thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
#thelawmaspodcast #tunnelvision #wrongfullyconvicted #thomasjames #lawmoms ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2023547/c1a-5w3p7-mk49j8jnhpvk-vvyqar.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:31:42</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 27: Legal Pop Culture Roundup: Conflicts of Interest, Celebrity Cases, and Autism Awareness]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 03:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2019127</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-27-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In the latest episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey began with a discussion about handling conflicts of interest in legal representation. They explored the ethical requirements and their personal approaches, noting the differences between criminal and civil law contexts.</p>
<p>Lauren and Lacey then provided several legal updates on high-profile cases. They discussed the Menendez brothers' recent approval for a re-sentencing hearing after serving more than 30 years in prison, with Lacey mentioning how Kim Kardashian had wished for their release on her birthday episode. Lauren explained the "Slayer statute," which prevents the brothers from inheriting their parents' wealth.</p>
<p>The conversation shifted to Kanye West's ongoing controversies, including recent personal revelations and disputes with Kim Kardashian over their children. Both hosts expressed concern about how these public statements might affect the children involved, with Lauren suggesting that supervised visitation might be appropriate given the circumstances.</p>
<p>The hosts also touched on Kim Kardashian's efforts to recover her family Bible from OJ Simpson's estate through probate proceedings, which prompted a brief personal anecdote from Lacey about her nieces' interest in family Bibles.</p>
<p>For Autism Awareness Month, the hosts discussed a recent criminal case where a judge rejected a prosecution's attempt to use autism as an explanation for violent behavior. This led to a deeper conversation about neurodiversity, misconceptions about autism, and Lacey's personal experience raising a child with Down syndrome.</p>
<p>Both hosts emphasized the importance of education, acceptance, and recognizing the value of all individuals regardless of neurological differences.<br />The episode concluded with the hosts inviting listeners to submit topic requests for future episodes via direct message or email, promising new series based on listener feedback.</p>
<p>#podcast #popculturecrime #thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #kardashians #kanye #autismawareness</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In the latest episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey began with a discussion about handling conflicts of interest in legal representation. They explored the ethical requirements and their personal approaches, noting the differences between criminal and civil law contexts.
Lauren and Lacey then provided several legal updates on high-profile cases. They discussed the Menendez brothers' recent approval for a re-sentencing hearing after serving more than 30 years in prison, with Lacey mentioning how Kim Kardashian had wished for their release on her birthday episode. Lauren explained the "Slayer statute," which prevents the brothers from inheriting their parents' wealth.
The conversation shifted to Kanye West's ongoing controversies, including recent personal revelations and disputes with Kim Kardashian over their children. Both hosts expressed concern about how these public statements might affect the children involved, with Lauren suggesting that supervised visitation might be appropriate given the circumstances.
The hosts also touched on Kim Kardashian's efforts to recover her family Bible from OJ Simpson's estate through probate proceedings, which prompted a brief personal anecdote from Lacey about her nieces' interest in family Bibles.
For Autism Awareness Month, the hosts discussed a recent criminal case where a judge rejected a prosecution's attempt to use autism as an explanation for violent behavior. This led to a deeper conversation about neurodiversity, misconceptions about autism, and Lacey's personal experience raising a child with Down syndrome.
Both hosts emphasized the importance of education, acceptance, and recognizing the value of all individuals regardless of neurological differences.The episode concluded with the hosts inviting listeners to submit topic requests for future episodes via direct message or email, promising new series based on listener feedback.
#podcast #popculturecrime #thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #kardashians #kanye #autismawareness]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 27: Legal Pop Culture Roundup: Conflicts of Interest, Celebrity Cases, and Autism Awareness]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>27</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In the latest episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey began with a discussion about handling conflicts of interest in legal representation. They explored the ethical requirements and their personal approaches, noting the differences between criminal and civil law contexts.</p>
<p>Lauren and Lacey then provided several legal updates on high-profile cases. They discussed the Menendez brothers' recent approval for a re-sentencing hearing after serving more than 30 years in prison, with Lacey mentioning how Kim Kardashian had wished for their release on her birthday episode. Lauren explained the "Slayer statute," which prevents the brothers from inheriting their parents' wealth.</p>
<p>The conversation shifted to Kanye West's ongoing controversies, including recent personal revelations and disputes with Kim Kardashian over their children. Both hosts expressed concern about how these public statements might affect the children involved, with Lauren suggesting that supervised visitation might be appropriate given the circumstances.</p>
<p>The hosts also touched on Kim Kardashian's efforts to recover her family Bible from OJ Simpson's estate through probate proceedings, which prompted a brief personal anecdote from Lacey about her nieces' interest in family Bibles.</p>
<p>For Autism Awareness Month, the hosts discussed a recent criminal case where a judge rejected a prosecution's attempt to use autism as an explanation for violent behavior. This led to a deeper conversation about neurodiversity, misconceptions about autism, and Lacey's personal experience raising a child with Down syndrome.</p>
<p>Both hosts emphasized the importance of education, acceptance, and recognizing the value of all individuals regardless of neurological differences.<br />The episode concluded with the hosts inviting listeners to submit topic requests for future episodes via direct message or email, promising new series based on listener feedback.</p>
<p>#podcast #popculturecrime #thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #kardashians #kanye #autismawareness</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2019127/c1e-mpgndfq0k14tgqvqj-dmz2kdx6az7m-gdyzzn.mp3" length="60002820"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In the latest episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey began with a discussion about handling conflicts of interest in legal representation. They explored the ethical requirements and their personal approaches, noting the differences between criminal and civil law contexts.
Lauren and Lacey then provided several legal updates on high-profile cases. They discussed the Menendez brothers' recent approval for a re-sentencing hearing after serving more than 30 years in prison, with Lacey mentioning how Kim Kardashian had wished for their release on her birthday episode. Lauren explained the "Slayer statute," which prevents the brothers from inheriting their parents' wealth.
The conversation shifted to Kanye West's ongoing controversies, including recent personal revelations and disputes with Kim Kardashian over their children. Both hosts expressed concern about how these public statements might affect the children involved, with Lauren suggesting that supervised visitation might be appropriate given the circumstances.
The hosts also touched on Kim Kardashian's efforts to recover her family Bible from OJ Simpson's estate through probate proceedings, which prompted a brief personal anecdote from Lacey about her nieces' interest in family Bibles.
For Autism Awareness Month, the hosts discussed a recent criminal case where a judge rejected a prosecution's attempt to use autism as an explanation for violent behavior. This led to a deeper conversation about neurodiversity, misconceptions about autism, and Lacey's personal experience raising a child with Down syndrome.
Both hosts emphasized the importance of education, acceptance, and recognizing the value of all individuals regardless of neurological differences.The episode concluded with the hosts inviting listeners to submit topic requests for future episodes via direct message or email, promising new series based on listener feedback.
#podcast #popculturecrime #thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #kardashians #kanye #autismawareness]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2019127/c1a-5w3p7-7z39qnx2i6v5-4zzvwn.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:30:50</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 26: Guest Aimee J. Zmroczek: The Gary Bennett Exoneration Case]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 00:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2015423</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-26-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, host Lacey welcomes guest attorney Aimee Zmroczek to discuss the exoneration of Gary Bennett, who was wrongfully convicted of murder and spent 18 years in prison before being acquitted in a retrial. Amy was part of the pro bono defense team that helped prove Gary's innocence.</p>
<p>Amy explains how she got involved in Gary Bennett's case through the South Carolina Defense Lawyers Association. She gives the details of the brutal murder of Marie, who worked at Taco Bell with Gary's wife, along with the critical timeline evidence that established Gary's alibi.</p>
<p>Physical evidence at the crime scene was mishandled by investigators. The co-defendant falsely implicated Gary to secure his own deal. Forensic evidence proving the killer was right-handed while Gary is left-handed Aimee discusses the jury's reaction to the co-defendant's testimony and outburst during cross-examination, along with the impact of 18 years of wrongful imprisonment on Gary's life and relationships.</p>
<p>Aimee also talks about Gary's life after exoneration. Lacey and Aimee discuss the importance of jury duty and critical evaluation of testimony from co-defendants or "snitches" who may be motivated to lie for their own benefit.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Aimee Zmroczek is a defense attorney in Columbia, SC, who worked pro bono on Gary Bennett's successful retrial and exoneration.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Questions or comments? Email <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #garybennett #aimeezmroczek #lawmoms #criminaldefensesouthcarolina</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, host Lacey welcomes guest attorney Aimee Zmroczek to discuss the exoneration of Gary Bennett, who was wrongfully convicted of murder and spent 18 years in prison before being acquitted in a retrial. Amy was part of the pro bono defense team that helped prove Gary's innocence.
Amy explains how she got involved in Gary Bennett's case through the South Carolina Defense Lawyers Association. She gives the details of the brutal murder of Marie, who worked at Taco Bell with Gary's wife, along with the critical timeline evidence that established Gary's alibi.
Physical evidence at the crime scene was mishandled by investigators. The co-defendant falsely implicated Gary to secure his own deal. Forensic evidence proving the killer was right-handed while Gary is left-handed Aimee discusses the jury's reaction to the co-defendant's testimony and outburst during cross-examination, along with the impact of 18 years of wrongful imprisonment on Gary's life and relationships.
Aimee also talks about Gary's life after exoneration. Lacey and Aimee discuss the importance of jury duty and critical evaluation of testimony from co-defendants or "snitches" who may be motivated to lie for their own benefit.
Aimee Zmroczek is a defense attorney in Columbia, SC, who worked pro bono on Gary Bennett's successful retrial and exoneration.
Questions or comments? Email thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #garybennett #aimeezmroczek #lawmoms #criminaldefensesouthcarolina]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 26: Guest Aimee J. Zmroczek: The Gary Bennett Exoneration Case]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, host Lacey welcomes guest attorney Aimee Zmroczek to discuss the exoneration of Gary Bennett, who was wrongfully convicted of murder and spent 18 years in prison before being acquitted in a retrial. Amy was part of the pro bono defense team that helped prove Gary's innocence.</p>
<p>Amy explains how she got involved in Gary Bennett's case through the South Carolina Defense Lawyers Association. She gives the details of the brutal murder of Marie, who worked at Taco Bell with Gary's wife, along with the critical timeline evidence that established Gary's alibi.</p>
<p>Physical evidence at the crime scene was mishandled by investigators. The co-defendant falsely implicated Gary to secure his own deal. Forensic evidence proving the killer was right-handed while Gary is left-handed Aimee discusses the jury's reaction to the co-defendant's testimony and outburst during cross-examination, along with the impact of 18 years of wrongful imprisonment on Gary's life and relationships.</p>
<p>Aimee also talks about Gary's life after exoneration. Lacey and Aimee discuss the importance of jury duty and critical evaluation of testimony from co-defendants or "snitches" who may be motivated to lie for their own benefit.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Aimee Zmroczek is a defense attorney in Columbia, SC, who worked pro bono on Gary Bennett's successful retrial and exoneration.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Questions or comments? Email <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #garybennett #aimeezmroczek #lawmoms #criminaldefensesouthcarolina</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2015423/c1e-x67d2i9rzjjukzvgd-z32232gosvdn-svxm2t.mp3" length="82571646"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, host Lacey welcomes guest attorney Aimee Zmroczek to discuss the exoneration of Gary Bennett, who was wrongfully convicted of murder and spent 18 years in prison before being acquitted in a retrial. Amy was part of the pro bono defense team that helped prove Gary's innocence.
Amy explains how she got involved in Gary Bennett's case through the South Carolina Defense Lawyers Association. She gives the details of the brutal murder of Marie, who worked at Taco Bell with Gary's wife, along with the critical timeline evidence that established Gary's alibi.
Physical evidence at the crime scene was mishandled by investigators. The co-defendant falsely implicated Gary to secure his own deal. Forensic evidence proving the killer was right-handed while Gary is left-handed Aimee discusses the jury's reaction to the co-defendant's testimony and outburst during cross-examination, along with the impact of 18 years of wrongful imprisonment on Gary's life and relationships.
Aimee also talks about Gary's life after exoneration. Lacey and Aimee discuss the importance of jury duty and critical evaluation of testimony from co-defendants or "snitches" who may be motivated to lie for their own benefit.
Aimee Zmroczek is a defense attorney in Columbia, SC, who worked pro bono on Gary Bennett's successful retrial and exoneration.
Questions or comments? Email thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #garybennett #aimeezmroczek #lawmoms #criminaldefensesouthcarolina]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2015423/c1a-5w3p7-pk44k47rsn57-e3igye.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:42:30</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 25: The Lawmas Book Club: Framed by 'Experts': When Science Gets It Wrong]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 15:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2011047</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-25-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey continue their book club discussion about wrongful convictions in the book Framed by John Grisham.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">But first, Lauren recommends "Love on the Spectrum," highlighting it as a respectful reality show following individuals with autism seeking relationships (with special mention of contestant Tanner from South Carolina)</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren and Lacey discuss two tragic cases from their book club selection:</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lacey covers Todd Willingham's case - wrongfully executed for allegedly setting a fire that killed his children, later exonerated posthumously due to flawed arson evidence.</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lauren discusses a case involving Dr. Hayne (medical examiner) and Dr. West (dentist) whose questionable "expert" testimony led to a wrongful conviction based on fabricated bite mark analysis</li>
</ul>
<p>Next week Lauren and Lacey wrap up their book club episodes and discuss a case Lacey worked on involving a client she believes is innocent. They welcome episode requests from listeners, mentioning they've already received requests including one about the Memphis Three!</p>
<p>Follow, subscribe, like, comment and share!</p>
<p>#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #framed #johngrisham #lawmoms #truecrimepodcast</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey continue their book club discussion about wrongful convictions in the book Framed by John Grisham.
But first, Lauren recommends "Love on the Spectrum," highlighting it as a respectful reality show following individuals with autism seeking relationships (with special mention of contestant Tanner from South Carolina)
Lauren and Lacey discuss two tragic cases from their book club selection:

Lacey covers Todd Willingham's case - wrongfully executed for allegedly setting a fire that killed his children, later exonerated posthumously due to flawed arson evidence.
Lauren discusses a case involving Dr. Hayne (medical examiner) and Dr. West (dentist) whose questionable "expert" testimony led to a wrongful conviction based on fabricated bite mark analysis

Next week Lauren and Lacey wrap up their book club episodes and discuss a case Lacey worked on involving a client she believes is innocent. They welcome episode requests from listeners, mentioning they've already received requests including one about the Memphis Three!
Follow, subscribe, like, comment and share!
#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #framed #johngrisham #lawmoms #truecrimepodcast]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 25: The Lawmas Book Club: Framed by 'Experts': When Science Gets It Wrong]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey continue their book club discussion about wrongful convictions in the book Framed by John Grisham.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">But first, Lauren recommends "Love on the Spectrum," highlighting it as a respectful reality show following individuals with autism seeking relationships (with special mention of contestant Tanner from South Carolina)</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren and Lacey discuss two tragic cases from their book club selection:</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lacey covers Todd Willingham's case - wrongfully executed for allegedly setting a fire that killed his children, later exonerated posthumously due to flawed arson evidence.</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lauren discusses a case involving Dr. Hayne (medical examiner) and Dr. West (dentist) whose questionable "expert" testimony led to a wrongful conviction based on fabricated bite mark analysis</li>
</ul>
<p>Next week Lauren and Lacey wrap up their book club episodes and discuss a case Lacey worked on involving a client she believes is innocent. They welcome episode requests from listeners, mentioning they've already received requests including one about the Memphis Three!</p>
<p>Follow, subscribe, like, comment and share!</p>
<p>#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #framed #johngrisham #lawmoms #truecrimepodcast</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2011047/c1e-pqw13f1pnozsqo046-6zownk7xb3jd-65alxp.mp3" length="60259373"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey continue their book club discussion about wrongful convictions in the book Framed by John Grisham.
But first, Lauren recommends "Love on the Spectrum," highlighting it as a respectful reality show following individuals with autism seeking relationships (with special mention of contestant Tanner from South Carolina)
Lauren and Lacey discuss two tragic cases from their book club selection:

Lacey covers Todd Willingham's case - wrongfully executed for allegedly setting a fire that killed his children, later exonerated posthumously due to flawed arson evidence.
Lauren discusses a case involving Dr. Hayne (medical examiner) and Dr. West (dentist) whose questionable "expert" testimony led to a wrongful conviction based on fabricated bite mark analysis

Next week Lauren and Lacey wrap up their book club episodes and discuss a case Lacey worked on involving a client she believes is innocent. They welcome episode requests from listeners, mentioning they've already received requests including one about the Memphis Three!
Follow, subscribe, like, comment and share!
#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #framed #johngrisham #lawmoms #truecrimepodcast]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2011047/c1a-5w3p7-0vk2xr1jhr1x-0yp9hi.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:30:58</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 24: The Lawmas Book Club: Framed by Prejudice: Two Lives Derailed by Justice Gone Wrong]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 14:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2005636</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-24-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey continue their Book Club discussion of "Framed" by John Grisham. The cases discussed this week are Joe Bryan and Carrie Cook. </p>
<p>Lacey opens the episode sharing her week of medical appointments with her 7-year old son, Luke, who has Down syndrome. Lauren talks about the universal struggles of motherhood. </p>
<h3 class="text-lg font-bold text-text-100 mt-1 -mb-1.5">Case 1: Joe Bryan</h3>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Elementary school sweethearts Joe and Mickey Blue were both teachers in a small Texas town</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Mickey was brutally murdered while Joe was at a conference 120 miles away</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Police started unfounded rumors about Joe being gay to create a motive</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Blood spatter "expert" with minimal training provided questionable testimony</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Despite physical evidence proving Joe couldn't have committed the crime (time constraints), he was convicted</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Joe was eventually released due to COVID prison reductions but never exonerated</li>
</ul>
<h3 class="text-lg font-bold text-text-100 mt-1 -mb-1.5">Case 2: Carrie Cook</h3>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Linda Jo Edwards was brutally murdered in her apartment</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Her roommate identified Jim Mayfield (Linda's former lover) at the scene</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Despite DNA evidence implicating Mayfield, police focused on Cook based on a fingerprint and unreliable jailhouse informant testimony</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Cook was tried three times, receiving death penalty twice</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Eventually took a plea deal for time served and was later exonerated</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lauren and Lacey discuss how homophobia was weaponized in both cases to secure convictions</li>
</ul>
<h3 class="text-xl font-bold text-text-100 mt-1 -mb-0.5">Here's our question for the listeners:</h3>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Would you have accepted a plea deal guaranteeing freedom (like Cook did) or risked a fourth trial?</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p>Send any questions or requests to <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p>Subscribe, follow, like, and share out podcast!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#framed #wrongfulconvictions #johngrisham #thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #mompreneurs </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey continue their Book Club discussion of "Framed" by John Grisham. The cases discussed this week are Joe Bryan and Carrie Cook. 
Lacey opens the episode sharing her week of medical appointments with her 7-year old son, Luke, who has Down syndrome. Lauren talks about the universal struggles of motherhood. 
Case 1: Joe Bryan

Elementary school sweethearts Joe and Mickey Blue were both teachers in a small Texas town
Mickey was brutally murdered while Joe was at a conference 120 miles away
Police started unfounded rumors about Joe being gay to create a motive
Blood spatter "expert" with minimal training provided questionable testimony
Despite physical evidence proving Joe couldn't have committed the crime (time constraints), he was convicted
Joe was eventually released due to COVID prison reductions but never exonerated

Case 2: Carrie Cook

Linda Jo Edwards was brutally murdered in her apartment
Her roommate identified Jim Mayfield (Linda's former lover) at the scene
Despite DNA evidence implicating Mayfield, police focused on Cook based on a fingerprint and unreliable jailhouse informant testimony
Cook was tried three times, receiving death penalty twice
Eventually took a plea deal for time served and was later exonerated
Lauren and Lacey discuss how homophobia was weaponized in both cases to secure convictions

Here's our question for the listeners:

Would you have accepted a plea deal guaranteeing freedom (like Cook did) or risked a fourth trial?

 
Send any questions or requests to thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
Subscribe, follow, like, and share out podcast!
 
#framed #wrongfulconvictions #johngrisham #thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #mompreneurs ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 24: The Lawmas Book Club: Framed by Prejudice: Two Lives Derailed by Justice Gone Wrong]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey continue their Book Club discussion of "Framed" by John Grisham. The cases discussed this week are Joe Bryan and Carrie Cook. </p>
<p>Lacey opens the episode sharing her week of medical appointments with her 7-year old son, Luke, who has Down syndrome. Lauren talks about the universal struggles of motherhood. </p>
<h3 class="text-lg font-bold text-text-100 mt-1 -mb-1.5">Case 1: Joe Bryan</h3>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Elementary school sweethearts Joe and Mickey Blue were both teachers in a small Texas town</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Mickey was brutally murdered while Joe was at a conference 120 miles away</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Police started unfounded rumors about Joe being gay to create a motive</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Blood spatter "expert" with minimal training provided questionable testimony</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Despite physical evidence proving Joe couldn't have committed the crime (time constraints), he was convicted</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Joe was eventually released due to COVID prison reductions but never exonerated</li>
</ul>
<h3 class="text-lg font-bold text-text-100 mt-1 -mb-1.5">Case 2: Carrie Cook</h3>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Linda Jo Edwards was brutally murdered in her apartment</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Her roommate identified Jim Mayfield (Linda's former lover) at the scene</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Despite DNA evidence implicating Mayfield, police focused on Cook based on a fingerprint and unreliable jailhouse informant testimony</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Cook was tried three times, receiving death penalty twice</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Eventually took a plea deal for time served and was later exonerated</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lauren and Lacey discuss how homophobia was weaponized in both cases to secure convictions</li>
</ul>
<h3 class="text-xl font-bold text-text-100 mt-1 -mb-0.5">Here's our question for the listeners:</h3>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Would you have accepted a plea deal guaranteeing freedom (like Cook did) or risked a fourth trial?</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p>Send any questions or requests to <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p>Subscribe, follow, like, and share out podcast!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#framed #wrongfulconvictions #johngrisham #thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #mompreneurs </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2005636/c1e-99wdoid3w9oawvdrg-qdwjd4mwtw9v-huh4do.mp3" length="66727034"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey continue their Book Club discussion of "Framed" by John Grisham. The cases discussed this week are Joe Bryan and Carrie Cook. 
Lacey opens the episode sharing her week of medical appointments with her 7-year old son, Luke, who has Down syndrome. Lauren talks about the universal struggles of motherhood. 
Case 1: Joe Bryan

Elementary school sweethearts Joe and Mickey Blue were both teachers in a small Texas town
Mickey was brutally murdered while Joe was at a conference 120 miles away
Police started unfounded rumors about Joe being gay to create a motive
Blood spatter "expert" with minimal training provided questionable testimony
Despite physical evidence proving Joe couldn't have committed the crime (time constraints), he was convicted
Joe was eventually released due to COVID prison reductions but never exonerated

Case 2: Carrie Cook

Linda Jo Edwards was brutally murdered in her apartment
Her roommate identified Jim Mayfield (Linda's former lover) at the scene
Despite DNA evidence implicating Mayfield, police focused on Cook based on a fingerprint and unreliable jailhouse informant testimony
Cook was tried three times, receiving death penalty twice
Eventually took a plea deal for time served and was later exonerated
Lauren and Lacey discuss how homophobia was weaponized in both cases to secure convictions

Here's our question for the listeners:

Would you have accepted a plea deal guaranteeing freedom (like Cook did) or risked a fourth trial?

 
Send any questions or requests to thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
Subscribe, follow, like, and share out podcast!
 
#framed #wrongfulconvictions #johngrisham #thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #mompreneurs ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2005636/c1a-5w3p7-7z2qzk39a4dz-mkz00s.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:34:16</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 23: The Lawmas Book Club: Framed: Inside the Shocking Norfolk Four & Ellen Reasonover Cases]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 01:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/2001656</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-23-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this first book club episode, hosts Lauren and Lacey discuss two cases from John Grisham's book "Framed." The book examines wrongful convictions, jailhouse informants and the failures of the justice system.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren covers the Norfolk Four case, where multiple military men were wrongfully convicted of a rape and murder despite DNA evidence only matching one person. The police continuously added suspects to their theory when DNA didn't match, eventually claiming seven men were involved in what they called a "gang rape" despite physical evidence only pointing to one perpetrator. The real perpetrator, Omar Ballard, even confessed, but authorities maintained their flawed theory. Four innocent men spent 10-15 years in prison before receiving conditional pardons from Governor Tim Kane.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lacy discusses the Ellen Reasonover case, where a single mother was wrongfully convicted of murdering a store clerk based solely on testimony from jailhouse informants with long criminal histories who received deals for their testimony. Ellen had initially come forward as a witness after seeing suspicious individuals near the store. The prosecution withheld exculpatory evidence—recordings of Ellen maintaining her innocence—violating Brady disclosure requirements. Ellen was eventually exonerated but missed her daughter's entire childhood, from age 2 to 18.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Both cases highlight serious issues in the criminal justice system: tunnel vision by investigators, Brady violations, the unreliability of jailhouse informants, coercive interrogation tactics, and potential racial bias. This is the first of a multi-part series of the book. Email the Lawmas at <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a> if you have questions or comments! Subscribe, follow, like, share and review us! </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#podcast #framedJohnGrisham#thelawmas #lawmoms #thelawmaspodcast #wrongfullycommitted</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this first book club episode, hosts Lauren and Lacey discuss two cases from John Grisham's book "Framed." The book examines wrongful convictions, jailhouse informants and the failures of the justice system.
Lauren covers the Norfolk Four case, where multiple military men were wrongfully convicted of a rape and murder despite DNA evidence only matching one person. The police continuously added suspects to their theory when DNA didn't match, eventually claiming seven men were involved in what they called a "gang rape" despite physical evidence only pointing to one perpetrator. The real perpetrator, Omar Ballard, even confessed, but authorities maintained their flawed theory. Four innocent men spent 10-15 years in prison before receiving conditional pardons from Governor Tim Kane.
Lacy discusses the Ellen Reasonover case, where a single mother was wrongfully convicted of murdering a store clerk based solely on testimony from jailhouse informants with long criminal histories who received deals for their testimony. Ellen had initially come forward as a witness after seeing suspicious individuals near the store. The prosecution withheld exculpatory evidence—recordings of Ellen maintaining her innocence—violating Brady disclosure requirements. Ellen was eventually exonerated but missed her daughter's entire childhood, from age 2 to 18.
Both cases highlight serious issues in the criminal justice system: tunnel vision by investigators, Brady violations, the unreliability of jailhouse informants, coercive interrogation tactics, and potential racial bias. This is the first of a multi-part series of the book. Email the Lawmas at thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com if you have questions or comments! Subscribe, follow, like, share and review us! 
#podcast #framedJohnGrisham#thelawmas #lawmoms #thelawmaspodcast #wrongfullycommitted]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 23: The Lawmas Book Club: Framed: Inside the Shocking Norfolk Four & Ellen Reasonover Cases]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this first book club episode, hosts Lauren and Lacey discuss two cases from John Grisham's book "Framed." The book examines wrongful convictions, jailhouse informants and the failures of the justice system.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren covers the Norfolk Four case, where multiple military men were wrongfully convicted of a rape and murder despite DNA evidence only matching one person. The police continuously added suspects to their theory when DNA didn't match, eventually claiming seven men were involved in what they called a "gang rape" despite physical evidence only pointing to one perpetrator. The real perpetrator, Omar Ballard, even confessed, but authorities maintained their flawed theory. Four innocent men spent 10-15 years in prison before receiving conditional pardons from Governor Tim Kane.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lacy discusses the Ellen Reasonover case, where a single mother was wrongfully convicted of murdering a store clerk based solely on testimony from jailhouse informants with long criminal histories who received deals for their testimony. Ellen had initially come forward as a witness after seeing suspicious individuals near the store. The prosecution withheld exculpatory evidence—recordings of Ellen maintaining her innocence—violating Brady disclosure requirements. Ellen was eventually exonerated but missed her daughter's entire childhood, from age 2 to 18.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Both cases highlight serious issues in the criminal justice system: tunnel vision by investigators, Brady violations, the unreliability of jailhouse informants, coercive interrogation tactics, and potential racial bias. This is the first of a multi-part series of the book. Email the Lawmas at <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a> if you have questions or comments! Subscribe, follow, like, share and review us! </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#podcast #framedJohnGrisham#thelawmas #lawmoms #thelawmaspodcast #wrongfullycommitted</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/2001656/c1e-mpgndfqwo0dbgqgdq-okwgrm2qu90m-sochoz.mp3" length="60170504"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this first book club episode, hosts Lauren and Lacey discuss two cases from John Grisham's book "Framed." The book examines wrongful convictions, jailhouse informants and the failures of the justice system.
Lauren covers the Norfolk Four case, where multiple military men were wrongfully convicted of a rape and murder despite DNA evidence only matching one person. The police continuously added suspects to their theory when DNA didn't match, eventually claiming seven men were involved in what they called a "gang rape" despite physical evidence only pointing to one perpetrator. The real perpetrator, Omar Ballard, even confessed, but authorities maintained their flawed theory. Four innocent men spent 10-15 years in prison before receiving conditional pardons from Governor Tim Kane.
Lacy discusses the Ellen Reasonover case, where a single mother was wrongfully convicted of murdering a store clerk based solely on testimony from jailhouse informants with long criminal histories who received deals for their testimony. Ellen had initially come forward as a witness after seeing suspicious individuals near the store. The prosecution withheld exculpatory evidence—recordings of Ellen maintaining her innocence—violating Brady disclosure requirements. Ellen was eventually exonerated but missed her daughter's entire childhood, from age 2 to 18.
Both cases highlight serious issues in the criminal justice system: tunnel vision by investigators, Brady violations, the unreliability of jailhouse informants, coercive interrogation tactics, and potential racial bias. This is the first of a multi-part series of the book. Email the Lawmas at thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com if you have questions or comments! Subscribe, follow, like, share and review us! 
#podcast #framedJohnGrisham#thelawmas #lawmoms #thelawmaspodcast #wrongfullycommitted]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/2001656/c1a-5w3p7-9jndkrmxfo41-l6fdm1.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:30:54</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 22: Miranda Wasn't Even There: Legal Myths & Gene Hackman Million-Dollar Estate Mistake]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 02:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1997101</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-22-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, attorneys Lauren and Lacey discuss what happens before a trial and debunk common legal misconceptions. They begin with a timely discussion about Gene Hackman's estate situation, highlighting how his will reportedly left everything to his wife without contingency clauses, creating complications when she predeceased him by several days. </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren and Lacey talk about common legal misconceptions, particularly focusing on Miranda rights. Lacey explains that, contrary to popular movies like Madea, police aren't legally required to read Miranda rights in most situations, and cases don't automatically get dismissed if they aren't read. Miranda rights only affect whether incriminating statements made in response to police questioning can be used as evidence.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren and Lacey also compare civil and criminal legal procedures, noting significant differences in how cases are handled before trial. While civil cases often involve depositions, mandatory mediation, and comprehensive discovery, criminal cases typically have more limited discovery and no depositions. They discuss how judges in their jurisdiction handle both civil and criminal cases and speculate about potential future specialization.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Don't forget, starting next week, March 28th, is the Lawmas book club series focusing on wrongful convictions. Pick up the book "Framed" and join the discussion!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#podcast #thelawmas #lawmoms #truecrime #madea #mirandaright #framed #johngrisham #genehackman</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, attorneys Lauren and Lacey discuss what happens before a trial and debunk common legal misconceptions. They begin with a timely discussion about Gene Hackman's estate situation, highlighting how his will reportedly left everything to his wife without contingency clauses, creating complications when she predeceased him by several days. 
Lauren and Lacey talk about common legal misconceptions, particularly focusing on Miranda rights. Lacey explains that, contrary to popular movies like Madea, police aren't legally required to read Miranda rights in most situations, and cases don't automatically get dismissed if they aren't read. Miranda rights only affect whether incriminating statements made in response to police questioning can be used as evidence.
Lauren and Lacey also compare civil and criminal legal procedures, noting significant differences in how cases are handled before trial. While civil cases often involve depositions, mandatory mediation, and comprehensive discovery, criminal cases typically have more limited discovery and no depositions. They discuss how judges in their jurisdiction handle both civil and criminal cases and speculate about potential future specialization.
Don't forget, starting next week, March 28th, is the Lawmas book club series focusing on wrongful convictions. Pick up the book "Framed" and join the discussion!
 
#podcast #thelawmas #lawmoms #truecrime #madea #mirandaright #framed #johngrisham #genehackman]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 22: Miranda Wasn't Even There: Legal Myths & Gene Hackman Million-Dollar Estate Mistake]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, attorneys Lauren and Lacey discuss what happens before a trial and debunk common legal misconceptions. They begin with a timely discussion about Gene Hackman's estate situation, highlighting how his will reportedly left everything to his wife without contingency clauses, creating complications when she predeceased him by several days. </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren and Lacey talk about common legal misconceptions, particularly focusing on Miranda rights. Lacey explains that, contrary to popular movies like Madea, police aren't legally required to read Miranda rights in most situations, and cases don't automatically get dismissed if they aren't read. Miranda rights only affect whether incriminating statements made in response to police questioning can be used as evidence.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren and Lacey also compare civil and criminal legal procedures, noting significant differences in how cases are handled before trial. While civil cases often involve depositions, mandatory mediation, and comprehensive discovery, criminal cases typically have more limited discovery and no depositions. They discuss how judges in their jurisdiction handle both civil and criminal cases and speculate about potential future specialization.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Don't forget, starting next week, March 28th, is the Lawmas book club series focusing on wrongful convictions. Pick up the book "Framed" and join the discussion!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#podcast #thelawmas #lawmoms #truecrime #madea #mirandaright #framed #johngrisham #genehackman</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1997101/c1e-0w9gzuk3v81t6m518-ndogo20ncd6p-utf7ws.mp3" length="50171747"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, attorneys Lauren and Lacey discuss what happens before a trial and debunk common legal misconceptions. They begin with a timely discussion about Gene Hackman's estate situation, highlighting how his will reportedly left everything to his wife without contingency clauses, creating complications when she predeceased him by several days. 
Lauren and Lacey talk about common legal misconceptions, particularly focusing on Miranda rights. Lacey explains that, contrary to popular movies like Madea, police aren't legally required to read Miranda rights in most situations, and cases don't automatically get dismissed if they aren't read. Miranda rights only affect whether incriminating statements made in response to police questioning can be used as evidence.
Lauren and Lacey also compare civil and criminal legal procedures, noting significant differences in how cases are handled before trial. While civil cases often involve depositions, mandatory mediation, and comprehensive discovery, criminal cases typically have more limited discovery and no depositions. They discuss how judges in their jurisdiction handle both civil and criminal cases and speculate about potential future specialization.
Don't forget, starting next week, March 28th, is the Lawmas book club series focusing on wrongful convictions. Pick up the book "Framed" and join the discussion!
 
#podcast #thelawmas #lawmoms #truecrime #madea #mirandaright #framed #johngrisham #genehackman]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1997101/c1a-5w3p7-pkgzg7mxc0rx-dpzmpt.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:25:48</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 21: Order in the Fake Court! Legal Myths Debunked]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2025 04:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1992619</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-21-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<div class="font-claude-message relative leading-[1.65rem] [&amp;&gt;div&gt;div&gt;:is(p,ul,ol)]:pr-4 md:[&amp;&gt;div&gt;div&gt;:is(p,ul,ol)]:pr-8 [&amp;_pre&gt;div]:bg-bg-300 [&amp;_.ignore-pre-bg&gt;div]:bg-transparent">
<div>
<div class="grid-cols-1 grid gap-2.5 [&amp;_&gt;_*]:min-w-0">
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey discuss legal misconceptions portrayed in TV shows and movies. They begin with answering a legal questions about addressing the legality of bringing prescription medications across borders. Lacey explains that just because something can be purchased legally in one country (like medications in Mexico) doesn't make it legal to possess in the United States without a proper prescription. They also note that medical marijuana cards from states where it's legal are not valid in states where it remains illegal, like South Carolina.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The hosts then critique legal inaccuracies in popular media. They analyze the movie "Legally Blonde," pointing out that courtroom proceedings are rarely as dramatic as depicted, with no "smoking gun" revelations during trials due to prior discovery processes. They explain that in real criminal cases, both sides have access to evidence beforehand, preventing surprise revelations.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren and Lacey also debunk the antagonistic relationship often portrayed between prosecutors and defense attorneys in shows like "Law and Order: SVU." In reality, legal professionals typically maintain cordial relationships while zealously representing their clients. They criticize how media often portrays defense attorneys negatively, when in fact all parts of the legal system serve important functions.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The podcast concludes with Lacey expressing frustration about South Carolina's grand jury system, which unlike some procedural dramas, doesn't allow defense participation. </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The Lawmas Bookclub starts March28th! Grab a copy of Framed by John Grisham and join them as they discuss the book!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#thelawmaspodcast #legalpodcast #legallyblonde #lawmoms #legalmyths #lawandorderSVU</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="absolute -bottom-0 -right-1.5"> </div>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[


In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey discuss legal misconceptions portrayed in TV shows and movies. They begin with answering a legal questions about addressing the legality of bringing prescription medications across borders. Lacey explains that just because something can be purchased legally in one country (like medications in Mexico) doesn't make it legal to possess in the United States without a proper prescription. They also note that medical marijuana cards from states where it's legal are not valid in states where it remains illegal, like South Carolina.
The hosts then critique legal inaccuracies in popular media. They analyze the movie "Legally Blonde," pointing out that courtroom proceedings are rarely as dramatic as depicted, with no "smoking gun" revelations during trials due to prior discovery processes. They explain that in real criminal cases, both sides have access to evidence beforehand, preventing surprise revelations.
Lauren and Lacey also debunk the antagonistic relationship often portrayed between prosecutors and defense attorneys in shows like "Law and Order: SVU." In reality, legal professionals typically maintain cordial relationships while zealously representing their clients. They criticize how media often portrays defense attorneys negatively, when in fact all parts of the legal system serve important functions.
The podcast concludes with Lacey expressing frustration about South Carolina's grand jury system, which unlike some procedural dramas, doesn't allow defense participation. 
The Lawmas Bookclub starts March28th! Grab a copy of Framed by John Grisham and join them as they discuss the book!
#thelawmaspodcast #legalpodcast #legallyblonde #lawmoms #legalmyths #lawandorderSVU



 ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 21: Order in the Fake Court! Legal Myths Debunked]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<div class="font-claude-message relative leading-[1.65rem] [&amp;&gt;div&gt;div&gt;:is(p,ul,ol)]:pr-4 md:[&amp;&gt;div&gt;div&gt;:is(p,ul,ol)]:pr-8 [&amp;_pre&gt;div]:bg-bg-300 [&amp;_.ignore-pre-bg&gt;div]:bg-transparent">
<div>
<div class="grid-cols-1 grid gap-2.5 [&amp;_&gt;_*]:min-w-0">
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey discuss legal misconceptions portrayed in TV shows and movies. They begin with answering a legal questions about addressing the legality of bringing prescription medications across borders. Lacey explains that just because something can be purchased legally in one country (like medications in Mexico) doesn't make it legal to possess in the United States without a proper prescription. They also note that medical marijuana cards from states where it's legal are not valid in states where it remains illegal, like South Carolina.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The hosts then critique legal inaccuracies in popular media. They analyze the movie "Legally Blonde," pointing out that courtroom proceedings are rarely as dramatic as depicted, with no "smoking gun" revelations during trials due to prior discovery processes. They explain that in real criminal cases, both sides have access to evidence beforehand, preventing surprise revelations.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren and Lacey also debunk the antagonistic relationship often portrayed between prosecutors and defense attorneys in shows like "Law and Order: SVU." In reality, legal professionals typically maintain cordial relationships while zealously representing their clients. They criticize how media often portrays defense attorneys negatively, when in fact all parts of the legal system serve important functions.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The podcast concludes with Lacey expressing frustration about South Carolina's grand jury system, which unlike some procedural dramas, doesn't allow defense participation. </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The Lawmas Bookclub starts March28th! Grab a copy of Framed by John Grisham and join them as they discuss the book!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#thelawmaspodcast #legalpodcast #legallyblonde #lawmoms #legalmyths #lawandorderSVU</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="absolute -bottom-0 -right-1.5"> </div>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1992619/c1e-4wo25u190jzt8xrmj-257v88rghnw9-yqvv27.mp3" length="52943480"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[


In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey discuss legal misconceptions portrayed in TV shows and movies. They begin with answering a legal questions about addressing the legality of bringing prescription medications across borders. Lacey explains that just because something can be purchased legally in one country (like medications in Mexico) doesn't make it legal to possess in the United States without a proper prescription. They also note that medical marijuana cards from states where it's legal are not valid in states where it remains illegal, like South Carolina.
The hosts then critique legal inaccuracies in popular media. They analyze the movie "Legally Blonde," pointing out that courtroom proceedings are rarely as dramatic as depicted, with no "smoking gun" revelations during trials due to prior discovery processes. They explain that in real criminal cases, both sides have access to evidence beforehand, preventing surprise revelations.
Lauren and Lacey also debunk the antagonistic relationship often portrayed between prosecutors and defense attorneys in shows like "Law and Order: SVU." In reality, legal professionals typically maintain cordial relationships while zealously representing their clients. They criticize how media often portrays defense attorneys negatively, when in fact all parts of the legal system serve important functions.
The podcast concludes with Lacey expressing frustration about South Carolina's grand jury system, which unlike some procedural dramas, doesn't allow defense participation. 
The Lawmas Bookclub starts March28th! Grab a copy of Framed by John Grisham and join them as they discuss the book!
#thelawmaspodcast #legalpodcast #legallyblonde #lawmoms #legalmyths #lawandorderSVU



 ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1992619/c1a-5w3p7-0v5z00z2sjxz-kyuhth.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:27:10</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 20: You Can Say That... But Should You? The Lawmas Break Down the First Amendment]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1986256</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-20-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<div class="font-claude-message relative leading-[1.65rem] [&amp;&gt;div&gt;div&gt;:is(p,ul,ol)]:pr-4 md:[&amp;&gt;div&gt;div&gt;:is(p,ul,ol)]:pr-8 [&amp;_pre&gt;div]:bg-bg-300 [&amp;_.ignore-pre-bg&gt;div]:bg-transparent">
<div>
<div class="grid-cols-1 grid gap-2.5 [&amp;_&gt;_*]:min-w-0">
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey discuss the First Amendment and common misconceptions about freedom of speech. They begin by answering a question about what it takes to become a lawyer in South Carolina, explaining the education requirements, bar exam, and continuing legal education obligations.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The hosts then discuss what the First Amendment actually protects. They clarify that the First Amendment primarily prevents the government from arresting people for their speech, with some exceptions. They emphasize that freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences in private settings. Employers can still fire employees for their speech, and people can face social repercussions for what they say.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lacey and Lauren discuss several examples, including reality TV contestants who faced employment consequences for using racial slurs, and explain that while you can't be arrested for most speech, it doesn't protect your reputation or job. They cover exceptions to protected speech, such as inciting violence, child pornography, and yelling "fire" in a crowded theater.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The hosts also share personal experiences with advocating against the use of derogatory terms, particularly the R-word, and how they address this in both professional and personal contexts. They discuss the difference between protected speech and offensive speech, and the importance of educating others about harmful language.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Announcement: Read "Framed" by John Gresham and Jim Grisham for upcoming book club episodes starting in a few weeks!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The Lawmas can be reached: <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#Thelawmaspodcast #lawpodcast #firstamendment #freespeech #lawmoms #framed #johngrisham #bookclubpodcast</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="absolute -bottom-0 -right-1.5"> </div>
<div class="w-px h-4/5 self-center bg-border-300 mr-0.5"> </div>
<div class="ml-1 mt-0.5 flex items-center transition-transform duration-300 ease-out"> </div>
<div class="flex-1 flex flex-col gap-3 px-4 max-w-3xl mx-auto w-full pt-1">
<div style="height:0px;"> </div>
</div>
<div class="sticky bottom-0 mx-auto w-full pt-6 z-[5]"> </div>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[


In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey discuss the First Amendment and common misconceptions about freedom of speech. They begin by answering a question about what it takes to become a lawyer in South Carolina, explaining the education requirements, bar exam, and continuing legal education obligations.
The hosts then discuss what the First Amendment actually protects. They clarify that the First Amendment primarily prevents the government from arresting people for their speech, with some exceptions. They emphasize that freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences in private settings. Employers can still fire employees for their speech, and people can face social repercussions for what they say.
Lacey and Lauren discuss several examples, including reality TV contestants who faced employment consequences for using racial slurs, and explain that while you can't be arrested for most speech, it doesn't protect your reputation or job. They cover exceptions to protected speech, such as inciting violence, child pornography, and yelling "fire" in a crowded theater.
The hosts also share personal experiences with advocating against the use of derogatory terms, particularly the R-word, and how they address this in both professional and personal contexts. They discuss the difference between protected speech and offensive speech, and the importance of educating others about harmful language.
Announcement: Read "Framed" by John Gresham and Jim Grisham for upcoming book club episodes starting in a few weeks!
 
The Lawmas can be reached: thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
 
#Thelawmaspodcast #lawpodcast #firstamendment #freespeech #lawmoms #framed #johngrisham #bookclubpodcast



 
 
 

 

 ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 20: You Can Say That... But Should You? The Lawmas Break Down the First Amendment]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<div class="font-claude-message relative leading-[1.65rem] [&amp;&gt;div&gt;div&gt;:is(p,ul,ol)]:pr-4 md:[&amp;&gt;div&gt;div&gt;:is(p,ul,ol)]:pr-8 [&amp;_pre&gt;div]:bg-bg-300 [&amp;_.ignore-pre-bg&gt;div]:bg-transparent">
<div>
<div class="grid-cols-1 grid gap-2.5 [&amp;_&gt;_*]:min-w-0">
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey discuss the First Amendment and common misconceptions about freedom of speech. They begin by answering a question about what it takes to become a lawyer in South Carolina, explaining the education requirements, bar exam, and continuing legal education obligations.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The hosts then discuss what the First Amendment actually protects. They clarify that the First Amendment primarily prevents the government from arresting people for their speech, with some exceptions. They emphasize that freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences in private settings. Employers can still fire employees for their speech, and people can face social repercussions for what they say.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lacey and Lauren discuss several examples, including reality TV contestants who faced employment consequences for using racial slurs, and explain that while you can't be arrested for most speech, it doesn't protect your reputation or job. They cover exceptions to protected speech, such as inciting violence, child pornography, and yelling "fire" in a crowded theater.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The hosts also share personal experiences with advocating against the use of derogatory terms, particularly the R-word, and how they address this in both professional and personal contexts. They discuss the difference between protected speech and offensive speech, and the importance of educating others about harmful language.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Announcement: Read "Framed" by John Gresham and Jim Grisham for upcoming book club episodes starting in a few weeks!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The Lawmas can be reached: <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#Thelawmaspodcast #lawpodcast #firstamendment #freespeech #lawmoms #framed #johngrisham #bookclubpodcast</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="absolute -bottom-0 -right-1.5"> </div>
<div class="w-px h-4/5 self-center bg-border-300 mr-0.5"> </div>
<div class="ml-1 mt-0.5 flex items-center transition-transform duration-300 ease-out"> </div>
<div class="flex-1 flex flex-col gap-3 px-4 max-w-3xl mx-auto w-full pt-1">
<div style="height:0px;"> </div>
</div>
<div class="sticky bottom-0 mx-auto w-full pt-6 z-[5]"> </div>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1986256/c1e-oqpgofv64n4idn8o9-34njz524cn01-dyiatd.mp3" length="54214485"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[


In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey discuss the First Amendment and common misconceptions about freedom of speech. They begin by answering a question about what it takes to become a lawyer in South Carolina, explaining the education requirements, bar exam, and continuing legal education obligations.
The hosts then discuss what the First Amendment actually protects. They clarify that the First Amendment primarily prevents the government from arresting people for their speech, with some exceptions. They emphasize that freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences in private settings. Employers can still fire employees for their speech, and people can face social repercussions for what they say.
Lacey and Lauren discuss several examples, including reality TV contestants who faced employment consequences for using racial slurs, and explain that while you can't be arrested for most speech, it doesn't protect your reputation or job. They cover exceptions to protected speech, such as inciting violence, child pornography, and yelling "fire" in a crowded theater.
The hosts also share personal experiences with advocating against the use of derogatory terms, particularly the R-word, and how they address this in both professional and personal contexts. They discuss the difference between protected speech and offensive speech, and the importance of educating others about harmful language.
Announcement: Read "Framed" by John Gresham and Jim Grisham for upcoming book club episodes starting in a few weeks!
 
The Lawmas can be reached: thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
 
#Thelawmaspodcast #lawpodcast #firstamendment #freespeech #lawmoms #framed #johngrisham #bookclubpodcast



 
 
 

 

 ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1986256/c1a-5w3p7-mkx6893oa83v-98xzva.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:27:52</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 19: If the Dress Fits: Marcia Clark and Gender Bias in Law]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 19:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1982549</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-19-tlpd</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast features Lauren and Lacey discussing two topics.</p>
<p>First, they address a legal question about family obligations to notify siblings about a parent's passing, explaining that while there's no legal requirement to inform relatives about an illness, probate laws require notification of all potential heirs after death.</p>
<p>The main topic of this episode dives into the O.J. Simpson case, focusing on how prosecutor Marcia Clark faced gender-based scrutiny during the trial. They discuss media criticism of Clark's appearance and unfair blame for trial outcomes despite her limited decision-making power. Lauren and Lacey also explore how the case transformed media coverage of trials and mention Simpson's civil case judgment and current estate disputes. They also reflecting on progress for women in male-dominated fields while acknowledging persistent challenges.</p>
<p>To contact The Lawmas, email <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p>#lawpodcast #OJSimpson #MarciaClark #lawmoms #thelawmas #genderbias #maledominatedfields #probatelaw #OJSimpsontrial</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast features Lauren and Lacey discussing two topics.
First, they address a legal question about family obligations to notify siblings about a parent's passing, explaining that while there's no legal requirement to inform relatives about an illness, probate laws require notification of all potential heirs after death.
The main topic of this episode dives into the O.J. Simpson case, focusing on how prosecutor Marcia Clark faced gender-based scrutiny during the trial. They discuss media criticism of Clark's appearance and unfair blame for trial outcomes despite her limited decision-making power. Lauren and Lacey also explore how the case transformed media coverage of trials and mention Simpson's civil case judgment and current estate disputes. They also reflecting on progress for women in male-dominated fields while acknowledging persistent challenges.
To contact The Lawmas, email thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
#lawpodcast #OJSimpson #MarciaClark #lawmoms #thelawmas #genderbias #maledominatedfields #probatelaw #OJSimpsontrial]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 19: If the Dress Fits: Marcia Clark and Gender Bias in Law]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast features Lauren and Lacey discussing two topics.</p>
<p>First, they address a legal question about family obligations to notify siblings about a parent's passing, explaining that while there's no legal requirement to inform relatives about an illness, probate laws require notification of all potential heirs after death.</p>
<p>The main topic of this episode dives into the O.J. Simpson case, focusing on how prosecutor Marcia Clark faced gender-based scrutiny during the trial. They discuss media criticism of Clark's appearance and unfair blame for trial outcomes despite her limited decision-making power. Lauren and Lacey also explore how the case transformed media coverage of trials and mention Simpson's civil case judgment and current estate disputes. They also reflecting on progress for women in male-dominated fields while acknowledging persistent challenges.</p>
<p>To contact The Lawmas, email <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p>#lawpodcast #OJSimpson #MarciaClark #lawmoms #thelawmas #genderbias #maledominatedfields #probatelaw #OJSimpsontrial</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1982549/c1e-x67d2imjv0mtkzzg2-9jn9g33ntnpx-3fetvi.mp3" length="54755860"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast features Lauren and Lacey discussing two topics.
First, they address a legal question about family obligations to notify siblings about a parent's passing, explaining that while there's no legal requirement to inform relatives about an illness, probate laws require notification of all potential heirs after death.
The main topic of this episode dives into the O.J. Simpson case, focusing on how prosecutor Marcia Clark faced gender-based scrutiny during the trial. They discuss media criticism of Clark's appearance and unfair blame for trial outcomes despite her limited decision-making power. Lauren and Lacey also explore how the case transformed media coverage of trials and mention Simpson's civil case judgment and current estate disputes. They also reflecting on progress for women in male-dominated fields while acknowledging persistent challenges.
To contact The Lawmas, email thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
#lawpodcast #OJSimpson #MarciaClark #lawmoms #thelawmas #genderbias #maledominatedfields #probatelaw #OJSimpsontrial]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1982549/c1a-5w3p7-ndoqrvvzc2pr-jy8mfg.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:28:07</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 18: Pageants, Prejudice & Patsy: A Mother's Story]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1978306</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-18-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey dive into the JonBenét Ramsey case, specially on the media's treatment of Patsy Ramsey. Lauren and Lacey discuss children's beauty pageants in the South versus other regions in the United States and analyze how the media unfairly sexualized JonBenét's pageant participation.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren &amp; Lacey discuss the examination of the evidence supporting the intruder theory, including:</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Unmatched DNA evidence</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Similar break-in attempt at another dance student's home</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">The broken basement window and suitcase placement</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Critical look at the media's treatment of women in the 1990s</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Comparison to other high-profile cases and media bias against women</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Personal reflections on motherhood, shared interests with children, and judgment of parenting choices</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Two notable quotes from this episode from Lacey: "If anybody looks at a child in pageantry or on the beach in a bikini and has those thoughts, they're the problem. They're the pedophile." and...</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">"You don't know how you're going to react. And let's hope we never do, right? Let's hope we never have to know." </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The Lawmas can be reached at <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#podcast #lawmoms #laurenandlacey #jonbenétramsey #patsyramsey #thelawmas #highprofilecrime #truecrime</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey dive into the JonBenét Ramsey case, specially on the media's treatment of Patsy Ramsey. Lauren and Lacey discuss children's beauty pageants in the South versus other regions in the United States and analyze how the media unfairly sexualized JonBenét's pageant participation.
Lauren & Lacey discuss the examination of the evidence supporting the intruder theory, including:

Unmatched DNA evidence
Similar break-in attempt at another dance student's home
The broken basement window and suitcase placement
Critical look at the media's treatment of women in the 1990s
Comparison to other high-profile cases and media bias against women
Personal reflections on motherhood, shared interests with children, and judgment of parenting choices

Two notable quotes from this episode from Lacey: "If anybody looks at a child in pageantry or on the beach in a bikini and has those thoughts, they're the problem. They're the pedophile." and...
"You don't know how you're going to react. And let's hope we never do, right? Let's hope we never have to know." 
The Lawmas can be reached at thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
 
#podcast #lawmoms #laurenandlacey #jonbenétramsey #patsyramsey #thelawmas #highprofilecrime #truecrime]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 18: Pageants, Prejudice & Patsy: A Mother's Story]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey dive into the JonBenét Ramsey case, specially on the media's treatment of Patsy Ramsey. Lauren and Lacey discuss children's beauty pageants in the South versus other regions in the United States and analyze how the media unfairly sexualized JonBenét's pageant participation.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren &amp; Lacey discuss the examination of the evidence supporting the intruder theory, including:</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Unmatched DNA evidence</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Similar break-in attempt at another dance student's home</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">The broken basement window and suitcase placement</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Critical look at the media's treatment of women in the 1990s</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Comparison to other high-profile cases and media bias against women</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Personal reflections on motherhood, shared interests with children, and judgment of parenting choices</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Two notable quotes from this episode from Lacey: "If anybody looks at a child in pageantry or on the beach in a bikini and has those thoughts, they're the problem. They're the pedophile." and...</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">"You don't know how you're going to react. And let's hope we never do, right? Let's hope we never have to know." </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The Lawmas can be reached at <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#podcast #lawmoms #laurenandlacey #jonbenétramsey #patsyramsey #thelawmas #highprofilecrime #truecrime</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1978306/c1e-vqw7gf9wndxhdv5dm-qdw28rwpan71-zlefpz.mp3" length="51559092"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey dive into the JonBenét Ramsey case, specially on the media's treatment of Patsy Ramsey. Lauren and Lacey discuss children's beauty pageants in the South versus other regions in the United States and analyze how the media unfairly sexualized JonBenét's pageant participation.
Lauren & Lacey discuss the examination of the evidence supporting the intruder theory, including:

Unmatched DNA evidence
Similar break-in attempt at another dance student's home
The broken basement window and suitcase placement
Critical look at the media's treatment of women in the 1990s
Comparison to other high-profile cases and media bias against women
Personal reflections on motherhood, shared interests with children, and judgment of parenting choices

Two notable quotes from this episode from Lacey: "If anybody looks at a child in pageantry or on the beach in a bikini and has those thoughts, they're the problem. They're the pedophile." and...
"You don't know how you're going to react. And let's hope we never do, right? Let's hope we never have to know." 
The Lawmas can be reached at thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
 
#podcast #lawmoms #laurenandlacey #jonbenétramsey #patsyramsey #thelawmas #highprofilecrime #truecrime]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1978306/c1a-5w3p7-v625k126unxm-kr5vom.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:26:31</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 17: From Blind Side to Blindsided: The Michael Oher Story]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 17:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1973779</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-17-michael-oher-and-the-nil</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">This episode of The Lawmas explores Michael Oher's conservatorship case and a broader discussion about protecting young athletes' finances in the NIL era.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">But first: a question answered about Miranda rights and deaf individuals. Officers use written cards for DUI cases. They also discuss challenges with field sobriety tests for deaf individuals and how there are now translation apps for Spanish-speaking individuals.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">With Michael Oher's conservatorship case, Lauren &amp; Lacey explain how it extended until age 25, which is very unusual for non-disabled adults. Oher believed he was signing adoption papers. They talk about the lack of proper oversight and accounting in Tennessee and the Tuohy's handling of movie proceeds. </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren &amp; Lacey also discuss NIL Implications. There is concern about young athlets managing sudden wealth, how some athletes start college at 17-18 years old and how there is a need for financial protection and education.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Watch/listen to get recommendations from Lauren &amp; Lacey! </p>
<p>Follow the podcast on YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, Apple Podcasts, and Spotify. Share your thoughts on NIL regulations via DM.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#podcast #NIL #michaeloher #thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #mompreneur #conservatorships</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This episode of The Lawmas explores Michael Oher's conservatorship case and a broader discussion about protecting young athletes' finances in the NIL era.
But first: a question answered about Miranda rights and deaf individuals. Officers use written cards for DUI cases. They also discuss challenges with field sobriety tests for deaf individuals and how there are now translation apps for Spanish-speaking individuals.
With Michael Oher's conservatorship case, Lauren & Lacey explain how it extended until age 25, which is very unusual for non-disabled adults. Oher believed he was signing adoption papers. They talk about the lack of proper oversight and accounting in Tennessee and the Tuohy's handling of movie proceeds. 
Lauren & Lacey also discuss NIL Implications. There is concern about young athlets managing sudden wealth, how some athletes start college at 17-18 years old and how there is a need for financial protection and education.
Watch/listen to get recommendations from Lauren & Lacey! 
Follow the podcast on YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, Apple Podcasts, and Spotify. Share your thoughts on NIL regulations via DM.
 
#podcast #NIL #michaeloher #thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #mompreneur #conservatorships
 ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 17: From Blind Side to Blindsided: The Michael Oher Story]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">This episode of The Lawmas explores Michael Oher's conservatorship case and a broader discussion about protecting young athletes' finances in the NIL era.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">But first: a question answered about Miranda rights and deaf individuals. Officers use written cards for DUI cases. They also discuss challenges with field sobriety tests for deaf individuals and how there are now translation apps for Spanish-speaking individuals.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">With Michael Oher's conservatorship case, Lauren &amp; Lacey explain how it extended until age 25, which is very unusual for non-disabled adults. Oher believed he was signing adoption papers. They talk about the lack of proper oversight and accounting in Tennessee and the Tuohy's handling of movie proceeds. </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren &amp; Lacey also discuss NIL Implications. There is concern about young athlets managing sudden wealth, how some athletes start college at 17-18 years old and how there is a need for financial protection and education.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Watch/listen to get recommendations from Lauren &amp; Lacey! </p>
<p>Follow the podcast on YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, Apple Podcasts, and Spotify. Share your thoughts on NIL regulations via DM.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>#podcast #NIL #michaeloher #thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #mompreneur #conservatorships</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1973779/c1e-0w9gzuj0x2nu6mpjg-okw9g1r6agkz-1txvpi.mp3" length="47935282"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This episode of The Lawmas explores Michael Oher's conservatorship case and a broader discussion about protecting young athletes' finances in the NIL era.
But first: a question answered about Miranda rights and deaf individuals. Officers use written cards for DUI cases. They also discuss challenges with field sobriety tests for deaf individuals and how there are now translation apps for Spanish-speaking individuals.
With Michael Oher's conservatorship case, Lauren & Lacey explain how it extended until age 25, which is very unusual for non-disabled adults. Oher believed he was signing adoption papers. They talk about the lack of proper oversight and accounting in Tennessee and the Tuohy's handling of movie proceeds. 
Lauren & Lacey also discuss NIL Implications. There is concern about young athlets managing sudden wealth, how some athletes start college at 17-18 years old and how there is a need for financial protection and education.
Watch/listen to get recommendations from Lauren & Lacey! 
Follow the podcast on YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, Apple Podcasts, and Spotify. Share your thoughts on NIL regulations via DM.
 
#podcast #NIL #michaeloher #thelawmaspodcast #lawmoms #mompreneur #conservatorships
 ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1973779/c1a-5w3p7-1p4o1mgjs4vn-1miiyz.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:24:36</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 16: Killer Cases: Comparing Gypsy Rose & The Menendez Brothers]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 15:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1968648</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-16-7</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<div class="font-claude-message pr-4 md:pr-9 relative leading-[1.65rem] [&amp;_pre&gt;div]:bg-bg-300 [&amp;_.ignore-pre-bg&gt;div]:bg-transparent [&amp;_pre]:-mr-4 md:[&amp;_pre]:-mr-9">
<div>
<div class="grid-cols-1 grid gap-2.5 [&amp;_&gt;_*]:min-w-0">
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas, attorneys Lacey and Lauren discuss two notable criminal cases - Gypsy Rose Blanchard and the Menendez brothers - examining the role of abuse in both cases and their dramatically different sentencing outcomes.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Key Points: </p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Gypsy Rose case: Victim of Munchausen by proxy abuse from birth, orchestrated her mother's murder, received 10-year sentence</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Menendez brothers case: Claimed sexual abuse by father, killed both parents, received life sentences</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Analysis of factors affecting sentencing:
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Gypsy's complete dependence and inability to escape vs. Menendez brothers' resources and opportunities to leave</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Gypsy's accountability and remorse vs. questions about Menendez brothers' credibility</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Debate over appropriate sentences for each case based on circumstances and culpability</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">This episode starts with advice for criminal defendants' courtroom attire, emphasizing the importance of appearing relatable to juries without being overdressed or flashy.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren and Lacey agree Gypsy Rose's 10-year sentence was appropriate given the extreme abuse and her accountability, while suggesting the Menendez brothers deserved lengthy but not life sentences, with potentially different terms for each brother based on their roles.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="absolute -bottom-0 -right-1.5">Subscribe, follow, comment and share our podcast. We want to hear from you: email us: <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></div>
<div class="absolute -bottom-0 -right-1.5"> </div>
<div class="absolute -bottom-0 -right-1.5">#gypsyrose #menendezbrothers #thelawmas #podcast #lawmoms #highprofilecrimecases #truecrimepodcast</div>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[


In this episode of The Lawmas, attorneys Lacey and Lauren discuss two notable criminal cases - Gypsy Rose Blanchard and the Menendez brothers - examining the role of abuse in both cases and their dramatically different sentencing outcomes.
Key Points: 

Gypsy Rose case: Victim of Munchausen by proxy abuse from birth, orchestrated her mother's murder, received 10-year sentence
Menendez brothers case: Claimed sexual abuse by father, killed both parents, received life sentences
Analysis of factors affecting sentencing:

Gypsy's complete dependence and inability to escape vs. Menendez brothers' resources and opportunities to leave
Gypsy's accountability and remorse vs. questions about Menendez brothers' credibility
Debate over appropriate sentences for each case based on circumstances and culpability



This episode starts with advice for criminal defendants' courtroom attire, emphasizing the importance of appearing relatable to juries without being overdressed or flashy.
Lauren and Lacey agree Gypsy Rose's 10-year sentence was appropriate given the extreme abuse and her accountability, while suggesting the Menendez brothers deserved lengthy but not life sentences, with potentially different terms for each brother based on their roles.



Subscribe, follow, comment and share our podcast. We want to hear from you: email us: thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
 
#gypsyrose #menendezbrothers #thelawmas #podcast #lawmoms #highprofilecrimecases #truecrimepodcast]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 16: Killer Cases: Comparing Gypsy Rose & The Menendez Brothers]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<div class="font-claude-message pr-4 md:pr-9 relative leading-[1.65rem] [&amp;_pre&gt;div]:bg-bg-300 [&amp;_.ignore-pre-bg&gt;div]:bg-transparent [&amp;_pre]:-mr-4 md:[&amp;_pre]:-mr-9">
<div>
<div class="grid-cols-1 grid gap-2.5 [&amp;_&gt;_*]:min-w-0">
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas, attorneys Lacey and Lauren discuss two notable criminal cases - Gypsy Rose Blanchard and the Menendez brothers - examining the role of abuse in both cases and their dramatically different sentencing outcomes.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Key Points: </p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Gypsy Rose case: Victim of Munchausen by proxy abuse from birth, orchestrated her mother's murder, received 10-year sentence</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Menendez brothers case: Claimed sexual abuse by father, killed both parents, received life sentences</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Analysis of factors affecting sentencing:
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Gypsy's complete dependence and inability to escape vs. Menendez brothers' resources and opportunities to leave</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Gypsy's accountability and remorse vs. questions about Menendez brothers' credibility</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Debate over appropriate sentences for each case based on circumstances and culpability</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">This episode starts with advice for criminal defendants' courtroom attire, emphasizing the importance of appearing relatable to juries without being overdressed or flashy.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren and Lacey agree Gypsy Rose's 10-year sentence was appropriate given the extreme abuse and her accountability, while suggesting the Menendez brothers deserved lengthy but not life sentences, with potentially different terms for each brother based on their roles.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="absolute -bottom-0 -right-1.5">Subscribe, follow, comment and share our podcast. We want to hear from you: email us: <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></div>
<div class="absolute -bottom-0 -right-1.5"> </div>
<div class="absolute -bottom-0 -right-1.5">#gypsyrose #menendezbrothers #thelawmas #podcast #lawmoms #highprofilecrimecases #truecrimepodcast</div>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1968648/c1e-2w0zvu85w2ruq79r8-ww6w4qpxboor-q2evnw.mp3" length="56053314"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[


In this episode of The Lawmas, attorneys Lacey and Lauren discuss two notable criminal cases - Gypsy Rose Blanchard and the Menendez brothers - examining the role of abuse in both cases and their dramatically different sentencing outcomes.
Key Points: 

Gypsy Rose case: Victim of Munchausen by proxy abuse from birth, orchestrated her mother's murder, received 10-year sentence
Menendez brothers case: Claimed sexual abuse by father, killed both parents, received life sentences
Analysis of factors affecting sentencing:

Gypsy's complete dependence and inability to escape vs. Menendez brothers' resources and opportunities to leave
Gypsy's accountability and remorse vs. questions about Menendez brothers' credibility
Debate over appropriate sentences for each case based on circumstances and culpability



This episode starts with advice for criminal defendants' courtroom attire, emphasizing the importance of appearing relatable to juries without being overdressed or flashy.
Lauren and Lacey agree Gypsy Rose's 10-year sentence was appropriate given the extreme abuse and her accountability, while suggesting the Menendez brothers deserved lengthy but not life sentences, with potentially different terms for each brother based on their roles.



Subscribe, follow, comment and share our podcast. We want to hear from you: email us: thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
 
#gypsyrose #menendezbrothers #thelawmas #podcast #lawmoms #highprofilecrimecases #truecrimepodcast]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1968648/c1a-5w3p7-mkxk9pwjh7nz-pyjukw.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:28:45</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 14: Civil War: The Battle of Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 05:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1949294</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-14-tlpc</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas, Lauren and Lacey tackle the Civil Case of Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Key Topics Discussed!</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Differences between civil and criminal cases</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Analysis of jury bias in high-profile civil cases</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Defamation law and burden of proof</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Impact of celebrity status on legal proceedings</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Effect of social media on jury deliberations</li>
</ul>
<p>Civil cases can significantly affect careers and future opportunities. This case damaged Heard's acting career, the effects can be long-lasting for reputations and employment. There are similar impacts on non-celebrities (think about evictions and medical malpractice).</p>
<p>Role of Social Media: The extensive coverage affected public opinion. There are the issues of potential influence on non-sequestered jury, challenges of keeping jurors unbiased in digital age and the discussion of need for courts to address social media influence.</p>
<p>Watch this episode on YouTube or listen on all major podcast platforms. The Lawmas are on Facebook, Instagram and X. Follow, like, subscribe, comment and share! Email The Lawmas: <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>#johnnydepp #amberheard #thelawmaspodcast #podcast #mompreneurs #momlawyers</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas, Lauren and Lacey tackle the Civil Case of Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard!
Key Topics Discussed!

Differences between civil and criminal cases
Analysis of jury bias in high-profile civil cases
Defamation law and burden of proof
Impact of celebrity status on legal proceedings
Effect of social media on jury deliberations

Civil cases can significantly affect careers and future opportunities. This case damaged Heard's acting career, the effects can be long-lasting for reputations and employment. There are similar impacts on non-celebrities (think about evictions and medical malpractice).
Role of Social Media: The extensive coverage affected public opinion. There are the issues of potential influence on non-sequestered jury, challenges of keeping jurors unbiased in digital age and the discussion of need for courts to address social media influence.
Watch this episode on YouTube or listen on all major podcast platforms. The Lawmas are on Facebook, Instagram and X. Follow, like, subscribe, comment and share! Email The Lawmas: thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
 
#johnnydepp #amberheard #thelawmaspodcast #podcast #mompreneurs #momlawyers]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 14: Civil War: The Battle of Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas, Lauren and Lacey tackle the Civil Case of Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Key Topics Discussed!</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Differences between civil and criminal cases</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Analysis of jury bias in high-profile civil cases</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Defamation law and burden of proof</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Impact of celebrity status on legal proceedings</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Effect of social media on jury deliberations</li>
</ul>
<p>Civil cases can significantly affect careers and future opportunities. This case damaged Heard's acting career, the effects can be long-lasting for reputations and employment. There are similar impacts on non-celebrities (think about evictions and medical malpractice).</p>
<p>Role of Social Media: The extensive coverage affected public opinion. There are the issues of potential influence on non-sequestered jury, challenges of keeping jurors unbiased in digital age and the discussion of need for courts to address social media influence.</p>
<p>Watch this episode on YouTube or listen on all major podcast platforms. The Lawmas are on Facebook, Instagram and X. Follow, like, subscribe, comment and share! Email The Lawmas: <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>#johnnydepp #amberheard #thelawmaspodcast #podcast #mompreneurs #momlawyers</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1949294/c1e-x67d2imn5pqfk7n5k-xxwg00dnc92-odfarq.mp3" length="54057385"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas, Lauren and Lacey tackle the Civil Case of Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard!
Key Topics Discussed!

Differences between civil and criminal cases
Analysis of jury bias in high-profile civil cases
Defamation law and burden of proof
Impact of celebrity status on legal proceedings
Effect of social media on jury deliberations

Civil cases can significantly affect careers and future opportunities. This case damaged Heard's acting career, the effects can be long-lasting for reputations and employment. There are similar impacts on non-celebrities (think about evictions and medical malpractice).
Role of Social Media: The extensive coverage affected public opinion. There are the issues of potential influence on non-sequestered jury, challenges of keeping jurors unbiased in digital age and the discussion of need for courts to address social media influence.
Watch this episode on YouTube or listen on all major podcast platforms. The Lawmas are on Facebook, Instagram and X. Follow, like, subscribe, comment and share! Email The Lawmas: thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
 
#johnnydepp #amberheard #thelawmaspodcast #podcast #mompreneurs #momlawyers]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1949294/c1a-5w3p7-7z2x007da23d-ybp6gp.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:27:45</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 13: Reasonable Doubt? The Lawmas Discuss the Scott Peterson Case]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 14:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1944503</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-13-8</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey discuss the Scott Peterson murder case. And a heads up, they have different views!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">First, a legal question about could you choose the execution method for a client? Watch/listen and find out their responses!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Now onto the Scott Peterson case.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren and Lacey focus on legal perspectives and recent developments of the case. Topics include:</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Convicted of killing his pregnant wife Laci Peterson</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Originally sentenced to death penalty</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Timeline of events from December disappearance to April body discovery</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Discussion of circumstantial evidence vs direct evidence</li>
</ul>
<p>Differing Legal Perspectives</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lauren believes Peterson is guilty</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lacey believes there isn't enough evidence to convict</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Watch to learn their reasons!</li>
</ul>
<p>There have been several new developments in the case:</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Death penalty conviction review due to juror issues</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">New DNA evidence pending testing</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">California nonprofit involvement in case review</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Discussion of potential new trial possibilities</li>
</ul>
<p>Lastly, theu look at the legal system analysis:</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Jury selection process (voir dire)</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Discussion of circumstantial evidence</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Evolution of DNA evidence in court</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Changes in trial procedures due to technology</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">"The state has not proven it beyond reasonable doubt in my eyes." - Lacey</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">"I think he's guilty. I have no doubts in my mind." - Lauren</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Looking Ahead:</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Once DNA test results are released there will be a follow up episode!</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Future episode on voir dire process planned</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Where to Follow:</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Apple Podcasts</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">YouTube</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Instagram</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Facebook</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Follow "The Lawmas Podcast" on all platforms for updates and future episodes!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#podcast #mompreneurs #lawmoms #scottpetersoncase #lacipeterson #truecrime</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey discuss the Scott Peterson murder case. And a heads up, they have different views!
First, a legal question about could you choose the execution method for a client? Watch/listen and find out their responses!
Now onto the Scott Peterson case.
Lauren and Lacey focus on legal perspectives and recent developments of the case. Topics include:

Convicted of killing his pregnant wife Laci Peterson
Originally sentenced to death penalty
Timeline of events from December disappearance to April body discovery
Discussion of circumstantial evidence vs direct evidence

Differing Legal Perspectives

Lauren believes Peterson is guilty
Lacey believes there isn't enough evidence to convict
Watch to learn their reasons!

There have been several new developments in the case:

Death penalty conviction review due to juror issues
New DNA evidence pending testing
California nonprofit involvement in case review
Discussion of potential new trial possibilities

Lastly, theu look at the legal system analysis:

Jury selection process (voir dire)
Discussion of circumstantial evidence
Evolution of DNA evidence in court
Changes in trial procedures due to technology

"The state has not proven it beyond reasonable doubt in my eyes." - Lacey
"I think he's guilty. I have no doubts in my mind." - Lauren
Looking Ahead:

Once DNA test results are released there will be a follow up episode!
Future episode on voir dire process planned

Where to Follow:

Apple Podcasts
YouTube
Instagram
Facebook

Follow "The Lawmas Podcast" on all platforms for updates and future episodes!
 
#podcast #mompreneurs #lawmoms #scottpetersoncase #lacipeterson #truecrime]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 13: Reasonable Doubt? The Lawmas Discuss the Scott Peterson Case]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey discuss the Scott Peterson murder case. And a heads up, they have different views!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">First, a legal question about could you choose the execution method for a client? Watch/listen and find out their responses!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Now onto the Scott Peterson case.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren and Lacey focus on legal perspectives and recent developments of the case. Topics include:</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Convicted of killing his pregnant wife Laci Peterson</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Originally sentenced to death penalty</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Timeline of events from December disappearance to April body discovery</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Discussion of circumstantial evidence vs direct evidence</li>
</ul>
<p>Differing Legal Perspectives</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lauren believes Peterson is guilty</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lacey believes there isn't enough evidence to convict</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Watch to learn their reasons!</li>
</ul>
<p>There have been several new developments in the case:</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Death penalty conviction review due to juror issues</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">New DNA evidence pending testing</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">California nonprofit involvement in case review</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Discussion of potential new trial possibilities</li>
</ul>
<p>Lastly, theu look at the legal system analysis:</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Jury selection process (voir dire)</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Discussion of circumstantial evidence</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Evolution of DNA evidence in court</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Changes in trial procedures due to technology</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">"The state has not proven it beyond reasonable doubt in my eyes." - Lacey</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">"I think he's guilty. I have no doubts in my mind." - Lauren</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Looking Ahead:</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Once DNA test results are released there will be a follow up episode!</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Future episode on voir dire process planned</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Where to Follow:</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Apple Podcasts</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">YouTube</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Instagram</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Facebook</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Follow "The Lawmas Podcast" on all platforms for updates and future episodes!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#podcast #mompreneurs #lawmoms #scottpetersoncase #lacipeterson #truecrime</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1944503/c1e-vqw7gf9mzmwbdz93r-0v5knkd6hm43-ncgf8h.mp3" length="61898808"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey discuss the Scott Peterson murder case. And a heads up, they have different views!
First, a legal question about could you choose the execution method for a client? Watch/listen and find out their responses!
Now onto the Scott Peterson case.
Lauren and Lacey focus on legal perspectives and recent developments of the case. Topics include:

Convicted of killing his pregnant wife Laci Peterson
Originally sentenced to death penalty
Timeline of events from December disappearance to April body discovery
Discussion of circumstantial evidence vs direct evidence

Differing Legal Perspectives

Lauren believes Peterson is guilty
Lacey believes there isn't enough evidence to convict
Watch to learn their reasons!

There have been several new developments in the case:

Death penalty conviction review due to juror issues
New DNA evidence pending testing
California nonprofit involvement in case review
Discussion of potential new trial possibilities

Lastly, theu look at the legal system analysis:

Jury selection process (voir dire)
Discussion of circumstantial evidence
Evolution of DNA evidence in court
Changes in trial procedures due to technology

"The state has not proven it beyond reasonable doubt in my eyes." - Lacey
"I think he's guilty. I have no doubts in my mind." - Lauren
Looking Ahead:

Once DNA test results are released there will be a follow up episode!
Future episode on voir dire process planned

Where to Follow:

Apple Podcasts
YouTube
Instagram
Facebook

Follow "The Lawmas Podcast" on all platforms for updates and future episodes!
 
#podcast #mompreneurs #lawmoms #scottpetersoncase #lacipeterson #truecrime]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1944503/c1a-5w3p7-7z23p34pf9rw-mz4y7y.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:31:46</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 15: Inside the Menendez Brothers Case]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 05:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1944296</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-13-7</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey open with a discussion of South Carolina divorce laws, covering resources through SC Legal Services and options for temporary orders and restraining orders, with information available at scbar.org.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The main segment of the podcast introduces their multi-episode series on the Menendez brothers case. Lauren and Lacey examine the two trials: the first in 1993 resulted in a hung jury with testimony about sexual abuse permitted, while the second trial excluded this testimony and ended in first-degree murder convictions with life sentences. They explore how the broader context of 1990s Los Angeles, including the Rodney King case and OJ Simpson verdict, influenced the proceedings.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren and Lacey note that current prosecutors are reviewing the case for potential resentencing based on the sexual abuse allegations. Their next episode, which will compare the Menendez case to Gypsy Rose's, examining how courts handle premeditation in abuse cases.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Contact The Lawmas at <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#thelawmaspodcast #legalpodcast #lawmoms #laceyandlauren #menedezbrothers</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey open with a discussion of South Carolina divorce laws, covering resources through SC Legal Services and options for temporary orders and restraining orders, with information available at scbar.org.
The main segment of the podcast introduces their multi-episode series on the Menendez brothers case. Lauren and Lacey examine the two trials: the first in 1993 resulted in a hung jury with testimony about sexual abuse permitted, while the second trial excluded this testimony and ended in first-degree murder convictions with life sentences. They explore how the broader context of 1990s Los Angeles, including the Rodney King case and OJ Simpson verdict, influenced the proceedings.
Lauren and Lacey note that current prosecutors are reviewing the case for potential resentencing based on the sexual abuse allegations. Their next episode, which will compare the Menendez case to Gypsy Rose's, examining how courts handle premeditation in abuse cases.
Contact The Lawmas at thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
#thelawmaspodcast #legalpodcast #lawmoms #laceyandlauren #menedezbrothers]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 15: Inside the Menendez Brothers Case]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey open with a discussion of South Carolina divorce laws, covering resources through SC Legal Services and options for temporary orders and restraining orders, with information available at scbar.org.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The main segment of the podcast introduces their multi-episode series on the Menendez brothers case. Lauren and Lacey examine the two trials: the first in 1993 resulted in a hung jury with testimony about sexual abuse permitted, while the second trial excluded this testimony and ended in first-degree murder convictions with life sentences. They explore how the broader context of 1990s Los Angeles, including the Rodney King case and OJ Simpson verdict, influenced the proceedings.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren and Lacey note that current prosecutors are reviewing the case for potential resentencing based on the sexual abuse allegations. Their next episode, which will compare the Menendez case to Gypsy Rose's, examining how courts handle premeditation in abuse cases.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Contact The Lawmas at <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#thelawmaspodcast #legalpodcast #lawmoms #laceyandlauren #menedezbrothers</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1944296/c1e-oqpgofvk15nsdn7zv-xxwon143tx0n-7mjdid.mp3" length="56274428"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, hosts Lauren and Lacey open with a discussion of South Carolina divorce laws, covering resources through SC Legal Services and options for temporary orders and restraining orders, with information available at scbar.org.
The main segment of the podcast introduces their multi-episode series on the Menendez brothers case. Lauren and Lacey examine the two trials: the first in 1993 resulted in a hung jury with testimony about sexual abuse permitted, while the second trial excluded this testimony and ended in first-degree murder convictions with life sentences. They explore how the broader context of 1990s Los Angeles, including the Rodney King case and OJ Simpson verdict, influenced the proceedings.
Lauren and Lacey note that current prosecutors are reviewing the case for potential resentencing based on the sexual abuse allegations. Their next episode, which will compare the Menendez case to Gypsy Rose's, examining how courts handle premeditation in abuse cases.
Contact The Lawmas at thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
#thelawmaspodcast #legalpodcast #lawmoms #laceyandlauren #menedezbrothers]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1944296/c1a-5w3p7-ndongnovuo4d-ks2fsv.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:28:51</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 12: Inside the Alex Murdaugh Case]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 18:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1937926</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-12-tlp</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, attorneys Lauren and Lacey dive into critical aspects of the Alex Murdaugh murder trial.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Key Topics Discussed:</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">The decision-making process behind defendants taking the stand</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">How social media evidence, particularly Snapchat, impacted the case (be careful with what you put online!)</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">The authentication process for digital evidence in court</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">The evolving landscape of digital evidence in criminal cases.</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Personal Insight:</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lacey shares her unexpected encounter with Alex Murdaugh during a prison visit</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Discussion of Murdaugh's physical stature and its relation to evidence trajectories</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lauren and Lacey both share their opinions on Murdaugh's involvement in the crimes</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Additional Notes:</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Moselle property is now on market for approximately $2.5 million!</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Send us your thoughts on Murdaugh's decision to testify.</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Follow The Lawmas</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Instagram and Facebook and YouTube</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Available on all podcast platforms</li>
</ul>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, attorneys Lauren and Lacey dive into critical aspects of the Alex Murdaugh murder trial.
Key Topics Discussed:

The decision-making process behind defendants taking the stand
How social media evidence, particularly Snapchat, impacted the case (be careful with what you put online!)
The authentication process for digital evidence in court
The evolving landscape of digital evidence in criminal cases.

Personal Insight:

Lacey shares her unexpected encounter with Alex Murdaugh during a prison visit
Discussion of Murdaugh's physical stature and its relation to evidence trajectories
Lauren and Lacey both share their opinions on Murdaugh's involvement in the crimes

Additional Notes:

Moselle property is now on market for approximately $2.5 million!
Send us your thoughts on Murdaugh's decision to testify.

Follow The Lawmas

Instagram and Facebook and YouTube
Available on all podcast platforms
]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 12: Inside the Alex Murdaugh Case]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                    <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, attorneys Lauren and Lacey dive into critical aspects of the Alex Murdaugh murder trial.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Key Topics Discussed:</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">The decision-making process behind defendants taking the stand</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">How social media evidence, particularly Snapchat, impacted the case (be careful with what you put online!)</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">The authentication process for digital evidence in court</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">The evolving landscape of digital evidence in criminal cases.</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Personal Insight:</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lacey shares her unexpected encounter with Alex Murdaugh during a prison visit</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Discussion of Murdaugh's physical stature and its relation to evidence trajectories</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lauren and Lacey both share their opinions on Murdaugh's involvement in the crimes</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Additional Notes:</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Moselle property is now on market for approximately $2.5 million!</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Send us your thoughts on Murdaugh's decision to testify.</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Follow The Lawmas</p>
<ul class="[&amp;:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 [&amp;:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 list-disc space-y-1.5 pl-7">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Instagram and Facebook and YouTube</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Available on all podcast platforms</li>
</ul>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1937926/c1e-x67d2im2p30sk7w1d-gpwkrwj3s0rz-kty15q.mp3" length="55039262"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, attorneys Lauren and Lacey dive into critical aspects of the Alex Murdaugh murder trial.
Key Topics Discussed:

The decision-making process behind defendants taking the stand
How social media evidence, particularly Snapchat, impacted the case (be careful with what you put online!)
The authentication process for digital evidence in court
The evolving landscape of digital evidence in criminal cases.

Personal Insight:

Lacey shares her unexpected encounter with Alex Murdaugh during a prison visit
Discussion of Murdaugh's physical stature and its relation to evidence trajectories
Lauren and Lacey both share their opinions on Murdaugh's involvement in the crimes

Additional Notes:

Moselle property is now on market for approximately $2.5 million!
Send us your thoughts on Murdaugh's decision to testify.

Follow The Lawmas

Instagram and Facebook and YouTube
Available on all podcast platforms
]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1937926/c1a-5w3p7-1p4d6427f9q0-epmixq.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:28:12</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 11: It's Britney B!tch (and Her Conservatorship)]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 04:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1933569</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-11-5</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">This week on The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey open with a question on Estate Planning &amp; Powers of Attorney. They discuss wills for single individuals without children, recommendations for everyone over 18 and the importance of having someone able to handle bills and accounts if incapacitated. </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Now on to the episode topic: Britney Spears' Conservatorship!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The Lawmas cover:</p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">California vs. South Carolina conservatorship laws</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Multiple doctors involved in declaring incompetence</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Issues with Jamie Spears (Britney's father) as conservator:
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">History of exploitation</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Past lawsuits and creditor issues</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Alcoholism</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Financial abuse of Britney since childhood</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">There are several key issues with conservatorship:</p>
<ol class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-decimal space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">No attorney choice for Britney</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Complete loss of bodily autonomy
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Forced IUD</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Controlled diet/food intake</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">No privacy in medical treatment
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Father could access therapy notes</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Could attend therapy sessions</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">More restrictive than typical conservatorships</li>
</ol>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Background Context on Britney Spears:</p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Early exploitation as child star</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">History of trauma</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Postpartum depression</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lack of support system</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">No opportunity for normal young adult development</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Current Status:</p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Still showing effects of conservatorship trauma</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Behavioral patterns reflecting stunted emotional development</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Questions about potential for full recovery</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Be sure to watch and listen to Upcoming Episodes on:</p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Scott Peterson</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Michael Ohr case</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">JonBenét Ramsey case</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Other pop culture legal cases</li>
</ul>
<p>Subscribe, follow and send us your questions: <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>#lawmoms #mompreneurs #LaurenandLacey #BritneySpears #itsBritneyBitch #conservatorship</p>
<p> </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This week on The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey open with a question on Estate Planning & Powers of Attorney. They discuss wills for single individuals without children, recommendations for everyone over 18 and the importance of having someone able to handle bills and accounts if incapacitated. 
Now on to the episode topic: Britney Spears' Conservatorship!
The Lawmas cover:

California vs. South Carolina conservatorship laws
Multiple doctors involved in declaring incompetence
Issues with Jamie Spears (Britney's father) as conservator:

History of exploitation
Past lawsuits and creditor issues
Alcoholism
Financial abuse of Britney since childhood



There are several key issues with conservatorship:

No attorney choice for Britney
Complete loss of bodily autonomy

Forced IUD
Controlled diet/food intake


No privacy in medical treatment

Father could access therapy notes
Could attend therapy sessions


More restrictive than typical conservatorships

Background Context on Britney Spears:

Early exploitation as child star
History of trauma
Postpartum depression
Lack of support system
No opportunity for normal young adult development

Current Status:

Still showing effects of conservatorship trauma
Behavioral patterns reflecting stunted emotional development
Questions about potential for full recovery

Be sure to watch and listen to Upcoming Episodes on:

Scott Peterson
Michael Ohr case
JonBenét Ramsey case
Other pop culture legal cases

Subscribe, follow and send us your questions: thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
 
#lawmoms #mompreneurs #LaurenandLacey #BritneySpears #itsBritneyBitch #conservatorship
 ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 11: It's Britney B!tch (and Her Conservatorship)]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">This week on The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey open with a question on Estate Planning &amp; Powers of Attorney. They discuss wills for single individuals without children, recommendations for everyone over 18 and the importance of having someone able to handle bills and accounts if incapacitated. </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Now on to the episode topic: Britney Spears' Conservatorship!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The Lawmas cover:</p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">California vs. South Carolina conservatorship laws</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Multiple doctors involved in declaring incompetence</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Issues with Jamie Spears (Britney's father) as conservator:
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">History of exploitation</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Past lawsuits and creditor issues</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Alcoholism</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Financial abuse of Britney since childhood</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">There are several key issues with conservatorship:</p>
<ol class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-decimal space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">No attorney choice for Britney</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Complete loss of bodily autonomy
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Forced IUD</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Controlled diet/food intake</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">No privacy in medical treatment
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Father could access therapy notes</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Could attend therapy sessions</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">More restrictive than typical conservatorships</li>
</ol>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Background Context on Britney Spears:</p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Early exploitation as child star</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">History of trauma</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Postpartum depression</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lack of support system</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">No opportunity for normal young adult development</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Current Status:</p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Still showing effects of conservatorship trauma</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Behavioral patterns reflecting stunted emotional development</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Questions about potential for full recovery</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Be sure to watch and listen to Upcoming Episodes on:</p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Scott Peterson</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Michael Ohr case</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">JonBenét Ramsey case</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Other pop culture legal cases</li>
</ul>
<p>Subscribe, follow and send us your questions: <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>#lawmoms #mompreneurs #LaurenandLacey #BritneySpears #itsBritneyBitch #conservatorship</p>
<p> </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1933569/c1e-5w3p7um8490iqxz77-0v5d2gnjb25r-lajrg7.mp3" length="52877733"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This week on The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey open with a question on Estate Planning & Powers of Attorney. They discuss wills for single individuals without children, recommendations for everyone over 18 and the importance of having someone able to handle bills and accounts if incapacitated. 
Now on to the episode topic: Britney Spears' Conservatorship!
The Lawmas cover:

California vs. South Carolina conservatorship laws
Multiple doctors involved in declaring incompetence
Issues with Jamie Spears (Britney's father) as conservator:

History of exploitation
Past lawsuits and creditor issues
Alcoholism
Financial abuse of Britney since childhood



There are several key issues with conservatorship:

No attorney choice for Britney
Complete loss of bodily autonomy

Forced IUD
Controlled diet/food intake


No privacy in medical treatment

Father could access therapy notes
Could attend therapy sessions


More restrictive than typical conservatorships

Background Context on Britney Spears:

Early exploitation as child star
History of trauma
Postpartum depression
Lack of support system
No opportunity for normal young adult development

Current Status:

Still showing effects of conservatorship trauma
Behavioral patterns reflecting stunted emotional development
Questions about potential for full recovery

Be sure to watch and listen to Upcoming Episodes on:

Scott Peterson
Michael Ohr case
JonBenét Ramsey case
Other pop culture legal cases

Subscribe, follow and send us your questions: thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
 
#lawmoms #mompreneurs #LaurenandLacey #BritneySpears #itsBritneyBitch #conservatorship
 ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1933569/c1a-5w3p7-kpw2dr0zir9o-yrpqy7.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:27:08</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 10: Wedding Bells to Prison Cells: The Komoroski DUI Case]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2024 19:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1929426</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-10-6</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">This week's starts a series of high profile case episodes. Lacey &amp; Lauren discuss the case in South Carolina where Jamie Komoroski received a 25-year maximum sentence after pleading guilty to felony DUI resulting in death and great bodily injury. The incident involved hitting a golf cart carrying newlyweds, killing the bride.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren &amp; Lacey cover:</p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">A follow-up on the question about South Carolina parole board appointment process</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">An analysis of Komoroski's sentencing and motion to reconsider</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">The comparison with similar DUI cases and sentencing disparities</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">A discussion of mandatory minimums vs. education for prevention</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">And advice for parents and young adults regarding safe transportation</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Case Details:</p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Defendant: Jamie Komoroski</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Charges: Felony DUI with death, DUI with great bodily injury</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Sentence: 25 years (maximum)</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Circumstances: Hit golf cart carrying newlyweds, bride killed</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Motion to reconsider filed citing: no prior record, absence of intent, addiction treatment, remorse</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Legal Discussion:</p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Different DUI charge levels explained</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Concurrent vs. consecutive sentencing</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Sentencing disparities in comparable cases</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Impact of age and circumstances on sentencing</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Role of judicial discretion and bias</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Resources:</p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Current SC mandatory minimum for felony DUI with death: 1 year</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Maximum sentence: 25 years</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Preventive Measures:</p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Importance of ride-sharing options</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Parent strategies for encouraging safe choices</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Need for better youth education about legal consequences</li>
</ul>
<p>To contact The Lawmas, send an email to <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p>or Visit their website: <a href="mailto:TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com">TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>#lawmoms #podcast #mompreneurs #thelawmaspodcast #jamiekomoroski #golfcartbridecase</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This week's starts a series of high profile case episodes. Lacey & Lauren discuss the case in South Carolina where Jamie Komoroski received a 25-year maximum sentence after pleading guilty to felony DUI resulting in death and great bodily injury. The incident involved hitting a golf cart carrying newlyweds, killing the bride.
Lauren & Lacey cover:

A follow-up on the question about South Carolina parole board appointment process
An analysis of Komoroski's sentencing and motion to reconsider
The comparison with similar DUI cases and sentencing disparities
A discussion of mandatory minimums vs. education for prevention
And advice for parents and young adults regarding safe transportation

Case Details:

Defendant: Jamie Komoroski
Charges: Felony DUI with death, DUI with great bodily injury
Sentence: 25 years (maximum)
Circumstances: Hit golf cart carrying newlyweds, bride killed
Motion to reconsider filed citing: no prior record, absence of intent, addiction treatment, remorse

Legal Discussion:

Different DUI charge levels explained
Concurrent vs. consecutive sentencing
Sentencing disparities in comparable cases
Impact of age and circumstances on sentencing
Role of judicial discretion and bias

Resources:

Current SC mandatory minimum for felony DUI with death: 1 year
Maximum sentence: 25 years

Preventive Measures:

Importance of ride-sharing options
Parent strategies for encouraging safe choices
Need for better youth education about legal consequences

To contact The Lawmas, send an email to thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
or Visit their website: TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com
 
#lawmoms #podcast #mompreneurs #thelawmaspodcast #jamiekomoroski #golfcartbridecase]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 10: Wedding Bells to Prison Cells: The Komoroski DUI Case]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">This week's starts a series of high profile case episodes. Lacey &amp; Lauren discuss the case in South Carolina where Jamie Komoroski received a 25-year maximum sentence after pleading guilty to felony DUI resulting in death and great bodily injury. The incident involved hitting a golf cart carrying newlyweds, killing the bride.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren &amp; Lacey cover:</p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">A follow-up on the question about South Carolina parole board appointment process</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">An analysis of Komoroski's sentencing and motion to reconsider</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">The comparison with similar DUI cases and sentencing disparities</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">A discussion of mandatory minimums vs. education for prevention</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">And advice for parents and young adults regarding safe transportation</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Case Details:</p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Defendant: Jamie Komoroski</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Charges: Felony DUI with death, DUI with great bodily injury</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Sentence: 25 years (maximum)</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Circumstances: Hit golf cart carrying newlyweds, bride killed</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Motion to reconsider filed citing: no prior record, absence of intent, addiction treatment, remorse</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Legal Discussion:</p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Different DUI charge levels explained</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Concurrent vs. consecutive sentencing</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Sentencing disparities in comparable cases</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Impact of age and circumstances on sentencing</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Role of judicial discretion and bias</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Resources:</p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Current SC mandatory minimum for felony DUI with death: 1 year</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Maximum sentence: 25 years</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Preventive Measures:</p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Importance of ride-sharing options</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Parent strategies for encouraging safe choices</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Need for better youth education about legal consequences</li>
</ul>
<p>To contact The Lawmas, send an email to <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p>or Visit their website: <a href="mailto:TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com">TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>#lawmoms #podcast #mompreneurs #thelawmaspodcast #jamiekomoroski #golfcartbridecase</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1929426/c1e-qq1z9f2q6wmijvovq-v6z8dg40c2v7-ehtiqq.mp3" length="54071447"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This week's starts a series of high profile case episodes. Lacey & Lauren discuss the case in South Carolina where Jamie Komoroski received a 25-year maximum sentence after pleading guilty to felony DUI resulting in death and great bodily injury. The incident involved hitting a golf cart carrying newlyweds, killing the bride.
Lauren & Lacey cover:

A follow-up on the question about South Carolina parole board appointment process
An analysis of Komoroski's sentencing and motion to reconsider
The comparison with similar DUI cases and sentencing disparities
A discussion of mandatory minimums vs. education for prevention
And advice for parents and young adults regarding safe transportation

Case Details:

Defendant: Jamie Komoroski
Charges: Felony DUI with death, DUI with great bodily injury
Sentence: 25 years (maximum)
Circumstances: Hit golf cart carrying newlyweds, bride killed
Motion to reconsider filed citing: no prior record, absence of intent, addiction treatment, remorse

Legal Discussion:

Different DUI charge levels explained
Concurrent vs. consecutive sentencing
Sentencing disparities in comparable cases
Impact of age and circumstances on sentencing
Role of judicial discretion and bias

Resources:

Current SC mandatory minimum for felony DUI with death: 1 year
Maximum sentence: 25 years

Preventive Measures:

Importance of ride-sharing options
Parent strategies for encouraging safe choices
Need for better youth education about legal consequences

To contact The Lawmas, send an email to thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
or Visit their website: TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com
 
#lawmoms #podcast #mompreneurs #thelawmaspodcast #jamiekomoroski #golfcartbridecase]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1929426/c1a-5w3p7-34g2dp74i35p-5kx9lj.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:27:43</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Coming Soon! The Lawmas Podcast High Profile Case Series]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 15:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1923843</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/lawmas-podcast-series-teaser</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<div class="font-claude-message pr-4 md:pr-9 relative leading-[1.65rem] [&amp;_pre&gt;div]:bg-bg-300 [&amp;_.ignore-pre-bg&gt;div]:bg-transparent [&amp;_pre]:-mr-4 md:[&amp;_pre]:-mr-9">
<div>
<div class="grid-cols-1 grid gap-2.5 [&amp;_&gt;_*]:min-w-0">
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In a teaser for the upcoming The Lawmas Podcast series, Lauren &amp; Lacey announce their plans to explore high-profile cases starting later this week! Lauren will focus on entertainment industry cases including the Britney Spears conservatorship, Michael Ohr and The Blind Side controversy, and Johnny Depp's defamation trial.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lacey plans to examine criminal cases, specifically highlighting the Jamie Komoroski case from South Carolina, where a woman pled guilty to felony DUI death after killing a bride on a golf cart following her wedding. They also express interest in revisiting the JonBenet Ramsey case with new insights to share.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren &amp; Lacey also plan to cover the O.J. Simpson case, which one host recalls watching at age five! This mix of entertainment, local, and historical criminal cases promises to be great episodes for you!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Contact The Lawmas at <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Find out more about The Lawmas on their website: thelawmaspodcast.com</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#podcast #lawmoms #mompreneur #highprofilecases #jonbenetramsey #jamiekomoroski #OJSimpson #BritneySpears #JohnnyDepp</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="absolute -bottom-0 -right-1.5"> </div>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[


In a teaser for the upcoming The Lawmas Podcast series, Lauren & Lacey announce their plans to explore high-profile cases starting later this week! Lauren will focus on entertainment industry cases including the Britney Spears conservatorship, Michael Ohr and The Blind Side controversy, and Johnny Depp's defamation trial.
Lacey plans to examine criminal cases, specifically highlighting the Jamie Komoroski case from South Carolina, where a woman pled guilty to felony DUI death after killing a bride on a golf cart following her wedding. They also express interest in revisiting the JonBenet Ramsey case with new insights to share.
Lauren & Lacey also plan to cover the O.J. Simpson case, which one host recalls watching at age five! This mix of entertainment, local, and historical criminal cases promises to be great episodes for you!
 
Contact The Lawmas at thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
Find out more about The Lawmas on their website: thelawmaspodcast.com
#podcast #lawmoms #mompreneur #highprofilecases #jonbenetramsey #jamiekomoroski #OJSimpson #BritneySpears #JohnnyDepp



 ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>trailer</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Coming Soon! The Lawmas Podcast High Profile Case Series]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<div class="font-claude-message pr-4 md:pr-9 relative leading-[1.65rem] [&amp;_pre&gt;div]:bg-bg-300 [&amp;_.ignore-pre-bg&gt;div]:bg-transparent [&amp;_pre]:-mr-4 md:[&amp;_pre]:-mr-9">
<div>
<div class="grid-cols-1 grid gap-2.5 [&amp;_&gt;_*]:min-w-0">
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In a teaser for the upcoming The Lawmas Podcast series, Lauren &amp; Lacey announce their plans to explore high-profile cases starting later this week! Lauren will focus on entertainment industry cases including the Britney Spears conservatorship, Michael Ohr and The Blind Side controversy, and Johnny Depp's defamation trial.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lacey plans to examine criminal cases, specifically highlighting the Jamie Komoroski case from South Carolina, where a woman pled guilty to felony DUI death after killing a bride on a golf cart following her wedding. They also express interest in revisiting the JonBenet Ramsey case with new insights to share.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren &amp; Lacey also plan to cover the O.J. Simpson case, which one host recalls watching at age five! This mix of entertainment, local, and historical criminal cases promises to be great episodes for you!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Contact The Lawmas at <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Find out more about The Lawmas on their website: thelawmaspodcast.com</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#podcast #lawmoms #mompreneur #highprofilecases #jonbenetramsey #jamiekomoroski #OJSimpson #BritneySpears #JohnnyDepp</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="absolute -bottom-0 -right-1.5"> </div>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1923843/c1e-wq7k1frm9jzb8gwr5-nd4grno5uzk1-jo56xv.mp3" length="2598121"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[


In a teaser for the upcoming The Lawmas Podcast series, Lauren & Lacey announce their plans to explore high-profile cases starting later this week! Lauren will focus on entertainment industry cases including the Britney Spears conservatorship, Michael Ohr and The Blind Side controversy, and Johnny Depp's defamation trial.
Lacey plans to examine criminal cases, specifically highlighting the Jamie Komoroski case from South Carolina, where a woman pled guilty to felony DUI death after killing a bride on a golf cart following her wedding. They also express interest in revisiting the JonBenet Ramsey case with new insights to share.
Lauren & Lacey also plan to cover the O.J. Simpson case, which one host recalls watching at age five! This mix of entertainment, local, and historical criminal cases promises to be great episodes for you!
 
Contact The Lawmas at thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
Find out more about The Lawmas on their website: thelawmaspodcast.com
#podcast #lawmoms #mompreneur #highprofilecases #jonbenetramsey #jamiekomoroski #OJSimpson #BritneySpears #JohnnyDepp



 ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1923843/c1a-5w3p7-pkjzn4g5tjkp-kimvo5.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:01:19</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 9: Holiday Survival Guide: How to Not Get Arrested!]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 15:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1923838</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-9-2</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Since the holidays are here, Lauren and Lacey provide expert legal guidance on navigating common holiday-related legal situations, with a focus on DUI prevention and domestic violence awareness to avoid getting arrested!</p>
<h4 class="font-600 text-lg font-bold">Question of the Day: Can You Sue After a Dismissed Criminal Case?</h4>
<p class="font-600 text-lg font-bold">Lauren and Lacey discuss civil lawsuits following dismissed criminal charges. There are key challenges in pursuing such cases:</p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Civil attorneys typically work on contingency (⅓ of damages recovered)</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Need for provable damages to make case viable</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Litigation costs start at $5,000+ for even simple cases</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">High upfront retainer requirements</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">No guarantees of favorable jury/judge decisions</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lauren &amp; Lacey discuss a real case example so listen to get the details!</li>
</ul>
<h3 class="font-600 text-lg font-bold">DUI Prevention and Legal Rights</h3>
<h4 class="font-600 text-base font-bold">Scenario Discussion: One Glass of Wine</h4>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lacey gives a detailed breakdown of proper response to a police stop, such as field sobriety tests, blood vs breath testing, and important considerations.</p>
<h4 class="font-600 text-lg font-bold">Then they move onto Domestic Violence during the holidays</h4>
<p class="font-600 text-base font-bold">Lacey talks about Law Enforcement Response, including the procedure for domestic calls, officer discretion factors, and recommendations if no arrest is made.</p>
<p class="font-600 text-lg font-bold">Lauren and Lacey also discuss Holiday Safety Tips, including managing alcohol consumption, watch what you post on social media (and how posts can be admissable in court). Domestic violence resources are also discussed and they give a few tips for victims.</p>
<p> </p>
<h4 class="font-600 text-xl font-bold">Connect With The Show!</h4>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Subscribe to podcast for regular updates</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Follow on Instagram for behind-the-scenes content</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Stay connected for new episode announcements</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Email the Lawmas with your questions: <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></li>
</ul>
<p>#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #mompreneurs #lawpodcast #laurenandlacey #attorneypodcast #businessownerpodcast #criminaldefenselawyer #estateplanningattorney</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Since the holidays are here, Lauren and Lacey provide expert legal guidance on navigating common holiday-related legal situations, with a focus on DUI prevention and domestic violence awareness to avoid getting arrested!
Question of the Day: Can You Sue After a Dismissed Criminal Case?
Lauren and Lacey discuss civil lawsuits following dismissed criminal charges. There are key challenges in pursuing such cases:

Civil attorneys typically work on contingency (⅓ of damages recovered)
Need for provable damages to make case viable
Litigation costs start at $5,000+ for even simple cases
High upfront retainer requirements
No guarantees of favorable jury/judge decisions
Lauren & Lacey discuss a real case example so listen to get the details!

DUI Prevention and Legal Rights
Scenario Discussion: One Glass of Wine
Lacey gives a detailed breakdown of proper response to a police stop, such as field sobriety tests, blood vs breath testing, and important considerations.
Then they move onto Domestic Violence during the holidays
Lacey talks about Law Enforcement Response, including the procedure for domestic calls, officer discretion factors, and recommendations if no arrest is made.
Lauren and Lacey also discuss Holiday Safety Tips, including managing alcohol consumption, watch what you post on social media (and how posts can be admissable in court). Domestic violence resources are also discussed and they give a few tips for victims.
 
Connect With The Show!

Subscribe to podcast for regular updates
Follow on Instagram for behind-the-scenes content
Stay connected for new episode announcements
Email the Lawmas with your questions: thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com

#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #mompreneurs #lawpodcast #laurenandlacey #attorneypodcast #businessownerpodcast #criminaldefenselawyer #estateplanningattorney]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 9: Holiday Survival Guide: How to Not Get Arrested!]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Since the holidays are here, Lauren and Lacey provide expert legal guidance on navigating common holiday-related legal situations, with a focus on DUI prevention and domestic violence awareness to avoid getting arrested!</p>
<h4 class="font-600 text-lg font-bold">Question of the Day: Can You Sue After a Dismissed Criminal Case?</h4>
<p class="font-600 text-lg font-bold">Lauren and Lacey discuss civil lawsuits following dismissed criminal charges. There are key challenges in pursuing such cases:</p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Civil attorneys typically work on contingency (⅓ of damages recovered)</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Need for provable damages to make case viable</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Litigation costs start at $5,000+ for even simple cases</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">High upfront retainer requirements</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">No guarantees of favorable jury/judge decisions</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lauren &amp; Lacey discuss a real case example so listen to get the details!</li>
</ul>
<h3 class="font-600 text-lg font-bold">DUI Prevention and Legal Rights</h3>
<h4 class="font-600 text-base font-bold">Scenario Discussion: One Glass of Wine</h4>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lacey gives a detailed breakdown of proper response to a police stop, such as field sobriety tests, blood vs breath testing, and important considerations.</p>
<h4 class="font-600 text-lg font-bold">Then they move onto Domestic Violence during the holidays</h4>
<p class="font-600 text-base font-bold">Lacey talks about Law Enforcement Response, including the procedure for domestic calls, officer discretion factors, and recommendations if no arrest is made.</p>
<p class="font-600 text-lg font-bold">Lauren and Lacey also discuss Holiday Safety Tips, including managing alcohol consumption, watch what you post on social media (and how posts can be admissable in court). Domestic violence resources are also discussed and they give a few tips for victims.</p>
<p> </p>
<h4 class="font-600 text-xl font-bold">Connect With The Show!</h4>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Subscribe to podcast for regular updates</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Follow on Instagram for behind-the-scenes content</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Stay connected for new episode announcements</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Email the Lawmas with your questions: <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></li>
</ul>
<p>#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #mompreneurs #lawpodcast #laurenandlacey #attorneypodcast #businessownerpodcast #criminaldefenselawyer #estateplanningattorney</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1923838/c1e-zq4jvfmk5q0u1kz35-ok310wnvcj2j-zt9naz.mp3" length="44532008"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Since the holidays are here, Lauren and Lacey provide expert legal guidance on navigating common holiday-related legal situations, with a focus on DUI prevention and domestic violence awareness to avoid getting arrested!
Question of the Day: Can You Sue After a Dismissed Criminal Case?
Lauren and Lacey discuss civil lawsuits following dismissed criminal charges. There are key challenges in pursuing such cases:

Civil attorneys typically work on contingency (⅓ of damages recovered)
Need for provable damages to make case viable
Litigation costs start at $5,000+ for even simple cases
High upfront retainer requirements
No guarantees of favorable jury/judge decisions
Lauren & Lacey discuss a real case example so listen to get the details!

DUI Prevention and Legal Rights
Scenario Discussion: One Glass of Wine
Lacey gives a detailed breakdown of proper response to a police stop, such as field sobriety tests, blood vs breath testing, and important considerations.
Then they move onto Domestic Violence during the holidays
Lacey talks about Law Enforcement Response, including the procedure for domestic calls, officer discretion factors, and recommendations if no arrest is made.
Lauren and Lacey also discuss Holiday Safety Tips, including managing alcohol consumption, watch what you post on social media (and how posts can be admissable in court). Domestic violence resources are also discussed and they give a few tips for victims.
 
Connect With The Show!

Subscribe to podcast for regular updates
Follow on Instagram for behind-the-scenes content
Stay connected for new episode announcements
Email the Lawmas with your questions: thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com

#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #mompreneurs #lawpodcast #laurenandlacey #attorneypodcast #businessownerpodcast #criminaldefenselawyer #estateplanningattorney]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1923838/c1a-5w3p7-34g15nv1bjjg-gi0esd.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:22:50</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 8: Sleigh the Holidays: Balancing Law, Life, and Family]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1919850</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-8-1</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this holiday-themed episode, Lacey and Lauren dive into the delicate art of balancing work and family during the festive season. The dynamic duo discusses how their law firms handle the holidays, sharing insights into their unique approaches to time off, client communication, and maintaining flexibility. They dig into the importance of setting boundaries, with both emphasize the need to prioritize family while still remaining accessible for truly urgent matters.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The conversation takes an interesting turn as they discuss the intricacies of power of attorney, with Lauren providing a detailed explanation of financial and medical power of attorney in South Carolina. The hosts also share personal strategies for managing holiday responsibilities, including creative gift-giving solutions like Amazon wishlists and the challenges of holiday shopping and wrapping. Lauren and Lacey discuss how they support their husbands and manage family expectations during this busy time of year.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">As small business owners and mothers, Lacey and Lauren reflect on the importance of being present with their families while still maintaining professional responsibilities. They offer practical advice for other working parents, highlighting the value of communication, setting boundaries, and being intentional about quality time. The episode concludes with both hosts sharing their personal goals for the holiday season - Lauren focusing on being present with her children, and Lacey working on better communicating with her husband about shared responsibilities.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">To learn more about Lauren &amp; Lacey, visit The Lawmas website: <a href="https://www.thelawmaspodcast.com">https://www.thelawmaspodcast.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Send in your questions and comments to <a href="mailto:TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com">TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com</a> or through the website!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#podcast #thelawmas #balancingworkandhome #laurenandlacey #mompreneurs #legalmoms</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this holiday-themed episode, Lacey and Lauren dive into the delicate art of balancing work and family during the festive season. The dynamic duo discusses how their law firms handle the holidays, sharing insights into their unique approaches to time off, client communication, and maintaining flexibility. They dig into the importance of setting boundaries, with both emphasize the need to prioritize family while still remaining accessible for truly urgent matters.
The conversation takes an interesting turn as they discuss the intricacies of power of attorney, with Lauren providing a detailed explanation of financial and medical power of attorney in South Carolina. The hosts also share personal strategies for managing holiday responsibilities, including creative gift-giving solutions like Amazon wishlists and the challenges of holiday shopping and wrapping. Lauren and Lacey discuss how they support their husbands and manage family expectations during this busy time of year.
As small business owners and mothers, Lacey and Lauren reflect on the importance of being present with their families while still maintaining professional responsibilities. They offer practical advice for other working parents, highlighting the value of communication, setting boundaries, and being intentional about quality time. The episode concludes with both hosts sharing their personal goals for the holiday season - Lauren focusing on being present with her children, and Lacey working on better communicating with her husband about shared responsibilities.
To learn more about Lauren & Lacey, visit The Lawmas website: https://www.thelawmaspodcast.com
Send in your questions and comments to TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com or through the website!
#podcast #thelawmas #balancingworkandhome #laurenandlacey #mompreneurs #legalmoms]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 8: Sleigh the Holidays: Balancing Law, Life, and Family]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this holiday-themed episode, Lacey and Lauren dive into the delicate art of balancing work and family during the festive season. The dynamic duo discusses how their law firms handle the holidays, sharing insights into their unique approaches to time off, client communication, and maintaining flexibility. They dig into the importance of setting boundaries, with both emphasize the need to prioritize family while still remaining accessible for truly urgent matters.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The conversation takes an interesting turn as they discuss the intricacies of power of attorney, with Lauren providing a detailed explanation of financial and medical power of attorney in South Carolina. The hosts also share personal strategies for managing holiday responsibilities, including creative gift-giving solutions like Amazon wishlists and the challenges of holiday shopping and wrapping. Lauren and Lacey discuss how they support their husbands and manage family expectations during this busy time of year.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">As small business owners and mothers, Lacey and Lauren reflect on the importance of being present with their families while still maintaining professional responsibilities. They offer practical advice for other working parents, highlighting the value of communication, setting boundaries, and being intentional about quality time. The episode concludes with both hosts sharing their personal goals for the holiday season - Lauren focusing on being present with her children, and Lacey working on better communicating with her husband about shared responsibilities.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">To learn more about Lauren &amp; Lacey, visit The Lawmas website: <a href="https://www.thelawmaspodcast.com">https://www.thelawmaspodcast.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Send in your questions and comments to <a href="mailto:TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com">TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com</a> or through the website!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#podcast #thelawmas #balancingworkandhome #laurenandlacey #mompreneurs #legalmoms</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1919850/c1e-x67d2imznrzsk7n9g-4715q8k9a4ow-3gdsv1.mp3" length="52760864"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this holiday-themed episode, Lacey and Lauren dive into the delicate art of balancing work and family during the festive season. The dynamic duo discusses how their law firms handle the holidays, sharing insights into their unique approaches to time off, client communication, and maintaining flexibility. They dig into the importance of setting boundaries, with both emphasize the need to prioritize family while still remaining accessible for truly urgent matters.
The conversation takes an interesting turn as they discuss the intricacies of power of attorney, with Lauren providing a detailed explanation of financial and medical power of attorney in South Carolina. The hosts also share personal strategies for managing holiday responsibilities, including creative gift-giving solutions like Amazon wishlists and the challenges of holiday shopping and wrapping. Lauren and Lacey discuss how they support their husbands and manage family expectations during this busy time of year.
As small business owners and mothers, Lacey and Lauren reflect on the importance of being present with their families while still maintaining professional responsibilities. They offer practical advice for other working parents, highlighting the value of communication, setting boundaries, and being intentional about quality time. The episode concludes with both hosts sharing their personal goals for the holiday season - Lauren focusing on being present with her children, and Lacey working on better communicating with her husband about shared responsibilities.
To learn more about Lauren & Lacey, visit The Lawmas website: https://www.thelawmaspodcast.com
Send in your questions and comments to TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com or through the website!
#podcast #thelawmas #balancingworkandhome #laurenandlacey #mompreneurs #legalmoms]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1919850/c1a-5w3p7-pkj3m04ks833-o5cuda.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:27:04</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 7: Friendship, Family, and the Balancing Act]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 18:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1914912</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-7-4</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey and Lauren dive into the challenging task of balancing friendships, work, and motherhood. They candidly share personal experiences of struggling to maintain meaningful connections while juggling multiple responsibilities as attorneys, business owners, and mothers.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The conversation explores the difficulties of being present for friends during tough times, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Both hosts recount instances where they felt they fell short in supporting friends—such as Lacey not visiting a friend going through a divorce and Lauren missing a friend's funeral due to pandemic fears—highlighting the emotional toll of trying to balance personal and professional commitments.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">They also share insights on maintaining friendships, emphasizing quality over quantity. They discuss strategies like making intentional efforts during free moments, sending supportive texts, and creating special traditions (like Lacey's Gamecock game days with friends). Lacey &amp; Lauren invite listeners to share their own tips for managing friendships while navigating the complexities of work and family life!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">If you have questions for Lauren &amp; Lacey to answer, email them to <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com!">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com!</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #lawyerpodcast #lawmoms #attorneypodcast</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey and Lauren dive into the challenging task of balancing friendships, work, and motherhood. They candidly share personal experiences of struggling to maintain meaningful connections while juggling multiple responsibilities as attorneys, business owners, and mothers.
The conversation explores the difficulties of being present for friends during tough times, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Both hosts recount instances where they felt they fell short in supporting friends—such as Lacey not visiting a friend going through a divorce and Lauren missing a friend's funeral due to pandemic fears—highlighting the emotional toll of trying to balance personal and professional commitments.
They also share insights on maintaining friendships, emphasizing quality over quantity. They discuss strategies like making intentional efforts during free moments, sending supportive texts, and creating special traditions (like Lacey's Gamecock game days with friends). Lacey & Lauren invite listeners to share their own tips for managing friendships while navigating the complexities of work and family life!
If you have questions for Lauren & Lacey to answer, email them to thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com!
 
#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #lawyerpodcast #lawmoms #attorneypodcast]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 7: Friendship, Family, and the Balancing Act]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey and Lauren dive into the challenging task of balancing friendships, work, and motherhood. They candidly share personal experiences of struggling to maintain meaningful connections while juggling multiple responsibilities as attorneys, business owners, and mothers.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The conversation explores the difficulties of being present for friends during tough times, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Both hosts recount instances where they felt they fell short in supporting friends—such as Lacey not visiting a friend going through a divorce and Lauren missing a friend's funeral due to pandemic fears—highlighting the emotional toll of trying to balance personal and professional commitments.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">They also share insights on maintaining friendships, emphasizing quality over quantity. They discuss strategies like making intentional efforts during free moments, sending supportive texts, and creating special traditions (like Lacey's Gamecock game days with friends). Lacey &amp; Lauren invite listeners to share their own tips for managing friendships while navigating the complexities of work and family life!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">If you have questions for Lauren &amp; Lacey to answer, email them to <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com!">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com!</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #lawyerpodcast #lawmoms #attorneypodcast</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1914912/c1e-nq1mxf5wqqmiqzro7-gpkggjvmhp17-umuvyi.mp3" length="49047275"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lacey and Lauren dive into the challenging task of balancing friendships, work, and motherhood. They candidly share personal experiences of struggling to maintain meaningful connections while juggling multiple responsibilities as attorneys, business owners, and mothers.
The conversation explores the difficulties of being present for friends during tough times, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Both hosts recount instances where they felt they fell short in supporting friends—such as Lacey not visiting a friend going through a divorce and Lauren missing a friend's funeral due to pandemic fears—highlighting the emotional toll of trying to balance personal and professional commitments.
They also share insights on maintaining friendships, emphasizing quality over quantity. They discuss strategies like making intentional efforts during free moments, sending supportive texts, and creating special traditions (like Lacey's Gamecock game days with friends). Lacey & Lauren invite listeners to share their own tips for managing friendships while navigating the complexities of work and family life!
If you have questions for Lauren & Lacey to answer, email them to thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com!
 
#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #lawyerpodcast #lawmoms #attorneypodcast]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1914912/c1a-5w3p7-5zknnq0jipdq-ekwivg.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:25:11</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 6: The Susan Smith Case, After the Parole Hearing]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 15:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1909474</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/episode-6-33</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of the The Lawmas podcast, hosts Lacey and Lauren discuss Susan Smith's recent parole hearing, where she was denied release after serving time for murdering her two sons in 1994. Lacey &amp; Lauren dive into the details of the hearing, highlighting key moments and reasons for her parole denial, including her lack of family support and multiple infractions while incarcerated.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The discussion focuses on critical aspects of the parole hearing, such as Smith's legal representation, her responses to questioning, and the testimony from the victims' family. Notable speakers included David Smith (the children's father), his wife, and his daughter, who powerfully spoke about the lasting impact of the tragedy. The hosts emphasized the importance of taking accountability and showing genuine remorse during parole hearings.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lacey and Lauren explore the legal nuances of parole in South Carolina, noting that before 1996, life sentences came with the possibility of parole. They discuss Smith's ability to reapply for parole every two years and share their perspectives on what might improve her chances in future hearings, including the need for more transparency about her mental health treatment and a more compelling narrative of personal growth and accountability.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Send questions to The Lawmas: <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#susansmith #podcast #thelawmaspodcast #parolehearing</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of the The Lawmas podcast, hosts Lacey and Lauren discuss Susan Smith's recent parole hearing, where she was denied release after serving time for murdering her two sons in 1994. Lacey & Lauren dive into the details of the hearing, highlighting key moments and reasons for her parole denial, including her lack of family support and multiple infractions while incarcerated.
The discussion focuses on critical aspects of the parole hearing, such as Smith's legal representation, her responses to questioning, and the testimony from the victims' family. Notable speakers included David Smith (the children's father), his wife, and his daughter, who powerfully spoke about the lasting impact of the tragedy. The hosts emphasized the importance of taking accountability and showing genuine remorse during parole hearings.
Lacey and Lauren explore the legal nuances of parole in South Carolina, noting that before 1996, life sentences came with the possibility of parole. They discuss Smith's ability to reapply for parole every two years and share their perspectives on what might improve her chances in future hearings, including the need for more transparency about her mental health treatment and a more compelling narrative of personal growth and accountability.
Send questions to The Lawmas: thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
 
#susansmith #podcast #thelawmaspodcast #parolehearing]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 6: The Susan Smith Case, After the Parole Hearing]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of the The Lawmas podcast, hosts Lacey and Lauren discuss Susan Smith's recent parole hearing, where she was denied release after serving time for murdering her two sons in 1994. Lacey &amp; Lauren dive into the details of the hearing, highlighting key moments and reasons for her parole denial, including her lack of family support and multiple infractions while incarcerated.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The discussion focuses on critical aspects of the parole hearing, such as Smith's legal representation, her responses to questioning, and the testimony from the victims' family. Notable speakers included David Smith (the children's father), his wife, and his daughter, who powerfully spoke about the lasting impact of the tragedy. The hosts emphasized the importance of taking accountability and showing genuine remorse during parole hearings.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lacey and Lauren explore the legal nuances of parole in South Carolina, noting that before 1996, life sentences came with the possibility of parole. They discuss Smith's ability to reapply for parole every two years and share their perspectives on what might improve her chances in future hearings, including the need for more transparency about her mental health treatment and a more compelling narrative of personal growth and accountability.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Send questions to The Lawmas: <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#susansmith #podcast #thelawmaspodcast #parolehearing</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1909474/c1e-vqw7gf90rjxsdzxj6-5zkw92drh0md-ab8ijs.mp3" length="59008923"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of the The Lawmas podcast, hosts Lacey and Lauren discuss Susan Smith's recent parole hearing, where she was denied release after serving time for murdering her two sons in 1994. Lacey & Lauren dive into the details of the hearing, highlighting key moments and reasons for her parole denial, including her lack of family support and multiple infractions while incarcerated.
The discussion focuses on critical aspects of the parole hearing, such as Smith's legal representation, her responses to questioning, and the testimony from the victims' family. Notable speakers included David Smith (the children's father), his wife, and his daughter, who powerfully spoke about the lasting impact of the tragedy. The hosts emphasized the importance of taking accountability and showing genuine remorse during parole hearings.
Lacey and Lauren explore the legal nuances of parole in South Carolina, noting that before 1996, life sentences came with the possibility of parole. They discuss Smith's ability to reapply for parole every two years and share their perspectives on what might improve her chances in future hearings, including the need for more transparency about her mental health treatment and a more compelling narrative of personal growth and accountability.
Send questions to The Lawmas: thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
 
#susansmith #podcast #thelawmaspodcast #parolehearing]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1909474/c1a-5w3p7-pkjq25vksjjw-k1i3cq.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:30:20</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 5: Work Smarter, Not Harder: When to Let Go & Outsource]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 18:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1903756</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/episode-5-outsourcing</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, attorneys and moms Lacey and Lauren dive into the important topic of outsourcing, both in business and home life. The episode begins with a  brief Q&amp;A about probate records, explaining that wills are public records and heirs should receive notice from the court when they're named in a will.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">They then share their experiences with business outsourcing, emphasizing how although hiring staff and delegating tasks, such as marketing, can be scary for small business owners, it often leads to increased profitability and better work-life balance. Lauren discusses how hiring a paralegal has allowed her firm to bill more hours, while Lacey shares how bringing on an associate attorney has helped her return to doing work she enjoys, like bond court. They also stress the importance of treating staff well and creating an open, family-like office environment where employees feel comfortable discussing personal challenges.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lacey and Lauren also discuss outsourcing in personal life, particularly as working moms. Both advocate for letting go of guilt associated with hiring house cleaners, ordering takeout, or paying for lawn care, emphasizing that outsourcing household tasks allows them to spend more quality time with their families.  Consider outsourcing when possible and recommend supporting small local businesses when doing so!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Subscribe so you don't miss an episode!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">If you have a question for The Lawmas, email <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#podcast #legalmoms #thelawmas #outsourcing</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, attorneys and moms Lacey and Lauren dive into the important topic of outsourcing, both in business and home life. The episode begins with a  brief Q&A about probate records, explaining that wills are public records and heirs should receive notice from the court when they're named in a will.
They then share their experiences with business outsourcing, emphasizing how although hiring staff and delegating tasks, such as marketing, can be scary for small business owners, it often leads to increased profitability and better work-life balance. Lauren discusses how hiring a paralegal has allowed her firm to bill more hours, while Lacey shares how bringing on an associate attorney has helped her return to doing work she enjoys, like bond court. They also stress the importance of treating staff well and creating an open, family-like office environment where employees feel comfortable discussing personal challenges.
Lacey and Lauren also discuss outsourcing in personal life, particularly as working moms. Both advocate for letting go of guilt associated with hiring house cleaners, ordering takeout, or paying for lawn care, emphasizing that outsourcing household tasks allows them to spend more quality time with their families.  Consider outsourcing when possible and recommend supporting small local businesses when doing so!
 
Subscribe so you don't miss an episode!
If you have a question for The Lawmas, email thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
 
#podcast #legalmoms #thelawmas #outsourcing]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 5: Work Smarter, Not Harder: When to Let Go & Outsource]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, attorneys and moms Lacey and Lauren dive into the important topic of outsourcing, both in business and home life. The episode begins with a  brief Q&amp;A about probate records, explaining that wills are public records and heirs should receive notice from the court when they're named in a will.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">They then share their experiences with business outsourcing, emphasizing how although hiring staff and delegating tasks, such as marketing, can be scary for small business owners, it often leads to increased profitability and better work-life balance. Lauren discusses how hiring a paralegal has allowed her firm to bill more hours, while Lacey shares how bringing on an associate attorney has helped her return to doing work she enjoys, like bond court. They also stress the importance of treating staff well and creating an open, family-like office environment where employees feel comfortable discussing personal challenges.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lacey and Lauren also discuss outsourcing in personal life, particularly as working moms. Both advocate for letting go of guilt associated with hiring house cleaners, ordering takeout, or paying for lawn care, emphasizing that outsourcing household tasks allows them to spend more quality time with their families.  Consider outsourcing when possible and recommend supporting small local businesses when doing so!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Subscribe so you don't miss an episode!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">If you have a question for The Lawmas, email <a href="mailto:thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com">thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#podcast #legalmoms #thelawmas #outsourcing</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1903756/c1e-mpgndfn223zag40pk-pkj291npi9qn-vt2e5x.mp3" length="49918529"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, attorneys and moms Lacey and Lauren dive into the important topic of outsourcing, both in business and home life. The episode begins with a  brief Q&A about probate records, explaining that wills are public records and heirs should receive notice from the court when they're named in a will.
They then share their experiences with business outsourcing, emphasizing how although hiring staff and delegating tasks, such as marketing, can be scary for small business owners, it often leads to increased profitability and better work-life balance. Lauren discusses how hiring a paralegal has allowed her firm to bill more hours, while Lacey shares how bringing on an associate attorney has helped her return to doing work she enjoys, like bond court. They also stress the importance of treating staff well and creating an open, family-like office environment where employees feel comfortable discussing personal challenges.
Lacey and Lauren also discuss outsourcing in personal life, particularly as working moms. Both advocate for letting go of guilt associated with hiring house cleaners, ordering takeout, or paying for lawn care, emphasizing that outsourcing household tasks allows them to spend more quality time with their families.  Consider outsourcing when possible and recommend supporting small local businesses when doing so!
 
Subscribe so you don't miss an episode!
If you have a question for The Lawmas, email thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com
 
#podcast #legalmoms #thelawmas #outsourcing]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1903756/c1a-5w3p7-jpj749xrb225-alypnu.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:25:40</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 4: The Lawmas and Juggling Families and Clients]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 16:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1876744</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/lawmas-podcast-episode-4-about-their-families</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<div class="font-claude-message pr-4 md:pr-9 relative leading-[1.65rem] [&amp;_pre&gt;div]:bg-bg-300 [&amp;_.ignore-pre-bg&gt;div]:bg-transparent [&amp;_pre]:-mr-4 md:[&amp;_pre]:-mr-9">
<div>
<div class="grid-cols-1 grid gap-2.5 [&amp;_&gt;_*]:min-w-0">
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">This week, Lauren and Lacey talk about the challenges of being both a mom and a lawyer, dealing with difficult children and clients.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lacey shares frustrations over her young son's frequent tantrums and refusal to listen, contrasting his behavior with her client's inability to make decisions about their criminal case. Lauren relates similar experiences with her own young daughters, noting how children can behave worse for their parents than others.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">They commiserate over how the stresses of their jobs dealing with difficult personalities can exacerbate the challenges at home. Lauren and Lacey are very grateful for having supportive partners, both at work and in their personal lives, to help them through these trying times. Having someone who can step in when they've reached their limit with a client or child provides much-needed relief.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren &amp; Lacey agree that running on caffeine gets them through many of these tough days juggling parenting and lawyering! </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Subscribe to The Lawmas and never miss an episode! Back next week!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">If you have questions for Lauren &amp; Lacey, email TheLawmasPodcast@Gmail.com</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#mompodcast #lawyerpodcat #thelawmaspodcast #criminaldefenselawyer #mompreneur #estateplanninglawyer</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="absolute -bottom-0 -right-1.5"> </div>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[


This week, Lauren and Lacey talk about the challenges of being both a mom and a lawyer, dealing with difficult children and clients.
Lacey shares frustrations over her young son's frequent tantrums and refusal to listen, contrasting his behavior with her client's inability to make decisions about their criminal case. Lauren relates similar experiences with her own young daughters, noting how children can behave worse for their parents than others.
They commiserate over how the stresses of their jobs dealing with difficult personalities can exacerbate the challenges at home. Lauren and Lacey are very grateful for having supportive partners, both at work and in their personal lives, to help them through these trying times. Having someone who can step in when they've reached their limit with a client or child provides much-needed relief.
Lauren & Lacey agree that running on caffeine gets them through many of these tough days juggling parenting and lawyering! 
Subscribe to The Lawmas and never miss an episode! Back next week!
If you have questions for Lauren & Lacey, email TheLawmasPodcast@Gmail.com
 
#mompodcast #lawyerpodcat #thelawmaspodcast #criminaldefenselawyer #mompreneur #estateplanninglawyer



 ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 4: The Lawmas and Juggling Families and Clients]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<div class="font-claude-message pr-4 md:pr-9 relative leading-[1.65rem] [&amp;_pre&gt;div]:bg-bg-300 [&amp;_.ignore-pre-bg&gt;div]:bg-transparent [&amp;_pre]:-mr-4 md:[&amp;_pre]:-mr-9">
<div>
<div class="grid-cols-1 grid gap-2.5 [&amp;_&gt;_*]:min-w-0">
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">This week, Lauren and Lacey talk about the challenges of being both a mom and a lawyer, dealing with difficult children and clients.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lacey shares frustrations over her young son's frequent tantrums and refusal to listen, contrasting his behavior with her client's inability to make decisions about their criminal case. Lauren relates similar experiences with her own young daughters, noting how children can behave worse for their parents than others.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">They commiserate over how the stresses of their jobs dealing with difficult personalities can exacerbate the challenges at home. Lauren and Lacey are very grateful for having supportive partners, both at work and in their personal lives, to help them through these trying times. Having someone who can step in when they've reached their limit with a client or child provides much-needed relief.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren &amp; Lacey agree that running on caffeine gets them through many of these tough days juggling parenting and lawyering! </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Subscribe to The Lawmas and never miss an episode! Back next week!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">If you have questions for Lauren &amp; Lacey, email TheLawmasPodcast@Gmail.com</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#mompodcast #lawyerpodcat #thelawmaspodcast #criminaldefenselawyer #mompreneur #estateplanninglawyer</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="absolute -bottom-0 -right-1.5"> </div>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1876744/c1e-0w9gzuj6xj2b6k3dd-471796o3hx6v-51napf.mp3" length="43665324"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[


This week, Lauren and Lacey talk about the challenges of being both a mom and a lawyer, dealing with difficult children and clients.
Lacey shares frustrations over her young son's frequent tantrums and refusal to listen, contrasting his behavior with her client's inability to make decisions about their criminal case. Lauren relates similar experiences with her own young daughters, noting how children can behave worse for their parents than others.
They commiserate over how the stresses of their jobs dealing with difficult personalities can exacerbate the challenges at home. Lauren and Lacey are very grateful for having supportive partners, both at work and in their personal lives, to help them through these trying times. Having someone who can step in when they've reached their limit with a client or child provides much-needed relief.
Lauren & Lacey agree that running on caffeine gets them through many of these tough days juggling parenting and lawyering! 
Subscribe to The Lawmas and never miss an episode! Back next week!
If you have questions for Lauren & Lacey, email TheLawmasPodcast@Gmail.com
 
#mompodcast #lawyerpodcat #thelawmaspodcast #criminaldefenselawyer #mompreneur #estateplanninglawyer



 ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1876744/c1a-5w3p7-gpkpdr5rt364-xde3zv.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:22:32</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 3: About The Lawmas]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 16:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1876741</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/lawmas-podcast-episode-3-intro-about-the-lawmas-and-the-podcast</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">After two episodes, it's time to go back and share how Lauren &amp; Lacey started The Lawmas Podcast!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lacey and Lauren have been friends since middle school and went to the University of South Carolina together, where they were both in the marching band.</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lacey practices criminal defense law, while Lauren practices in the estate planning and civil cases. They have very different areas of legal expertise.</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Both are Moms! Lacey has two young boys, while Lauren has two young daughters. Being moms has really impacted their lives, and they will share more on future episodes!</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Both Lacey and Lauren were initially unsure about pursuing law - Lacey was a broadcast journalism major and Lauren considered medical school. But they ended up at USC Law together.</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">The hosts tease future podcast topics, including potentially discussing high-profile cases like the Murdaugh saga, since they are South Carolina natives.</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren &amp; Lacey can be reached at <a href="mailto:TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com">TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #podcast #moms #criminaldefense #estateplanning #mompodcast</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[After two episodes, it's time to go back and share how Lauren & Lacey started The Lawmas Podcast!
 

Lacey and Lauren have been friends since middle school and went to the University of South Carolina together, where they were both in the marching band.
Lacey practices criminal defense law, while Lauren practices in the estate planning and civil cases. They have very different areas of legal expertise.
Both are Moms! Lacey has two young boys, while Lauren has two young daughters. Being moms has really impacted their lives, and they will share more on future episodes!
Both Lacey and Lauren were initially unsure about pursuing law - Lacey was a broadcast journalism major and Lauren considered medical school. But they ended up at USC Law together.
The hosts tease future podcast topics, including potentially discussing high-profile cases like the Murdaugh saga, since they are South Carolina natives.

Lauren & Lacey can be reached at TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com
 
#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #podcast #moms #criminaldefense #estateplanning #mompodcast]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                    <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 3: About The Lawmas]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">After two episodes, it's time to go back and share how Lauren &amp; Lacey started The Lawmas Podcast!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<ul class="-mt-1 [li&gt;&amp;]:mt-2 list-disc space-y-2 pl-8">
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lacey and Lauren have been friends since middle school and went to the University of South Carolina together, where they were both in the marching band.</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Lacey practices criminal defense law, while Lauren practices in the estate planning and civil cases. They have very different areas of legal expertise.</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Both are Moms! Lacey has two young boys, while Lauren has two young daughters. Being moms has really impacted their lives, and they will share more on future episodes!</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">Both Lacey and Lauren were initially unsure about pursuing law - Lacey was a broadcast journalism major and Lauren considered medical school. But they ended up at USC Law together.</li>
<li class="whitespace-normal break-words">The hosts tease future podcast topics, including potentially discussing high-profile cases like the Murdaugh saga, since they are South Carolina natives.</li>
</ul>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren &amp; Lacey can be reached at <a href="mailto:TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com">TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com</a></p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words"> </p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #podcast #moms #criminaldefense #estateplanning #mompodcast</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1876741/c1e-6x952h26k23akpwow-pkjk831pczk9-kqilsu.mp3" length="39736578"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[After two episodes, it's time to go back and share how Lauren & Lacey started The Lawmas Podcast!
 

Lacey and Lauren have been friends since middle school and went to the University of South Carolina together, where they were both in the marching band.
Lacey practices criminal defense law, while Lauren practices in the estate planning and civil cases. They have very different areas of legal expertise.
Both are Moms! Lacey has two young boys, while Lauren has two young daughters. Being moms has really impacted their lives, and they will share more on future episodes!
Both Lacey and Lauren were initially unsure about pursuing law - Lacey was a broadcast journalism major and Lauren considered medical school. But they ended up at USC Law together.
The hosts tease future podcast topics, including potentially discussing high-profile cases like the Murdaugh saga, since they are South Carolina natives.

Lauren & Lacey can be reached at TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com
 
#podcast #thelawmaspodcast #podcast #moms #criminaldefense #estateplanning #mompodcast]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1876741/c1a-5w3p7-gpkpd8xotj5p-gzxbwg.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:20:31</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 1: Let's Talk About the Word That Hurts: The R-Word]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1870167</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/ep-2-the-use-of-the-r-word</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>This week on The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren &amp; Lacey aren't getting political, and they want to address the use of the R-word. They have seen on social media, on Facebook, from some of their friends, family, people that we follow are using the word in this political climate.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lacey shares her personal experience and emphasizes how using disability-related terms as insults affects the special needs community. They both acknowledge that while this word was once a medical diagnosis, it's now outdated and inappropriate, stressing the importance of treating everyone with respect regardless of their intellectual capabilities.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The conversation then shifts to Lauren's experience with special needs planning and her cousin with autism. They discuss how people with Down syndrome and other intellectual disabilities are unique individuals with distinct personalities, often reflecting their parents' traits rather than fitting into stereotypes. The hosts conclude by encouraging listeners to be mindful of their language both online and offline, reminding them that social media posts can have real-world consequences, particularly in legal settings.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren and Lacey can be reached at <a href="mailto:TheLawmasPodcast@Gmail.com">TheLawmasPodcast@Gmail.com</a> or The Lawmas on Instagram and Facebook.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#rword #specialneeds #thelawmaspodcast #disabilities #legalpodcasts #mompodcasts</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[This week on The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren & Lacey aren't getting political, and they want to address the use of the R-word. They have seen on social media, on Facebook, from some of their friends, family, people that we follow are using the word in this political climate.
Lacey shares her personal experience and emphasizes how using disability-related terms as insults affects the special needs community. They both acknowledge that while this word was once a medical diagnosis, it's now outdated and inappropriate, stressing the importance of treating everyone with respect regardless of their intellectual capabilities.
The conversation then shifts to Lauren's experience with special needs planning and her cousin with autism. They discuss how people with Down syndrome and other intellectual disabilities are unique individuals with distinct personalities, often reflecting their parents' traits rather than fitting into stereotypes. The hosts conclude by encouraging listeners to be mindful of their language both online and offline, reminding them that social media posts can have real-world consequences, particularly in legal settings.
Lauren and Lacey can be reached at TheLawmasPodcast@Gmail.com or The Lawmas on Instagram and Facebook.
#rword #specialneeds #thelawmaspodcast #disabilities #legalpodcasts #mompodcasts
 
 ]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 1: Let's Talk About the Word That Hurts: The R-Word]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>This week on The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren &amp; Lacey aren't getting political, and they want to address the use of the R-word. They have seen on social media, on Facebook, from some of their friends, family, people that we follow are using the word in this political climate.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lacey shares her personal experience and emphasizes how using disability-related terms as insults affects the special needs community. They both acknowledge that while this word was once a medical diagnosis, it's now outdated and inappropriate, stressing the importance of treating everyone with respect regardless of their intellectual capabilities.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">The conversation then shifts to Lauren's experience with special needs planning and her cousin with autism. They discuss how people with Down syndrome and other intellectual disabilities are unique individuals with distinct personalities, often reflecting their parents' traits rather than fitting into stereotypes. The hosts conclude by encouraging listeners to be mindful of their language both online and offline, reminding them that social media posts can have real-world consequences, particularly in legal settings.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren and Lacey can be reached at <a href="mailto:TheLawmasPodcast@Gmail.com">TheLawmasPodcast@Gmail.com</a> or The Lawmas on Instagram and Facebook.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">#rword #specialneeds #thelawmaspodcast #disabilities #legalpodcasts #mompodcasts</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1870167/c1e-jzq95tqr5xru52g62-qd4p1jw1cr09-kxdtzw.mp3" length="32893005"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[This week on The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren & Lacey aren't getting political, and they want to address the use of the R-word. They have seen on social media, on Facebook, from some of their friends, family, people that we follow are using the word in this political climate.
Lacey shares her personal experience and emphasizes how using disability-related terms as insults affects the special needs community. They both acknowledge that while this word was once a medical diagnosis, it's now outdated and inappropriate, stressing the importance of treating everyone with respect regardless of their intellectual capabilities.
The conversation then shifts to Lauren's experience with special needs planning and her cousin with autism. They discuss how people with Down syndrome and other intellectual disabilities are unique individuals with distinct personalities, often reflecting their parents' traits rather than fitting into stereotypes. The hosts conclude by encouraging listeners to be mindful of their language both online and offline, reminding them that social media posts can have real-world consequences, particularly in legal settings.
Lauren and Lacey can be reached at TheLawmasPodcast@Gmail.com or The Lawmas on Instagram and Facebook.
#rword #specialneeds #thelawmaspodcast #disabilities #legalpodcasts #mompodcasts
 
 ]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:16:55</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 2: Our Town, Her Crime: Thoughts On Susan Smith]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 16:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1870158</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/episode-1-susan-smith</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren &amp; Lacey, from Union, South Carolina, discuss the Susan Smith case from their unique hometown perspective. They were young children when Smith murdered her two sons, Michael and Alex, by driving her car into John D. Long Lake in 1994. They share personal memories from that time, including the community's initial belief in Smith's fabricated story about her children being kidnapped by a man at a traffic light in Monarch, and the fear that gripped their small town before the truth emerged just days later.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren &amp; Lacey delve into the legal aspects of the case, explaining how Smith's actions led to South Carolina establishing true life sentences without parole. They discuss her upcoming parole hearing and share insider perspectives, including Lauren's mother potentially being called as a witness due to knowing Smith when she was a candy striper at the local hospital. Listen to learn their perspectives!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren &amp; Lacey can be reached at <a href="mailto:TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com">TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com</a> and can be found on TheLawmas on Instagram and Facebook!</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren & Lacey, from Union, South Carolina, discuss the Susan Smith case from their unique hometown perspective. They were young children when Smith murdered her two sons, Michael and Alex, by driving her car into John D. Long Lake in 1994. They share personal memories from that time, including the community's initial belief in Smith's fabricated story about her children being kidnapped by a man at a traffic light in Monarch, and the fear that gripped their small town before the truth emerged just days later.
Lauren & Lacey delve into the legal aspects of the case, explaining how Smith's actions led to South Carolina establishing true life sentences without parole. They discuss her upcoming parole hearing and share insider perspectives, including Lauren's mother potentially being called as a witness due to knowing Smith when she was a candy striper at the local hospital. Listen to learn their perspectives!
Lauren & Lacey can be reached at TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com and can be found on TheLawmas on Instagram and Facebook!]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[Episode 2: Our Town, Her Crime: Thoughts On Susan Smith]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren &amp; Lacey, from Union, South Carolina, discuss the Susan Smith case from their unique hometown perspective. They were young children when Smith murdered her two sons, Michael and Alex, by driving her car into John D. Long Lake in 1994. They share personal memories from that time, including the community's initial belief in Smith's fabricated story about her children being kidnapped by a man at a traffic light in Monarch, and the fear that gripped their small town before the truth emerged just days later.</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren &amp; Lacey delve into the legal aspects of the case, explaining how Smith's actions led to South Carolina establishing true life sentences without parole. They discuss her upcoming parole hearing and share insider perspectives, including Lauren's mother potentially being called as a witness due to knowing Smith when she was a candy striper at the local hospital. Listen to learn their perspectives!</p>
<p class="whitespace-pre-wrap break-words">Lauren &amp; Lacey can be reached at <a href="mailto:TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com">TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com</a> and can be found on TheLawmas on Instagram and Facebook!</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1870158/c1e-3wx8pu56k1kuw258o-9j0gwd78b2np-i3aivf.mp3" length="40913311"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren & Lacey, from Union, South Carolina, discuss the Susan Smith case from their unique hometown perspective. They were young children when Smith murdered her two sons, Michael and Alex, by driving her car into John D. Long Lake in 1994. They share personal memories from that time, including the community's initial belief in Smith's fabricated story about her children being kidnapped by a man at a traffic light in Monarch, and the fear that gripped their small town before the truth emerged just days later.
Lauren & Lacey delve into the legal aspects of the case, explaining how Smith's actions led to South Carolina establishing true life sentences without parole. They discuss her upcoming parole hearing and share insider perspectives, including Lauren's mother potentially being called as a witness due to knowing Smith when she was a candy striper at the local hospital. Listen to learn their perspectives!
Lauren & Lacey can be reached at TheLawmasPodcast@gmail.com and can be found on TheLawmas on Instagram and Facebook!]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:21:02</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>
                    <![CDATA[The Lawmas Podcast Trailer]]>
                </title>
                <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 17:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>Lauren &amp; Lacey</dc:creator>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">
                    https://permalink.castos.com/podcast/62525/episode/1867622</guid>
                                    <link>https://the-lawmas-podcast.castos.com/episodes/the-lawmas-podcast-trailer</link>
                                <description>
                                            <![CDATA[<p>Juggling courtrooms and playrooms, legal briefs, and bedtime stories...</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Meet Lauren and Lacey, two powerhouse attorneys and moms who are laying down the law on work-life balance. Lauren handles estate planning, while Lacey is a criminal defense attorney. And together, they're The Lawmas!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Join them as they dive into into the chaotic world of running law firms while raising families, where they share war stories from the courtroom and the playground, while offering tips on building a thriving practice without missing soccer games and dance class...</p>
<p>These two prove that moms really can do it all - with a little help from coffee and wine! <u></u><u></u>From estate planning emergencies to criminal defense dilemmas, these legal eagles tackle it all with wit, wisdom, and a whole lot of heart.</p>
<p>So whether you're a working mom, an aspiring attorney, or love a good laugh... Tune in to The Lawmas Podcast. Where justice meets juice boxes!</p>
<p>Court is now in session!</p>
<p>Coming soon to YouTube and major podcast platforms!</p>]]>
                                    </description>
                <itunes:subtitle>
                    <![CDATA[Juggling courtrooms and playrooms, legal briefs, and bedtime stories...
 
Meet Lauren and Lacey, two powerhouse attorneys and moms who are laying down the law on work-life balance. Lauren handles estate planning, while Lacey is a criminal defense attorney. And together, they're The Lawmas!
 
Join them as they dive into into the chaotic world of running law firms while raising families, where they share war stories from the courtroom and the playground, while offering tips on building a thriving practice without missing soccer games and dance class...
These two prove that moms really can do it all - with a little help from coffee and wine! From estate planning emergencies to criminal defense dilemmas, these legal eagles tackle it all with wit, wisdom, and a whole lot of heart.
So whether you're a working mom, an aspiring attorney, or love a good laugh... Tune in to The Lawmas Podcast. Where justice meets juice boxes!
Court is now in session!
Coming soon to YouTube and major podcast platforms!]]>
                </itunes:subtitle>
                                <itunes:title>
                    <![CDATA[The Lawmas Podcast Trailer]]>
                </itunes:title>
                                                <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
                <content:encoded>
                    <![CDATA[<p>Juggling courtrooms and playrooms, legal briefs, and bedtime stories...</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Meet Lauren and Lacey, two powerhouse attorneys and moms who are laying down the law on work-life balance. Lauren handles estate planning, while Lacey is a criminal defense attorney. And together, they're The Lawmas!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Join them as they dive into into the chaotic world of running law firms while raising families, where they share war stories from the courtroom and the playground, while offering tips on building a thriving practice without missing soccer games and dance class...</p>
<p>These two prove that moms really can do it all - with a little help from coffee and wine! <u></u><u></u>From estate planning emergencies to criminal defense dilemmas, these legal eagles tackle it all with wit, wisdom, and a whole lot of heart.</p>
<p>So whether you're a working mom, an aspiring attorney, or love a good laugh... Tune in to The Lawmas Podcast. Where justice meets juice boxes!</p>
<p>Court is now in session!</p>
<p>Coming soon to YouTube and major podcast platforms!</p>]]>
                </content:encoded>
                                    <enclosure url="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/1867622/c1e-830kxh92kzwfrdp5w-471mv20pc47x-fppziw.mp3" length="2494991"
                        type="audio/mpeg">
                    </enclosure>
                                <itunes:summary>
                    <![CDATA[Juggling courtrooms and playrooms, legal briefs, and bedtime stories...
 
Meet Lauren and Lacey, two powerhouse attorneys and moms who are laying down the law on work-life balance. Lauren handles estate planning, while Lacey is a criminal defense attorney. And together, they're The Lawmas!
 
Join them as they dive into into the chaotic world of running law firms while raising families, where they share war stories from the courtroom and the playground, while offering tips on building a thriving practice without missing soccer games and dance class...
These two prove that moms really can do it all - with a little help from coffee and wine! From estate planning emergencies to criminal defense dilemmas, these legal eagles tackle it all with wit, wisdom, and a whole lot of heart.
So whether you're a working mom, an aspiring attorney, or love a good laugh... Tune in to The Lawmas Podcast. Where justice meets juice boxes!
Court is now in session!
Coming soon to YouTube and major podcast platforms!]]>
                </itunes:summary>
                                    <itunes:image href="https://episodes.castos.com/671bd75ae7e5f5-86967496/images/1867622/c1a-5w3p7-ok3pok8zc9mg-0sqft3.png"></itunes:image>
                                                                            <itunes:duration>00:01:16</itunes:duration>
                                                    <itunes:author>
                    <![CDATA[Lauren &amp; Lacey]]>
                </itunes:author>
                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>
